Tom Jicha

Tom Jicha grew up in New York City and worked with John Pricci at the short-lived revival of the New York Daily Mirror. Tom moved to Miami in 1972 for a position in the sports department at the now defunct Miami News.

Tom became the TV critic in 1980 and moved to the South Florida Sun Sentinel in 1988. All the while he has kept his hand in sports, including horse racing. He has covered two Super Bowls, a World Series and the Breeders Cup at Gulfstream Park.

He's been the Sun Sentinels horse racing writer since 2007 as a staff member, and continues to this day as a free-lancer.

Most recent entries

Monthly Archives

Syndicate


Thursday, July 27, 2017


Saratoga Live is a Grade 1 telecast


Saratoga Live, which is available in 75 million homes every racing day at the Spa, should be the model for racing telecasts. It's fast paced and informative and never condescending or frivolous. The hosts know their stuff and communicate it well. This weekend the show will be all over the Jim Dandy showdown between Derby champion Always Dreaming and Preakness upsetter Cloud Computing and the Grade 1 Haskell at Monmouth.

NYRA can be justifiably proud that it has managed to get “Saratoga Live” into 75 million American homes. But some perspective is needed. When I was writing about TV for three decades a point driven home repeatedly was content is king.

Being in a home is meaningless if nobody bothers to tune you in. Only about 10 programs in the cable/satellite universe of literally thousands of shows average as many as 1 million viewers. Many of these are on cable channels such as ESPN, USA, TBS and TNT, which are in about 100 million homes.

Fortunately, if any racing program is going to bring people to the set, “Saratoga Live” is it. In racing parlance it is Grade 1: informative, thorough, well paced and, most importantly, entertaining.

The talent also is Grade 1. Unlike some racing telecasts, the commentators delve into racing’s finer points without talking down to their audience. When they put up their suggested bets, you get the feeling they are also putting their money where their mouth is.

I didn’t get to see this season’s first two telecasts for the best of reasons. I was at the track betting the simulcast. This past Sunday, Monday and Wednesday, I monitored the show from beginning to end. In what might be a career first, I have almost nothing negative to say.

I made notes critiquing Gabby Gaudet for interviewing Mike Smith early in the Coaching Club American Oaks show and not bringing up Arrogate’s clunker at Del Mar the previous day. This was one of those occasions when I was glad I was gathering material for a column and not instant tweeting. The explanation became apparent shortly thereafter.

Gabby did her job, quizzing Smith about the Arrogate debacle in a portion of the interview that was being held to be shown just prior to the CCAO.

My first inclination was a half-dozen voices would be two or three too many but each of the commentators has a specific role and handles it without stepping on the others.

Greg Wolf and Paul Lo Duca are the nominal hosts and keep the show moving while also offering insights to upcoming races. Former Major League catcher Lo Duca took some heat unjustly because a lot of NYRA fans blamed him for the departure of Richard Migliore.

In any profession when someone suddenly quits “to spend more time with my family,” you can be sure there is a bigger story. This was reiterated when within days The Mig wound up on XBTV doing essentially what he was doing for NYRA.

There might be a nasty little man instrumental in The Mig leaving but it wasn’t Lo Duca. If he didn’t replace The Mig, someone else would have.

Gabby Gaudet and Maggie Wolfendale, who handle paddock and race track analysis, aren’t just the obligatory female voices. These two women know their stuff and how to communicate it. Sunday, Maggie pointed out that trainer Horacio de Paz is an up and comer, whose horses are worth giving second and third looks. She looked prescient as De Paz’s Ginger N Rye got home for a $24 mutuel.

After the feature, she questioned Smith, who rode favored Abel Tasman, about pinning down Elate on the rail sufficiently to have the stewards take a look. “It was old fashioned race-riding,” Smith acknowledged, the kind of candid revelation you don’t often get.

Gabby, who works the paddock show at Gulfstream during the winter, demonstrated her handicapping chops on Monday, nailing back-to-back exactas. She’s Ms. Versatility. She also sits in with Wolf and Lo Duca at the main desk and with Andy Serling for handicapping.

