It was humid and dank on Saturday at Belmont Park, the kind of day local press box wags commonly refer to as an Aqueduct day, an occasion for which the Sun Gods need not apply. “I’ve got news for you,” offered the writer upon not being asked. “The few people who still come out for days like this really love this,” his comment accompanying the whoops and hollers of fans as Curlin’s handler gave him a final turn of the ring before the huge chestnut settled into picture-taking repose.
The people who lined the ring were among those 8,500 who showed up to see Belmont's five Grade 1 events, about half as many as the count registered at Santa Anita. By definition, these races are championship events but, as everyone knows, all Grade 1s, like synthetic tracks, are not created equal.
Tom Durkin tried to make the quest more exciting than it eventually turned out to be, observers never getting a sense that winning the race for Curlin was little more than a perfunctory exercise, a fait accompli. At least that was our feeling when--despite the fact that the slop-loving speedster Wanderin Boy, who makes a habit of finishing second to wonder horses, was setting his own, unpressured pace--Albarado, with six furlongs remaining, reached up and took another hold of his champion. Call it disdainful confidence.
Apparently, the rider had a plan. Opting to ride the champion, but having ridden Mambo in Seattle to a second place Travers finish--a race he “still can’t believe we lost”--Albarado waited for the three-year-old Jockey Club second choice to make his move before asking Curlin to jump into the fray. That point came leaving the five-furlong pole as Mambo in Seattle scooted up the inside, as Curlin now was beginning to unwind from the middle of Belmont's expansive far turn.,
But the sophomore couldn’t sustain his run. Wanderin Boy remained on the lead as Merchant Marine, Allen Jerkens attempting to slay yet another giant, crept closer to the leader. Curlin, in full stride approaching headstretch, straightened out into the stretch six horses wide of the rail. In midstretch, Curlin at once drew even and began to pull away, the eventual second and third finishers struggling to keep pace, and doing just that, courageously. But a final half-mile over the sand and loam in 48 seconds, easily within Curlin’s scope, was enough to convince his two closest rivals to await another day.
On the other side of America, meanwhile, Santa Anita, site of the silver anniversary edition of Breeders’ Cup, was in the midst of its six Grade 1s program--the first time that’s ever happened on a non-Breeders’ Cup card. Cost of Freedom was taking the Ancient Title as one of his West Coast sprint brethren, Black Seventeen, took Belmont’s Vosburgh in the slop because, according to Santa Anita-based trainer Brain Koriner--catch this--”didn’t know the kind of track we would be running over.”
That would be a fast Pro Ride surface, sir, 87 percent dirt and 13 percent whatever, which apparently, like the old Polytrack at old Del Mar, is a different surface in the afternoon than it is for training in the morning. Apparently Koriner preferred to take his chances over a wet Eastern dirt track than a melting West Coast synthetic surface currently having issues.
Trainers would not speak for the record to Daily Racing Form reporter Brad Free for fear of losing stalls, some said. But jockey Rafael Bejarano told his agent that he never “felt this hot” in his whole life. (Isn’t he from South America?) Garrett Gomez, to his credit unafraid to speak his mind, said the difference was like, well, day and night.
GG said, too, that it was his experience that nearly half the horses racing in the afternoon were not getting over the surface well, and those that were winning or money-placed did so because they tolerated it better. Gomez said that if a horse was running one-paced and gradually gained momentum that that was OK, but if you tried to “squeeze them” they’d fall apart.
Track management commented they were satisfied with horse safety concerns and that they would continue to tweak the surface to deal with the afternoon heat which, on the day before the six-Grade 1 card, reached 97 degrees. Of course, it’s hot and dry in SoCal in October, too, a.k.a. brushfire season.
Finally, not long after saying that he would protect Curlin because “the gene pool needs a horse like this,“ word came that Curlin would be on a plane Sunday morning bound for Santa Anita where he will train for a presumed meeting with Big Brown; the synthetic specialist and Goodwood winner Well Armed, and possibly European sensation Duke of Marmalade, among a bevy of other Grade 1 performers that could make this Classic one of the deepest in its history. Obviously, it’s a matchup of the Big Two that racing wants, er, needs, to see.


01 Oct 2008 at 07:01 am | #
Mr. Pricci: As the above commentary refers to last Saturday’s Jockey Gold Cup race card, I would like to comment from a different perspective; a matter that few from NYRA personnel, to directors of NYRA, to turf writers, to politicians have ever broached.
The matter: Where did the money come from, the purse money for the JGC race card totaling $3,146,000?
NYRA is supposedly a new ‘not-for’profit’ corporation with 25 directors; the word new is a misnomer, as 18 of the directors were on the previous NYRA board and the current management, from CEO, CFO, on down is the same management. Nothing has changed, even the flow of red ink keeps on flowing unabated.
The facts: Total on-track handle was $1,681,000, generating about $353,000 in takeout earnings; total simulcasting handle was $15,000,000, earning NYRA about $750,000 (generous percentages used of 21% and 5%). Do the math and the purses exceeded takeout and signal fee income by over $2-million before the day’s operating expenses were included. JGC day, as is every Saturday when there are stake races, was a financial disaster.
