Since their inception they have always had the vision to say that less is more. The pint is the largest unit they serve. How often have you wished for there to be half-gallons of Stephen Colbert’s Americone Dream or Hannah Teter’s Maple Blondie? Yet when you want more, they give you less, and you keep coming back having never reached your saturation point.
This is the mantra I’ve adopted and proposed for horse racing in pieces at both Carryover 2.0 and Carryover Classic (the original recipe). Why is it necessary to race five days a week especially when the racing product smells worse than a pre-mucked stall?
Now a leaner meet is stronger, richer, and dammit, a whole lot sexier. Honestly, I’d call Monmouth for a second date. Hell, I’ll pick up the tab. That’s the quality person I am. Coffee upstairs? Please excuse my place, it’s a tad messy.
With $50 million in 50 days, just look at who is in the Top 11 of the trainer standings through June 10.
1. Todd Pletcher
2. Richard Dutrow, Jr.
4. Nicholas P. Zito
11. Steve Asmussen
Wasn’t it Deep Throat who said, “Follow the money.”?
Monmouth Vice President Bob Kulina, contributing a column for The Blood-Horse, writes, “The experiment being carried out now at the Monmouth Park spring/summer meet is exceeding our best expectations. Very conservatively, we had hoped by racing only three days a week and boosting the purses, we could increase everything—handle and attendance—by 20 percent. After the first five days of the meet, ontrack handle is up 51.8 percent ... Total handle on our races sent to other tracks is up 137 percent to $36.4 million, and attendance is up 26 percent to 64,946.”
Monmouth is like the hot and strangely sexy exchange student. By any normal stretch this exchange student isn’t very attractive, yet the mystery, the accent, the newness of her allows you to look past the stained teeth and strange shoes. Maybe Monmouth can teach us some new swear words.
But if the shimmer doesn’t fade, they may have smashed a drive 325 yards right down the middle of racing’s fairway. When the New York Racing Association decided to add four days of racing to its seemingly perfect 36 days, I squirmed. It’s like light beer, the product is watered down.
Take it further: Why not race just two days? Create anticipation throughout the week and increase the purses even more. In essence, you can have a mini-Breeders’ Cup every weekend.
People clamor for the NFL to add games to its schedule. Stop! A guy I work with said he can’t wait for football season and he wishes the season were longer. It’s when that wish is realized that we get Bud Light instead of Boston Lager.
When demand is high, if anything, show restraint. When people want more, give them less. What makes anything special if everyone can have it? Keep the velvet rope locked. Don’t you want what you can’t have?
With 64,946 people clicking through the turnstiles at Monmouth, the exclusivity and the quality product on the dirt makes it special to go the track again. Why else are the Washington Nationals having a hard time filling seats, but when Steven Strasburg starts they sell out? The product on the field matters.
The everyday gambler will argue this into the ground, that the times of the $10,000 claimer aren’t that much slower than a stakes race run at the same distance with supposedly better horses. They will say it doesn’t matter how good the athlete is and that racing, at its root, is a gambling sport better left to the OTB caverns tucked into seedy districts all over the country.
Nickle-claimers are like the Pittsburgh Pirates and the stakes horses are the Red Sox. Both teams have pitchers that throw 90 miles per hour, both have big-league hitters, but, ultimately, one puts on a better show.
Even when we eat, our tongues are most sensitive at the start of a meal. The first bite is the best, the rest is largely empty.
Keep horse racing in pints, and, while you’re at it, serve me up a Guinness, I’m going to Monmouth.
Brendan O’Meara blogs about horse racing here at HRI and at The Carryover. He also blogs about narrative nonfiction and his book project “Six Weeks in Saratoga” at The Blog Itself. His Web site is http://www.brendanomeara.com.



12 Jun 2010 at 04:51 am | #
Sure, reduce Thoroughbred racing to two days a week and the crowds will come. A perfect solution. Doing such will result in numerous racetracks closing, and thousands of owners, trainers, and hundreds of jockeys will have to seek employment elsewhere.
Thoroughbreds will be in abundance so the market for yearlings will shrink.
Pletcher, Asmussen, Dutrow, Baffert, Zito, and Mott will further increase their stranglehold on racing, and me, and my fellow OTB lowlives, will take up fishing during the week.
How about just one day a week? Double the purses! Imagine, just Belmont/Saratoga, Churchill, Gulfstream, and Santa Anita operating.
Wow! SRO. There will be twenty entrants per race. All the OTBs in Vegas and around the country will be open for just one or two days a week, even the poorly maintained ones; the same for all the racinos and racebooks. The ADW hubs will be open only one or two days also.
Yup, less is more.
I suppose you haven’t noticed, but some of the jockeys riding at Monmouth Park on Friday thru Sunday are riding at other racetracks the rest of the week, and trainers who normally would be racing during the week at Monmouth are shipping to other racetracks.
As I have stated several times at HRI, Monmouth Park’s less is more will be an utter financial failure, as the purses are not supported by handle. All entrepreneurs, except those involved in racing, measure their success by the bottom line; racing associations measure their success by attendance and handle, then go running, hat in hand, to their legislature demanding funding, because, to their surprise, the cash drawer is empty.
12 Jun 2010 at 05:33 am | #
You make good points, but I applaud anyone looking to take a machete to new trails. Perhaps it will fail, but it’s better to be death by guillotine than starvation.
12 Jun 2010 at 06:30 am | #
Wendell,
You have accidently stumbled upon a great truth without realizing it.
You said, “me, and my fellow OTB lowlives, will take up fishing during the week.”
