Now he’s got his chance. Royal Delta is too good for fillies and mares and she’s in the best shape of her life and she showed it Saturday. Her Beldame triumph was positively laughable, reminiscent of Rachel Alexandra’s Mother Goose win. Mike Smith moved early and blew right past It’s Tricky and opened up.
What’s upsetting is that the four and a half fans of this sport won’t see her run against the boys again this year. Mott and owner Benjamin Leon want to defend her Ladies Classic title and go for the Big One next year. That’s right. Next year. We all know how durable these horses are.
If there were a horseman who could do it I’d bet on Mott and maybe John Sherriffs. Mott's skilled and patient enough to let the horses to the talking. Come to think of it, Mott must have a voodoo-like effect over his owners. How else can he get performances out of To Honor and Serve that ignite and baffle and still keep the horses in his barn? Every time he gets us off THAS, the horse blows up.
Who knows what Royal Delta's race figs are, but they must match up squarely with the boys.
It makes you wonder the past few years why fillies have had such success against the boys. Going back to 2008, Eight Belles ran a monster Kentucky Derby before she suffered that catastrophic freak gallop out. But I really think Jess Jackson is responsible for fast fillies taking on the boys. He made it go viral.
Since 2009, we saw Rachel beat the boys three times, Zenyatta beat them once and nearly again and even Havre de Grace defeated eventual Jockey Club Gold Cup winner Flat Out. Is it because the males aren’t as good? Maybe. Is it because these fillies were big? Well, yeah, they do need to match up a bit on size, but I bet if that little squirt Proud Spell ran against the boys she could’ve held her own. I really think that the special fillies were always as fast as the boys, but trainers and owners just kept them in their class. Maybe they got spooked by Ruffian’s breakdown.
There was Genuine Risk and Serena’s Song, but I bet there were many more that could’ve run against the boys.
There’s the money reason, which, in effect, may be the only reason. Had Rachel Alexandra run in the Black-Eyed Susan she would have run for $300,000. The Preakness gave her a shot at a $1 million-race. Zenyatta, $2 million vs. $5 million. Havre de Grace in the Woodward vs. say, the Personal Ensign? $300,000 (it’s $600,000 now, post VLT) vs. $750,000.
I often wonder what made Rachel Alexandra as captivating as she was. When Havre de Grace ran in the Woodward nobody cared. Zenyatta had the appeal, and my lord, if she ran on the east coast she would’ve been a phenom on the level of Kate Middleton. She brought it herself with her dancing and late-charging style. But I think it ultimately goes back to Jackson’s media and PR savvy. That’s something Royal Delta’s connections lack, for better or worse. She’s one of the best 14 horses in the world and she won’t run against them.
I’d be shocked and awed if she runs in the Breeders’ Cup Classic 13 months from now.


02 Oct 2012 at 12:36 am | #
Why have we gotten to a point in this sport that we dismiss horses running in the races that they are supposed to run in as being cowardly and boring. Tyson couldn’t fight Holyfield every time. Billie Jean King couldn’t take on some arrogant washed-up jerk once a month. MJ can only play in the NBA Finals once a year, and Usain Bolt can only glide to an Olympic Gold Medal once every four years.
We all often complain about horses being coddled in the modern era - only running when they’re at their absolute peak, and only running when the track conditions, purse, humidity and the alignment of the planets are all optimal.
Is it possible that on some level the fans and the media are contributing to the state of coddling by reacting with outrage when an owner/trainer seeks to run their horse in a perfectly reasonable or ordinary spot rather than shooting for the moon? We predictably throw our arms in the air in disgust when yet another three year old retires early, but do we not also react in the same way if a trainer dares to run this same three year old in an ungraded Thursday afternoon overnight stake? 1 to 9 odds! Boring! What a joke! Not even worth watching! The fact is, if horses are to run more often, we have to be ready to watch them suck once in a while, to beat up on inferior competition, to win in ordinary fashion, and to swallow ridiculously short prices. We claim to want to see these horses doing more of the ordinary, more of what they do best - simply race - but at the same time we seem to only want to see them register 115+ beyers, or face older competition in Grade 1’s, or switch surfaces, or be in epic dogfights, or, as has been so common lately, to have a girl take on the boys.
My vote is for Royal Delta to take on the girls - a nice set of girls at that. Keep her sound, keep her running as much as possible, and save any possible home run swings for next year. The most likely scenario vs. the girls - an impressive 3 length win at 8-5. The most likely scenario in the Classic - a non-descript 6th at 4-1, followed by a retirement announcement. I’ll take the short price on this one.
