Thursday, April 03, 2014
Social Inclusion owner: No price on a dream
Social Inclusion, might be sold between the Wood and Derby. However, his owner, Ron Sanchez, said any deal will have him keeping a substantial interest.
MIAMI, April 3--Ron Sanchez is convinced Social Inclusion is a once in a lifetime horse. Heâs putting his money, a boatload of money, where his mouth is in Saturdayâs Wood Memorial.
Reports of him turning away $5 million for 75 percent of Social Inclusion are too low, he says. âThe biggest offer, which came from outside the U.S. (Coolmore? the sheiks?) is $8 million for 75 percent of the horse. This places Social Inclusionâs value at more than $10.6 million. The biggest money winner in the history of thoroughbred racing is Curlin at just north of $10.5 million.
We are talking about a horse who has won only a maiden sprint and a five-horse entry-level allowance race at Gulfstream. Sanchez is confident that Saturday night we will be talking about racingâs newest Grade I winner and the favorite for the Kentucky Derby. Heâs aware that if heâs wrong, the big money offers could disappear.
One of the reasons he can be so bold is that he is Rontos Racing. Sanchez, who has been in racing for almost a quarter-centuryâhe started in 1991 in his native Venezuela and the last four years has raced in the U.S.--doesnât have to answer to partners.
âIâm a risk taker. Not everything in life is about money. Weâve had a dream for 25 years (to have a horse in the Kentucky Derby). We are going to try to make that dream come true. If we win, weâre in the Derby. Thatâs a dream of everybody. Iâm going to take the risk.â
Because of this, money has not been the major impediment to closing a deal. âI want to keep a piece of the horse and breeding rights.â The 25 percent figure being reported also is too low. âI want to keep at least half.â
He also wants to keep the horse under the care of veteran South Florida trainer Manny Azpurua. When Sanchez bought Social Inclusion for $60,000 at Keeneland, he said to Azpurua, âI think we have a Derby horse.â
Sanchez has been connected with Azpurua, a Venezuelan countryman, for the past three years. His first U.S. trainer was Jose Garoffalo, who also will be going to his first Derby with Wildcat Red.
âManny is 85 and old school. I have a lot of respect for him. He is a legend in Venezuela,â Sanchez said in an NTRA conference call.
He has been telling potential buyers that it makes no sense to take the horse away from Azpurua. âIf you change training methods, the horse will probably bounce.â
However, asked if keeping Azpurua as Social Inclusionâs trainer could be a deal-breaker, Sanchez hedged. âYou never know.â
First things first, Sanchez said. âWe are going to focus on the Wood to get the points. No points, no Derby.â He didnât say it, but you could probably add, âNo deal.â
Contessa seeks reversal of Gotham, Withers
Sanchez is not the only one who thinks the Derby favorite could come out of the Wood. This is also the opinion of Gary Contessa, who will saddle Uncle Sigh. âI think itâs the best field assembled for any of the preps.â
Contessa is, of course, hoping that Uncle Sigh, who has dropped a couple of tight decisions to Wood rival and fellow New York bred Samraat, is the one who emerges as New Yorkâs big horse going to Louisville.
With a little better racing luck, Contessa feels, Uncle Sigh could have gotten his picture taken both times. In the Withers, the trainer said, Uncle Sigh was stuck outside. In the Gotham, he was between In Tune and Samraat in the crucial stages. âWe were sandwiched. Corey Nakatani couldnât use his whip. If he could have gone to the whip, we could have turned the tables on Samraat.â
Uncle Sigh also was at a hidden disadvantage in those two races. He stayed in New York and had his training interrupted by the brutal weather. âIt was very hard to develop a horse in New York this winter,â Contessa said.