Serling’s normal partner is trainer Tom Amoss, who has the luxury of being a successful trainer when he’s not on TV. So he can speak his mind and dare to cross favorite son Serling. The two get into some heated discussions. After a flareup on Sunday, Amoss was missing Monday and Wednesday. Maybe he had responsibilities in his far-flung barns.

This is something to watch for in the coming days and weeks—just one more reason to pay attention to one of the best racing programs ever produced.

3YO’s start anew

Time to hit the reset button on the 3-year-old division. Through the first half of the year, the closest to a leader is Always Dreaming. All things being equal, the edge always goes to the Kentucky Derby champion.

However, even though Always Dreaming also has the Florida Derby on his credit sheet, things could not be more equal. Three different horses won Triple Crown races and several others have sufficient credentials to crash the party by putting together a string of wins during the second half of the season.

The shakeout could start this weekend. Always Dreaming and his conqueror in the Preakness, Cloud Computing, go at it again in the Jim Dandy in a Todd Pletcher-Chad Brown showdown.

On the Jersey Shore, Wood Memorial winner and Belmont runnerup Irish War Cry tries to get back into the championship mix in the Haskell against an accomplished group of challengers, some of whom also still have championship aspirations.

I’ll reiterate something I do every year at this time. It is absolutely insane that two races of this stature are contested within 24 hours. The Jim Dandy is pretty much locked in because of the compact Saratoga meeting, which culminates in the Travers. The Haskell could and should move to earlier in the Monmouth season, ideally around the Fourth of July. This would provide sufficient spacing from the Triple Crown races on one side and the Jim Dandy/Travers on the other.

I’m in Always Dreaming’s corner at the Spa. Taking nothing away from Cloud Computing, he had everything going for him in Baltimore. Brown skipped the Derby to have a fresh horse for the second jewel of the Triple Crown. He joked after Cloud Computing ran third in the Wood that not winning New York’s premier prep saved him some grief. If he had won, Brown quipped, it would have been difficult to tell Cloud Computing’s owners that the plan was to skip the Derby.

Cloud Computing didn’t beat the real Always Dreaming, the stellar colt I expect to show up Saturday. Always Dreaming had not finished behind a horse during his 3-year-old campaign, which coincided with a switch to the Pletcher program. At Pimlico, he finished behind seven horses. Obviously, this was the outlier.

Pletcher, who doesn’t prepare his horses to run back in two weeks, has had more than two months to get Always Dreaming right again.

The Jim Dandy has the bigger marquee names but the Haskell is the more intriguing and challenging betting race. In addition to Irish War Cry, McCraken, who was at the top of many lists this past spring, will line up as will a couple of Brown standouts , Dwyer winner Practical Joke and undefeated Timeline, and Girvin, the Risen Star and Louisiana Derby winner.
.
Irish War Cry is the sentimental choice. His owner, Isabelle de Tomaso, is the daughter of Amory Haskell, Monmouth’s first president and the man for whom the race is named. Graham Motion said he doesn’t have to be told how much winning the race would mean to de Tomaso, who, for decades has presented the trophy to others.

My preference is for McCraken. Trainer Ian Wilkes is bringing McCraken to Monmouth for one reason and it’s not to duck Always Dreaming and Cloud Computing. “We’re not ducking anyone. The Haskell is a Grade 1 and it’s important that we win a Grade 1 with this horse.”



Written by Tom Jicha

Comments (8)

 
 

Thursday, July 20, 2017


Your first tip of the Saratoga season


Handicapping books and tout sheets abound at Saratoga. The one that stands out for me is the 'Saratoga Handicapper.' It doesn't attempt to pick winners but gives a player useful information about trainers' historical trends at the Spa, which can be used to come up with not-so-obvious winners and help eliminate heavily played horses who don't fall into a winning pattern. In another matter, it would be great if Songbird's connections give her the opportunity to do the one thing she hasn't done, which other great fillies have, take on the boys and beat them.