02 Oct 2012 at 03:58 am | #
Lover, your points are well taken.
But what if, and it’s a big IF, Game On Dude were removed from the Classic equation, who would Royal Delta necessarily have to fear?
Is she an automatic with Awesome Feather and My Miss Aurelia, among others, in the Ladies Classic? Yes, she’s the deserving favorite but this race is far from a gim’me.
Do believe the fact that Billy already has three horses for the Classic and there’s another $2 million pot with her name on it, potentially, is the reason.
The 2013 Classic is a long, long, long way off. We old schoolers like to see those owners--those among the 1%--to challlenge the history of this great game, before the sport itself becomes history because it has become irrelevent to sports fans of every stripe.
02 Oct 2012 at 04:46 am | #
B...B...B…
C’MON Man! As a member of the 4 1/2 fans of this sport I agree with you and would love to see the Delta Lady beat the boys… but.... who could argue with BILLY THE KID?
Yes William(Billy) I. Mott, and the I doesn’t stand for idiot. Hall of Famer Billy who was the second youngest trainer ever to be inducted. Billy who started training horses at age 15. Who trained his first Stake winner before graduating High School. Yes that Billy the Kid.
Trainer William I. Mott who is the fourth leading Breeders Cup purse earner behind Lukas, Frankel and McGaughey. Who has nine Saratoga training titles. Who trained the wonderful, incomparable, unbeatable Cigar. Who won the BC Ladies and Classic Dailey Double just last year. Yeah that Billy the Kid.
Did I mention yet that Billy has Flat Out(JCGC two time winner just like Curlin) and Ron The Greek(who won on the SA surface earlier this year). Don’t question Billy the Kid! Don’t mess with the man who dons the Bronx Bomber Cap!
BTW...How’s Bobby Valentine workin out for you?
The Beat goes on....
From a town known as Wheeling, West Virginia
rode a boy with a six gun in his hand,
and his daring life of crime made him a legend in his time…
east and west of the Rio Grande.
Well, he started with a bank in Colorado.
In the pocket of his vest, a colt he hid.
And his age and his size took the teller by surprise…
and the word spread of BILLY THE KID.
From a town known as Oyster Bay, Long Island
rode a CAT with a six pack of Bud in his hand…
02 Oct 2012 at 05:14 am | #
Here’s the speed figs from DRF.com & BRISNET.com
Horse DRF BRIS
Royal Delta 106 105
Flat Out 109 117
Game On Dude 109 109
02 Oct 2012 at 05:52 am | #
Denny - thanks for the figs. As they show, Royal Delta is not in a league of her own among Classic contenders. She also achieved her figure versus a small field with a great ride and a great trip against only one real rival who didn’t seem to be have her best stuff.
And if we’re looking for history here, or as JP put it, for owners and trainers in the upper echelon “to challlenge the history of this great game”, then why not aim to have Royal Delta go for the Distaff this year, and then look to join the ranks of Zenyatta (Classic/Distaff Double) and Goldikova (3 BC Wins) by attempting the Classic next year?
03 Oct 2012 at 06:10 pm | #
I’m all for girls running against boys, especially when they dwarf the accomplishments of their male peers at a given moment in time. Rachel Alexandra was denied her chance to be a triple crown winner, as was Silverbulletday. As fans and internet blabbers, such as myself, it is not our decision, but I believe these bad decisions do a great injustice to the Sport of Kings. Love of money; the root of all evil. Would love to see her run against the boys, and see what she has; she is greatness, that is for sure. I’m not of the persuasion that this causes danger to the females; if they are inferior, they usually simply give up and defer to the stronger sex, as they do in the wild. If this is too deep for any of you, or too cerebral, I apologize. Does anybody remember the race of this century when Zenyatta beat the boys. I still get goose bumps thinking about it, and have to go take a cold shower. What a women!
TTT
03 Oct 2012 at 06:52 pm | #
I have no problem with girls running vs. the boys. I just think it doesn’t make sense in this case. Royal Delta is a lot closer to Havre de Grace then Zenyatta or Rachel - she’s a great filly, but one that will probably have her hands full vs. her own division.
03 Oct 2012 at 10:56 pm | #
This is what it’s about, baby. We’ve got the Editor in Preach, we’ve got The Cat, The Lova, Triple T and DennyM. I’d take this gang against the Avengers any day!