Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Rotation, real dirt have to be Breeders’ Cup priorities
Breeders' Cup hopes to set criteria for hosting future events. Two should be prime: there must be a rotation and no track without a real dirt main track should be considered.
MIAMI, Nov. 20, 2013--William Farish said during Breedersâ€™ Cup week that a priority of the BC has to be setting parameters to be used in selecting host sites. Moreover, he said he wanted it done sooner rather than later, ideally by the end of 2013, certainly by early in the new year.
As Breedersâ€™ Cup Chairman as well as one of the most respected people in the sport, Farish is in a position to make this happen.
Iâ€™d like to suggest two criteria that should be paramount. No track, except under extraordinary or emergency situations, should host the event three years in a row, as Santa Anita doing, and the BC should not be hosted by any track with an artificial surface.
No matter where the races are conducted, there will be home court advantages. These seem especially pronounced at Santa Anita.
The Turf Sprint has become an annuity for Santa Anita-based horses familiar with the most unique course in North America. It has been run four times in Arcadia and four times it has been won by a local, with Mizdirection coming out on top in 2012 and 2013.
Whatâ€™s more, the first three finishers from last year filled three of the first four positions this year. You have to wonder why an owner and trainer of a contender from elsewhere in the country would even bother to show up next year.
In winning the Distaff, Beholder put in a strong bid for a second Eclipse to go along with the one she won last year after taking the Juvenile Fillies. As I pointed out in a previous column, it is conceivable that Beholder could capture three consecutive Eclipse Awards without winning a graded stakes anyplace but Santa Anita, which she has yet to do. Thatâ€™s not right.
I understand the Breedersâ€™ Cup has issues with Churchill Downs but there has to be a way to work these out so that the citadel of racing is again part of the Breedersâ€™ Cup mix. Wars used to be put on hold for the Olympics.
Farish agrees. He was quoted in the Blood Horse saying, â€śIf we can rotate the eventâ€”thatâ€™s a real possibilityâ€”Churchill Downs absolutely needs to be part of that rotation.â€ť
It also would be nice if NYRA, home of more significant races than any other locale, could host the event every few years now that its franchise issues have been resolved.
There should be no â€śifâ€ť when it comes to a rotation. There is no other major sport that anchors its championship in one location, save for the U.S. Open tennis championships.
If the Breedersâ€™ Cup makes Southern California its permanent home, it is only a matter of time until the rest of the racing nation grows weary of being dominated by home town heroes and goes its own way.
Itâ€™s always sad to see a racetrack close. In the case of tradition rich Hollywood Park, which is in its final season, it is a loss almost beyond words. The only positive is that another synthetic track will bite the dust next month.
Del Mar, in the midst of a multi-million dollar expansion of its turf course, expressly to be able to host a Breedersâ€™ Cup, is thought to be the front-runner for 2015. If this is true, it is spending a fortune on the wrong problem. The Breedersâ€™ Cup shouldnâ€™t happen as long as its main track is toy dirt.
With Hollywoodâ€™s closing, the only remaining track in the United States other than Del Mar where major stakes are conducted on kitty litter is Keeneland, with its pair of three-week meetings.
Almost all of the races of consequence at Arlington are on grass. Same goes for Golden Gate. Turfway Park is struggling to hold on and has one day a year with significant stakes. Presque Isle has only one noteworthy race. This is all the more reason why a real dirt main course should be mandatory for the Breeders' Cup.
Del Mar is not only out of step with most of the rest of America, it now stands alone in Southern California. Santa Anita, Fairplex and soon to join the game Los Alamitos all have real dirt tracks.
Iâ€™ve been banging the drum that the Blue Grass Stakes should no longer be given first tier Kentucky Derby points or a Grade 1 designation because of the sorry history of its winners since waxed dirt was installed. Mike Watchmaker did the same in the Racing Form recently when he traced the dismal subsequent performances of the winners of the Alciabides and Breedersâ€™ Futurity since Keeneland went artificial. For the record, this yearâ€™s winners, My Conquestadory and We Miss Artie, both failed to hit the board at the Breedersâ€™ Cup.
My Conquestadory, who ran a breathtaking race in Kentucky, didnâ€™t even attempt the Juvenile Fillies on dirt. Her connections opted instead for the turf counterpart. Doesnâ€™t this tell you all you need to know?
There is now an indisputable body of evidence that fake dirt tracks are like Las Vegas. What happens on them stays on them. In light of this, the Breedersâ€™ Cup should not even consider Del Mar unless and until it rejoins the mainstream of major North American tracks.
Written by Tom Jicha
Friday, November 15, 2013
Stewards owe timely decisions to fans
Stewards often take much too long to render a call on inquiries, even when the outcome is inevitable. It happened in back-to-back races during Gulfstream's Sunshine Millions Preview. There was no excuse for either.
MIAMI, Nov. 15, 2013--The most agonizing moments for a horseplayer are waiting out a tight photo and sweating out an interminable inquiry. The former is a necessary evil. The latter, in many cases, is not.
