ELMONT,NY, JUNE 6, 2009--And so, in this most unusual of Triple Crown seasons, it was a son of Birdstone--the sire that upset Smarty Jones in this classic in 2004--that upset this year’s 6-5 Belmont Stakes favorite, another son of Birdstone, 50-1 Kentucky Derby pin-up Mine That Bird, and denied jockey Calvin Borel his ticket to racing immortality.
Before the excuses for Mine That Bird begin, stop and pay tribute to Summer Bird and his trainer Tim Ice, who decided after the colt finished a strong third in the Arkansas Derby in only his third lifetime start, that the classic on the first Saturday of June was more appropriate for his horse than the one run on the first Saturday in May.
It was a Cajun delight all right, but not the one the crowd or Calvin Borel was anticipating. Borel will be lamenting what might have been tonight while fellow Cajuns Tim Ice and Kent Desormeaux will pop a couple of cold ones and suck on the heads of more than a few crawfish.
For Desormeaux, it was vindication for last year’s Belmont debacle aboard a failed Triple Crown champion, the odds-on favorite Big Brown, and relieves the bitter taste left by Real Quiet.
At about the same point of the turn that Desormeaux began pulling up Big Brown and easing him to the finish, the same point on the track that Birdstone went after Smarty Jones five years ago, Desormeaux first found a seam.
And after saving ground down the long backstretch on the best part of the Belmont surface this day, the inside, Desormeaux allowed his forward momentum to carry him outside for a free run at the battling leaders, who were now beginning to tire.
Desormeaux timed his move perfectly, winding up 2-¾ lengths to the good of Dunkirk, the rail path enabling him to come again to displace Mine That Bird, who fired prematurely and wide, tiring to finish third, a neck behind Dunkirk.
After the agonizing defeat on Real Quiet and the inglorious Big Brown fiasco, Desormeaux's well engineered ride, his fourth winner on the card, gave him his first Belmont victory.
For birthday boy Tim Ice, who brought a fresh horse to Belmont to win the champion’s test in only the colt’s fifth lifetime start, there’s nothing like celebrating your 35th in the winners’ circle following a classic.
The week must have seen like a blur to Borel, seeing himself on Leno and Letterman and, ringing the bell Thursday at the New York stock exchange, the social gatherings, the sightseeing with fiancée Lisa Funk.
So he took a week off from work, the week before the biggest day of his professional career. Without older brother Cecil to keep him focused, the responsibility fell on long time friend and agent, Jerry Hissam.
It made no sense to have not a single ride on the undercard. Actually, he had one, in a grass race, and took off that mount. Worse, it wasn’t clear watching Calvin ride Mine That Bird that he watched any of the races that occurred earlier in the day.
Here’s what Borel would have seen, according to official chart footnotes: First winner: “Moved through on rail to gain the lead“... Second: “Set rapid pace in two path, angled in…” Third: “Well placed along the rail.”
Fabulous Strike went wire to wire in the two-path. Gabby’s Golden Gal sprinter clear soon after the start (from post two going a mile). Munnings “moved up quickly along inside.” And, finally, the Belmont:
Dunkirk “sprinted clear along the rail…fought back gamely along the rail…” And Summer Bird: “Steadied along the rail… Raced in traffic on the inside…”
What Borel did was to circle the field four wide on the final turn. The fraction from the mile marker to the mile and a quarter point in the race went in :23.80. Mine That Bird made up 5-½ lengths, making his mid-move a ridiculous :22 3/5 with a quarter mile left to run. Mine That Bird was beaten three lengths for all of it. The ground loss and premature move was too much to overcome.
Borel didn't see it the same way, but this is where he crawls in a little deeper. "I knew the fence wasn't good," he said. "It's kind of deep down there... It's very--track is deep, you know. If anything, maybe moved a little earlier than I was supposed to...I wasn't going to take the race out of him because I knew someone was going to plod on this and beat us, and that's what happened."
And then, this: "Not that I moved him too early. It might have looked like he was a little fresher but they're going a mile and a half. Like I said, maybe might have moved a little tad early but he took me there... When they're moving that easy and the horses are coming back to you that fast, it might look like he got there quicker."
