That cannot be confused with ‘depressing,’ though that is often the case, Ernie. Think about it: What other sport’s media commentary is so mired in ‘what the sport can do to get better.’
Poor sport. Perhaps all it needs is a friend, a willing ear, a pat on the back, a shot of Jack, a gaming summit!
But one such note, that your very own John Pricci writes about in his Morning Line column, that expanded gaming is tantamount to the success of horse racing in New York.
A full-scale casino is in the works for the Berkshires in Western Massachusetts, which, as Mr. Pricci says, rests just a few furlongs away. If that doesn’t seem like a threat, know that where I grew up in southeastern Massachusetts many people made trips to either Mohegan Sun or Foxwoods for a fun night and that was hours away, not just one hour away.
So what is the Empire State to do? And, more importantly, what will become of the Triforce of racetracks: Big A, Big Sandy, and the Spa?
For one, identify horse racing for what it is: a legalized gaming sport, just another game of chance, albeit somewhat more calculated.
I’d like to see the tracks turn into casinos with table games, roulette wheels, poker tables, and black jack tables. Horse racing will just be another game to play and collect dollar bills.
There will be high roller rooms and just think, Saratoga’s Curlin Café could be put to good use with $1,000 minimum black jack. Hit me. 16. Hit me. 18. Hit me. 23. And if some of these tables overlook the track maybe they’ll get distracted and hit on 19.
The Connecticut Sun, yes a WNBA franchise, play at a casino. Why can’t horse racing be the same sporting event that takes place in and among the morally lecherous activity of gambling, excuse me, gaming? Think of the crossover potential. That annoying loose change in your pocket after you cash that winning Daily Double ticket? Throw it into a slot machine. Everyone wins! ... except you, because you just got hosed. But did you? You’ve been imbibing Heineken and gin and tonics all afternoon. You hit the Pick 3. You lost your shirt and won it back.
The rewards potential is awfully enticing as well. Sitting down at a table with a losing horse racing ticket can be a voucher for X amount of dollars per ticket. Or the other way around. Sitting down at a black or poker table grants you betting vouchers at the windows.
Better still would be the legalization of sports betting. As someone who spends most of his mornings in a Las Vegas sports book a few days every March, having sports parlays available while playing the races is what YOU do.
There’d be nothing like playing the Late Pick 4 at Belmont ending with the Jockey Club Gold Cup and snaking in a parlay with Tennessee, Alabama, Florida, and USC football on the same day. Women’s field hockey? Why not, just give us an honest line.
But then again, we won’t, because things in New York State move as fast as Chip Woolley in his crutches.
So the money will drip out of New York like an IV bag into its neighbors’ veins. New York needs some serious dough and people will be willing to make it rain outside its borders.
So horse racing remains depressed. And, really, what better way to build up one’s self esteem than by giving it a bunch of tokens, a free drink, and saying, ‘Go have fun.’ It’s fool proof!
Beats medicating.
Brendan O’Meara blogs about horse racing here at HRI and at The Carryover. He also blogs about narrative nonfiction and his book project “Six Weeks in Saratoga” at The Blog Itself. His Web site is http://www.brendanomeara.com.


26 Jun 2010 at 06:44 am | #
Well I’ll be damned, a turf writer said the following, “identify racing for what it is: a legalized gaming sport, another game of chance.”
(I read the above commentary late last night and I thought I read a paragraph where Rachel and Zenyatta were mentioned and how the public doesn’t identify with them; must have read this comment elsewhere).
At this website for a very long time I have banged the drums urging you turf writers to 1) stop referring to racing as a sport, 2) stop promoting a few horses and a few trainers, and 3) to promote racing as a gambling alternative to casino gambling; that horses are merely a means to an end, no different than a deck of cards or a pair of dice; that racing’s future is in convincing the unknowing thousands of people that gambling on the horses is far more exciting, challenging, and financially rewarding that any other form of gambling; that a buck or two wagered on the horses can be very profitable; that no racetrack is any different from another when money is wagered on a horse race.
But, it is the same ole’ same ole’ where today all one will read is commentary on a few stake races with obscene purses, a handful of trainers, a few so-called ‘special’ thoroughbreds, and a few jockeys. In the meantime, thousands of people will enter casinos, coast-to-coast, seeking the opportunity to gamble and enjoy the entertainment totally unaware that Thoroughbred racing is a gambling venue far superior to slots, card, and table games, where a buck or two can bring huge rewards along with tremendous excitement.
Instead those that do read racing commentary are told what a great sport it is, how a Triple Crown winner will restore racing to its former glory, and how a match race between Rachel and Zenyetta will be the greatest race ever - yawn!
Today we got the Mother Goose with five entrants, three trained by Pletcher; how exciting.
I just keep on banging away, hoping that someday racing’s decision makers will finally get it: it’s all about gambling!
A casino in the Berkshires will draw a tremendous amount of disposable income away from Saratoga, and will probably attract me as the ride there will be far more scenic than driving to the Mohegan Sun casino.
26 Jun 2010 at 07:14 am | #
If New Yorkers want first hand understanding of what the IV feels like, just visit us here in Maryland. Our spigot is wider than the BP pipe!
26 Jun 2010 at 08:22 am | #
Maybe Abigail spiked my carrots this morning but I say horse racing can still be the sport of kings. BUT mismatches with small fields and high takeout rates have put the game on life support. Get a commissioner and put the best horses against each other. How many people will show up and what would be the handle(take out rate at 10% on all bets) IF Zenyatta, Rachel, Quality Road, Blame, Rail Trip, I Want Revenge, Regal Ransom and St. Trinians showed up together? Who would be the favorite? How many NEW fans will be made?
27 Jun 2010 at 09:11 am | #
Sorry Mom’s Command, but your idea has been tried and has failed innumerable times.
Mr. O’Meara: Please read Bill Finley’s article at ESPN.com that informs all why Woodbine is enjoying success by emphasizing the gambling and not the horse; Mr. Pricci, please read Finley’s article also. Maybe, finally, racetrack management is getting it!