The less said about the IRS the better, but figuring the correct way to conduct Thoroughbred Hall of Fame voting is apparently above my pay grade as well.
Since I’ve been voting, decades, several methods were tried and each failed to pass muster for one reason or another. Then why should agreement on the Hall of Fame voting process be different from any other issue facing this industry; 10 people, 10 opinions.
I understand the present system which is inclusionary, not exclusionary. Ten names are proffered, both humans and beasts. Voters are required to vote yes for any, all, or none of the candidates. The four highest vote getters are inducted. In the event of ties, both make the cut.
Like all the other methods, this one, too, is flawed, that’s if, say, four horses make it to the exclusion of any jockeys or trainers. A look at this year’s nominees suggests there is at least one worthy inclusion in each category.
It seems to me that, in years when candidates are all truly viable, at least one horse, trainer, and jockey should represent each category. But that’s just me; an apples to apples thing.
My problem is that if I choose one jockey as being the most worthy, when I believe that two are deserving of the honor, it seems that if I voted for both I’d be penalizing my top choice because the second choice is rated as equal to the first. See the dilemma.
This year’s nominated horses are Ashado, Ghostzapper, Housebuster and Xtra Heat.
The trainers are Roger Attfield and Robert Wheeler.
The riders are a virtual who’s who: Calvin Borel, Garrett Gomez, Alex Solis and John Velazquez.
Now, please, remember, we’re splitting hairs here, so some of our decisions will appear arbitrary. But that’s only because they are. None of above nominees would embarrass the Hall but, like any handicapping practitioner, I have opinions:
I did not vote Yes on Ashado, Ghostbuster and Alex Solis. I know, I know…what the hell is wrong with me?
For Ashado, I’ll blame the system. I’m a big fan Housebuster and Xtra Heat and, for me, a vote for Ashado or Ghostbuster cancels out my support for Housebuster and Xtra Heat.
Ashado compiled a lifetime slate of (21) 12-4-3, seven of those 12 victories Grade 1, with earnings of nearly $4 million. She will gain entry, probably this year but, for me, not at the expense of the old-schoolers.
Ghostzapper is one of the most brilliant horses I’ve ever seen. He was a dominant winner of nine races, four of them Grade 1. But 11 career races is just not enough of a body of work.
Housebuster, meanwhile, brings a (22) 15-3-1 record to the dance and in 1990 had one of the most productive 3-year-old seasons of the modern era, going 9-for-11 with eight graded wins, one of those defeats a neck loss while splitting older rivals, eventual Horse of the Year Criminal Type and Easy Goer, in the famed Met Mile.
Xtra Heat was a remarkably tough sprinting filly, compiling a (35) 26-5-2 lifetime mark, almost unheard of in this Millennium. She faced males on five occasions, winning only the oldest race in America, Keeneland’s Phoenix Stakes, and was third in Dubai’s G1 Golden Shaheen and G1 DeFrancis Dash and was second in Squirtle Squirt’s 2001 Breeders’ Cup Sprint.
To me, Calvin Borel, Garrett Gomez and John Velazquez are first ballot Hall of Famers which shows how wrong I can be since they were also on last year’s ballot. Generally, no one gives me grief about Gomez and Velazquez, but people regard Borel as a one-track wonder.
So, in that context, was Pat Day a one-track wonder, too, since both were so dominant at Churchill Downs? Sorry, whatever he does at any Churchill race meet is not the point. Nearly 5,000 career wins and three Kentucky Derbies ends the argument for me.
OK, name another rider--Angel Cordero Jr. and Manuel Ycaza notwithstanding—that might have been able to get Mine That Bird home? The aerial shot of that race alone belongs in the Hall of Fame. I voted for all three, not having seen enough of Alex Solis in his prime to have a comfortable opinion.
I’m tired of voting for Robert Wheeler, a California legend when Charlie Whittingham was still a pup. But I voted for him again, and I voted for Roger Attfield, too, a horseman who needs no introduction.
I fearlessly predict that the four highest vote getters this year will be Ashado, Attfield, Ghostzapper and Velazquez. It’s not like I haven’t been wrong before.