That's why this is a humbling game. Borel gave the kind of ride many informed people called the greatest race ride they've ever seen. But that was at home, where Borel won the bulk of his 4,500 races. This wasn't home, this was the infamous Big Sandy.
Calvin did not give it, or the race's history, enough respect. He rode overconfidently, having to justify the kind of pressure making guarantees places on you. He should have known better. And if he didn't, that's what agents are for. Friends don't let friends ride cold. Borel would have found no shortage of live mounts in one of the five undercard stakes.
Hopefully, he will learn from the experience. People are still rooting for him and Woolley said that he would ride him back next time out no matter where that race turns up.
Borel made the kind of move that gets you beat in this classic. The ride Desormeaux gave Summer Bird is the kind that wins Belmonts. Ask Tim Ice and the colt's owners, the Doctors Jayaraman.
Then ask the people at Gainesway Farm just outside Lexington. They probably could give you chapter and verse on just how America's hottest stud horse won a classic at Belmont Park, too.
And then consider that Summer Bird was the best horse on Saturday and that Mine That Bird, under the circumstances, might have been as well. In this game, that's as close as one gets to a win-win.
07 Jun 2009 at 03:43 am | #
I am a casual fan, but I just love the Triple Crown Races, so I apologize if what I’m about to say sounds stupid. I think Mine That Bird would have been our first Triple Crown winner in a long, long time if not for the mistakes made by Calvin Borel who should have ridden Mine That Bird in the Preakness and done a much better job in the Belmont. I think Mr. Borel got cocky. And what was this crap with putting Rachel Alexandra in the mix in only one race of the Triple Crown and screwing up Mine That Bird’s chances? I think the Triple Crown honor is only valid if the SAME horses run ALL three races. I don’t think it’s fair when horses are allowed to skin one or two of the races. But I do think the races should be much further apart to make it safer for these horses. I think Mine That Bird and his trainer were overlooked, snubbed, and taken for granted. Mine That Bird is like Seabiscuit, the little gelding that could. He’s all heart and guts and should have one the Triple Crown if not for human screwups. He should win horse of the year at the very least.
07 Jun 2009 at 03:47 am | #
I noticed I mispelled two words in my post, so I am posting it again with corrections. I am a casual fan, but I just love the Triple Crown Races, so I apologize if what I’m about to say sounds stupid. I think Mine That Bird would have been our first Triple Crown winner in a long, long time if not for the mistakes made by Calvin Borel who should have ridden Mine That Bird in the Preakness and done a much better job in the Belmont. I think Mr. Borel got cocky. And what was this crap with putting Rachel Alexandra in the mix in only one race of the Triple Crown and screwing up Mine That Bird’s chances? I think the Triple Crown honor is only valid if the SAME horses run ALL three races. I don’t think it’s fair when horses are allowed to skip one or two of the races. But I do think the races should be much further apart to make it safer for these horses. I think Mine That Bird and his trainer were overlooked, snubbed, and taken for granted. Mine That Bird is like Seabiscuit, the little gelding that could. He’s all heart and guts and should have won the Triple Crown if not for human screwups. He should win horse of the year at the very least.
Name:
07 Jun 2009 at 04:01 am | #
I love when reporters write about bad rides. When was the last time any of you tried to walk a mile and a half, much less control a 1,200 thoroughbred for that distance? It wasn’t Borel’s best ride, but more often than not, going after tiring leaders at the top of the stretch is the right move.
07 Jun 2009 at 04:37 am | #
Joan: That is why it is called the test of the champions. One horse beats all comers in the three races. Simple as that.
Pricci: agreed on these points. How about a proofreader?
07 Jun 2009 at 04:40 am | #
Personally, I think that this has been one of the most refreshing and enjoyable Triple Crowns in a long time. We had an opportunity to see some relatively new trainers and owners come to the forefront in a series of very exciting races. In addition, many females became racing afficianados with Rachel Alexander’s victory, which many most likely regarded as the second soming of Joan of Arc.
07 Jun 2009 at 04:42 am | #
It’s not as simple as that if some horses are more rested than the ones or one that ran in all three races. That is not a true test of champions.