Samraat commuted to South Florida between starts and trained under ideal conditions during an extremely mild winter. Contessa, who also went back and forth between Aqueduct and Gulfstream, said he would have followed Samraatâs lead if he knew how ugly the Big Apple weather was going to be. âI didnât think I was going to miss as many days of training as I did. If I could do it over, I would have had Uncle Sigh in Florida on Dec. 1. I think (Samraatâs trainer) Rick Violette should be applauded.â
Contessa appreciates that Uncle Sigh, who is named for a âDuck Dynastyâ character, has more than Samraat to beat in the Wood. âIâve been blown away by Social Inclusion. He could be any kind of horse.â
The key to the Wood, in Contessaâs estimation, is, âSomebody has to hook Social Inclusion.â Ideally for Uncle Sigh, that would be Samraat. âI would love to see that.â
âChromeâ owner thinking Triple Crown
Talk about counting your Triple Crown before even the Santa Anita Derby hatches, Steve Corbin, owner-breeder of California Chrome, considers Saturdayâs signature Derby at the Great Race Place a forgone conclusion.
âWhen we win the Santa Derby, weâll be on top of the points list. Notice I said âwhen.â I have no doubts heâll win the race.â
California Chrome is one of those feel good stories that racing needs more of. He is the first horse bred by Corbin, who already is having the time of his life and will celebrate his birthday on Kentucky Derby Day. California Chrome was born on Super Bowl Sunday. Corbin won a bet that would happen.
California Chrome, the 6-5 morning line favorite for the Santa Anita Derby, made a shambles of the San Felipe, crushing Midnight Hawk and others by more than seven lengths at a mile and a sixteenth. Now he goes nine furlongs en route to the mile and a quarter at Churchill Downs.
Corbin is super confident his Cal-bred will only get better as the distances increase. âI donât think youâve seen the top of this horse. Heâs just a very special colt. Maybe at a mile and a quarter, heâll win by 12 or 15.â
Corbin is not only looking past the Santa Anita Derby, he feels the Kentucky Derby is a mere steppingstone to the ultimate prize, the Triple Crown. His big concern, he says, is that his dream might be shattered in the Preakness or Belmont by a colt who hasnât danced all the Triple Crown dances. âTo me going to just the Preakness or Belmont is cheating. If youâve got a horse you think can do it, put him in the first race and keep him in the second and third races.â
Too bad more owners and trainers donât think like that.
If racing, reeling from the Steve Asmussen controversy, ever needed owners like Corbin and Sanchez, this is the year.
Written by Tom Jicha
Tuesday, April 01, 2014
Conservative training tactics could bump top colts out of Derby
Cairo Prince belongs in the Kentucky Derby despite running fourth in the Florida Derby. Candy Boy also should be at Churchill Downs the first Saturday in May but might not be if he doesn't run at least third in the Santa Anita Derby. If either or both miss the cut, blame the trend to extremely conservative management by their trainers.
MIAMI, April 1, 2014--The Kentucky Derby could be run this year without two colts considered the best in the East and West most of the winter not because they are hurt or arenât good enough but because of overly conservative training tactics. It was bound to happen sooner or later.
After his disappointing fourth in the Florida Derby, it is more likely than not that Cairo Prince, who didnât race for nine weeks after dominating the Holy Bull, his only previous race this year, will be shut out. This also could happen to Candy Boy, who has been idle since winning the Robert B. Lewis almost two months ago, his only start in 2014.
It would be a shame if either or both fall short of the points necessary to get into the Run for the Roses. But in the big picture, it could be a good thing. Trainers in future years will be more inclined to race--the name of the game-- than nurse their 3-year-olds up to the Derby.
Candy Boy is in the better position. He controls his own destiny in Saturdayâs Santa Anita Derby. If he finishes in the first three, heâs as good as in. Fourth would give him an outside shot but he would need help in the form of the usual late Derby attrition. Right now, the only horse in the top 20 who is improbable for the Derby, but not entirely ruled out, is United Arab Emirates Derby winner Toast of New York.
Cairo Prince is in a truly precarious position. Kiaran McLaughlin put all his eggs into the Florida Derby basket and the 10 points he earned gives him 24, enough for a tie for 16th and 17th now. But there are four big points races this weekend and next, and the fields will be loaded with more than a dozen hopefuls who need only the 20 points they would get for running third to vault over Cairo Prince. Another early favorite, Strong Mandate, with 11, is in this position going into the Arkansas Derby.
