This is a sad if unintended commentary of the state of winter racing in New York but I was stricken yesterday while in search of a Thursday afternoon opportunity that I have not seen a live horserace since the Cigar Mile on Thanksgiving weekend, almost three months ago, which is the longest absence from live racing of my adult life after about three decades of daily attendance. Part of the reason is Aqueduct itself, which has the atmosphere of a third-world bus terminal. Part is a personal distaste for winter and part – not the smallest part – is the lack of a racing product that amounts to more than fodder for the simulcast and OTB gristmill.
I find very little at Aqueduct that prompts speculation in the pari-mutuel pools and expect nothing to change after post-scratch re-evaluation of this position. While admittedly more conservative than most horseplayers, a typical week of racing this winter has failed to yield more than a handful of plays and it is not unusual for a card, like today’s – which does not include a single open allowance race but two for maiden claimers and a special weight for state-breds -- to be completely empty.
So, like many others, winter racing is observed from a couch in the living room and wagering, what little there is, is carried out on the Internet. This eliminates exposure to both the first-level clubhouse at Aqueduct and the Belt Parkway. But living with the Long Island cable system that carries the NYRA feed is not the ideal alternative to Aqueduct or an OTB-affiliated simulcast venue if the focal point is a race run out of town. On Monday, with the field for the Southwest Stakes in the paddock at Oaklawn Park, the screen went black and after 30 seconds or so, returned with no horses and people speaking in Italian.
A TVG subscription would have been handy and would have eliminated the need to rush to a nearby restaurant in order to see an out-of-town race run after 6 p.m.—in this case the Southwest and the San Vicente at Santa Anita -- in deference to the local OTB’s arrogant disregard for its customers. That, however, would not solve the problem when Gulfstream or Santa Anita was the scene of a race of importance and HRTV, which carries those tracks, is not available on cable here.
The convenience of account wagering is among the better developments resulting from the off-track migration of players but there are obvious flaws born in the competition among various betting platforms, none of which operate with the best interest of the patron as a priority. Convenience is not always convenient. --PM


22 Feb 2009 at 12:09 pm | #
Mr. Moran: I am sorry that you have found only a handful of plays at Aqueduct during this winter meet. To me, your inability to find races that are worthy of wagering on indicates a lack of handicapping ability, or simply stubborness to admit that winter racing at Aqueduct is no different than racing anywhere else. You and your ilk, (turf writers) have deliberately, and for your own benefit, elected to create the false impression that only stake races are worthy of one’s attention; and over the years you turf writers have managed to convince the public that claiming races, the backbone of racing, are unworthy of attention - contributing greatly to racing’s demise.
As I have said repeatedly at this web site, there is no difference between a stake race and a claiming race; both races involve horses running around the race track, and both races look identical in every aspect to the human eye.
Your belief that only stake races are worthy of one’s wager has prevented you from having many enjoyable days wagering on the ponies this winter.
BTW, it would be nice if you gave out a selection that wasn’t even money and picked across the board by all Daily Racing From ‘cappers.
24 Feb 2009 at 11:12 am | #
Paul,
To compare Aqueduct to a third world bus terminal exposes your personal prejuidices. No need for that.
The atmosphere at Aqueduct is the same as it’s been for years. Old, tired and outdated. To it’s credit, NYRA management is trying, with new additions such as the Players Lounge for it’s NYRA Rewards accountholders.
The racing itself?? Not great quality, but as Wendell points out, there are opportunities on any wagering card, and some of the best plays can pop up in cheaper races.
A winter break?? You’re dreaming. In this economic climate, you’re suggesting cutting off smaller stables ability to stay afloat, not to mention the tax loss to the state?
Here’s a thought for you, Paul:
Simulcasting!! If you don’t like the fare at the Big A, try one of the other 15 or so tracks you can wager on at OTB or any other account wagering venue!! Don’t like anything at any of those tracks either?? Then go spend the afternoon at the Port Authority Bus Terminal and hang out with the “third world” people you seem to have issues with.
25 Feb 2009 at 07:52 pm | #
You sure have some tough customers replying to this article (nature of the business). You are so correct about AQU cards this season....MCL, MSW,NW2(barely a step above MDN races). I do what I can do ‘cause I do it for a living.yea I had #3 in the 3rd today because it was the bet of the day..didn’t see it ‘cause I was golfing, but the sucker goes off @ 2/5, but had 2 goodies at other tracks that paid a lot better.
You really don’t want HRTV..they have MORE commercials than network TV, although they show NYRA.
I don’t understand all these twinspires, xpressbet, etc. outfits that promise you the world..I’ve had an account w/Phonebet.com for over 10 years (no NYRA video at the moment, but odds/results). Their closest outlet is 20” away, and if I don’t want to go, a phone call gets your check in the mail 2 days later!!
I’m getting about 58% winners this month @ $4.70 payoff & not many of them are at AQU.
Do some research of PHA and TBD....you’ll make $$$ Dollar Bill
09 Mar 2009 at 08:11 am | #
No need to run out to a restaurant to catch the Southwest. A computer and a Twinspires account would have done the trick. And even the Aqueduct races(which aren’t shown live) are available for free on replay only a few minutes after the race is completed.
Also, for Bill Todd. I’m a little frightened that you do this for a living and are taking 2/5 on a horse. You might want to rethink your negativity about Twinspires as well. They allow conditionaly wagers where you can set a minimum price that you would accept before a bet is made.(so, for example, you could have instructed the system to only make the bet if the horse was 7/5 with 1 minute to post) That way you don’t have to waste money on a ridiculous wager.