Friday, June 28, 2013
Halftime Report: Best Is Yet to Come in 2013
The first half of 2013 might have been a bit of a disappointment to some, with no Triple Crown possibility and most divisions lacking a standout. But this augurs well for the second half of the year, where wide-open categories, especially among the 3-year-old colts and fillies, will encourage multiple showdowns well before the Breeders' Cup.
MIAMI, June 28, 2013â€”Halftime. Six months down, six months to go.
The lack of a clear leader in most divisions inspires optimism that the best is yet to come. The only undisputed leader is Wise Dan as top older turf runner. With Point of Entry sidelined and Little Mike not having reestablished himself, the top challenger, if there is one, has yet to be identified. Maybe the Firecracker at Churchill on Saturday night will produce one. Keep an eye on Lea.
With three different winners of the Triple Crown races, the 3-year-old male category is wide open. If the vote were today, it would be a tossup between Oxbow and Orb. Those two and Belmont winner Palace Malice are ticketed for a showdown in the Travers. However, this far out, itâ€™s never wise to anticipate a prospective field will be the one to show up on the day.
Suppose the Triple Crown trio does make it to the starting gate. Whoâ€™s to say a repeat of the 1982 Travers wonâ€™t reoccur. That year Runaway Groom upset Derby winner Gato del Sol, Preakness champion Alomaâ€™s Ruler and Belmont hero Conquistador Cielo. A lot of people--myself not included-- remain high on Normandy Invasion.
This would open the door to Verrazano, who still has suffered his only loss in the Kentucky Derby and is being steered away from the three Classics winners. His major summer goal is the Haskell, where he figures to be odds-on.
A longshot possibility is the 3-year-old Rydilluc, who has crushed everything lined up against him on the grass. He could throw his hat into the ring if he keeps winning and perhaps gets over on Wise Dan at some point. A turf runner as 3-year-old champion is not out of the realm of possibility this year.
Dreaming of Juliaâ€™s dud in the Mother Goose bolsters Kentucky Oaks winner Princess of Sylmarâ€™s claim to pro tem 3-year-old filly leadership but there will be plenty of opportunities for Beholder, Midnight Lucky, Unlimited Budget, Close Hatches and Dreaming of Julia to make their bids for supremacy.
Royal Deltaâ€™s disappointing comeback race after Dubai leaves a huge hole at the top of the older filly category. One race (two, if you count Dubai) doesnâ€™t disqualify the reigning queen, especially with so many opportunities to make amends and no clear heiress-in-waiting.
Delaunay sits atop the sprint ranks but he still has challenges coming from the likes of Fast Bullet, Sahara Sky, Comma to the Top and Jimmy Creed. The latter two face off Saturday in Hollywood's Triple Bend.
Fort Larnedâ€™s turnaround in the Stephen Foster after a couple of clunkers sets the stage for an East-West battle with Game on Dude, which might not take place until the Breedersâ€™ Cup Classic. Paynterâ€™s exhilarating return adds dimension to this category.
At this point, it doesnâ€™t appear any of the 2013 3-year-olds belong in the same starting gate as their accomplished elders. Someone I respect, who has been making solid figs for decades, says this yearâ€™s crop is weak even when measured against some of the ordinary bunches of recent years.
As long as weâ€™re putting the first half behind us, there are other things, which have fallen through the cracks, Iâ€™d like to get off my chest:
It was infuriating to hear
how union operatives hijacked NYRAâ€™s Fan Forum in June. Despite their claims, the unions, which are a big part of NYRA's problem, have access to high ranking officials. Fans get to air their gripes and suggestions less often than there is a sweep of the Triple Crown.
Hopefully, the public will get a better hearing at Saratoga. If necessary, NYRA should follow the lead of political debates. Gather questions in advance, then invite the fans who posed the most universally interesting ones to go to the mike at the meeting.
Granted, this process could be used to weed out queries to which NYRA would rather not have to offer a response. The solution is to allow media to become involved in the winnowing process. It would lend credibility to the procedure. The racing media is far better attuned to the concerns of the betting public than the swells on the top floor.
How can anyone believe the state will actually privatize NYRA in three years? Thanks to political gamesmanship, it took 10 years after VLTs were approved to get them into Aqueduct, costing the state (read â€śtaxpayersâ€ť) billions in lost revenue.
NYRA under state control is going to be OTB all over again, a sewer for political patronage that politicians will be reluctant to surrender.
Moreover, by the time Cuomo the Second finishes surrounding the tracks, which he clearly has no use for, with casinos, there will be little interest among potential investors in taking over what will surely be doomed to be a losing proposition. So the state will be able to argue that with no viable bidders, it has to continue to operate NYRA.
