ELMONT, NY, June 1, 2010--They will run an American classic on Saturday. Happy 142nd Anniversary, Belmont Stakes! The race might not have been an instant classic, even if at one time it pre-dated the Kentucky Derby and Preakness, but it is now.
The inaugural, incidentally, was run at Jerome Park, in 1867, but it didn’t arrive at its current home until 1905, following a stopover at Morris Park--in the Bronx of all places.
Even without the possibility of a Triple Crown winner, or seeing the Derby or Preakness winner, for that matter, Belmont Park will be
the place to be this Saturday because 12 furlongs makes this American classic unique.
Belmont Park has been called “the Longchamp of American racing,” as it was fashioned after that great venue in the burbs just outside Paris, so it’s more than appropriate that the race be run at the European classic distance of a mile and a half.
The Belmont will be one of four Grade 1 events, something you don’t often see this side of the Breeders’ Cup. With two Grade 2s to whet the appetite, it’s the kind of day that only New York can still pull off. That’s something, anyway.
Somewhere between 40,000 and 50,000 fans will show up on Long Island this weekend to see classic history made. Hell, that’s even bigger than the crowds they’ve been getting the last couple of Saturdays at Monmouth Park.
But I kid the current state of racing in New York which, sadly, is no laughing matter.
If it weren’t for the state coming up with a $25-million cash advance against future VLT commerce--after having defaulted on its terms of the franchise agreement with the New York Racing Association--major league racing in New York might have been suspended following Saturday’s 13th and final.
Even hallowed Saratoga was in serious trouble, but the emergency measure was passed and so, for now, all’s well that ends.
It is against this backdrop that the curtain will rise on this American original, but after the last car pulls out of the parking lot on Saturday reality will return with a thud, not a pleasant prospect these days at NYRA racetracks.
Before the association can go full bore into Spa mode, it will have to deal with some vexing issues. Beyond the construction of a VLT emporium at Aqueduct, for one thing, what will New York racing look like in 2011 and beyond?
For openers, how many racing dates will it request? It can take the easy way out and request the same number of dates, so as not to force Albany legislators to think and make a decision at the same time.
And let’s not ask the State Racing and Wagering Board to do too much heavy lifting, either. It took years just to allow trifecta wagering in races with coupled entries, as if horseplayers couldn’t be trusted to count to four.
Conducting superfecta wagering with entries must probably still be years away. The SRWB doesn’t give without getting in return. No quid; no pro quo.
The loan, meanwhile, is a very short term fix. The longer term VLT fix won’t pay dividends until mid-2011, at best. And then what? It already has been demonstrated that the edge VLTs provide has two sides. Will VLTs bring long term health? Mostly, that depends on who gets asked.
In the long term, New York racing never will rebound fully in its present construct. VLTs can kick in, New York City-OTB might make significant contributions again, but the continuance of year-round racing will kill any chance New York racing can again be an industry leader.
Given the status quo, inner track handle will continue eroding as world-class racehorses shift to Gulfstream Park and as Tampa Bay Downs continues to gain winter market share. Santa Anita, particularly with a return to dirt, and the Fair Grounds, provide far more attractive fare than anything available at wintry Aqueduct.
As foal crops continue to shrink nationally and in New York--which relies more and more on state-bred runners to fill its programs--offering a product people want to bet on will be New York’s greatest challenge.
The spring and fall meets at Aqueduct are more representative of what New York racing can and should be; Belmont and Saratoga speak for themselves. But the NYRA no longer can allow its winter-track tail to wag this puppy. And now, at least, New York's "winter trainers" have a viable alternative; slots-infused Philadelphia Park.
While it may not be fair to compare the last two weekends in Elmont to the last two in Eatontown, New Jersey, comparisons are inevitable. To date, Monmouth Park has averaged about 9.5 horses per race, compared to New York’s 7.5.
The reason Monmouth Park can offer more to horsemen is because they offer less. They sink all available purse monies into fewer races. At once, the less-is-more model has manufactured excitement and provided a sense of anticipation, as opposed to the same-old, same-old.
As a simulcast player recently compelled to take advantage of living-room punting, more than ever I bet my money where racing is the most interesting, turf racing plentiful, takeouts lower, and where fractional wagering is available.
When it comes to today’s modern customer, I’m the rule, not the exception. I no longer need any one track; I create my own daily wagering menu.
The only major competitive advantage New York has in today’s simulcast market is pool size, where late odds fluctuations are at a minimum. But as the New York product becomes less desirable, even in prime time, that handle will be churned elsewhere.
