Of course the answer is the latter, though the former was quite impressive, but just when your hopes get up, “That earns him a start in the Travers,” said Dutrow of Curlin Stakes winner Winslow Homer. “That’s what we were looking for. He was impressive and scooted away from them, and he loved the distance. We’re hoping he goes into the Travers as well as he did today. He’s bred to go the distance and I think that he proved today that the distance will be a friend.”
Then a condylar fracture to his left front will sideline him for the Travers. Such is life.
Back to Jackson. The wine magnate who wants to rename a Black Mountain to Alexander Mountain in Cali has seen the peaks. For example, when he announced that Curlin would race as a four year old at the Eclipse Awards. Then he sank to the valley when he pulled Rachel out of the Apple Blossom. The Sportsman was suddenly the Sportsman ... so-long-as-it-works-in-my-favor.
Every week clicked by and the steam in the press box shot from the ears of turf writers, most notably Claire Novak, who was most prominent in her disdain among writers about Jackson’s vagueness.
The brass at the New York Racing Association suffered from impatience as well. Rachel deserved a good show—one being denied her by the short notice. And racing secretary P.J. Campo had trouble filling races since the presence or absence of Rachel determined where a slew of other horses would be running.
Whatever the reason Jackson decided to announce her next race in timely fashion. Perhaps he threw a bone to NYRA to give folks like Neema Ghazi, Dan Silver and Campo a chance to effectively do their jobs.
Also, in so doing, Jackson turned the table on Zenyatta’s owner, Jerry Moss. It was just a few months ago that the Apple Blossom was bumped to $5 million pending the attendance of both Zenyatta and Rachel Alexandra and eight other horses and a partridge and a pare tree.
Moss committed thus putting the pressure on Jackson. Jackson ducked (which, let’s face it, was the right move. Rachel wasn’t fit and she would have been demolished. Would she have hit the board???).
Not since “Charlie’s Angels” have two or more females looked so good together and the time is now. Why? Anything can happen to these athletes. If they are sound and fit, run them against each other now. We can’t bet that they’ll be ready or healthy in November (remember Big Brown v. Curlin?).
Jackson put the pressure where he likes it: on other people. And he put it right on Moss’s nose to bring his mare to New York sans Security Barns.
Meanwhile, Zenyatta’s trainer John Shirreffs readies his alpha mare for the Clement Hirsch.
So NYRA must also ratchet the pressure by making the Personal Ensign a run for $1 million. Should that lure both connections and handful of others, fans may have their dream race.
Too much can happen between now and November. Let us not forget that.
Thanks to Jackson, at least we actually have three weeks instead of three days to think about it.
Brendan O’Meara blogs about horse racing here at HRI and at The Carryover. He also blogs about narrative nonfiction and his book project “Six Weeks in Saratoga” at The Blog Itself. His Web site is http://www.brendanomeara.com.


04 Aug 2010 at 09:05 am | #
Why don’t you writers knock it off! Jackson was proven right by Rachael’s subsequent performances. Who’s ducking who? Rachael is scheduled for the Personal Ensign, why is Zenyatta going to Del Mar when both owner and trainer voice concerns about the surface. I guess any synthetic is better than dirt, especially when so much is at stake. Rachael is ready now, Zenyatta has no excuses, NONE! Leave Jackson and Rachael alone. He does what is best for the horse, not indignant sportswriters, or mesmerized, naive/uninformed public. The only thing that the public knows is what the biased sportswriter tells them, IN HIS WAY! The public contradicts itself on so many levels that they Are Not Worth Considering. All they know is “what feels good”, “what I want”, not considering the horse, UNTIL IT BREAKS DOWN, then its someone else’s fault. Remember Ruffian? Do you? Who “forced” that match race?
04 Aug 2010 at 10:29 am | #
I’m the only horse whose undefeated record has merit. Races on man made plastic surfaces is not what horse racing is about and do not count. Nor do races at Oaklawn against nobodies. Staying in California proves nothing. Winning at the graveyard of favorites Saratoga(race named for me), the Beldame at Big Sandy(Belmont) and the Breeders Cup at Churchill will put you in my class, case closed.