If you do, remember this. State fisheries and wildlife experts have adopted the “less is more” mantra by regulating when and where you can fish, and for which species. The fact is Wendell, if fishing followed the racing mentality of 365 days per week at multiple venues around the country, which you seem to embrace, there would be no fish for you and your friends to catch.
The bottom line? Less is more Wendell and you put your finger right squarely on the facts.
12 Jun 2010 at 07:08 am | #
The most unforgotten and unmentioned issue among all this (besides Hollywood Park’s continuing to outhandle Monmouth with 25% fewer horses and 65% lower purses) is the non-concern by everyone to the plight of the frontside hourly race track workers whose paychecks have been reduced 16-20% by the reductions at CD, HP, Del Mar, Arlington etc.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the profitability of reductions of racing days isn’t exactly the amount of the money saved on these paycheck reductions.
How about raising the hourly rates to a level that splits the difference for those of us whose paychecks have been killed by this.
I know this doesn’t mean squat to anyone but those affected, but it irks me that we get to take the entire brunt of the losses while everyone crows how successful these reductions have been.
12 Jun 2010 at 08:35 am | #
Mr. Kling: My statement should have read, ‘I, and my fellow lowlives, will take up fishing ...”
I don’t follow your analogy, comparing fishing to horse racing. If no one shows up to fish, there is no economic loss as no entrepreneur has put forth any money (purses) nor incurred operating expenses.
Mr. O’Meara: Any and all business decisions should be made after considering the affect on the bottom line. What the NJSEA is attempting to do is beyond the pale. If anything, Monmouth should have reduced purses and instead of stiffing the local owners, trainers, and jockeys, who provide horses, et cetera, for an entire meet, attempted to write conditions that fit what was stabled on-track instead of luring the so-called top trainers and their blue blood thoroughbreds to their racetrack. In other words to try to operate profitably.
What riles me is what turf writers have done to the industry unwittingly: by constantly writing about certain thoroughbreds, trainers, and jockeys they have convinced the public and even hardcore bettors that there is such a thing as quality races; that stake races are far superior to a lowly claiming race (you have bought into this assumption); it simply isn’t true.
Please, Mr. O’Meara, go to a website that has replays of a day’s race card. Pick any racetrack, watch the replays, then explain at this website just what was the difference between, say, racing at Philadelphia Park and racing at Belmont Park.
If the public realized that all racing everywhere was virtually identical, things would change dramatically.
12 Jun 2010 at 08:43 am | #
Wendell,
You must be too hard at work on today’s Finger Lakes card.
If the fishing season wasn’t regulated by limiting the number of legal days, there would be no fish to catch and you would have to take up another pastime.
So it is with racing. There are too many racing days chasing after too little money. Restrict the number of days and allow wagering bankrolls to build, while also increasing interest in the fewer number of days available.
It’s called supply and demand Wendell and it works.
12 Jun 2010 at 08:56 am | #
Mr. Kling: Gee, am indeed into Finger Lakes’ card. Hope to get jump started with a few bucks on the nose of Kim’s Dream in first; horse is in tough, could get a decent price - but he gotta win foist; this race is as good as any other race in the country with a purse of $19,100.
12 Jun 2010 at 05:00 pm | #
Mr. O’Meara: If I can continue with today’s rant, I wish to point out why NYRA is bankrupt and doesn’t deserve a dime from slot revenue.
At Belmont today, NYRA scheduled a stake race, titled ‘The Ogden Phipps Handicap’. The purse is listed as $250,000. Wow! So what did a purse of $250,000 get for entrants? Five horses!! Again, Wow! And the race was exciting, wasn’t it? JR went to the front and the favorite chased him all around the track. A most thrilling race. Any race at Finger Lakes or Philly would have been more exciting with the purse being $15,000 or so - a long way from $250,000.
So, doesn’t the question become why six figure purses?
Two or three weeks ago Presque Isle presented a stake race with a purse of $100,000, but the requirement written into the conditions was that if less than six entrants went to post the race would be cancelled. Six went to post. Presque Isle’s management has an awareness that few racetrack management possess.
Six-figure purses, dictated by owners on the boards of racetracks, are bankrupting racetracks. It is utterly ridiculous to have a race with a purse more than $60,000, which in today’s climate is barely covered by handle. Yet, we see purses of $500,000 upwards. For what? For Pletcher, Asmussen, Dutrow, Baffert, Mott, and Zito to garner?
When are your turf writers going to wake up and start writing about the real world of racing and what should be done to keep it alive?
17 Jun 2010 at 05:09 pm | #
Wendell,
You make a great point about horse racing media ignoring the lower level races.
On the post belmont 3 million dollar carryover Wednesday last a couple of weeks ago, a few writers went around and interviewed trainers, owners, and jockeys about what would have otherwise been very ordinary midweek races.
With the big bucks in the pick 6 on the line, we were able to see a whole bunch of interesting storylines going into a claiming race or a statebred MSW.
Of course we need expensive stakes races, and of course we can’t have those without the nickel claimers. Let Monmouth try this, and let Finger Lakes keep on keepin on. A balance will be reached. This is America after all.
But in the meantime, I wouldn’t mind every once in a while reading about a grizzled 9 year old gelding going for his 30th win in a claimer at Philly, or a recap of a thrilling allowance race at Deleware.
Get to work!
26 Jun 2010 at 07:26 pm | #
Mr. O’Meara have you ever been to Monmouth? Take a walk through the picnic area and see how many people are just sitting there and not going to the windows.Today(Saturday) the attendance was only 9,000 which had been a typical Saturday in years gone by. I’d like to hear how the track management spins that. Oh the weather was beautiful for the beach hence not track patrons. By the way this is a $50 million dollar meet in 50 days a million a day. They have yet to run for purses for a million a day.