For years, NYRA has had no desire to operate profitably and the board of directors looked the other way - and it continues.
Once slot revenue starts feeding the purses, profitability will be of little concern; in fact, any semblance of financial accounting or operating profitably will be archaic (mot juste).
Where did the purse money come from? As it has for years, stolen from the handle and signal fees of the claiming races with their paltry purses.
01 Oct 2008 at 10:42 am | #
While I’m glad Curlin may run in the classic, I think his handlers are making a mistake. I wasn’t particularly impressed with either of his last two efforts, especially Saturday’s, when it looked at the top of the lane, he would blow by and win by 5, yet didn’t clear all that easily and won by less than a length, similiar to his Woodward effort. Is he hanging just a bit, or just doing what he needs to do? I’ve watched the Santa Anita races the past week and it’s obvious some horses are having a difficult time with the surface. Curlin, having never raced on any synthetic track, would seem very vunerable, should he start.
01 Oct 2008 at 01:42 pm | #
Sarnataro,
Agree that Curlin hasn’t looked sharp. I questioned Angel Cordero about Curlin’s Woodward. Cordero has no vested interest. He said he thought Curlin was getting “smarter” doing only what he has to do. “They all do,” Cordero said. I liked his JCGC a lot better. He had energy in reserve when he crossed the wire, in my opinion.
Wendell,
You might find this hard to accept but I completely agree. They have been deficit spending for some time now, with no real accountability. They knew their debt would be forgiven as a result of the franchise agreement.
Further, forget the JCGC card. What about the raised purses at Saratoga while handle has been eroding slowly all season? Everywhere purses are cut when handle goes down. Apparently, New York doesn’t use the same model.
Thanks for your time, gents.
John
02 Oct 2008 at 05:58 am | #
Wendell,
As it happens, I have NYRA’s position on purses. There have been some recent calls to the television show I do questioning if NYRA purses would decline. Hence, I contacted Charlie Hayward.
His comments are below, with the bottom line being purses are determined by state law, not personal whim.
I would add my own regarding purse levels on Jockey Club Gold Cup day. They are:
The day I buy a new widescreen HD TV my expenses are much higher than my income. Hopefully, my income other days is enough to afford the TV. So, should I not buy it because I’m deficit spending on one day? Of course not. Without the incentive of something nice to come home to after a hard day’s work, life would be no fun.
So it is, for most of us, with big race day cards.
Hayward said, “The purses that NYRA pays are based on a statutory schedule (as in NY state law) for every wager that is made and differs depending on whether it is on track, at NY OTBs or at simulcast sites. We have some latitude on the timing of those payments which allows us to have consistent purse levels for Aqueduct, Belmont Park and Saratoga. For the year 2007, NYRA paid out almost exactly what was earned based on the wagering.”
“Because we had built up a purse cushion from prior periods, and we paid out less than what had been earned, which we have some flexibility by statute on the timing of purse payments, we had some credit in the purse account as we entered 2008.”
“For 2008 through the Belmont Spring meet that ended just before Saratoga, our all source handle was ahead of the prior year and our retention amounts for NYRA and for purses from that increased handle was up even more due to some favorable rate increases that we were able to negotiate from account wagering companies...”
“(What I said last month was) we would certainly maintain the current Belmont level and that we hoped to be able to maintain the 2007 purse levels at Aqueduct.”
“We are continuing to monitor our revenues on a daily basis and we will make a decision about purse levels at Aqueduct in the next few weeks...”
02 Oct 2008 at 06:43 am | #
Mr. Kling: Thank you for reiterating Mr. Hayward’s remarks. I have to assume that NYRA paid out exactly what was earned from wagering, or they have a money tree on the infield. My argument is that they bundle, repackage, actually steal, the income earned from the claiming races so that a purse of $500,000 or more can be applied to a stake race; that the stake race, or any race with a six-figure purse, does not generate enough income to be justified - such a stake race is a horrific financial loser in the sense that the income derived from the stake race does not come even close to the purse. So, why do it?
Does an automobile manufacture use the profits from its low-end models and transfer such to the high-end model so it can sell the high-end vehicle for less that its cost to manufacture?
By using income earned on the cheap claiming races to supplement stake race purses NYRA is depriving the owners/trainers/jockeys of such claiming races from getting back in the form of higher purses what their horses earned racing as claimers. What NYRA is doing is robbing Peter to pay Paul and providing a good living for the ‘big eight’ trainers.
Anyway, where the purse money is coming from and how it is distributed will soon be a moot point, as the anticipated slot revenue will hide everything, from increased salaries, improved executive pension plans, to stake purses.
02 Oct 2008 at 07:01 am | #
Mr. Kling: Another thing. According to Hayward, NYRA paid out in purses what was earned from wagering, which must mean that nothing was held back for operating expenses, interest on debt, taxes, et cetera; thus the massive debt accumulated over the years while the corp of trustees slept. Pure deficit spending.
What is disturbing is that the same management and directors are still in place.
But, again, who cares anyway - slot revenue is coming.
(I realize that we have been over all of the above several months ago and the defense by NYRA is that the law dictates their action. I must be really dumb, ‘cause I don’t get it, and I believe NYRA management was and is utterly incompetent).