By Tom Jicha
HALLANDALE, FL--The Swale used to be a significant stepping stone toward the Kentucky Derby, the co-feature on Florida Derby Day. That was in an era when trainers didn’t regard a three-race or more prep agenda as animal abuse. Triple Crown contenders would get their 3-year-old campaign started in the seven furlong Swale, then move on to a couple of two-turn stakes.
More significantly, the new Kentucky Derby points system, which dismisses races at less than a mile, hadn’t been created. All of this made this year’s Swale seem to be merely an early season gauge of outstanding sophomore sprinters.
The Swale still might turn out to be just that. But hold the phone. It took Clearly Now only 1:23.19 to perhaps vault himself back into Derby consideration. “There’s always that temptation, isn’t there?” jubilant trainer Brian Lynch said in the Gulfstream winner’s circle. “Especially the way he finished today.”
Clearly Now surged from mid-pack of the 11-horse field to take the lead in the lane, then draw away to a decisive length-and three-quarter margin, which was extending with every stride. In so doing, he remained perfect around one turn, winning for the third time in as many tries. But it’s not as if he is without two-turn credentials. He finished third in Woodbine’s Display, then came south to do the same in the Holy Bull. Granted, he was more than 13 lengths behind Itsmyluckyday and Shanghai Bobby. However, those two were breaking the course record and there were seven behind Clearly Now.
If Clearly Now does jump back on the Derby trail, it will almost certainly be in the Florida Derby on March 30, Lynch said. Itsmyluckyday and Shanghai Bobby and several other promising colts also are targeting Gulfstream’s premier event. “Wherever you go, it’s a gunfight,” Lynch said.
While Lynch allowed himself a few moments to dream the dream, he quickly came back to earth. “There’s the points system (Clearly Now has none). Also, there’s the question of whether he wants to run that far. This might be an ideal distance for him and he might be a lovely miler on the turf.”
About 1,200 miles up the coast in Aqueduct's Gotham, Vyjack continued to provide the correct answers to questions about his ability to handle a distance. Moreover, he showed a new dimension that encourages the notion that the son of Into Mischief will run as far as he has to and do it faster than those lined up against him.
In winning his first three starts at six furlongs, seven furlongs and a mile and 70 yards, Vyjack raced close to the pace. Joel Rosario, who replaced Cornelio Velazquez because of his ability to get horses to relax, did just that. Rosario allowed Vyjack to dawdle at the rear of the 11-horse field down the backstretch in the mile and a sixteenth stake. Going to the far turn Vyjack still had only three horses beaten but Rosario had put him into overdrive.
Rather than break their momentum, Rosario swung Vyjack five wide at the top of the stretch and he gobbled up foes like Pac Man. They hit the wire in 1:44.09 a drawing away 2 1/4 lengths in front.
West Hills Giant, a 33-1 shot whose only victories were in New York-bred races, held the place over maiden winner Elnaawi. However the margin and style of Vyjack’s triumph left the impression that in this bunch there was him and then everyone else.
The Todd Pletcher Derby bandwagon, which had been seemingly running downhill since late last season, hit another pothole as Overanalyze, game winner of the Remsen in November, could do no better than fifth in his season debut. The Remsen is moving toward negative key race status, as runnerup Normandy Invasion also disappointed last Saturday at the Fair Grounds.
Overanalyze's failure comes on the heels of a potential career-ending injury to Violence in last week’s Fountain of Youth and an also-ran performance by Palace Malice in the Risen Star. With points, not money, the new criteria, Pletcher’s once loaded barn of Derby contenders is in danger of running out of time and races to make the Derby cut.
With the cutoff estimated to be at about 40 points (no one knows since this is the first time), Team Pletcher is going to have to begin to step it up, starting next Saturday with Verrazano in the Tampa Bay Derby. As brilliant as he has been in two runaway wins, Verrazano has zero points. If he doesn’t grab the 50 for first in Tampa, he’ll be part of a mad scramble in the final phase of Derby preps, where circumstances might force Pletcher to run multiple entries, each in need of a win or second.
Saturday just wasn’t Pletcher’s day. His Forty Tales, sent away at even-money in the Swale, never really fired and wound up fifth, almost four lengths behind Clearly Now. The best that can be said of this from Pletcher’s standpoint is that Forty Tales was never considered a Triple Crown contender.
The 50 points earned by Vyjack effectively puts him into the Derby starting gate. This affords his connections the luxury of picking his next stop. In the aftermath of the Gotham, they indicated it would be the Wood, which could wind up loaded. However Vyjack’s people don’t have to worry about wringing him out to win, possibly compromising his chances in Louisville.
Though the way he won the Gotham, Vyjack might not have to overextend himself to go into the Derby undefeated.