07 Jun 2009 at 04:44 am | #
“...stop and pay tribute to Summer Bird and his trainer Tim Ice, who decided after the colt finished a strong third in the Arkansas Derby in only his third lifetime start, that the classic on first Saturday of June was more appropriate that the one run on the first Saturday in May.”
What? Summer Bird ran in the Derby...he was sixth by 13.
07 Jun 2009 at 04:48 am | #
Joan, you might be the only one who thinks MTB is worthy of company the likes of Affirmed, Seattle Slew, Secretariat, Citation, Whirlaway, et al.
07 Jun 2009 at 05:37 am | #
Afterthoughts; was the on horseback warmup interview sanctioned by the same living brain donor who killed Randy’s filly, put towers in the Mth B C infield? Endless stupidity. Lukas, Mc Laughlin, Zito, Pletcher, ran physically compromised horses; the people are entitled to better from men of their stature. The stewards again interpretated the rules. Run straight or come down; that is the rule. Ultimate outcome of failue to enforce; racetrack tragedy! Is anyone in N A more capable than the truly talented Penna Jr?
07 Jun 2009 at 06:42 am | #
Wow, the Triple Crown sure does inspire.
Joan, have to agree with Erin. You beat whoever shows up on any given day, T Crown or not. But there should be more time between. More on that later this week.
Erin, that was my bad, but I knew I could count on people like you to proofread for me. This is no excuse, just an explanation. Did a Tele Seminar Belmont eve. Got to sleep 2 a.m. Up at 6:30 for early morning remote at Belmont Park. After blogging throughout the day, sent this story, I don’t know, 9 PM? Lucky I can see the computer at that point. Copy’s much cleaner now.
Ryan, I bet my money which entitiles me to an opinion.Been watching races 50 years, professionally for about 40. I agree that the right move is the aggressive one while the competition is tiring. But, plain and simply, Belmonts are not won this way.
How can you rally in 22 and change and have enough reserves for the final quarter mile of a mile and a half race?
Dan, excellent observation about this particular series. Will have more on that this week as well.
Doug, I like the idea that stewards can now make judgment calls. Of course, that depends on the
people in the booth. And couldn’t agree more about Penna Jr. Having a wild time thus far in ‘09.
Thanks one and call.
JP
07 Jun 2009 at 12:23 pm | #
Question: If MTB had won, would we be saying the same things? I don’t think so. Summerbird was very good in that race, on that day. Having said that, Dunkirk and MTB did better than average (not happy about the “tying up” episode). 1, 2, 3 in the TC is not shabby. It was a good, provocative series and no one died on the track for the entire world (if they even decided to watch) to witness. Progress? Somewhat.
MTB is a hip little horse. That track is a bitch with a 5 week timetable in play for the TC. I don’t want to see asterisks next to the next TC winner if they decide to screw with timetable, eligibility, etc.
Thanks MTB, RA, SB, BOrel, Wooley and company, Smith...even Mr. J and Asmussen. It was an interesting ride.
Since I don’t subscribe to any of the racing rags, were all the contestants on Salix/Lasix? Just curious.
07 Jun 2009 at 01:31 pm | #
Although ALL runnings of the Belmont stakes are true ‘events’ in the racing calendar, this one wound up a smaller story. Rooting for MTB was legit owing to his ‘little guy’ status and maybe some blame could go to Borel, but overall Summer Bird beat a rather lackluster group in my opinion. But the real story is Birdstone and his extraordinary burst on the breeding scene. A small stallion that seems to be making it big.
07 Jun 2009 at 02:37 pm | #
John,
Your column is composed a little bit overconfident also. As if you had previously ridden the horse and so forth. I agree that Summer Bird deserves all the credit but it’s not necessary to bash Borel and dig so deep. As Chip said after the race, it’s a judgement call for the Jock. You shouldn’t be so critical really.
You conveniently failed to mention the way the horse was acting a little keen after being release from the detention barn.
Your report here is worse than Calvins riding, DUDE!
07 Jun 2009 at 02:52 pm | #
A lot is being written about some ordinary horses. The Derby winner had run for $35 claiming in the provinces. The Belmont victor was eligible for nw 1x after having broken his maiden in Opyville. There is no reason to think any less of Birdstone now than there was before the series began. The crop’s only hope is that Quality Road makes the Travers.
