![]() Photo by Toni Pricci Animal Kingdom assessing the new Derby Point System |
MIAMI, February 14, 2013--Churchill Downs is “very comfortable” with its new Kentucky Derby points system, Senior Director of Communications Darren Rogers told The Blood-Horse recently. With the second phase of the points system looming next week, the 2013 debut of Animal Kingdom at Gulfstream on Feb. 9 was a reminder of why Churchill should be at least a little bit uncomfortable.
It’s entirely possible Animal Kingdom would not have made the cut for the 2011 Derby if the qualifying criteria had been what it is in 2013.
Guesstimates are it will take 40 to 50 points to earn a spot in the 2013 starting gate. This seems reasonable. Eight preps between Feb. 23 and March 24 award the winner 50 points. The big seven final preps are worth 100 points to the winner and 40 apiece to the runnersup. That’s a potential 22 horses with at least 40 points, probably more, as 13 Triple Crown candidates had at least 10 points through the first stage of the qualifying process. (Goldencents and Shanghai Bobby lead with 24.)
There almost certainly will be at least a few horses earning big points in both rounds and injuries always take their toll late in the run-up to the first Saturday in May, so some horses might squeak in with fewer points. But a horse with 50 points wouldn’t necessarily have it knocked.
By 2013 standards, Animal Kingdom had 50 points entering the Derby. All were earned in the Spiral Stakes, a race that has changed its name more often than Diddy. Perhaps Animal Kingdom’s pre-Derby campaign would have been managed differently under a points system. Then again, Animal Kingdom went into the Spiral still eligible for an entry level allowance.
Allowing that Animal Kingdom would have been more likely than not to make the Derby field, this was definitely not the case with 2010 Derby champion Mine That Bird. He had only 13 points by 2013 methodology.
Giacomo, hero of the 2005 Derby, would have been an unlikely qualifier with 36 points.
There is no uncertainty with a couple of horses who went into the Belmont Stakes with a shot at the Triple Crown, War Emblem in 2002 and Charismatic in 1999. War Emblem would have had zero points because his triumph in the Illinois Derby would have counted for nothing, thanks to the outrageously political decision by Churchill Downs to snub the race. Charismatic would have had only 10 points from his fourth-place finish in the Santa Anita Derby.
That’s four Derby winners, two of whom also won the Preakness, in the past 14 years who wouldn’t have cracked the field and another who would have been on the bubble. The only significant horse I can recall who didn’t make the starting 20 under the earnings criteria was Drosselmeyer in 2010.
Just Saying: Dustin Hoffman is just saying something that needs to be heard. The two-time Academy Award winning actor told The New York Post that he was “beyond disappointed” and “shocked” that the horse racing drama “Luck” was abruptly canceled by HBO in March 2012.
The reason offered by HBO was the death of a third horse during the making of the drama set in the colorful milieu of horse racing. Trust me, this was an excuse looking for a way to happen.
In my previous life, I was a TV critic for 30 years. I know how the business works and how disingenuous the people in it can be. A crack by Ted Harbert to TV writers during my time on the beat is illustrative. Harbert, a highly regarded executive, programmed the ABC network and later ran NBC studios, among several big jobs he has held.
He was asked the difference between being the public face of ABC, who had to explain and defend his network programming decisions to critics, and the less visible position at NBC behind the scenes supervising production of shows. “I don’t have to lie to you guys as much,” Harbert quipped shamelessly.
“Luck” wasn’t drawing a crowd. Its well publicized premiere in January 2012 attracted only about a million viewers, a paltry number for HBO, which was spoiled by audiences 10 times as large during “The Sopranos” heyday. Nobody expected “Luck,” or any series, to be another “Sopranos.” However, HBO was hoping for an audience closer to the more recent “Game of Thrones,” which is generally north of 4 million.
Worse for “Luck,” the trend line was discouraging. The subsequent weekly audiences were in the ballpark of about a half-million. With Hoffman heading the cast, which also included established stars Nick Nolte, Jill Hennessy, Dennis Farina, Richard Kind and Jason Gedrick (as well as Gary Stevens and Chantal Sutherland), “Luck” was an expensive show to make. The ambitious racing footage also blew up the bottom line.
HBO, which had ordered a second season based on the quality of the series, needed an escape hatch. You don’t embarrass a Dustin Hoffman by pulling the plug on him, especially when you’re a network that prides itself in saying it is above ratings.