One final thing, only peripherally related to racing. I had a great pre-Derby week at South Point in Las Vegas. The racebook is clean and bright, Racing Forms are essentially free ($2 deposit refunded when you bring it back) and the people behind the counter are friendly and patient. For the money and the spacious rooms, there is no better housing value in town. Make that â€śwas.â€ť
South Point is the latest casino/hotel to jump on the â€śresort feeâ€ť scam. Theirs is $14 a day, which is about at the midpoint of the Sin City range, which goes from $6 to at least $25, depending on the property.
But when they pitch $35 rooms on racing websites and email, the $14 fee amounts to a 40% percent tariff. Tack on the unavoidable state taxes and $35 becomes almost double that. This is the resort industryâ€™s version of OTB surcharges.
Any business, whether it be a casino/hotel or an airline, is entitled to charge whatever it feels is necessary to remain a profitable operation. What is unseemly is to bait customers with a low price, then pile on exorbitant hidden charges.
What do you get for this additional fee? Hotels actually have the nerve to include things like free parking (anyone know of a casino that charges for parking?), in-room local calls (which in the era of cell phones is as generous as a free Bible in the nightstand drawer) and the swimming pool (no comment needed).
So the next time you are planning a trip to Sin City and see an attractive rate, be sure to inquire if there is an additional resort fee. There are still some hotels that don't participate in this outrage. There are even billboards around town urging tourists to fight these fees, undoubtedly bankrolled by hotels that donâ€™t charge them. This is probably a losing battle but it is one worth enlisting in the resistance to fight.
Written by Tom Jicha
Friday, June 21, 2013
The Triple Crown should be tough, changes would diminish it
Animal Kingdom went out on a down note but it was good to see a Derby winner still in action after his 3-year-old season. Another year without a Triple Crown winner has ignited the usual cries that the series is too demanding and too compact. But this is what makes it special. Any change in the race distances would diminish the feat, if and when it happens. Meanwhile, on the southern front, the head-to-head weekend conflict between Calder and Gulfstream moves ever closer to happening starting July 6.
MIAMI, July 21, 2013--The listless performance by Animal Kingdom at Ascot in his final race has to be the biggest flop by a Kentucky Derby winner since Big Brownâ€™s Belmont.
But plaudits to Barry Irwin for keeping Animal Kingdom in training long past the time most Derby winners have been retired. Irwin can be abrasive and rubs many the wrong way. However, the guiding force behind Team Valor is an old fashioned horsemen, who buys thoroughbreds to race. Too bad there arenâ€™t more like him.
You have to go back to the gelding Funny Cide in 2004 to find another Derby champion who won a race after his 3-year-old campaign. Super Saver, Mine That Bird, Street Sense and Giacomo never won another race, period. Ill-fated Barbaro also falls into this category with an asterisk. So, half the Derby champions of the past decade never found the winnerâ€™s circle again.
The rush to breed isnâ€™t the only factor. Itâ€™s a matter of conjecture how much of their shortened careers can be traced to the wear and tear of the Triple Crown campaign? This and another year without a Triple Crown winner has brought out the annual cries that the series is too demanding and too compact, that changes need to be made or we will never have another winner of the Triple Crown.
Nonsense. Racing has gone 35 years without a Triple Crown winner. Baseball went 45 years before Miguel Cabrera swept the batting average, home run and RBI titles. Three races in five weeks is grueling but 162 games within 180 calendar days isnâ€™t summer camp.
The fact that the Triple Crown is so rare and difficult to achieve is what makes it special. If it happened every three or four years, it would become a ho-hum event.
A frequently suggested change would see the sequence altered to a mile-and-an-eighth Kentucky Derby, a mile-and-three-sixteenths Preakness and a mile-and-a-quarter Belmont. The way Palace Malice and his pursuers were going up and down the final quarter-mile of the Belmont, I understand how momentum could gather for this idea. But why would Churchill Downs entertain suggestions that it tinker with the nationâ€™s most glamorous race. Speculation about which 3-year-old will handle 10 furlongs generates as much conversation as the outcome of any prep. The Derby will remain a mile and a quarter as long as three feet is a yard.
In light of this, what would be proven by a Belmont rerun at the Derby distance?
Moreover, a horse whose sweep included an abbreviated Belmont would never be recognized alongside the likes of Secretariat, Seattle Slew and Affirmed.