Back-to-back races during Gulfstreamâ€™s Sunshine Millions Preview program provided examples of how stewards are regularly responsible for unnecessary delays in announcing a decision, which stretch out the card and cause heartburn for players.
My Pal Chrisy, the odds-on favorite in the Distaff Preview, powered past second choice Awesome Belle as the field straightened for home. For some mystifying reason, Jeffrey Sanchez aboard Awesome Belle claimed foul.
All it took was one look at the TV monitors to confirm what was seen during the actual running. My Pal Chrisy never came near Awesome Belle on the turn and was well clear when she moved over in front of her in the lane.
Fans all over the track were mocking Sanchezâ€™s claim, crying out, â€śWhereâ€™s the foul?â€ť As one wise guy put it, â€śWhatâ€™s he claiming, that the other horse ran too fast?â€ť
The stewards should have taken one courtesy look to make certain they didnâ€™t miss something. Instead, they took six or seven minutes to look, relook, then look again at every conceivable angle before doing what they should have done in 30 seconds, let the result stand.
The very next race, the Juvenile Sprint, produced the opposite situation. Wildcat Red led into deep stretch, then began to drift out, two, three, four paths. Meanwhile, Bolita Boyz was rallying furiously down the middle of the track. Wildcat Redâ€™s drift forced Paco Lopez aboard Bolita Boyz to hesitate, then, not knowing how much further Wildcat Red was going to come out, duck to the inside where his charge fell short.
The stewards were right on it, putting up the inquiry sign within seconds of the horses going under the wire. Once again, everyone at the track knew what the outcome was going to be. Wildcat Red had to come down. If there was any doubt, it was dispelled by a single look at the head-on.
Indeed, Wildcat Red was disqualified but not until the stewards took another five or six minutes to look repeatedly at the same incriminating footage. Remember, they saw enough live to put up the inquiry. This doesnâ€™t always result in a DQ but when the video reinforces what the stewards had seen live, it should be an easy and quick call. Their lengthy delay was inexcusable.
These two calls were so clear cut--there are similar ones all the time at tracks everywhere--you have to wonder if the stewards come to a decision, then sit on it for a few minutes so that they appear to have been in deep deliberations.
There are, of course, situations when an inquiry is so borderline it is commendable that the stewards consider every possible angle and take as much time as necessary before coming to a decision. More often, this is not the case. On these occasions, the stewards should take one look at the pan, one at the head-on, do whatever is called for and make the result official as quickly as possible.
Mutual poll manipulation?
Later the same afternoon, there was a suspicious turn of events at Hollywood Park, which suggested the possibility of mutual pool manipulation.
A horse named Ekahi opened at 3-5 in the seventh race, an open $16,000-$14,000 claimer. Problem was Ekahi was 30-1 on the morning line in a race in which there were no 20-1 shots. The next highest was 12-1.
The morning line was supported by the past performances. Ekahi was one-for-nine lifetime, zero-for-four in 2013. He was coming out of a $20K starter race in which he finished last of seven, beaten 28 lengths. His previous start, for the same tag as last Saturday but for limited winners, he finished 10th of 12. He had finished in front of only four of 31 opponents this year.
Unlikely winners often open short, especially at tracks with relatively small pools. Less than $100 can do it. But this was Hollywood Park on a Saturday, where it takes a sizable punch to make the toteboard rock. But there was no obvious contender worthy of this kind of support. The morning line choice was 3-1 and he didnâ€™t even wind up going off the favorite.
Another possible explanation was someone had made a mistake and hit the wrong number. Ekahi was No. 6. One of the well regarded horses was Cast a Doubt in No. 5, who did eventually become the betting choice at 5-2. This also is a fairly frequent occurrence and the board adjusts when the ticket is canceled and the money placed where it was meant to be.
But Ekahi lingered for most of the betting as the heavy favorite, drifting only slightly to even-money, then 6-5. It wasnâ€™t until about three minutes to post that the odds on Ekahi began their retreat to where they should have been. In one click, he zoomed to 14-1. By post time, he was 27-1. He ran like a 27-1 shot, trailing the field from start to finish.
For many years, a bettor couldnâ€™t change a wager once he stepped away from the window. It was a positive development when changes became permissable, theoretically because a wrong number had been purchased.
Computerized betting has changed the game. Now cancellations can be made with a simple click up to seconds before the field breaks.
I donâ€™t know where the Ekahi shenanigans originated but Hollywood Park and the California Racing Board can find out. They owe it to fans to investigate the circumstances and take steps to make sure it doesnâ€™t happen again.
Written by Tom Jicha
Friday, November 08, 2013
Separate dirt and turf Eclipses and other thoughts
Thoughts on the Breeders' Cup linger. One suggestion worth consideration is separate Eclipse Awards for best older dirt and turf horses. If nothing else, it would solve the Wise Dan controversy. Also, the Breeders' Cup Juvenile Sprint should be reinstated.
MIAMI, Nov. 8, 2013--All things Breedersâ€™ Cup and their ramifications remain hot topics. So before we move on to pondering the Triple Crown, there are still thoughts to be shared.