It’s horse players’ Christmas Eve. The day before the opening of Saratoga is one of the most joyful, anticipatory occasions of every year, superseded only by opening day itself. Forget sugar plums. Visions of great scores to come dance in players’ heads.

Some of the biggest hits I’ve had at the Spa have come as a result of a Christmas-in-July present I get for myself every year, "The Saratoga Handicapper." The magazine-sized publication put out by Jim Mazur isn’t a tout sheet. It’s an encyclopedia of information, the most useful tool to attack the Saratoga meeting I’ve ever encountered.

The front of the book contains three-year summaries of every trainer who has started a horse at the Spa, not just their overall record but how they fare in various categories: 2-year-olds, maidens, turf, etc.

Personally, I find the negative information to be as useful as the positive. It’s a great handicapping aid to know certain trainers haven’t won a race in three years or are one-for-a-hundred with first time starters. Many times this has helped me to toss horses getting solidly bet.

For example, Mark Henning, a fine trainer, seems to be cursed in upstate New York. Over the past six years, he’s a 6% trainer, 10-for-179, according to the book.

Even more revealing is Tom Albertrani’s past performances with 2-year-old maiden first-time starters. He’s a 9% trainer overall, a number that would jump well into double digits if he wasn’t zero-for-65 with debuting juveniles. Some of these have been well bet because of the classy stock Albertrani gets.

For those who prefer more than cold stats, subsequent pages include full profiles of the top trainers with angles that have been successful for them over the years. Some of the lower profile trainers, who have clicked with price horses at the Spa, have abbreviated bios.

Roy Lerman is a fine example. Lerman, who lives in the upstate area, points for the Spa. He doesn’t hit often. He’s four-for-58 in recent years, but when one of his horses does get home, it makes up for the draughts. His average win payoff is $43, so if you threw a deuce on every horse he sends out, you would have a handsome profit.

Linda Rice has established herself as the queen of the turf sprints. Because of this her horses in this category regularly get over bet. However, her reputation was established a few years when turf sprints were introduced and other barns weren’t as prepared for it as she was. She’s only 5-for-46 the past three years.

Rice is actually more effective in turf routes, where she is 10-for-59.

Mazur, who left a career in real estate to begin publishing handicapping aids, has built his company to more than a dozen covering various tracks and big events such as the Triple Crown and Breeders’ Cup. He has been putting out the "Saratoga Handicapper" for more than two decades.

The inspiration, he says, was the "Saratoga Scorecard," a publication he first noticed about 30 years ago when he was just a player. “I thought it was so helpful in handicapping that I decided to try to do something similar at Gulfstream in the winter.”

He didn’t want to rip off its creator, John Angelo, so he asked him if there would be any problem with a Gulfstream edition. “He told me, ‘knock yourself out,’” Mazur said with a laugh. The two became friends and remain so. When Angelo decided he wanted to cut back, Mazur convinced him to become a contributor to his publications. Angelo still contributes to the trainer profiles, Mazur said.

The books are especially useful for relatively contained meets, such as Gulfstream and Saratoga, because trainers from several venues show up each year and many seem to have the same methodology. Mazur points out in the profiles how some like to crack right out of the box at the start of the meeting while others prefer to give their horses a race over the track.

A tip he offers for the first few days of the Spa season is to be wary of horses coming off big efforts at Belmont. New York players get overly enthused about New York form, Mazur said. A more profitable angle would be to watch out for horses with decent credentials shipping in from lesser circuits.

But not every circuit, Mazur said. Not surprisingly, Finger Lakes shippers have a dreadful record at Saratoga. Horses coming up from Delaware used to fare poorly against the stronger Saratoga competition but with top trainers such as Graham Motion using the Fair Hills training center as their base, horses often have one in Wilmington, then come to Saratoga to get the money.