Protests by the nutbags at PETA, an organization generally ignored and ridiculed, provided HBO the opportunity to seem high minded and compassionate toward animals when all it really cared about was a face-saving way to get out of a commitment it had made.




15 Feb 2013 at 09:42 pm | #
Here’s why the argument that past Derby winners wouldn’t have qualified doesn’t work: there was no points system to even consider. So, it’s a moot point.
Trainers charted whatever course they wanted based on a different criteria—graded earnings. You can’t overlay one set of qualifications over the other and call them equal across eras.
Now, with the points system in place, trainers chart a different course, one based on points. It’s like looking back on the NBA pre-3-point line and drawing parallel conclusions.
15 Feb 2013 at 10:11 pm | #
I know this will draw a lot of heat, but I believe “Luck’s” biggest problem was its timing. A show so in-your-face about presenting racing’s perceived dark side at a time when all its actual dark sides were in plain view had to fail. I’ll be surprised if it doesn’t wind up making somebody money in some form eventually.
16 Feb 2013 at 08:21 am | #
Hello TV Tom,
One could argue that Bodemeister would have won last years Derby under this years point system which could have prevented the speedball Trinniberg qualifying and speeding up the pace. Coulda woulda shoudas…
As for Luck being cancelled, it probably was because of the allmighty dollar. Simply not enough die hard racing fans, die hard racing fans who can afford HBO and women who can stomach horse breakdowns like in the first episode.
Here’s my top bakers dozen TV shows of alltime for you to critic.
1- The Sopranos
2- MASH
3- The Twilight Zone
4- The Ed Sullivan Show
5- All In The Family
6- 60 Minutes
7- Seinfeld
8- The Honeymooners
9- Star Trek
10- The Tonight Show - Johnny Carson
11- The Simpsons
12- Luck
13- Mister Ed
The beat goes on…
Just a small town girl, livin’ in a lonely world
She took the midnight train goin’ anywhere
Just a city boy, born and raised in south Detroit
He took the midnight train goin’ anywhere…
16 Feb 2013 at 10:12 am | #
Did you ever consider it would have been better if some of those horses didn’t win the Derby.
A national audience wouldn’t see Charasmatic break down.
Did Mine That Bird ever win another race? Giacomo?
*
I thought it was really dumb to put a fatal breakdown in the very first episode. Probably turned off a large number of people right away.
16 Feb 2013 at 10:43 am | #
An authentic show about Thoroughbred racing without a breakdown would be like a cop show without someone getting shot - dishonest.
Tom Amello & I interviewed David Milch a couple of weeks into Luck’s first season. When asked why the breakdown was in the first show Milch said it was to get it out of the way and move on.
Luck was far from perfect, but it was pretty darn good. The four horseplayers could have come from almost any track or OTB parlor in the country. I ‘knew’ those guys and I’ll bet you did too.
Re: the points system - what Brendan said.
Saying those horses wouldn’t have been in the Derby is like saying the 1969 Mets wouldn’t have won the World Series if the post season was played under 1968 rules, the last year there was no playoff system before the Series.
16 Feb 2013 at 11:42 am | #
Why have I been censored?
17 Feb 2013 at 09:08 am | #
Oh, I get it, it’s a joke, right TTT? The problen is that many readers take things literally. We only cesor bad labuage and such. Please clarify?
The Management
17 Feb 2013 at 01:36 pm | #
Brendan,
That different tactics might have been used to qualify for the Derby of course occurred to me. But it wasn’t as if some of these Derby winners were sitting in the barn looking for a spot. Giacomo danced many West Coast dances. Charismatic could have been claimed for $62.5. Mine That Bird could’t beat stakes horses in New Mexico. My point is the new system isn’t well thought out. The Breeders Cup Juvenile winner should be an automatic, not on a par with the winner of a mile race in England.
Of the 23 horses in the first Futures pool, theoretically the best of the bunch, I’d bet at least half will not make the points cut.
The best thing about it is we are talking about it.
17 Feb 2013 at 01:46 pm | #
Tobasco Cat,
Any list such as yours is personal and subjective. I like most of your selections but there is, IMHO, a glaring omission: Hill Street Blues. I consider it the best and most influential broadcast drama ever (it’s unfair to compare broadcast and cable). The hand held cameras, multiple simultaneous story lines and overlapping dialogue, not to mention mature material, now commonplace, were all pioneered by HSB.
Also, I would put All in the Family higher for the influence it had on sitcoms.
14 May 2013 at 02:53 pm | #
http://123rrnhhgyyt.com