04 Aug 2010 at 02:30 pm | #
Frank,
I mean this in all sincerity: thanks for using your real name ... or at least an alias that looks like a real name. Thanks for your commentary as well.
Personal Ensign”
Boy, howdy, we got a horse in the mix. Personal Ensign, if you weren’t older than sand I’d make you my wife. Though, a struggling writer does need a sugar mama. I’ll get back to you.
BRO
04 Aug 2010 at 02:30 pm | #
Personal Ensign: Your coming from far back in the slop, appearing hopelessly defeated, to just get up in the Breeders’ Cup made me some money - I thank you. However, not wishing to rain on your parade, the days of champion horses like yourself are over, done with, kaput!
People today, I should say gamblers, simply do not identify with you, or any other media hyped so-called ‘star’; they are tired of wagering on champions and receiving pittance in return, preferring to gamble at casinos, or directing their attention to other races that offer exciting exotic wagering opportunities. And the ‘newbies’ who try Thoroughbred racing are not thrilled by you champions paying zilch.
04 Aug 2010 at 03:10 pm | #
Wendel, your welcome, had to make it exciting for my last race, but thanks for the confidence with your wager on me.
But I have to disagree with you that gamblers don’t show up for stars. Look how many showed at the Haskel(40,000) and the total handle that day(17mil) for Lookin at Lucky(star). Must have been some new players born that day that won on a race on the card. This Saturday the gamblers will show for Quality Road(star) and some new players will be born from winning a race on the card. Yes many champions like me will pay zilch but thats why there’s many other races on the card(that will pay big). But you need stars like me to draw the masses.
04 Aug 2010 at 04:17 pm | #
Personal Ensign: I suggest that you stick to oaks and water, and flirting with people who will give you an apple or a carrot. You have been sucked up into believing that attendance and handle are the criterion for a successful Monmouth day.
True, attendance was 40,904 and these people wagered on-track $3,270,939. Doing the math, the per capita wager was $80, which means that the track earned via takeout about $16 from each bettor in attendance, and the track received about $654,200 in income as takeout from their wagers.
Unfortunately, the total purses for Haskell Day totaled $2,568,000, which means that about $1,913,800 was yet to be covered by bettors elsewhere. So, if off-track bettors wagered per capita the same as the on-track crowd ($80) the track would have earned $4 (a generous assumption)from each of the off-track bettors; thus, a mere 478,500 off-track bettors were needed to just cover the purses for the day.
Did the extra help needed to accomodate the ‘huge’ crowd in attendance work for nothing? Did everyone in attendance each drink 100 beers and 200 hotdogs?
Remember, the purses (a huge giveaway of casino and state money) provided the purses.
IMO Haskell Day was a financial disaster, as it has been each and every year for decades, yet no one seems to give a hoot. Just maybe the governor of New Jersey finally picked up a pencil.
04 Aug 2010 at 05:16 pm | #
Wendel: I suggest that you stick to one arm bandits at the casino, since a lifetime of handicapping has deadened your brain. Or you just don’t get it that newbies are needed in all businesses and that it takes investing to succeed long term. Have you heard of the lost leader? Sometimes you have to lose money now to make money later. Sometimes you have to advertise to attract. STAR horses bring the WOW factor to the game. Fathers will bring their sons and daughters with them to see a STAR. Newbies will be born and the game will go on.
Brendan”
I’m probably younger than you and if you were a STUD we could talk.
I can hear Harvey P. now .... may the horse be with you all!
05 Aug 2010 at 03:55 pm | #
Frank,
So because “Rachel is ready now” you expect team Zenyatta to completely change her schedule leading up to the BC Classic to accommodate Jess Jackson and Rachel? That’s ridiculous. Rachel had her shot in last year’s BC Classic but dodged it, she had another shot in this year’s Apple Blossom and dodged it. Now you expect team Zenyatta to turn their training and racing schedule upside down just because that works well for Rachel.
The facts are as follows: Zenyatta has never dodged Rachel. Rachel ran in only one race last year that wasn’t restricted to three-year-olds therefore Zenyatta could not have raced against her in any of the others - period!
You might get a chance to see her in the Beldame because it fits Zenyatta’s schedule but otherwise you’ll just have to wait for the BC Classic… and that’s assuming Rachel doesn’t again dodge Z in the big race!