When racinos didn’t exist in the early days of off-track betting, it made sense for New York to race in winter. Competition was virtually non-existent. For serious players, the point of purchase was still the racetrack. Fields were competitive because winter was the time for journeymen trainers to make their year.
That’s not the case anymore. The biggest outfits still follow the sun, only now they leave behind sizable divisions. The little guy is no better off in January as he is in June.
Eventually, New York will have VLTs to prop up racing year-round, but the quality of the competition will not improve significantly as long as the breeding industry continues to contract.
New York racing’s leaders rightfully can point to the legislature's nine-year failure to designate a racino operator. That’s recent history, not the variety that will be celebrated Saturday at Belmont.
To continue making that kind of history, New York’s future will depend on whether its custodians decide it’s time to stop doing the same things in the same way, expecting a different result.
02 Jun 2010 at 01:50 am | #
John,
<Somewhere between 40,000 and 50,000 fans will show up on Long Island this weekend to see classic history made.>
Aside from one of most thoughtful columns you have recently written your claim of attendance figures for the Belmont are probably off by 50%, unless NYRA plays with the figures.There are currently over 4,000 tickets available at fansnap.com.
There will be high caliber entries throughout the card but there is nothing in the feature to attract large numbers.
I believe that the Saratoga meet is going to be very disappointing as the caliber of stock will be chasing purses elsewhere and the public outrage directed towards NYRA, and it’s recent loan, will keep the curious fan away.
What needs to happen with racing in New York and throughout the country for that matter, is a total washout of weak hands. That includes plants, owners, trainers and stock. This travesty has gone on for far too long and the story is getting old.
There are die hard NYRA supporters who are eager to criticize what is happening down at Monmouth but I give them credit for trying to make changes.Perhaps they will need to recalibrate the purse structure but as we all know the 10000 mile journey begins with the first step.
Having said that, we are planning our first trip ever to Monmouth this week end and look forward to exciting racing that was on display over the week end. Man that was good stuff!!
02 Jun 2010 at 03:50 am | #
Where to begin, Tim? The attendance guesstimate was based on previous attendance from non TC years. Perhaps you are right, but I’ll take over 40,000 for $1. If you come to Saratoga, we can settle up there.
I, too, am concerned about the quality of racing this year in Saratoga and while purse levels across the board will be lower, they are not that far apart. Besides, the one advantage Saratoga has is, well, it’s Saratoga. Horsemen will always want to win there.
Also, don’t see where the public is angry with NYRA, per se, and its loan--which is no loan at all. NYRA deservedly has its share of critics but in the scenario above, they are the victims.
I also believe that racing must contract before it can grow again and applaud what Monmouth is attempting to accomplish: Taking pro-action to save the industry in New Jersey. They deserve support and I have practiced what I’m preaching. I am, however, 0-4 in the 50-Cent Pick 5.
And, speaking of support, I hope you enjoy your weekend at the races. But you sound like a good racing fan. Shouldn’t that support go to Belmont Park this weekend, especially if the attendance will be as low as you project?
I’ll say this. From a quality perspective, Saturday’s Belmont program has a chance to be the Card of the Year. All entries will be drawn today.
Thanks for commenting.
JP
02 Jun 2010 at 04:25 am | #
First:
Those 4,000 available tickets are resales. They are not available direct from NYRA, since they were already sold by NYRA.
The major source of the tickets are from scalpers who gambled on making money if there was a chance for a Triple Crown. That is why they are available below face value and/or at face value right now. Wait until Friday, they will be going for 25% of face value. Happens every year. In addition travel agencies, hotels, ticket brokers, one day fans, get a hold of blocks of tickets. When no Triple Crown is in sight, they also become available.
One thing by Saturday morning there are never any left. All of these extra resales are resold at a loss to the first buyer, but for a gain to the second buyer. Like horse racing, some gamble and loose, some gamble and win.
As far as NYRA’s numbers are concerned, those are sold tickets. There is no fudging the numbers of attendance. Every year, whatever the weather conditions, with no Triple Crown Prospect, The Belmont Stakes always has a crowd of 40,000 to 60,000. The local town newspapers, the local town governments, and the local people always strongly support this day and the attendance reflects that support. If it could only be 365 days a year!
Second:
Monmouth is doing good, I’m happy. Just proves there is room in the North East for more then one great track. Yet, compare the numbers, purse vs handle; average amount wagered per fan; New York is not getting knocked out of the box, not by a long shot. Compare the money from any aspect, New York does beat Monmouth each and every day they go head to head. But both are doing good, and that is very good for all of racing.
Third:
The money NYRA received may have been classified as a loan for political accounting methods, and/or to cover the political a-- (donkey), but I reject the term loan. I could go on, but just let me say if the elected sheep in N.Y. were people whose word could be trusted, NYRA would have the money it is legally owed. There would be no need for the politicians smoke and mirrors to make them look good at NYRA’s expense.
02 Jun 2010 at 06:52 am | #
Give him credit for what’s happening now, but also remember, Mr. Dennis Drazin for years FOUGHT AGAINST doing what Monmouth has done this year.
An interesting development: Monmouth Park’s been gentrified.
We saw this happen in SOHO in NYC; when the real estate prices soared, the loft artists had to decamp for the then-still-cheap Brooklyn.
Now we have trainers at MP with the lesser horses on forced marches to low-rent purses at Belmont, in unwillingly reaction to the big barns at Belmont shipping to MP for the recently inflated rewards.
Soon, Belmont’s going to look like “NOHO’ (No Horses).
And when it folds, many of the horses stabled there will be shipped upstate, to The New Brooklyn (Finger Lakes).
What would be nice is Monmouth taking some of their profits and cleaning up their track, which looks like a World War I dowager reduced to taking in laundry in order to survive.
Whether or not they can accomplish this without destroying MP’s charm is debatable; remember when we all thought oceanic oil exploration, drilling and pumping was manageable?
(Ah, the good old days…April 19th…)
A salute to the effervescently courageous Richard Migliore, who retired yesterday.
He was one of the bravest of the brave. He’s also one of the smartest of the smarts, and if the racing media has no future use for him, its collective indifference will define their incompetence.
02 Jun 2010 at 08:21 am | #
A point or two to augment your introspective article....Presently State bred races are carrying NYRA to the tune of 38% of the races and 40% of the runners. N.Y. Bred races have a field size of 8 per race while the open races are just a tick over 7.
As I have pointed out previously, horses just do not ship to NYRA (from 1,400 in ‘05 down to 600 last year and continuning downward)because of it’s very unfriendly policies towards shippers. (Detention barn, overbearing, discourteous security personnel, Racing & Wagering Board interference, etc.)
N.J. conversely makes it a very enjoyable experience and as you pointed out by offering less they are actually offering more which entices both horsemen and horse players to return.
BTW i’ll take the “under 40” for a buck. “Freddie the Clocker” can hold the pool!!
02 Jun 2010 at 09:12 am | #
“Because of its very unfriendly policies towards shippers…overbearing, discourteous security personnel…”
Well said. Pencil a six-month detention barn experience for the security personnel - the time estimated to be necessary to get the point across that their behavior is one good reason why NYRA facilities are becoming Ghost Towns.
Speaking of which, I’ve noticed for the first time, and agree with, the below warning about personal attacks, etc.
That it is even necessary to post the warning: How’s that for a cringe-inducing barometer of racing’s fatal internal temperature, & temperament?
02 Jun 2010 at 11:04 am | #
Mr. Pricci: Can you agree with me that just about everyone who goes to a racetrack goes there to gamble. I am sure the answer is yes. Thus, I need for you to tell me just what is a ‘world-class horse’ and what is a ‘quality ‘ race?
Neither you, you fellow turf writers, or commentators seem to realize that 1) all races are basically the same; 2) neither a claiming race or a stake race has an edge over the other as to handicapping, picking the winner, and cashing.
But what blows my mind is the total disregard that you and your fellow turf writers fail to even consider is the question: at what cost? Belmont day will be a total financial disaster, as there is no way that handle and signal fees will cover the purses.
I would be most excited if the Belmont Stakes were any different than any race at Philadelphia or Finger Lakes, but the race will be no different;
As to Monmouth Park’s ridiculous purse structure for this revamed meet, it is and will be a financial disaster.
So, please tell me why my chances of picking the winner of the Belmont Stakes is easier than picking the winner of a race at Finger Lakes, when all horses have started at least thirty times already? And, tell me just how, if you were to watch a race at Finger Lakes, the Belmont Stakes is more exciting, more enjoyable, and easier to handicap. If I understand correctly why I go the the local racebook, I desire to cash tickets, to win!
“Play it again Sam”: It is all about gambling, about winning. No horse race is any different than another. Class and quality are the figment of the imagination of turf writers; or stated another way, such gives turf writers fodder to write and write as they convince the public that there are only a few racetracks, trainers, and jockeys worthy of their attention - a huge reason why Thoroughbred racing is declining.
02 Jun 2010 at 11:10 am | #
Mr. Corrow: Kindly cease and desist.
The points that you’re tring to make have been eclipsed by the impression you’ve already made.
It’s a big world. Find another sport.
02 Jun 2010 at 12:02 pm | #
Mr. Reed: Sorry, but Thoroughbred racing is not a sport. Take away the ability to gamble, and this so-called ‘sport’ of racing would be extinct.
Also sorry to keep banging the drum, but hopefully you and turf writers coast-to-coast will finally get it; unfortunately, I think it is to late.
02 Jun 2010 at 12:17 pm | #
Don,
After The Mig is finished fighting through his emotions and nurses himself back to health at his farm, look for him on a TV set near you. He would make an excellent analyst. But to know him is to know how much he really loves to ride.
Mousse,
You’re on for $1. I have over 40,000 for Belmont Stakes attendance. Q: Can we find someone other than Freddie to hold the money?
Wendell,
Quality Road.
Metropolitan Handicap.
02 Jun 2010 at 12:40 pm | #
Mr. Pricci: Quality Road paid $2.50 to win. The race was about as exciting as watching paint dry or grass grow.
BTW, I will hold the money, if Freddie is suspect.
How can any seasoned handicapper bet the Belmont Stakes with serious money? When none of the entrants have ever gone this distance, isn’t a rule of handicapping never to wager on a horse that has never gone the distance of the race?
I don’t see 40,000 people in attendance, but they need 100,000 plus to just break-even financially.
Oh, the Belmont Stakes will be exciting, hopefully, as most of the entrants stagger home.
Good luck, I’m going elsewhere with my wagering on Saturday, as it is real money I am using, not play money.
02 Jun 2010 at 12:41 pm | #
JRP: I’m in for a dollar bet that:
Friday night into Saturday (06/04-05/10) is when it really hits Rich - that his life has changed, forever.
In his final years, wasn’t his winning the Pacific Classic grand?
And wouldn’t he make - with his decidedly incorruptible sense of right and wrong – a great racing steward?
Well, that’s it for me today…back to the Spaceballs (the movie; and why hasn’t anyone named a horse SB?) snippets on You Tube.
“What’s the matter, Colonel Sanders – CHICKEN?!”
02 Jun 2010 at 01:00 pm | #
It’s getting a little rich, here, readers trying to beat me for bucks all over the lot.
Incidentally, Mousse and Don, you have my permission to stop me if you see me any day at Saratoga and tell me whether I owe you or you need to pay me. Your on your honor.
Wendell, I proudly gave out that $2.50, but with a cold exacta, plus a triple and superfecta which, for $20, total, fetched a $71 Tri and $354 Super. It’s called taking what they give you and finding the chaos to make it worthwhile. Shame on you, Wendell, you didn’t even read my Met analysis on Monday. And it’s free, five days a week!
JP
02 Jun 2010 at 01:14 pm | #
JP: No risk involved, at all. My memory’s shot to hell (which is why my wife always collects before Lights Out).
02 Jun 2010 at 01:18 pm | #
Think Mr Pricci bet is lock as would never announce attendance under 40k, they will count seats sold I believe.
John, if you think they should run fewer days why in the world are they running 10 races on weekends when they have many 6 horse fields before scratches. One Sunday they had two 5 horse races planned and ran 10 heats day.I certainly do agree with the idea of fewer months of racing. Stay well all
02 Jun 2010 at 01:36 pm | #
Mr. Pricci: Wish I had read your Met analyis; however, yesterday 06/01 at good ole Philly I was alive going into the fourth race with two horse for the pick three. Total investment $12.
The horses were #5 and #8, paying $914 and $2200.
Deep in the stretch the #8 was gaining fast, and my heart beat rose accordingly, as the ticket in my paw became a bit wet. Like I have said, the best racing for gamblers is overlooked by you turf writers.
Today, I didn’t cash a ticket at Belmont or Delaware. And so it goes.
Good night. Write an interesting column for tomorrow so I can present an opposing viewpoint.
02 Jun 2010 at 01:43 pm | #
JRP: Time to rename your column, “Journalism On Demand(Brought to You By Time-Warner).”
Yum. I say that because I chew on all my winning tickets. Bad habit. But I am a thin man.
Back to Star Balls. Popcorn ready?
02 Jun 2010 at 01:47 pm | #
Wendell,
I’m happy for you, truly. Nice going. Say, if Don can’t get TIme Warner to sponsor my column, how about you stepping up to the plate?
Don,
First thing I was told on the racetrack, think it was Mannie Kalish who said it to me first: “Never wise up a chump.”
Hey, I’m just sayin!
P.S.
If when I eyeball the crowd and think it’s less than 40K, I’ll pay!
02 Jun 2010 at 01:58 pm | #
Aside from writing a column usually on the side of the horesplayer Mr Pricci seems to be a gentlmen. Enjoy the day at Belmont sir.
02 Jun 2010 at 11:19 pm | #
New York’s winter racing scenes
Are bettor viewed on TV screens
Amidst the ice and snow one gleans
There is no Sport of Kings in Queens.
03 Jun 2010 at 02:53 am | #
Indulto,
Your a poet and I didn’t know it!
(Sorry, best I could do; on Belmont overload).
Don, right back at you, sir.
JP
03 Jun 2010 at 10:00 am | #
Mea culpa: That’s YOU’RE, as in you are. Said I was on overlod, didn’t I?
03 Jun 2010 at 12:57 pm | #
Brother Indulto: According to the facts I have become aware of, over 90% of all handle is off-track, thus just about everyone is wagering on the nags from their home, OTB, racino, or racebook. Now, how do they watch the races? Seems to me they all are looking at a computer screen, or an OTB or racebook screen. Thus, it is fair to say that there is no sport of kings come spring, summer, fall, or winter - lost to the summer wind.
03 Jun 2010 at 08:45 pm | #
wnc,
I’m honored that you read my poem. You are right, of course, about the 90%—even at Saratoga. However, it’s the noticeably greater attendance and congeniality at the Spa that qualifies proceedings there as something reminiscent of the Sport that started dying in the ‘80s.
While for you the gaming aspect of racing—the ability to make and, hopefully, cash a bet—supersedes any appreciation of athleticism, skill, courage, the spirit of competition, gameness, gamesmanship, or rooting interests – I suspect that mindset does not predominate among those attending the current Monmouth meeting.
It will be interesting to see how well Saratoga attendance stands up to the New Jersey challenge and whether the combined total attendance and handle from those venues supports either of our assertions.
04 Jun 2010 at 10:47 am | #
Mr. I(ce Box?);
Great poem.
It had to be. It’s the only thing that can inspire me to match it (a minute later, the futility of doing so collapses the attempt!)
04 Jun 2010 at 12:08 pm | #
DR,
Inspiration is what sets HRI apart. The variety of subjects and ideas brought into play by these writers and their audience is what keeps us our interest in the game fresh; and provokes reactions that go from bad to verse.
Funny you should mention Ice Box. Deflated expectations due to dual defections by the Derby and Preakness “first place finishers,” should be deflected by the fact that the Belmont will still be contested by the two “second place finishers” who arguably might have won their respective legs given higher dosages of good fortune. A photo finish between those two would be positively poetic.
04 Jun 2010 at 05:39 pm | #
I dunno…It WOULD thrill me to see Romans win his first TC race. And Zito is equally respected. But after betting on Ice Box (Derby) and then backing First Dude (Preakness), I’m the Second Dude Twice & my enthusiasm for tomorrow’s race has just been…tepid.
On June 5th, 2010, we’re casting ballots in the election for the captain of the JV football team. That’s an obligation, not an inspiration. And the NYRA mess is impossible to ignore, which makes paying any sort of attention to their big race a Drag Plus.
I did just enjoy watching an Australian jumper race where the saddle on the favorite, Tradesman’s Choice, slipped out from under the rear end of Ms. Emily Taylor like The World’s Worst Kept Secret.
Off he went, to the sidelines (this would be bad enough on the flats; imagine trying to continue in a race with no saddle and looming hedges!)
Whomever bet on him, bankrupted, then experienced the indignity of hearing that the winner was “My Big Fat Greek Horse.”
From there we went to Mountaineer, where Uranium (2/5 fave) appears to be the Second Coming of Iridium - a spectacularly inept horse that at Belmont & Saratoga (@ 7 years ago) would habitually leave the gate as a 2/5 favorite and then reliably ruin his backers.
Uranium, tonight, managed not only to not hit the board, but was beaten by TWO horses for the FOURTH place position (dead heat) in the super.
Now, that’s incompetence. There should be a certain glory about being all thumbs; not just showing up to lose, as a matter of routine.
So tonight’s Undaunted Hero of Competent Ineptitude is Uranium, who blew 4th in a seven-horse JV football race at a track that pays purses with rolled-up coins.
Which is why there should be a horse named “NYRAdium,” in the Belmont Stakes tomorrow - just to make things interesting.