One thing you learn is that to move a chemical reaction along, that is, to move the ingredients into a higher yield, you have to remove product, otherwise the reaction stalls because reactions must be balanced.
Horse racing has too much product thus stalling innovation and losing its specialty. If stuff, whatever that stuff may be, is too numerous, if it loses its allure, if I can go to the track every day then why would I go? There’s not enough exclusivity.
It’s as if Count Dracula not only sucked the life out of the tracks, but left them shells of their former selves, walking Un-Dead, nosferatu.
At least the off-seasons of the major sports leave some anticipation, a lag time when you have to think about the upcoming year. Horse racing seems like the over-anxious boyfriend doting over the hot chick. Buddy, she liked you but you wouldn’t leave her alone. There’s something to be said for playing hard to get.
My God! Why is egg nog so good? Because we can only drink Hood Golden (the only egg nog worth drinking, for all you Garelick or Southern Comfort people, just stop it. Stop it.) for 25 percent of the year it makes it special. Starbucks Egg Not Latte is the treat of treats. To quote the Steep and Cheap Web site (for all you campers and hikers, I highly endorse their products), “I think we only drink egg nog around the holidays because it would kill us if we drank it all year.” Horse racing seems to be drowning on horse racing.
What can the game do to reclaim a sense of experience? Isn’t the NFL a drama fix condensed into neatly packed three-hour pills? Though I think the college’s Bowl Championship Series would be better suited with a playoff system, it has made Week 1 at the end of August every bit as compelling as Week 11. Every week there’s anticipation and every week there is a payoff.
Let’s make every weekend, let’s say Saturday’s, like a major stakes day, bump up the admission, enforce some sort of a dress code and turn every weekend into an encapsulated Travers Day, Derby Day, Ascot, and, a shout-out to my friend Phil Schoenthal, who used to train Digger in 2007, the winner of the 2009 Grade 3 Gravesend, down in Bowie, Maryland, Maryland Millions Day.
Could this squeeze out some people? Yes, and I hope so. Because it is the exclusivity that makes something special, that brews anticipation. The NFL Network steals a few games away from the general public and it infuriates fans, but you still tune in every week. You’re still talking about the NFL.
Your very own John Pricci wrote that a dress code at the track would add to the overall experience, a throwback to the days when the track was a place to see and be seen. When I go, granted under different parameters than most, I’m in a suit and I don’t necessarily want to be brushing shoulders with the meatball in a Queen tank top sloshing around his eighth Coors Light by the time Thursday’s weekly steeplechase race goes off.
Run the claiming races as simulcast-only during the week so trainers can swap horses and keep their strings afloat, but turn it over on the weekend to a card with a continuous loop of stakes, change $15 to get in (children under 12 get in free!), men where pants, a blazer, (and please, leave the mustache in your bathroom’s S-pipe), women, well, use your imagination (have we ever had to really worry about you?) Men, grab a fedora too, a very underrated look. If you’re dressed to the nine, imagine it like the Italian custom of the passeggiata, where the men essentially dress above their means and parade themselves in the town’s square to impress the women hanging outside their windows.
By turning the track into an experience instead of a wasted piece of property, it will be special again, the place to be, a nip of nog at the perfect time.
As always I encourage comments, but if you shy away from public participation and want to voice an opinion, feel free to e-mail me at .


09 Jan 2010 at 10:26 am | #
Brendan: I know exactly where John’s coming with his dress code idea. When I was a kid, I became interested in the track because it was an exotic place. There were people of all types, a way to behave, a language you spoke - an escape from reality. Racing went wrong when it tried to make the sport just the same as other entertainments. Differences are what separate products from each other, not similarities.
As for the Saturday idea, you fell short of explaining that, with some cooperation, the afternoon could become a televised extravaganza of stakes races from noon to dusk from tracks all across the USA. An enterprising operator would turn the racetrack into a never-before-seen video experience, flipping the emphasis on these days from live racing to telecasted racing.
Alas, the industry lacks vision and, also, restraint. Fun for us to be sharing these ideas. But science fiction doesn’t sell to the extent history does. Good ideas in your article.
09 Jan 2010 at 11:54 am | #
B,
It’d encourag8ng to me that intelligent young people understand the importance of, what I’d call, and hinted at by Vic also, specialized exclusivity.
I’m afraid that less is more is ultimately the way our economy is going to recover in the long term, hoping in time for people your age to have a family of their own.
The same goes for racing, although how this might be accomplished is in the formative stages.
Well reasoned piece, and I have a great Egg Nog recipe--I’m a rum person, so call me!
JRP
09 Jan 2010 at 05:52 pm | #
Mr. O’Meara: Quoting you, “Horse racing has to much product ....”, “If I can go to the track every day why would I go?”; “Every other sport takes a break;” “It is exclusivity that makes something special.”
First of all, Thoroughbred racing is not a sport, though you turf writers won’t agree; the fact that no one would go to a racetrack if there were no ability to gamble escapes you and your fellow turf writers.
Now, it would be nice if you could tell me just what is the difference between a claiming race at Philly Park and a stake race at Saratoga; there is absolutely no different to the human eye, yet you turf writers see a difference. Inform me please, just what is the difference?
Since I, and everyone else in attendance at a racetrack, am there to gamble is my chance of cashing a ticket better when wagering on stake race?