03 Mar 2013 at 10:24 am | #
You amost feel sorry for Pletcher,no I don’t think so,love it when he gets beat,if you have a horse watch list,I would put Siete de oros on it.Watch the replay several times and make notes.This boy is a fighter,he just keeps trying.You will not get good odds on him again....
03 Mar 2013 at 12:17 pm | #
It’s fashionable to try to knock the guy on top off his pedestal but Pletcher is a top horseman and he works his ass off. This is why he gets the top stock he does.
03 Mar 2013 at 03:02 pm | #
Yup, Pletcher must really work his ass off. According to the Daily Racing Form, the turf authority (aka the bible), Pletcher lifted a leg up for jockeys on 137 plodders so far this year; that is on average two per day. When does he sleep? He gotta be training his plugs 24/7.
One doesn’t disagree with the bible, the Daily Racing Form; if they report that Pletcher has trained 137 platers to date, that is a fact Alice!
Of course, you, me and any other knowledgeable ‘capper knows that the ‘todster’ (hasn’t some turf writer come up with that moniker?) didn’t train a quarter of these nags, but what are ya gonna do? You pay $7 plus for the Daily Racing Form and you get information that is clearly tainted.
03 Mar 2013 at 03:18 pm | #
You’ll be a contrarian about anything, won’t you? If you think Pletcher--or any other successful trainer--doesn’t work hard, there’s nothing to talk about.
03 Mar 2013 at 04:18 pm | #
Okay, let me ask you a direct question: Do you believe that Mr. Todd Pletcher trained, had hands on, the 137 thoroughbreds he is given credit as having started so far this year?
03 Mar 2013 at 05:06 pm | #
I think that at one point or another, he has laid hands on every one. Does he do it everyday? Of course not. But he keeps track of everyone’s workouts and places them in races.
03 Mar 2013 at 08:55 pm | #
You really can’t blame Pletcher if he’s given so many horses.
But,I’d like to see more owners do what Ken Ramsey does. He splits his horses between Pletcher, Maker, Ward, and probably others.
I don’t think most people like to see so many good horses under the care of so FEW top trainers. We all know who they are.
There are plenty of top horsemen out there who, I’m sure, would do a great job if given the opportunity.
The only suggestion I’ve heard that makes some sense is for tracks to limit stalls. Maybe then, the wealth could be spread a little more.
04 Mar 2013 at 11:15 am | #
Another problem with one super trainer having so many horses is he spots them around to avoid each other. So, in the case of Pletcher, there are enough crack 3-year-olds in his barn to stage quite a stakes race of their own. But it will never happen except in the Kentucky Derby.
04 Mar 2013 at 02:04 pm | #
TJ,
It may be as reasonable as it is fashionable to knock TAP considering the volume of well-bred stock entrusted to his care compared with his Triple Crown event results. The stifling of competition you just described doesn’t seem beneficial for his owners or the fans. I agree with you that the new Derby eligibility rules will likely work to his disadvantage and I wonder if that’s intentional.
Who can deny that he’s a competent, successful trainer who reflects well on the game. His obvious strengths are his management and social skills as well as his ability to spot horses for success without surprise. Except for the Triple Crown and BC races, they consistently run where they can win. Fans seldom need inside information to isolate his winners.
What isn’t evident to me yet is to what extent his trainees’ problems are resolved through his own horsemanship at a level I associate with to some other super trainers such as Mott, for example.
Perhaps his system is superior to the services provided by smaller barns with fewer minds applied to problems and eyes applied to detail, but if I had the wherewithal to consider becoming a client, I think I’d want day-to-day hands-on evaluation of my horse’s condition, health, and progress by the top training talent in the organization as well as the individual I held personally responsible.
if I had a horse deemed to have the potential worthy of nominating to the TC, I’d be concerned with his record not just with horses that actually competed in those races, but those that failed to get there through injury.
BTW did the owner of Animal Kingdom ever back off his post-Derby remark that all his other trainers lied to him?
04 Mar 2013 at 02:58 pm | #
Without knocking Pletcher or his success, I’d also want a trainer with fewer horses under his care.
As for injuries, the more horses you train the more injuries you are going to have. That’s just the law of averages. Pletcher’s injury losses are more publicized because his horses tend to become more prominent. But injures happen in all barns, big, small, successful and struggling.
Barry Irwin did back off those statements somewhat and hasn’t said anything as controversial since. What’s more, he has become more cordial and accommodating since then, at least on the occasions when I’ve done pre- or post-race interviews.
05 Mar 2013 at 08:10 am | #
Tom,
Congratulations to you for formulating one of the brilliant comments in modern racing history.
That is, “...in an era when trainers didn’t regard a three-race or more prep agenda as animal abuse.”
Absolutely outstanding!
05 Mar 2013 at 10:55 am | #
Thanks, Nick.
Looking forward to meeting you.