18 Apr 2012 at 05:39 am | #
JRP,
I feel your pain. Someday (in the next millennium?) the Hall of Fame will adopt a methodology more like the MLB HOF.
I cast one vote only. It was for Bob Wheeler. Partly for the reasons you suggest, partly because I’m getting grumpy in my old age and want our Hall of Fame to represent nothing but superior accomplishment with no ambiguity.
Call me crazy.
18 Apr 2012 at 08:53 am | #
Nick,
Do believe your attitude is shared by many, myself included. But if you recall, we tried the MLB methodology before and that didn’t work very well either. The answer, frankly, is above my pay grade.
Thanks for weighing in on this.
18 Apr 2012 at 09:04 am | #
“Ghostzapper is one of the most brilliant horses I’ve ever seen. He was a dominant winner of nine races, four of them Grade 1. But 11 career races is just not enough of a body of work.”
In this day and age, what do you feel constitutes an adequate body of work (number of races)? Keep in mind that Secretariat only raced 21 times.
Recall the Breeders’ Cup with him, and I’ve never been so sure that a horse was going to win, as I was that day, and as I recall he paid about 3 or 4 times what he should have.
TTT
18 Apr 2012 at 09:11 am | #
....and 9 of those were at the age of 2, and never ran past 3.
18 Apr 2012 at 11:08 am | #
T,
I guess Secretariat, citing that he never ran past 3, started the negative trend of early retirements
If you recall, he was syndicated for an unheard of $6 million back in the day. Your point is well taken vis a vis # of starts but Big Red ran in almost twice as many races, accomplished the most difficult task in American racing, the Triple Crown.
Then, too, there were those 31 lengths to consider.
18 Apr 2012 at 11:16 am | #
JRP,
It is above my pay grade as well, but of two things I am relatively sure.
1) The 75 percent threshold is too high for horse racing. Several thousands of horses race every year, but there are only slightly more than a 1000 MLB players each year. That fragments the vote too much.
2) If a percentage system is installed, the results should be made public each year, as it is in MLB.
Ted,
Only one time did Ghostzapper put two races together within a 3 week period.
As brilliant as he was he was never able to demonstrate a three-race cycle remotely approaching Secretariat’s Triple Crown. I’m sure you recall, but in case others don’t, let’s recap.
1) A track record in the Kentucky Derby, running each quarter faster than the previous, an astonishing accomplishment at 10 furlongs.
2) 2 weeks later, a sudden, last-to-first burst in the Preakness and another (unofficial) record, marred only by Pimlico’s faulty teletimer.
3) Three weeks later the Belmont Stakes and a record unlikely to be broken. The only embellishment worth adding to the race’s name and Big Red’s performance is to recall Chick Anderson, “He’s moving like a tremendous machine.”
You can make a case Ghostzapper might have approached Secretariat’s Preakness, but certainly neither of the other two.
18 Apr 2012 at 11:39 am | #
Nick, watched the movie Secretariat, again, the other day, and, again, it brought a tear to my eye. The greatest accomplishment in sport that I have ever witnessed. Loved the line in it, “that’s impossible,” which said it all. Guess the point I was trying to make, which I don’t always do so well, is that each situation is different, with each particular horse, and I’m all in favor of giving extremely wide latitude to those who are given a vote. Although, I think that stringent rules should be applied towards who gets to vote, and since am ignorant on that subject, your affiant sayeth nought. Thought Barbaro was the 3rd coming (Secretariat being the 2nd). I’ve never been to the Hall of Fame, and have decided to make it a point to go this summer. Happy voting.
TTT
18 Apr 2012 at 11:50 am | #
Another that comes to mind is Ruffian (11 races).
19 Apr 2012 at 01:45 pm | #
Mr. Kling: It has come to our attention that despite your protests, in fact, you’re a teenager & have been experiencing the joys & mishaps of Spring Break in Fort Lauderdale, for the past four years.
When you get back up north, wager on Union Rages in the Derby. That will pay for Spring Break in 2013.