So, you want to reduce racing to, say, the weekends. What will I do during the week? What will thousands of other bettors do? And come the weekend, what will we have? Two days of racing, with the ‘Big Eight’ trainers more dominant than ever, virtually shutting out 95% of all trainers coast to coast. Reducing racing will certainly achieve one thing: it will allow casino gambling to pull further ahead of racing for the gambling dollar.
As I asked Mr. Zast last week, when have you made a wager on a horse?
The idea of having less racing is ridiculous, and such an idea can only come from people who couldn’t backwheel a double if you gave them a half hour.
Play it again Sam: The future of Thoroughbred racing is in promoting it as a gambling option to casino gambling. Unfortunately, all of us this year are going to read commentary from turf writers that follow precisely the format of prior years, while racing continues to tank for its inability to promote itself for what its only attraction is: the betting window.
Mr. O’Meara, will you or someone else please tell me precisely just what is the difference between a claiming race and a stake race?
10 Jan 2010 at 09:55 am | #
Mr. Corrow,
A Diamond is a girl’s best friend. Think about it! That is the difference between a claiming race and stake race.
eric s.
10 Jan 2010 at 10:40 am | #
let me understand...you want exclusivety, versus inclusivety! God speed, but I guess they need two sides on the Harvard debate team. I see no long term solution to limiting your base. The people that support this sport are not the DuPonts, whitneys,Galbraiths etc. It is the Joe six pack that without their $2, the sport would be no more. Why do you think the NCAA basketball tournament is so succesful...because people like to watch teens run around putting a ball ina hoop?!...gambling...hello!
10 Jan 2010 at 11:08 am | #
Eric: If all horse races look the same, meaning that a bunch of thoroughbreds run a round a racetrack, and you are unable to ascertain how fast they are going using the human eye, are unable in a post parade to determine what horse is 3 or 7 years old, unable to ascertain which horse in the post parade is supposedly classier, then how can you determine which race is a claimer or a stake race; that is without relying on a timer, past performances, and turf writer commentary.
Sure, a stake races should be run faster, but how is that relevant?
There is no difference period! A day at the races at Delaware Park or Philly Park is absolutely no different from a wagering viewpoint than a day spent at Saratoga; I wish turf writers would convey this point to the public.
10 Jan 2010 at 02:46 pm | #
Mr. Corrow,
No offense, but you didn’t think about it enough! Diamonds have no intrinsic value beyond our attachment of preciousness to them. Second, as an example, when Arazi made his move in the BC juvenile and demolished the field, he didn’t look like any other racehorse to me. When Secretariat won the Belmont by 31 lengths, there was something beyond the ordinary wednesday feature to me. When Easy Goer and Sunday Silence dueled down the stretch at the preakness (in front of my own eyes), wasn’t anything like the day before when two $5K claimers finished noses apart. I can go on and on…
eric s.
10 Jan 2010 at 06:38 pm | #
Eric: In your immediate comment above you give examples of media hyped stake horses: Arazi, Secretariat, Easy Goer, and Sunday Silence; thus, IMO, you are soaking up what turf writers deliver, which ignores the wonderful horses in the claiming ranks.
I had a palpitating experience today at Philly Park when the claimer Kansas Kitty, ridden by Jose Vega, lost ground on the turn then surged very late to miss by inches costing me the pick three; a race as thrilling as any race I have ever watched.
Wouldn’t it be nice if all turf writers, coast to coast, were to suggest to their readers that going to the races at any racetrack is simply an enjoyable experience; that all racetracks offer races that offer excitement, thrills, and wagering opportunities superior to anything found sitting in front of a slot machine.
As to your placing the Easy Goer - Sunday Silence duel down the stretch as more exciting than the virtual deadheat of a couple of claimers is, again IMO, an example of you being programmed by turf writer commentary; both races had to be extremely exciting, especially if you had wagered on them.
11 Jan 2010 at 06:13 am | #
Congratulations Brendan,
You are now the recipient of Wendell’s shop worn cliche’s and ideas. You have arrived on HRI!
14 Jan 2010 at 08:18 pm | #
Brendan, Glad to see you on HRI. Been a fan of your writing, good luck on the new book.
As for the dress code, good conversation to have .. with a groan to our climate. Things this year fell apart in the rain, hypothermia temps and mud on Travers Day. Slicks, mud boots and soggy blankets looked good. It’s all about perspective.
The concept of racing as a festival atmosphere keeps coming up. People can gamble from home, at simulcast or from a phone or blackberry. Going to the track can also serve as a family, social, community event.
It’s not gamblers vs fans, as some posters seem to imply, when you see so many well dressed folks at the IRS windows. I think there’s room in the game - and need - for a variety of different audiences. We see their presence on these sites, with a deep history of involvement with the horses and the game.
Agree with wmcorrow - I have not been back to a casino type situation since discovering the immense fun - and challenge - of wagering, even at my humble level, at the races.
I think many folks are naturally thrilled watching an incredible stretch duel - stakes horses or more humble - without a ticket in their hand, but when one of your horses comes in, it’s unbelievable.
23 Jan 2010 at 10:50 am | #
Horse Racing is a sport. It is called the Sport of Kings. Yes it has gambling just like any sport but to me you get double the fun at the races. The sport of watching the horses run and gambling or wagering.
As far as the Turf Writers shoving Stakes races down are throat is ridiculous. Claimers are the bread and butter of racing but what helps attract people to the track. A good Stakes race. That is why I go alot of the time. It is like watching any top player of any sport. You go mainly to watch them play. Its that simple. Some of the above posts are waaay to complicated and over the top.