Some, such as Uncle Sigh in the Wood, who is tied with Cairo Prince, need only a fourth in the final round of preps. The same goes for Harryâs Holiday, second in the Spiral, and Sam. F. Davis winner and Tampa Bay Derby runnerup Vinceremos in the Blue Grass.
The much hyped Social Inclusion could crash the Derby field with a first or second in the Wood Memorial. His owner, Ron Sanchez, might be making the biggest bet in the history of the Wood. Reportedly, he has been offered as much as $5 million for 75% of the son of Pioneer of the Nile. Sanchez opted to wait until after the Wood to make a decision.
If Social Inclusion wins impressively, his value could double, thanks to Derby fever. If heâs up the track, he reverts to being just a winner of an entry level allowance against a short field over a speed favoring track. Five million dollars could turn into zilch in about a minute and 50 seconds.
California has its own second coming, Bayern, who could push his way into the Derby field with a win or second in the Arkansas Derby.
In other words, we are not talking about unlikely longshots knocking out bigger names. However, there could be a few of those, too, especially with the Blue Grass giving 100-40-20-10 to its customary field of turf and synthetic specialists, who would have little chance on dirt in the Derby. Unfortunately, this wonât keep owners from wanting to go. The lure of that walk from the barn in front of 150,000 fans and millions on TV is irresistible.
Bobbyâs Kitten, for example, might be the best 3-year-old in America on turf. Grass form translates well to Keenelandâs kitty litter. If Bobbyâs Kitten, who has never raced on dirt, wins or places, itâs 1-to-9 Ken Ramsey takes him to the Derby.
Turf races do not earn Derby qualifying points. There is enough of a body of evidence now that synthetic and conventional dirt are two different worlds to adopt the same policy for artificial tracks.
Any horse only a few points short of Derby qualification also has the April 19 Lexington on Keenelandâs fake dirt to steal a berth in the Derby starting gate, even though the raceâs allotment is only 10-4-2-1.
McLaughlin said after the Florida Derby that none of this is an option for Cairo Prince, who currently ranks seventh among all 3-year-olds in earnings in unrestricted stakes. âIf we get in, weâre going. If not, weâll look for another race.â
McLaughlin, one of the class acts in racing, has been proposing that a couple or three Derby berths be determined by a panel of racing experts, ala the Breedersâ Cup, for instances in which a clearly deserving colt such as his (two Grade 2 wins and a Grade 2 place) is shut out by the points system.
Even "American Idol" has a âjudgesâ saveâ for when an extremely talented singer comes up short in fan voting.
This is not sour grapes. McLaughlin said this before Cairo Prince ran fourth in the Florida Derby.
There are arguments pro and con on this. How many spots? Would this be reserved for years only when an outstanding horseâa Cairo Prince or Candy Boy, for exampleâmissed the cut? Or would it be extended to a couple or three horses, who are merely the best of the rest?
The best solution is not to let it come to this. Iâm going to go out on a limb and predict that in future years, McLaughlin and John Sadler, who trains Candy Boy, will never put themselves in this position by babying an exceptional colt through Derby prep season.
This is the way it should be.
Written by Tom Jicha
Friday, March 28, 2014
Racing’s Worst Nightmare: Asmussen at the Derby
Unless and until Steve Asmussen clears himself of the PETA allegations, his presence at the Kentucky Derby would be the worst thing that could happen to racing. It would shift the focus from the race to Asmussen. If he were to win, headlines would read, "Disgraced Trainer Wins Derby."
MIAMI, March 27, 2014--Racing is staring at its worst nightmare: Steve Asmussen at the Kentucky Derby.
Make that its second worst nightmare. The worst would be if Asmussen were to win the Derby with Tapiture, who is a genuine contender.
Thanks to the PETA allegations, which allege the Asmussen barn is guilty of mistreatment and drugging of horses as well as encouraging a jockey to ride with a buzzer, the spring classics would become secondary to the Asmussen controversy.
Media will jump all over the story, knowing that any piece involving mistreatment of animals is a guaranteed ratings and reader magnet. Asmussenâs past drug suspensions will be dredged up...if there is enough time to discuss all of them. Before itâs over, Michael Vick would be more popular among animal lovers.