Over the years, Canadian shippers also have produced positive results, according to Mazur. The beauty of this, he said, is out-of-town horses often carry Beyers that don’t seem to measure up to the New Yorkers.

I’m not in the endorsement business and Mazur isn’t an advertiser on Horse Race Insider. This is merely one horse player telling others about a publication that has helped him find Saratoga winners over the years. I spend a week or two every summer in Las Vegas for an orgy of betting horses. I've come to know several regulars and the first question they ask when they see me is, "Did you bring the book?" There's no better testimonial than that.

Songbird's final challenge

Super filly Songbird hasn’t been as dazzling in her first two starts this season as she was as a juvenile and 3-year-old. Perhaps, as John Pricci speculated, her gut-wrenching Breeders’ Cup Distaff effort against Beholder emptied her tank.

Her next start reportedly will be in the Clement Hirsch at Del Mar or Personal Ensign at Saratoga. Both are no-win scenarios. Songbird has done all anyone can ask against her own gender. If she wins, she’s supposed to. If not, her luster is tarnished. Besides, she has the Breeders’ Cup Distaff to ratify her gender superiority.

If Songbird is to be considered among the great distaffers of recent years, she must do the one thing she hasn’t attempted: take on the boys and beat them. Rachel Alexandra did it three times, including in the Preakness as a 3-year-old. Zenyatta did it. Havre de Grace did it. Personal Ensign did it. Lady’s Secret did it. Until Songbird does it, she cannot be in a conversation with those greats.

The Woodward Stakes on Sept. 2 is a prime opportunity. Gun Runner is targeting next weekend’s Whitney and might not run back that quickly with the Breeders’ Cup his ultimate goal. Beyond him there isn’t much. Connect is gone. Shaman Ghost showed his vulnerability when he couldn’t hold off Keen Ice.

The Woodward might be Songbird’s last best chance to show she is better than merely the standout of her gender. Her connections owe her the opportunity.

Miami, July 20, 2017






Written by Tom Jicha

Comments (13)

 
 

Thursday, July 13, 2017


Continuing problems demand radical, outside-the-box solutions


The thoroughbred foal crop is declining because racing is almost a guaranteed losing proposition. A major contributor is per diem fees of $100 a day and up. A new system in which trainers would get more of a horse's purse earnings but no per diem would help bring new blood into the game and almost certainly increase field sizes because horses standing in their stalls earn nothing.


Crucial, seemingly irreversible declines in any business demand creative, out-of-the-box solutions. Continuing to do things the way they've always been done is a slow road to disaster.

Thoroughbred racing's alarming drop in foal crops and its subsequent impact on race days and field sizes isn't a chicken-and-egg situation. There aren't fewer owners getting into the game because fewer horses are being bred. There are fewer horses being bred because there are fewer people willing to get into ownership.

There's a simple explanation. It's well nigh impossible to stay solvent under the current business model. Something dramatically different needs to be attempted. Something like a shift away from trainer per-diems. This could not only make owning horses more financially viable, it could trigger an increase in field size.

I've been marginally involved in two pari-mutuel sports. One didn't involve per diems. The other did. The former was far more preferable.

Per diems, which typically run about $100 a day for thoroughbred trainers in South Florida and more on the larger circuits, are a killer for owners and offer limited incentive for trainers to race horses more often than they do now. While owners are hit with a bill for a C-note every day, the trainers are getting paid whether a horse races or not.

Of course, trainers don't get to pocket the whole per diem. They have to pay hot walkers, grooms and exercise riders. But unless they are poor managers, there should be enough left to provide a comfortable living.

Several decades ago, I was a partner in a litter of racing greyhounds. The owner-trainer arrangement in greyhound racing was you offered your dogs to a kennel, which kept two-thirds of the purses won. I received small checks when the dogs finished in the money but never got a training bill.

Granted, greyhounds vs. thoroughbreds is apples vs. oranges. Dogs race far more frequently and cost substantially less to maintain. On the other hand, purses are a pittance in dog racing as compared to horse racing. So the formula would have to be different. But the principle is the same.