Itâ€™s not as if the Triple Crown under its current conditions has become impossible. Smarty Jones appeared to have the job done in 2004 until Birdstone unleashed a furious rally that saw him get up in the final strides. Victory Gallop needed every inch of the mile and a half to deny Real Quiet the Triple Crown in 1998. Who knows what would have happened if Charismatic hadnâ€™t suffered an injury while leading in the stretch of the 1999 Belmont.
The Triple Crown is doable. Itâ€™s just not easily doable. Nor should it be.
If there is one change worthy of discussion, it is the spacing between the races. Iâ€™m a purist, who prefers things the way they are. However, I would go along with adding an extra week between the Derby and Preakness and even a fourth week between the Preakness and Belmont, because of the pampered way thoroughbreds are now trained. If you twisted my arm, I might say OK to a July 4 Belmont. (Derby as is, Preakness on Memorial Day weekend, Belmont on Independence Day has some appeal.) But this is as far as I would go.
Spreading the series over three or four months, as some have suggested, is almost as bad an idea as the inane one suggested in the New York Daily News that the Belmont and Kentucky Derby alternate being the first jewel of the Triple Crown. This is what happens when you fire your racing specialists and assign the Belmont advance to whoever on the staff has nothing else to do.
Itâ€™s worth noting that if the old Triple Crown bonus points system of 5-3-1 were in effect this past spring, the one-two finishers would have been Oxbow and Orb, both of whom raced in all three events over five weeks.
Palace Malice is the latest example of a horse who ran in the Derby then skipped the Preakness to point for and win the Belmont. But half the 2013 Belmont field fit this pattern. Palace Malice got the money but the others finished well behind Oxbow and Orb.
has the more widely recognized name. Calder has the horses. This is where the stalemate between the two tracks stands two weeks before they are scheduled to begin racing head-to-head on weekends starting July 6.
If the scorched earth war comes to pass there will be no winners and three losers: Calder, Gulfstream and Florida racing.
Gulfstream claims to have about 300 horses stabled at the track or at satellite facilities. On numbers, this is enough to run 16-20 races a week. But these horses are spread over numerous age, gender, distance and surface preferences as well as racing conditions. To make its year-round agenda go, Gulfstream needs to attract a sizable contingent of horsemen from Calder, which has more than a thousand horses at its disposal.
Gulfstream is doing all the right things to make this happen in the face of Calder warning horsemen it wonâ€™t allow back any horse who leaves for a race at the rival track about eight miles away. Purses in Gulfstreamâ€™s first condition book are about a thousand dollars higher for comparable races at Calder. Any horseman, who makes the switch, has been promised year-round stabling in more modern facilities.
Purses have been jacked up $4,000 a race for June 25, when Gulfstream will race for one day (on a dark Tuesday at Calder) to qualify as a host simulcast track year round. (Tampa is doing something similar on June 30-July 1.) Every horse who runs that day at Gulfstream will earn at least $1,000.
But even someone with the seemingly bottomless pockets and strong will of Frank Stronach canâ€™t keep this up over an extended period. So itâ€™s still a roll of the dice for a Calder horseman to risk his stalls on the gamble that the unprecedented Gulfstream meeting will succeed.
The only sensible resolution is a financial settlement, which will give Gulfstream its weekends and Calder enough weekdays to keep its casino license.
For the past couple of months, this has been the expectation. As July 6 looms ever closer, it has become only a hope.
Written by Tom Jicha
Friday, June 14, 2013
Breeders’ Cup good intentions zero out in Triple Crown
Not a single horse from last fall's Breeders' Cup Juvenile made it to the starting gate of the Kentucky Derby, Preakness or Belmont this spring. It's probably not coincidental that this was the first BC in which Lasix was not allowed in 2-year-old races. The result was an atypically small field. Moreover, the BC Juvenile Sprint drew only 5, an embarrassment that led to the race being discontinued. The same rule will remain in effect this November. The BC is to be commended for trying to take a leadership position but it picked the wrong spot. It probably has made another misstep in awarding Santa Anita a third straight BC in 2014 with the strong possibility the BC will be back on the West Coast in 2015.
MIAMI, June 14, 2013â€”â€śThe road to hell is paved with good intentionsâ€ť is steeped in reality.
Breedersâ€™ Cup had the best of intentions in attempting to show leadership when it comes to race day medications by banning Lasix in juvenile races. But those who should have had BC's back essentially said, â€śGo to hell.â€ť
Moreover, the just concluded Triple Crown season turned out to be an embarrassment for the Breedersâ€™ Cup.
