Miami, Fla., January 24, 2013--Relationships begin with a getting to know you ice-breaker. Hopefully, this column is the dinner and drinks that will lead to a long term connection.

I’ll start with issues and opinions I find most compelling at the moment. However, the game plan is to be eclectic and wide ranging. Racing is the main thrust but my interests stretch beyond that, as I’m sure yours do, too. If this is to be lasting and enjoyable for both of us, I need to hear from you on your likes and dislikes, comments and suggestions. If you want to take a shot, that’s OK, too.

Here goes.

I have the same regard for synthetic race tracks as I do for synthetic breasts. They might look real but you know they’re not. Some might not mind either but I suspect most prefer the real thing. Keeneland used to be on my bucket list. Now it’s on my spit list.
I would un-grade any race on kitty litter (a term I wish I had coined), because it has little relationship to traditional racing. Dullahan is the poster horse. He is a perfect three-for-three (all Grade 1’s, no less) on artificial surfaces. He is nothing-for-six on dirt.

Synthetics are fine for training purposes. Some horses get legged up on wood chips. But there are no graded races on wood chips.

Steve Crist reported in the Daily Racing Form that at least one major track with a synthetic surface is considering a return to the real thing. Process of elimination suggests Arlington or Del Mar. The only other major tracks with synthetics are Keeneland, which has a vested interest in the stuff, and Hollywood Park, whose racing future is almost day to day.

Hopefully this is a swing of the pendulum like the one when stadiums jumped on the artificial grass bandwagon only to see many jump off after a few years of sky-high hops and injury-shortened careers. Racing also is learning fake dirt could be substituting one set of problems for another.

If ever there was an example of fixing something that wasn’t broken, the new Kentucky Derby points system is it. The rationale for the change, according to Churchill Downs CEO Robert Evans, is “to create new fans for horse racing.” Exactly how a series of three dozen races, with varying complex rewards, is fan friendly defies logic. Try explaining to a casual fan why the Sam F. Davis at Tampa Bay Downs, the Grey Stakes in Canada and the Southwest Stakes at Oaklawn are on the same points level as the Breeders’ Cup Juvenile. Or that a mile turf race in England gets points but the Illinois Derby does not.

Anyone want to bet that the next time the Breeders’ Cup is at Churchill, the Juvenile will get a points bump.

Evans said the new system will ensure the finest group of 3-year-olds will earn places in the starting gate. Does anyone recall a serious contender being excluded under the old system?

Some tweaks were necessary. That the first two finishers in the slots-swollen Delta Downs Jackpot, contested on a bull ring, were assured a berth in the Kentucky Derby was an aberration. This could have been resolved by simply excluding any race run on a track with a circumference of less than one mile.

Current thinking is it will take about 40 points to crack the Derby field. This could be conservative. Seven major final preps (the Florida, Santa Anita, Arkansas and Louisiana Derbys, the Wood Memorial, Blue Grass and, in another misguided international goodwill gesture, the United Arab Emirates Derby) will award 100 points to the winner and 40 points to second. Theoretically this could produce 14 of the 20 starters, although injuries and good sense will likely reduce that number. In fact, the fourth-place finisher in any of these races will earn as many points as Shanghai Bobby did for winning the BC Juvenile.

Another eight stakes, most prelims for their track’s major prep, will bestow 50 points to the winner. So if I had a Derby horse, I wouldn’t consider 40 points to be safe.

There are upsides to the change, starting with the Delta Jackpot being cut down to size. Also, a sprinter like Trinniberg will not make the cut. On the other hand, there might never be another filly in the Run for the Roses, as races for distaffers will not earn Derby points. In the wake of the Eight Belles tragedy, this might have been a secret goal of Churchill.

To get back to racing being more fan friendly, there are means to this end that don’t require round tables or focus groups to analyze to death. Foremost, simulcasting is the backbone of the sport. Is it asking too much to avoid simultaneous races at major tracks?

It’s impossible to avoid this entirely with so many tracks operating. However, NYRA, Gulfstream and Santa Anita should never have races going on at the same time during the winter. Likewise, Churchill, Santa Anita/Hollywood and NYRA should avoid conflicts in the spring and fall.

Simple solution. The major circuits agree to a system where one runs on the hour and half-hour, another goes at 10 and 40 minutes after the hour and the third goes at 20 and 50 minutes after the hour. This would allow some wiggle room for inquiries. Other venues could decide where to fit into the grid for maximum advantage to their bottom lines.

Supposedly, a new system is on the verge of being introduced that will deal with this. It can’t arrive soon enough