A comment on my most recent column suggested separate Eclipse awards for outstanding older dirt horse and turf horse. On one hand, this would solve the Wise Dan conundrum. On the other, there would still be debates on who deserves each prize. This year the dirt prize would come down to five-for-six Game on Dude or two-for-five Mucho Macho Man.
Every year the candidates would be different but the arguments would be just as passionate.
I still like the idea. Turf and dirt are different worlds. Without getting into this seasonâ€™s particulars, the floor is open for opposing views on the bigger picture.
showed up the Breedersâ€™ Cup decision-making process when he added the Sprint championship to the 2011 Juvenile Sprint title on his resume. The Juvenile Sprint was axed after only five showed up last year. But that was as much a product of the first time Lasix ban as lack of interest.
Meanwhile, the long running joke (pun intended) Marathon, which has produced no one of merit and hasnâ€™t encouraged a meaningful increase in long distance races during the year, remains a part of the program.
The Marathon does no harm as a program-opening novelty but the Juvenile Sprint should be given another chance. There are more juvenile sprint specialists in November than there are 2-year-olds ready for two turns. Also, Lasix is no longer an issue.
won the Turf Sprint for the second time. Another filly, Reneesgotzip, hit the board for the second time against colts. The great female Goldikova won the Turf Mile three straight years and Miesque won it twice. The Fugue just missed in the Turf, defeating all of the best American males. Letâ€™s not forget Treve winning the Arc against the worldâ€™s best.
Isnâ€™t it time North America rethinks its gender classifications. In Europe, top females are expected to race against males once they turn 4. In America, itâ€™s such a rarity that we give Horse of the Year Awards to distaffers who beat males even once or, in the case of Zenyatta, come close.
Iâ€™m not arguing for an end to gender specific races on a day-in, day-out basis but there should be a severe reduction of Grade 1 races restricted to females. Such stakes, especially in the second half of the year, should be no more than Grade 2 and I wouldnâ€™t object to dropping one grade lower.
have been offered as to why Euros are so superior to North American horses on grass. The obvious one is this is the surface on which they race almost exclusively, so when they rise to the top, they have really accomplished something. On our side of the Atlantic (hasnâ€™t â€śacross the pondâ€ť become one of the most over-used clichĂ©s in all of sports?) a lot of horses arenâ€™t tried on grass until they are proven wanting on dirt. Some of our best never set foot on the infield course.
It should not be discounted that we breed and buy for speed, they do it for stamina and most major turf races are contested at distances beyond a mile and an eighth, which seems to be the breaking point for all but a handful of our horses. Euro horses are not superior to ours, they are just superior at longer distances. Mizdirection and Wise Dan prove we are right there with them up to a mile.
Et tu Breeders Cup?
Some things never change at Santa Anita, even when the Breedersâ€™ Cup has taken over the facility. On Saturday, the standings of the BC handicapping contest, of interest to almost no one, were posted on TV monitors before the will-pays of multiple-race wagers, which were important to almost everyone.
never change at any track. In the middle of the Dirt Mile Friday, as the horses went down the backstretch, TV monitors at Calder switched away from the channel the Breedersâ€™ Cup had been on all day to the Golden Gate signal. It was marginally better Saturday at Gulfstream where the same situation occurred but with the Breedersâ€™ Cup horses still in the paddock.
This has happened at every track or simulcast facility I have visited, including Las Vegas race books. I understand room has to be found for later in the day tracks, but those at the switch should be more sensitive to when they hit the button. A warning several minutes out isnâ€™t asking too much, is it?
sent a note about the lucky coup for the Sirius radio Breeders' Cup crew, which included Bill Finley and Peter Kleinhans. The latter is friendly with the connections of Ria Antonia, so they did a pre-race interview even though the filly was 32-1 and given little chance. The Racing Form had her at the bottom of its graded entries.
When Ria Antonia got into a photo with Sheâ€™s a Tiger, they reconnected by cell phone. Finley astutely asked if they could get jockey Javier Castellano to the phone. While the stewards were deliberating, Castellano was offering his version of what happened. They still had the Ria Antonia people on the phone when Sheâ€™s a Tiger was taken down.
This goes to show luck comes in many forms at the race track.
The New York Times
is relentless. On racingâ€™s most glorious occasion, the paperâ€™s Breedersâ€™ Cup advance was an extensive story on the drug violations of Americaâ€™s top 20 trainers along with a rehash of its exposes of a year ago, most of which were at third tier and outlaw tracks.
Missing was context, such as how many of the violations were for relatively minor, legal pharmaceuticals lingering in a horseâ€™s system beyond the time they were supposed to, whether they were trace samples so minute that they wouldnâ€™t affect the performance of a gnat or were a product of a stablehand snorting coke and getting the residue on a horseâ€™s bridle.
This would have interfered with The Times agenda to slime racing.
Racing's audience might be gray but I've got a couple of bucks that say the sport will be around long after The Gray Lady ceases to exist as a newspaper.
Written by Tom Jicha