07 Jun 2009 at 04:15 pm | #
This is a very tough crowd, which is good. If only more people were as passionate about the game we all seem to love.
I have a question: Do you have to be WIllie Sutton to recognize when a bank robbery is taking place?
But then maybe I was overconfident, just like Calvin. Because the point of the whole piece is that if Team Borel were less cavalier about the contest pre-race, pilot error could have been avoided.
Or do I just not get it? Apparently I have more respect for a horse asked to run a sub-23 second quarter-mile before looking down the stretch and seeing about another quarter-mile away left to run. This is, after all, a ONE-RUN horse we’re talking about here. At least that’s what his trainer thinks, and that’s good enough for me.
Giving perhaps the greatest race ride anyone has ever seen, getting credit for it, making you a household name, brings responsibility that goes with the territory. Perhaps I wouldn’t have been so hard on Calvin if he hadn’t tried to double-talk his way out of something that he knows in his heart was pilot error. Still, no problem, WE ALL MAKE MISTAKES.
But own it, talk about it, and move on. And that goes for the big and littles fishes both.
Thanks for provoking some additional thought.
JP
07 Jun 2009 at 05:29 pm | #
I think if the MTB team had been paying more attention to the horse, the track and the race the outcome may have been better. And I was disappointed with Calvin when I saw he had appearances on Leno, Letterman & the Today show. And also when everyone rushed off to open the stock market. But then I put myself in their shoes. This is a bunch of guys who never expected to be where they were and who made a decision to just enjoy every minute of it. I mean, how often does something like that come up in a person’s life? Dr. Blach is 72 and he wanted to go to the Derby because he might not have a chance like that again. And they all got to see and do things that may never happen again. So, while I am disappointed MTB didn’t win and am less forgiving of Calvin who did get a little cocky, I’m glad for the owners and trainer, even the exercise rider, and especially glad we all got to enjoy this gutsy little gelding.
08 Jun 2009 at 12:49 am | #
It’s finally over! Thoroughbred racing’s premier event, the Triple Crown; did the three ‘events’ increase racing’s popularity?
Until MTB crossed the finish line at Churchill, the horse was a complete unknown, and the trainer was thought to be quite different from the norm (is hick the right word?). Turf writers were pounding out copy for months on the
Derby prospects without any mention of MTB.
In less than three minutes, MTB leapfrogs from virtually last in significance to first, and carries Calvin from mediocrity to prominance; and turf writers canonize Calvin for the greatest ride in Derby history.
A few days later, a wine merchant decides to buy his way into the winner’s circle, and turf writers coast-to-coast applaud him as the coming savior or facing. The new trainer of SA, who trains by cell-phone (having, according to racings authority, Daily Racing Form, supposedly legged up 1,137 starters this year) had to rush to identify himself to MTB.
So, after the Preakness, the subject became girl vs. boy; if SA doesn’t run, will Calvin ride MTB; and, will Calvin sweep the Triple Crown? No mention that Lukas and Zito, heros to turf writers for years, had entered two horses each in the Belmont Stakes to merely keep their name in the spotlight; four horses that didn’t belong there, yet no turf writer mentioned this fact.
Fortunately, justice or whatever prevailed as the trainer of the winner had only legged up 74 starters, and I do believe that he actually did put his arm out to the jockey 74 times.
Did this year’s Triple Crown races increase the popularity of racing? Any novice or casual fan certainly had to conclude that few ‘experts’ were in fact experts, that money can buy glorification, and that occasionally the little guy can win. Racing probably did gain a few new ‘fans’, thanks to Tim Ice.
08 Jun 2009 at 04:40 am | #
Agree that Borel’s belief in his own invincibility combined with his lack of Belmont experience probably cost Mine That Bird a victory on Saturday. To have said “my horse can’t lose” was like saying “the Titanic is unsinkable.” I hope that Wooley’s gratitude for the Derby win doesn’t extend to ruining Mine That Bird’s career by keeping Borel aboard no matter what. Maybe this defeat will bring Calvin down a notch in his own mind - but I doubt it, since he basically blamed the horse for the loss.
At the same time, Summer Bird’s win was fun to watch and this year’s Triple Crown season had great characters and wonderful stories. I was absolutely delighted that the usual suspects - the hair-sprayed trainers with the mega-stables - were relegated to the background this year.
08 Jun 2009 at 07:21 am | #
Noelle, it really was a great year for the little guy. I don’t count Steve Asmussen as the trainer of Rachel Alexandra, Hal Wiggins did all the work. So we had Chip Wooley, Hal Wiggins & Tim Ice. They also had something else in common in that they don’t have too many horses and they are more hands on. Other than the Grade I winners, how many of the ‘lesser’ horses do you think trainers with hundreds or thousands like Steve Asmussen actually know?
As for the jockey situation, I hope that as well. Besides, he’s already shown if given a choice between MTB or RA which one he’d choose. MTB deserves someone who will commit to him and be a nationally capable rider.
08 Jun 2009 at 07:35 am | #
I’ve always thought Borel’s getting too caught up in his own celebrity along with his overconfidence cost Street Sense the Preakness. When he seemed to handle it better between the Derby & Preakness this year I thought he’d learned from that mistake. But then Belmont week came.
And yes, people who had money on that race have every right to criticize Borel’s ride and pre-race conduct. Even if you didn’t have money on it you have the right to criticize. It was Borel who guaranteed a win and Borel who decided to get drunk on his own celebrity instead of prepping for the race. When a public figure behaves that way he is begging for criticism.
Every retired jockey who I’ve seen interviewed thinks Borel moved the horse too early and should have at least run a race or two on the undercard. Then he would have had a sense of how the track was playing that day. Instead he thought “the fence wasn’t good”.
My critiques aside, I thought it was a fun Triple season. Looking forward to the Travers, etc.
08 Jun 2009 at 01:03 pm | #
Why do you blog on a website that accepts advertising dollars from off-shores [e.g. Belmont.com, bodog.com and logans.com]? Absolutely unconscionable. Please explain.
08 Jun 2009 at 02:31 pm | #
NY Horseman? How about your real name. I use mine.
Allow me one, short story.
At the end of 2008, my advertising person called the New York Racing Assn. soliciting an ad. We thought that since I was selecting the feature race in NY every day for two years, and showing a flat-bet profit, this would be a natural synergy. The Feature Race Analysis had become one of the most popular on HRI.
My ad person was told that the budget was depleted for the year but to contact him again at the end of the next quarter. He did.
Long story short: My ad person was told there wasn’t money in the budget for HRI. We were asking for an introductory ad cost of $500.
Even in this environment, that’s chump change.
So what you call unconscionable I call survival. With the exception of Tampa Bay, Suffolk Downs, and promises from two other industry related organizations, we have received no support from any other segment of the industry.
I’m too old to stop eating now.
A question: If, then, you’re not misrepresenting yourself, are you a member of the same horseman’s organization that sold out your constituents to the NYRA after they reached an accord with New York State on the franchise?
Whether you are or not, there are far more serious issues than whether or not a small independent web-site accepts ads from the off-shore bet shops.
Hey, know anybody over at TwinSpires, or YouBet, or...??
John Pricci, executive editor
HorseRaceInsider.com
08 Jun 2009 at 03:13 pm | #
For Jean, & her comments about horses being able to skip a Triple Crown race and still win another one of them…
It’s great for the sport that two of the winning Triple Crown trainers, Woolley & Ice, were - until they won - relative-to-complete unknowns.
It’s not so great that a trainer can inherit a horse in between TC races & then, @ two weeks later, be standing next to the new owner in the winner’s circle. That’s like not returning a found wallet that has the owner’s address in it.
(The finder may be honest. And he certainly didn’t steal the wallet. But finding it in these circumstances doesn’t give someone the right in good conscience to keep it.)
For Ryan: Yes, people should have a taste of what it’s actually like to do what they criticize others for doing, competently or otherwise.
In a related matter, it was indeed a notable experience to hike a couple of miles with a weight vest on, holding onto a ten-pound balance bar on the way (and wondering why the leg weights are necessary);
And then to end the hike by walking into the Saratoga race course - & then see a grossly overweight trainer - actually wearing a shirt with food stains on it - who hasn’t walked up a flight of stairs since grade school, staring at you as if you’re from Mars.
(That individual, briefly successful, is now back in the murky recesses of winter racing, presumably hoping to claim the horses that can help him pay his back rent.)
For John: It’s amazing how identical guarantees can get a disreputable fool into trouble, and how - after his spectacular failure - the spectacle prompted people to howl with laughter at his misfortune;
Whereas, a year later, someone - whose integrity and good will was obvious - who unwisely engaged in an identical guarantee, after he failed, was regarded with compassion.
And that’s another reason why 2008-2009, as you aptly put it, was so unique.
08 Jun 2009 at 03:23 pm | #
Sorry. I’d like to overstay my welcome by also noting that the above was sent in at 8:57 pm on June 8th, 2009. Your system’s “06/09/09 12:53 am” is in error.
And as for the NY Horseman, I’d like to note that he and I are benefiting from the availability of this site and the advantage of being able to read the excellent columns it contains -
At a cost of $00.00.
If Horseman would, instead, like to pay for the service - in exactly the same manner that his clients pay for his services - John, let me know when he mails in a $50.00 honorarium.
I’ll be delighted to match it.
08 Jun 2009 at 04:13 pm | #
Dear NY horseman: If the industry did not charge such high takeout a majority of the offshore users would not go there. 26% at NYRA in many bets is absurd.
We have more tracks and fewer horses which has lead to fewer starters per race in cheaper heats and people raise the takeout. Could you tell me waht the takeoout was in the 70s when the tracks had no competition and were in their hayday.
08 Jun 2009 at 09:26 pm | #
Joan,
You were right, much of what you had to say did sound stupid.
08 Jun 2009 at 09:49 pm | #
Afterthoughts…
2008: Iavarone (IEAH) opened the NYSE. Dutrow issued Belmont Stakes guarantee. Big Brown DNF.
2009: Cal opened the NYSE. Issued BS guarantee. MTB bomb-faved (3rd).
For god’s sake - whomever the 2010 racing celebrity turns out to be, keep him/her/it away from Wall & Broad.
What could have been...Drat! Chantal Sutherland on Rachel in the Belmont… 500,000 women storming into Belmont on June 6th, each betting $100 & up, and rockin’ the joint until the adrenalinated walls came tumblin’ down.
Worst Mixed Metaphor, 2009 Belmont Stakes reporting: Desormeaux - on a horse called Summer Bird - was a “Phoenix” shedding an “albatross” that had been “around his neck.”
Work a cameo by Tippi Hendren into it, and you’re home free.
09 Jun 2009 at 02:07 am | #
Don,
Any more threads like your “Afterthoughts” and we may have to hire you. What is the computer language? LOL? (Fortunately, in this audience, I’m thinking most people get the “Birds” reference. Good job.
JP
09 Jun 2009 at 02:33 am | #
Do not mean to be a site hog; re; ads. Found Full Card Reports here; subscribed and would never be w/o them; also brought 3 other daily players on board. Associations in their heart of hearts would rather seek out sightseers and degenerates rather than committed fans/players or people seeking a challenge. Of course, everybody already knows that. On to the “Graveyard”, maybe JRP can find us a Travers scoop in his own backyard.
09 Jun 2009 at 02:58 am | #
“It’s not so great that a trainer can inherit a horse in between TC races & then, @ two weeks later, be standing next to the new owner in the winner’s circle. That’s like not returning a found wallet that has the owner’s address in it.”
Not a great analogy here but I get the point. What I don’t get is people in racing who fret connections so much. People in racing are for worrying about when they’re stewards making decisions, or racing boards looking out for their own interests, or they’re Halsey Minor trying to save Hialeah, or Bramlage issuing edicts about the breed...when it comes to racehorse owners racing horses, that’s inconsequential. I’m here for the great fillies and colts, handicap horses and turf phenoms.
A great horse raced on Preakness day, and I got to see her tested, and I got to see her prove her mettle.
That is what it’s all about. Racing. Horses.
It was as simple as that, on Preakness day, just like the good ol days - and that horse race took me there.
Sorry not everyone could join me.
09 Jun 2009 at 04:53 am | #
John:
I don’t understand, nor do I agree with your logic. Are you suggesting that maintaining your lifestyle is more important than doing what is right for the game? I hope my colleagues do a quick about face the minute they see you approach them. Q: Why do other industry related websites and bloggers choose to play by the rules while you carelessly operate as a maverick free agent? A: They have integrity and refuse to compromise themselves for $$$. Every racetrack in America should revoke your press credentials! I’d like to see you justify your New World Order advertising position to NYTHA and NYTB membership. Now would be a good time to revisit your original HRI objectives. The lack of industry wide support is a poor excuse for your clear shortcomings and limited perspective.
NY Horseman
09 Jun 2009 at 05:10 am | #
Ok, I can’t ignore this.
“I’m too old to stop eating now.”
“We were asking for an introductory ad cost of $500. Even in this environment, that’s chump change.”
Which is it?
Pricci, you’re certainly not working for the greater good with moves like this.
You’ve got a great product here and I hate to think you’re sullying it by potentially luring unknowing or uncaring bettors toward a business model that takes takes takes and never gives back.
Yeah take outs are too high. Competing with off shores, among other things, might have a thing to do with it. Some times you gotta rise above market forces in the short term in order to secure food on the plate in the long term. And yeah the NYRA is a bunch of back scratching good ol boys who also do not make decisions for the greater good. NY Horseman may well be a hypocrite. But that doesn’t excuse anyone else from the same.
At least, not if you want respect from your readership and industry peers. Not if you want a readership, period. In your market niche, you don’t have the bargaining chips NYRA does.
09 Jun 2009 at 06:07 am | #
Ok horseman & Erin; you started this. If tracks truly wanted to eliminate off shores, Hong Kong gave them a template. 3 mins to post, any track in America can announce “this is a bet free race; there will be no pari-mutuel takeout on any pools and all breakage will revert to the next race win pool”. Result: end of the off shores!
09 Jun 2009 at 06:44 am | #
For close to a year HRI has been attempting to secure advertisers from within horse racing industry. The majority did not want to support us for one reason or another. We did not want to take ‘off-shore’ advertising at first, but there comes a point in a business where you have to start making money instead of losing it. If there was more support from within the industry, there wouldn’t be off-shore ads, but unfortunately that has not been the case.
09 Jun 2009 at 06:51 am | #
What about soliciting voluntary reader support - a fundraising drive ala PBS? Just a thought.
09 Jun 2009 at 09:08 am | #
As to the TC races, the Derby was great. We were reintroduced to Calvin and met Woolley et al andfound them refreshing. On to Pimlico and after the jockey jockeying it was Calvin again, this time of the filly. It was (in my opinion) a mistake for Calvin not to ride at Belmont this week. When they begin tobend into the far turn at Belmont there is still a long way to go. MTB has a sharp 3 furlongs and got to the 1/8 pole and fatigued. He moved too soon. Summer Bird didn’t have the best trip yet was still running well when he went by a game Dunkirk and a tired by determined Mine that Bird. Tim Ice did a great job with him. New shooters in the TC won 2/3 of the crown. Obviously the “big boys” haven’t cornered the market on training ability.
Now on to Rachel and the “wine merchant.” Jackson has been berated for buying Rachel and running her. Then he berated for NOT running in the Belmont. Her prior owner chose not to run in the Derby and wouldn’t have run her in eiher the Preakness or the Belmont. Were she still Morrison’s horse she “might” have run in the Mother Goose and the Alabama. Now she’s a Preakness winner and racing fans had the chance to see her take on and beat the boys. Now we have thew possibility of another run against colts in the future.
For the most part, I don’t care who owns the horses I follow. It’s nice when it’s someone I like and respect, but it has no impact on me as a fan. What does impact me is how they manage the horse. I want to see the horse run as often as they are able to. I like to see owners take on challenges with their top horses. Jackson tried Curlin on turf and Rachel against boys. Chalk it up to ego if you wish but the net result was that two leading horses, owned by Jackson were asked to do something that most owners wouldn’t ask of them.
09 Jun 2009 at 10:01 am | #
Erin,
I accept your criticisms and your efforts to be fair minded. Unlike NY Horseman, I don’t sense that there’s a hidden agenda at work in your commentary.
And you are correct when you say it doesn’t excuse anyone else from being hypocritical.
You are also right when you say I don’t have the bargaining chips that NYRA has. But I would argue that I don’t need them when it comes to having respect for, and earning the respect of, the HRI readership.
However, I don’t feel as if my livelihood is threatened by this issue alone. If, on the other hand, body of work doesn’t mean what it used to, then perhaps you are correct once again.
You do need to understand, however, that while off-shores do act as independent bookmakers and contribute nothing toward purses, they service horseplayers by treating them as valued clients, something the industry hasn’t fully comprehended beyond distributing the occasional tee-shirt.
Many people who wager off shore also wager with industry sites when playing in the multi-exotic pools featuring high payouts. Off shores cap winnings at a predetermined fixed amount, so some off-shore money does go into “legitimate” circulation in multi-race pools and the like.
Then, of course, the suggestion posted by Doug Amos to use the Hong Kong template to conduct “instant” takeout-free races would force the off-shore shops to pay out more money than they take in. They wouldn’t keep that bargain for long.[See post #33].
But you’ve given me food for thought. You tried to address both sides of the issue in objective fashion. And this site would be nothing without the intellectual support of fair minded critics such as yourself.
Thanks for reading and four your feedback.
JP
09 Jun 2009 at 10:16 am | #
JP. Thanks! We like humor.
A shame that in the last five weeks, we didn’t have a trainer in it named Hitchcock - entering a filly named Grace Kelly.
We’ll have to settle for the obscure trotter out there, whose name is - if I recall it correctly - My Cary Grant, valiantly running in the buck-fifty claimers at Threadbare Downs.
Speaking of ghouls, let’s start a pool.
The aim will be to guess the exact date on which the penny-pinching Saratoga casino corporation completes its transformation of the Gideon Putnam - into the 2nd coming of their mega-dilapidated harness facility.
I’ve got dibs on “July 27, 2012.”
Special Request: Move it up to “July 1st, 2010” if - in the interim - they merge with “the same horseman’s organization that sold out [its] constituents to the NYRA.”
09 Jun 2009 at 10:30 am | #
“However, I don’t feel as if my livelihood is threatened by this issue alone. If, on the other hand, body of work doesn’t mean what it used to, then perhaps you are correct once again.”
Well I’ll prove myself wrong by continuing to read. Your advertisers may not like it, and I hope they don’t, but Ad Block Plus prevented me from ever seeing the offending ads. I am glad the issue was brought up, and I do not like that you are supporting them, but realistically - like many things in life - the gratification is worth the compromise. Keep up the good work as I keep up my end, holding you to the fire, as any conscientious reader should.
I also appreciate what you’re saying about off shores and customers service. From what you say (I’ve never patronized an off shore service, but have experienced plenty of frustration patronizing domestic ADWs), it sounds like this issue can be likened to a trip to a casino vs. a trip to the track. Both are fighting for many of/or potentially the same dollars, but the contrast in experiences is stark. Racing really is its own worst enemy. (But it doesn’t mean I have to be one too. Find another way, JRP...)
09 Jun 2009 at 11:43 am | #
Can we be more specific regarding the term “offshore.” There are offshore bookmakers and then there are offshore rebate shops like RGS, who I work for, and Elite Turf that pay the highest rates for the simulcast signals. This results in more money going back to the racetracks and the purses for the horsemen. Please don’t confuse us with the offshore bookmakers.
Dick Powell, RGS
10 Jun 2009 at 04:07 am | #
Dick,
Absolutely correct, a delineation should have been made. I am well aware that RGS and Elite pay much higher rates for the signal than is the industry standard. Good job.
Erin,
As an FYI to you and all the readers, I do not have an off shore account, nor have I ever. But I don’t blame anyone who does. Not all bettors can the bankrolls to patronize RGS and Elite.
In fact, the only account I have is with Capital Off-Track Betting, for whom I occasionally work as a handicapping analyst.
One final point of information. The majority owner of HRI lives in the Toronto area and HRI is registered as a Canadian company, where betting and doing business with off shore bet shops is not illegal.
Thanks everyone. Enough with this distraction. I consider the matter closed in terms of personal commentary.
JP