Maybe 50-50 or 60-40 one way or the other would work with thoroughbreds. The numbers could be fine tuned to make it equitable for both parties once the new paradigm became accepted. Also there would have to be allowances made for extraordinary expenses such as vet bills.

But one thing is inarguable. If a trainer's earnings were determined by what his horses won, you would see them going to the starting gate more frequently than they do now. The more a horse earned, the more a trainer would make. A horse languishing in its stall earns nothing.

This would inevitably knock some small trainers out of the business but if they can't make a go of it by winning races, maybe they don't belong in the business.

The argument that struggling trainers might be influenced to send out horses when they aren't fit doesn't hold up. A horse that doesn't finish in the money earns nothing.

This would be such a dramatic shift in the status quo that most current trainers would resist it as vigorously as they do the elimination of race day medications. Why would they want any change in a system that works so well for them?

This leads to Part B of the new paradigm. A new generation of trainers, willing to play under the revised arrangement, would have to be brought into the game. Since this could not happen without stalls being made available to them, the only way to achieve this would be to put a cap on the number of stalls any trainer could control.

This, too, could be beneficial to the sport. Outfits like Todd Pletcher's, Chad Brown's and Bob Baffert's are assets but they come with a downside. They tie up an untold number of stalls, many occupied by horses who won't run for months.

Stronach Group presidentTim Ritvo recently pointed out that there are more than 3,000 horses in Southern California, so Santa Anita should not have problems filling four or five days of racing per week. Yet the Great Race Place is pressed to fill three because of the number of stalls filled by horses not ready to race. This is what training centers are for.
.
Consider a couple of prominent examples. Arrogate has been tying up a stall most of the year but chances are, he will not race at Santa Anita this year. The three starts on his dance card are all at Del Mar--next Saturday's San Diego Handicap, the Pacific Classic and the Breeders' Cup Classic. So thanks Santa Anita but sorry about that.

The same goes for Jerry Hollendorfer and Songbird. She has been training at Santa Anita but she made her first start of the year at Belmont and will run this Saturday at Delaware. It's understandable that Rick Porter, a credit to the game, would want to win the most prestigious stakes at the track nearest his home but this does nothing for Santa Anita, which would have benefited greatly if she had shown up in a race there.

I use these examples not to criticize Baffert or Hollendorfer but only because these horses, the best of their gender, have crowd magnet star power.

Think of how many lesser known horses fall into the same category. This is not to mention juveniles months from the races yet tying up stalls that could be filled by ready-to-run lesser horses. Young horses should not be allocated stalls at a track currently racing until they are within weeks of a start, no matter how prominent their trainers are.

I don't expect these suggestions to be immediately embraced but it is time to start a conversation, since what is happening now is not working.

New pick 4 a good try

NYRA and Los Alamitos deserve plaudits for trying something different, the East-West pick 4--two races from each track--that will be introduced Saturday. But other than that and the opportunity to attempt another multiple-race proposition with a 50-cent buy-in, there is not a lot to get excited about.

The leadoff race from Belmont, the Forbidden Apple, features record-setting Disco Partner stretching out to a mile. The final leg, the Los Alamitos Derby, is headed by one-time Derby hopefuls Klimt and West Coast. However the middle two legs, a 2-year-old maiden race from Belmont and an optional claimer from Los Al aren't going to inspire many to hang around for three extra hours (which might be the purpose of the bet).

Couldn't each track have attempted to dress it up by creating an overnight stakes as part of the package?

The Forbidden Apple has a 5:18 post. The Los Al Derby isn't scheduled to go off until 7:58.

The bet wasn't announced until mid-week, leaving scant time for promotion, and it's essentially a one-off, since this is the final weekend at both tracks. Let's hope it's a trial balloon for a similar wager featuring races from Saratoga and Del Mar.

That would be something to get excited about.


Written by Tom Jicha

Comments (19)

 
 

Page 2 of 88 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »