John Pricci executive editor John Pricci has over three decades of experience as a thoroughbred racing public handicapper and was an award-winning journalist while at New York Newsday for 18 years.

John has covered 14 Kentucky Derbies and Preaknesses, all but three Breeders' Cups since its inception in 1984, and has seen all but two Belmont Stakes live since 1969.

Currently John is a contributing racing writer to, an analyst on the Capital Off-Track Betting television network, and co-hosts numerous handicapping seminars. He resides in Saratoga Springs, New York.

Most recent entries

Monthly Archives


Sunday, September 20, 2015

Confessions of a Big Race Junkie

HALLANDALE BEACH, FL., September 20, 2015—Hello, my name is John and I bet on the horses at Parx Racing yesterday. This is because I suffer from a common affliction, Stakes Race Syndrome, so it wasn’t entirely my fault.

Due to a promotional agreement with 123GAMING, part of my professional task for Saturday was to handicap the final six races from Parx, which was posted on the website.

And I was anxious to do the work. There were two million-dollar races on the program. One featured Frosted, the Grade 1 Wood Memorial winner and Travers third, who was the early line favorite for the Grade 2 Pennsylvania Derby.

The other million-dollar pot, the Grade 1 Cotillion, featuring Embellish the Lace, winner of the storied, Grade 1 Alabama and its runner-up, I’m a Chatterbox.

And the Grade 3 Gallant Bob sprint at 6 furlongs is always a great betting race. So I went all in.

Having already handicapped the last six races, including an All-Stakes Pick 4, I looked at the first five races on the card Friday evening. The second race featured a horse on my Saratoga Watch list, the Graham Motion-trained My Senses. I was pumped, ready for the big day.

Parx is a track I don’t usually play, except's unique Pick 6 wager when I'm obligated to handicap the last six races, routinely every Sunday. But we chose Saturday this week for an obvious reason:

National interest would be high for the Pennylvania Derby program, which is not usually the case when Parx has to go up against the big boys of the simulcast world. Indeed, they don't normally attract simulcast handle of $5.5 million as they did yesterday.

I’m not a Pick Six player, except for this unique pool. For one thing, there’s always a winner. In fact, there are prizes for the top three finishers and if you wind up on the leader-board you even get your $2 back.

You don’t have to pick six winners either, and only have to beat the competition you're up against that day. The player accruing the biggest dollar return, converted into points, wins. The score consists of adding up the dollars win in each race:

If your race winner pays $5.00, 4.00 and 3.00 across the board, you earn 12 points. If your pick finishes second, and pays $10.00 to place and 5.00 show, that’s worth 15 points, etc., etc.

I didn’t win the 123 Pick 6 yesterday but the day started well enough when My Senses, perfectly ridden by Johnny, won at a very square $8.60. I could now afford to rough it up a little throughout the day and the Pick 4 appeared very winnable.

I decided I would go against the usurious 26% takeout on this occasion; I simply can’t help myself when it comes to betting on the best horses, trainers and jockeys available.

I used five horses in the wide open, newly created Bayern Stakes, an overnight event run under allowance conditions. (We think it’s cool that next year’s event will be named for the 2015 Pennsylvania Derby winner; at last, a new tradition with symmetry.

And did Kelly Breen ever have Encryption ready for his first start since June 13, shipping in from his Monmouth Park base with a series of bullet works and Paco along for the ride.

That’s just the way it looked, too, when, reaching the far turn in an attending position, Lopez looked around disdainfully, peering over both shoulders for competition that never came.

Encryption was expected to win, bet down early and often from his 10-1 early line and he won in full stride, making 3-1 look like a bargain. But he would better value than that in the Pick 4 pool; a very good start, indeed.

I was alive to four horses in the second leg, the Grade 3 Gallant Bob. Big mistake; it was a seven-horse field and I should have bought the entire race or at least one more, vastly improved runner.

I watched in dread as Trouble Kid came up with a SUPER performance for his SUPER trainer, Ramon Preciado, ridden by one of his go-to guys, the talented Joshua Navarro.

Trouble Kid was claimed out of a $15,000 claimer by Preciado on July 5, a race in which he showed improved early speed to finish second.

Twenty days later, Preciado ran him back in a $25K maiden sprint, removed the front bandages and Trouble Kid responded with a 16-length victory, improving his BRIS figure 14 points, his Thoro-Graph figure 11 points, and our own Energy Ratings by 16 points.

Thirty-two days after that, Preciado sharpened him by sending the gelding to Delaware, cutting him back to 5-1/2 furlongs. This time he only won by 9 lengths.

But it was another 5-point BRIS improvement, a 2-point Thoro-Graph improvement (running a 0) and he improved his Energy Rating by another 6 points.

Still, how could he beat Limousine Liberal, 2-for-2 at the distance and recently second in Saratoga's Grade 1 Kings Bishop? Trainer Ben Colebrook blew him out a bullet half-mile at Keeneland for the race, his fourth lifetime start.

Trouble Kid hung on by a neck over Limousine Liberal after posting fractions of 21.32 and 44.31. Of the other three horses I used, Grand Bili never picked up his feet and Bayerd, like the winner, 13-1, rallied up a dead inside to finish third by a half-length.

Preciado is not infallible, of course. He went only1-for-7 on the day, although he did win the 4th with Beach Nut and was disqualified. But his performance did hurt the stats, however.

As of Wednesday, Preciado was winning at a SUPER 32% rate with an across-the-board slate of (319) 102-67-36.

But make no mistake; the losing Pick 4 investment is on me and not on the greatest trainer in Pennsylvania (sorry Jonathan).

If I’m a Chatterbox is not the leader of the topsy-turvy three-year-old filly division then I don’t know who is. She took the G1 Cotillion by a drawing-away two lengths beneath the white hot Florent Geroux.

The Cotillion was the filly’s first Grade 1, although she did finish first but placed second in the Coaching Club Oaks, somewhat controversially, was second in the Alabama, also winning a Grade 3 and Grade 2 at the Fair Grounds last winter. Embellish the Lace was dull but did race on the slower inside throughout.

Frosted was sensational taking the Pennsylvania Derby. Joel Rosario knew what was happening, saving ground, but away from the rail. When he went on the attack of Iron Fist, a much better horse than I thought, he unleashed a final eighth in 11.97, stopping the timer in 1:50, winning in full stride powerfully.

Good for the horse; good for trainer Kiaran McLaughlin. Next stop, Lexington.

Next week, we’ll be in action at Belmont Park, where the takeout rates are much friendlier, and where four Grade 1s, highlighted by the Joe Hirsch Turf Classic and Flower Bowl, and the Grade 3 Pilgrim for juvenile turf runners, will be featured.

If I can stay awake, I probably will take a shot at Santa Anita, where takeout rates are good in the straight pools, not so much in the multiples (Pick 5 notwithstanding), and where four more Grade 1s and a Grade 2 will be contested.

Two things, though: I just hope Preciado doesn’t run Trouble Kid back in the Vosburgh, and next time I won’t be as obtuse in my approach to the Pick 4.

Written by John Pricci

Comments (2)


Sunday, July 19, 2015

Twas’ the Week Before Saratoga

HALLANDALE BEACH, FL., July 19, 2015—With the exception of the amazing program on display on Meadowlands Pace night Saturday, everything I observed in the afternoon drew me the realization that Saratoga Race Course opens five days hence.

If that wasn’t a precursor yesterday, surely it would have been this morning when a NYRA press release in my inbox included possible runners expected for next weekend’s stakes: comprised of Friday’s Lake George for 3-year-old turf fillies and the traditional Schuylerville for the baby girls.

On Saturday, the colts get their chance in the Sanford, turf fillies and mares meet in the Grade 1 Diana while the following day 3-year-old fillies clash in the G1 Coaching Club American Oaks, opening week concluding with the Lucky Coin for turf sprinters.

Talk about front-end loading at the Spa: It’s almost enough to make fans forget about Chris Kay and the six missing trees.

A look through a pre-Spa notebook including Belmont final Saturday highlights:

Two Year Old Star on the Horizon

His name is Manipulated and he was bred in New York about a 40-minute drive north of Saratoga at the nursery of Chester and Mary Broman in Chestertown on Friends Lake Road.

If that name has a familiar ring, it should. Back in the pre-Funny Cide days, Friends Lake won the Florida Derby beneath Richard Migliore, giving the Bromans their first Grade 1 winner, the latest being the fleet filly Artemis Argotera.

The program is now world class, winning open stakes with some regularity. They bred the winner of 11 races at Saratoga last year, 62 in all, a sensational meet for any breeder. We thought it good enough to earn them our Eclipse Award vote--for all the good it did them.

As for the colt, he was buffeted about at the start, settled professionally once gathered up by Luis Saez (riding triple), got closer at the five-eighths pole, made a smooth a strong 3-wide rally at mid-turn, gained command in midstretch and lengthened his stride fully, shading 25 seconds for the final quarter-mile.

Did we mention he won by open lengths at even money and that his racing debut came in the Rockville Centre Stakes for state-breds at six furlongs? Where will he run next? Whenever that is, it likely will be in Saratoga, possibly in open company. He certainly has the tools.

For Sciacca, a Great Second Act

It’s extremely doubtful that when Gary Sciacca wakes up in the morning and looks in the mirror, it’s not Bill Mott who’s staring back at him.

In fact, no one has ever confused the two trainers but as far as Saratoga Snacks is concerned, the man who has the gelded 6-year-old’s hole card has, well, his whole card.

Despite a first act that included excellent results in stakes company, the owners apparently weren’t satisfied and made a barn change to Mott. The Hall of Famer went 0-for-5 with the gelding and at the end of 2014 got him back, this time as the owner trainer.

After a 2-1/2 month break, Saratoga Snacks was back in the winners circle going two turns on Aqueduct’s inner track, followed by a showing at seven-eighths on the main track before finishing a good third in the Commentary Stakes at Belmont in May.

Craftily ridden by Johnny Velazquez, Saratoga Snacks gamely repelled the surging Empire Dreams, who had taken a short lead in midstretch, surging forward again to win the mile and one sixteenth Saginaw Stakes.

This result provides another angle for handicappers to consider: Horses for Trainers. For good measure, Sciacca saddled seventh race winner Police Camp, under a well-timed finish from Angel Arroyo.

Good job all around; hooray for the little guys!

Lasix Free Juveniles as Business Keeps Booming at Gulfstream

With a year-round racing schedule finally in place, Gulfstream Park continues to offer a product that remains popular with simulcast bettors.

From the start of its summer meet, July business is up a half-million dollars per day year over year.

The barn area is full, whatever stalls remain at Calder are maxed out and there are over 200 horses sheltered at the Palm Meadows training facility. With that, field size has increased from approximately 7.8 horses per race to just over 8.2.

The product might not quite be up to “world class” standards, but the operation continues to defy national trends that shows overall handle to be flat when it’s not down slightly.

While at first, Lasix-free juvenile racing seems almost a hollow gesture, the experiment is worth exploring, especially given the reticence horsemen display just at the suggestion that regulators would take their raceday Lasix away.

Trainers supported the over-subscribed maiden 4-1/2 furlongs for fillies drawing 23 entrants. The races were split and after one scratch yielded fields of 10 and 12, respectively, in the sixth and eighth races.

Only five of the 22 starters had ever raced, one of which was coming off Lasix, and despite the “first-timer factor,” the races attracted all-sources handle of $411,330 and $449,694.

By way of comparison, the featured 10-filly Bougainvillea Handicap for older turf sprinters handled a mere $328,337. Interestingly, the maiden fillies raced for a $65,000 purse while the overnight event carried a purse of $60,000.

We’d expect to see a lot more of these events carded by the racing office, with or without the same purse structure.

It what be interesting to see will happen when these fillies are entered back as either first-Lasix maidens or trainers wanting a little extra oomph in the tank for an upcoming stakes engagement.

Ralph Nicks was the training star of the juvenile afternoon. The well-backed Dancie (D’Wildcat) and Kandoo (Kantharos) both won off by daylight, one just as impressive as the other—although Kandoo was a couple of ticks faster. Hicks entered three, and in the eighth completed his own exacta.

Who does the former long-time Mott assistant think he is, Gary Sciacca?


While some of the hit is attributable to events beyond its control, like yesterday’s deluge and lightning storm that set a palm tree lining the backstretch on fire, ole Del Mar has gotten off to a rocky beginning.

The storm accounted for late scratches in the double digits and three turf races were rescheduled to the main track. With one less race than a comparable Saturday in 2014, handle was down $4.6 million at $9.4 million for the day. Yesterday’s handle was $3.7 down from 2013’s 10-race program, according to researcher Roger Newell.

Hurt by a lack of a big Pick 6 carryover present in 2014, accounting for a healthy percentage of this year’s decrease, business is down just under $4.9 million year over year.

Wonder what’s in store for the Spa? I expect there will be an increase the first weekend--if season pass-holders might be included in 2015 attendance figures starting opening day.

Written by John Pricci

Comments (6)


Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Del Mar-Spa Takeout Study Very Revealing

The following is re-printed verbatim from a post by Jeff Platt, President of the Horseplayers Association of North America (HANA), that originally appeared on the Pace Advantage chat room site.

In it, Platt reveals the debilitating effect that higher takeout rates have on parimutuel handle. Platt compared handle figures from the 2014 Del Mar and Saratoga race meets and the data is compelling.

Every racetrack executive in America should study the following analysis for a clearer understanding of this issue. No doctorate in mathematics is required to consider the lessons to be learned herein.

By Jeff Platt

Last year, after the conclusion of the Del Mar and Saratoga meets, I ran the following handle analysis comparing Del Mar 2014 vs. Saratoga 2014 and submitted it to the CHRB.

The analysis shows a side by side handle comparison by wager type along with takeout rate for each wager.

Overall, Del Mar handled about 78% as much as Saratoga did.

On WPS wagers, where both tracks have approximate level takeout rates, Del Mar handled 82.76% as much as Saratoga did.

But on Exacta wagers, where Del Mar has a takeout rate of 22.86% and Saratoga has a takeout rate of 18.50%, Del Mar handled just 54.79% as much as Saratoga did.

I found that number stunning and upon learning that an open to the public CHRB Parimutuel Wagering Committee meeting was scheduled to be held at Los Al where the topic of discussion was whether or not the CHRB should consider undertaking a formal economic study of takeout rates and their effect on handle and revenue, made the drive up to Los Al and presented my analysis.






------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

WPS 357,191.42 431,591.93 0.8276 15.43 16.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

EXA 191,623.58 349,769.78 0.5479 22.68 18.50

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

QUIN 9,616.63 17,509.86 0.5492 22.68 18.50

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

DD 51,382.56 109,866.97 0.4677 20.00 18.50

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

TRI 128,401.10 200,302.83 0.6410 23.68 24.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

P3 90,587.11 96,380.09 0.9399 23.68 24.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

SUPER 90,214.33 104,983.19 0.8593 23.68 24.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

P4 309,936.53 428,709.63 0.7230 23.68 24.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

High5 54,307.78 -NA- -NA- 23.68 24.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

P5 542,446.00 334,177.73 1.6232 14.00 15.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

P6 363,049.75 165,065.08 2.1994 23.68 24.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

OTHER 24,337.28 35,594.83 0.6837 23.68 24.00

------ ------------ ------------ ------- ----- -----

FLDSIZE 8.78 7.97 1.1020



1. The above handle summary compares DMR 2014 against SAR 2014 and handle numbers are expressed as handle per race.

2. Column B lists average handle and field size per race for DMR 2014.

3. Column C lists average handle and field size per race for SAR 2014.

4. Column D lists DMR numbers expressed as a percentage of SAR numbers.

5. Column E lists a side by side comparison of takeout rates for DMR and SAR.

6. For WPS, Del Mar and Saratoga have approximate level takeout rates, Del Mar at 15.43% with Saratoga at 16.00 % with Saratoga using Nickel Breakage, DMR handled approx 83% as much as SAR did. (Use this as your baseline.)

7. For EXA, Del Mar handled just 55% as much as Saratoga did. This number is stunning when you consider the differential in takeout rates.

8. For DD, Del Mar handled just 47% as much as Saratoga did. This number is stunning when you consider the "logic" used to justify abandoning Santa Anita's 18% rolling double experiment where DD handle per race was up 24%.

9. I submitted the argument that had EXA takeout at DMR been 18.50% like SAR, EXA handle at DMR would have likely been in line with the WPS baseline of 82.76%.

I also submitted the argument that if this were true EXA handle for the DMR 2014 meet could be estimated as follows:


or (EST DMR EXA HANDLE PER RACE) = (349,769.78) x (0.8276)

or (EST DMR EXA HANDLE PER RACE) = 289,469.47

10. Based on handle projections assuming an 18.5% takeout rate, I submitted the further argument that revenue on Exacta wagers for the DMR 2014 meet could be estimated as follows:

(Revenue Per Race on EST DMR EXA HANDLE PER RACE) = (289,469.47) x (0.185)

or (Revenue Per Race on EST DMR EXA HANDLE PER RACE) = 53,551.85

11. (Revenue Per Race on ACTUAL DMR EXA HANDLE PER RACE) = (191,623.58) x (0.2268)

or (Revenue Per Race on ACTUAL DMR EXA HANDLE PER RACE) = 43,460.23

12. I also submitted the argument that as a result of their 22.68% exacta takeout rate, Del Mar experienced a REVENUE SHORTFALL for Exactas of just over $10k per race calculated as follows:

= 10,091.62

(or 53,551.62 - 43,460.23)

13. I also submitted the argument that as a result of their 22.68% exacta takeout rate, Del Mar experienced an Exacta REVENUE SHORTFALL for their 2014 MEET of approximately $3.279 MILLION calculated as follows:


(or 10,091.62 x 325 exacta races)

14. The numbers suggest 22.68% takeout on 2 horse bets is costing California Racing millions of dollars per year in lost purse money and track revenue.

15. The numbers suggest 22.68% takeout on 2 horse bets has negatively impacted funding for alpha-bet groups such as the CHRB, TOC, CTT, CARMA, Disabled Jockeys Fund, etc.

The CHRB Commissioners treated me politely - as did track management and representatives of the TOC - But I found it interesting that I was the only one attending who took the podium and spoke in favor of the meeting agenda item: Whether or not the CHRB should consider undertaking an economic study on takeout rates and their effect on handle and revenue.

I also found it interesting that many members of track management in Cali racing, management at brick and mortar OTBs, representatives from the TOC, and Labor Unions also took the podium - and all who spoke publicly bemoaned declines in revenue, layoffs, and cutbacks in hours for parimutuel clerks over the past few years (following the takeout increase they insisted on implementing Jan 01, 2011) but NONE of them spoke up in favor of the agenda item: Whether or not the CHRB should consider undertaking an economic study on takeout rates and their effect on handle and revenue. And many from track management and the President of the TOC voiced opposition to even the idea of an economic study of takeout and revenue.

Speaking honestly, I'm far from convinced track management at any California track "gets it" at all.

Written by John Pricci

Comments (2)


Page 2 of 287 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »