So, while the taxpayers are now unwilling, ad hoc shareholders in AIG and face the very real prospect of shouldering yet undetermined but inevitably staggering expense of a wholesale bailout of people whose greed, incompetence and sheer stupidity have brought free-market capitalism effectively to an end in this country, those who happen also to be payers of already onerous pari-mutuel taxes find themselves and their financial well being slammed from an entirely different direction.
The takeout on sequential wagers and other propositions popular with bettors is now as high as 26 percent, a Draconian tariff that will eventually result in a decline in betting receipts, which are already substantially diminished from 2007 levels in a recessionary climate that gnaws at the fiscal health of most Americans.
Raising prices in a recessionary economy is not exactly an enlightened business strategy. The result is inevitable. One percent added to an already substantial off-the-top skim amounts to a stimulus that encourages the off-shore migration of funds that will no longer reach comingled pools and are rebated more generously that anywhere in the United States. Worse -- some bettors will turn to other pursuit, which, from a practical standpoint, is perfectly logical – unless they begin trading stocks.


25 Sep 2008 at 06:57 am | #
Paul,
You hit the nail on the head. Barry Schwartz once said that when times are bad you should lower prices. I think he knows a thing or two about business.
28 Sep 2008 at 06:09 am | #
Another well written commentary on the negative impact that occurs when takeout is increased; this commentary (or similar) could just as well have been written twenty years ago (and probably was), as racetrack management certainly has not changed its opinion of the lowlife that trudges through the front entrance at racetracks, OTBs, and racinos.
So why isn’t something being done about takeout?
The National Turf Writers Association numbers over 200 members, and one of its goals is ‘to promote, foster, and encourage the development of Thoroughbred racing’. Have all 200 plus members commented publicly on the lastest increase in takeout at NYRA?
Have all, or any, members gotten together to discuss what can be done, like urge us lowlife bettors across the country to boycott a specified racetrack every Saturday?
Just what has the NTWA accomplished of late? You guys/gals could ‘stir the pot’ if you all got together and devised a plan. To me, the NTWA is no different than the members of the NTRA, as each member seems to be doing his own thing; ignoring reality as Thoroughbred racing’s popularity continues to decline, slowly being beaten to death by other gambling options obviously more popular to people desiring to gamble.
27 Oct 2008 at 09:51 pm | #
Paul:
Horse racing’s determination to commit hara-kiri never fails to amaze me. With all the competition for gambling dollars, with all the perks that casinos offer, you would think “they” would know better.
Why in the world would younger fans be attracted to this game?