The damage to racing will be incalculable. In the wake of the Asmussen controversy, God forbid a horse breaks down in one of the televised races.
What will go largely unmentioned is the vile history of PETA, which disingenuously claims to be all about the welfare of animals. The Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services reports that PETA killed more than 29,000 animals during an 11-year period. In 2013 alone, 1,792 dogs and cats were put down, 82% of those who came under PETA control. Thatâs one state. What is 50 times 1,792?
The U.S. Department of Agriculture once branded PETA a terrorist threat.
PETA contributed at least $45,200 to the Rodney Coronado support committee in 1994-95. Coronado was convicted in federal court of arson for fire-bombing a Michigan State University research lab in 1992. A sentencing memorandum by U.S. attorney Michael Detmer expressed the opinion that Ingrid Newkirk, co-founder of PETA, was connected to the crime.
PETA has given financial support and has common members with the Animal Liberation Front and Environmental Liberation Front, which the FBI has labeled domestic terrorist threats.
PETA distributed reading material to the children of fishermen competing in a tournament that read, âYour dad is a blood-thirsty murderer and he loves killing animals.â PETA is as opposed to fishing and hunting as it is to horse racing, zoos, circuses, rodeos, eating meat and dairy products and wearing any clothing that comes from animal hides or fur. It is even opposed to guide dogs for the blind.
These are the people the New York Times unquestioningly jumped into bed with.
The Asmussen contretemps could be avoided with some common sense. The reason it wonât be is epitomized by the statement David Fiske, racing manager for Ron Winchell, owner of Tapiture and Oaks favorite Untapable, gave to the Racing Form. âI think itâs just too close to the second and third of May to take these horses away from the people, the routine, the feed and everything theyâve known for the last two years and put them someplace else. Thatâs not in the horsesâ best interests.â
The best interests of the sport apparently aren't a consideration.
Fiskeâs statement epitomizes why racing might never have uniform standards or produce any united action to move the sport forward. Whether itâs owners, trainers, tracks or state legislatures, the attitude is âItâs all about me. Nothing else matters.â
Whatâs more, Team Winchell isnât thinking things through. What they haven't considered is if their horse wins, the story won't be Tapiture, it will be along the lines of âDisgraced Trainer Wins Derby.â They will be lucky if the horseâs name is mentioned in the headline.
The Fiske statement is nonsense. Horses move from barn to barn every day without negative ramifications. Bob Baffert didnât get War Emblem until three weeks before he won the 2002 Kentucky Derby then encored in the Preakness.
Is Fiske saying a Baffert, Todd Pletcher or Kiaran McLaughlin, to name just a few world class trainers, couldnât bring Winchellâs horses up the Derby and Oaks at the top of their game?
It might seem unfair, even un-American, to penalize Asmussen. We are supposed to have a presumption of innocence until convicted in a court of law. But this is due to a misinterpretation of the Constitution similar to the common one about free speech.
The First Amendment prohibits the government from prosecuting an individual for something he or she said or wrote (with the traditional "Fire!" in a theater exceptions). This freedom doesnât extend to the workplace. Say or do something that embarrasses your employer or puts it into a bad light and you probably will be gone. Likewise, Asmussen has a presumption of innocence only as it pertains to criminal prosecution, which might be coming.
Asmussen didnât extend any presumption of innocence to his top assistant Scott Blasi, who made most of the most outrageous comments on the PETA video. Letâs not overlook that the video contained more words than deeds and very little Asmussen. Within two days of the controversy erupting, Asmussen fired Blasi, who had worked for him for 18 years and, according to Blasi, was his friend as well as his boss.
Asmussen must not have realized how self-indicting this was. Itâs inconceivable that the two worked side by side for almost two decades and the trainer was unaware of any of the outrages Blasi described. If Blasi deserved to have his career thrown into tatters, what about the man himself?
The only way this disaster in the making can be avoided is for Asmussen to be replaced as the trainer of Team Winchell's horses. The Hall of Fame did the right thing in tabling Asmussenâs nomination. The Zayats did the right thing in moving their horses out of his barn. Team Winchell needs to reconsider and follow suit.
Written by Tom Jicha