Itâ€™s well known the BC Juvenile has produced only one winner who went on to double in the Kentucky Derby, Street Sense in 2006. Nevertheless, the climactic race of each 2-year-old season has a rich history of producing winners and in-the-money finishers in the following seasonâ€™s Triple Crown events.
Union Rags, runnerup to Hansen in the 2011 BCJ, won the 2012 Belmont. Creative Cause and Dullahan, third in the Preakness and Belmont, respectively, also came out of that BCJ.
The 2010 BCJ produced Belmont runnerup Stay Thirsty.
The previous yearâ€™s second-place finisher, Luckin at Lucky, won the Preakness.
So on and so forth-- until this year.
Not only didnâ€™t a single thoroughbred from the 2012 BCJ hit the board in a Triple Crown race, not one even made it to the starting gate of the Derby, Preakness or Belmont. This has to be a first.
What else made the 2012 BCJ unique? It was the first conducted under the new edict that 2-year-olds could not race on Lasix.
Coincidence? Perhaps. Maybe itâ€™s also a coincidence that the BCJ, an event that often drew limit fields, had only nine entrants. The BC Juvenile Sprint had only five and was won by a maiden. This was such an embarrassment the race has been jettisoned. A number of no-shows can be traced directly to the Lasix prohibition.
This is germane because the same restriction will be in place this coming fall. Noticeably absent from the announcement that Santa Anita will host the two-day BC carnival in 2014 was any mention whether the Lasix ban will still be in effect. Iâ€™d take a short price on the negative.
The continuation of the edict for this fallâ€™s 2-year-old events was a face-saving compromise. Breedersâ€™ Cup's plan was to bar Lasix from all BC races this year. The threat of a mass boycott by horsemen, which could have reduced the rest of the card to what happened with the Juvenile Sprint, forced Breedersâ€™ Cup to back off.
However, California horsemen, as well as those in other potential venues, indicated they would not grant simulcast permission in 2014 if the no-Lasix rule is still in effect. There has been no indication they are backing off this stand. Absent simulcasting revenue, there is no Breedersâ€™ Cup.
Breedersâ€™ Cup was trying to do the right thing, trying to begin to negate the perception that racing has degenerated into chemical warfare.
However, the entities that should have been BCâ€™s allies turned out to be giving only lip service to dealing with this issue. Clearly, the people who make the game go on a daily basis donâ€™t really want to deal with this.
With zero backing, Breedersâ€™ Cup turned into a one-man army. Custer had a better shot.
It makes no sense to conduct races billed as championship events under conditions significantly different from all the races run the rest of the year. Most of the 2-year-olds in the BC stakes raced on Lasix before the BC, went off it for the one race, then went right back on it for subsequent races. Expect the same this November.
Breedersâ€™ Cup might have made another ill-advised decision when it awarded the 2014 renewal to Santa Anita for the third straight year. There was a tipoff the fix was in when the California racing board awarded Santa Anita the weekend known to be the Breedersâ€™ Cup preference.
Del Mar has been given similar dates for 2015. The San Diego area track also has announced that its turf course is being widened to accommodate 14-horse fields. The only impetus for the expensive renovation is to host the BC. BC President and CEO Craig Fravel came to his current position after serving as Del Mar President until June 2011.
Is the fix in again?
If so, it could be the end of the Breedersâ€™ Cup as we know it. Reading between the lines of the official statement from Churchill Downs, the only other contender for 2014, as well as those from Kentucky politicians, the snub is not going down as smoothly as Black Jack in Blue Grass land.
Outspoken New York owner Mike Repole has been a loud voice in the Empire State objecting to the apparent West Coast bias, even suggesting an alternate event on the East Coast over the BC not being held at Belmont since 2005.
A concerted action by tracks and horsemen east of the Mississippi, which is not outside the realm of possibility, could transform the Breedersâ€™ Cup into typical Southern California stakes, small fields of little betting appeal.
Santa Anita and Del Mar have much to offer as Breedersâ€™ Cup venues. Fast and firm tracks are almost guaranteed. Hollywood star power spices the TV show. Speaking of which, the three-hour time difference from the East Coast allows for a prime-time Classic in daylight, something Kentucky and New York cannot match.
A formidable case can be made that Southern California should host the Breedersâ€™ Cup more often than other venues. But not every year.
The NFL understands this. California, Florida, Arizona and New Orleans are the most desirable venues for the Super Bowl, not only for the game but for all that surrounds it. But the league appreciates the value of moving around sportsâ€™ biggest event, even to a ridiculous site like the open air stadium at the Meadowlands in the dead of winter.
But what does the NFL know?
Written by Tom Jicha