TARRYTOWN, NY, June 23, 2010--As gaming executives go, Jeff Gural is not a bandwagon guy. He’d rather create one. And there don’t appear to be any boxes big enough that would prevent his thinking outside it.
Gural’s free-wheeling, straight-talking style has made him somewhat of a maverick in an oft-stodgy industry, his remarks leading to controversy on more than one occasion. One gets the sense that he really wouldn’t want it any other way.
At the 2010 Gaming Summit Tuesday, the keynote address by the American Racing and Gaming LLC Chairman easily was the highlight. His tracks are succeeding not only because they benefit from an infusion of gaming revenue but because he’s a practitioner of a less-is-more philosophy.
That philosophy is paying dividends thus far, especially at Gural’s Tioga Downs Racing Casino and Entertainment complex, a harness track in the southwest corner of New York State. On a larger scale, it’s the same philosophy that just might save Monmouth Park.
Gural believes less is more when it comes to making horse racing popular again. He also managed to convince myopic lawmakers to accept less tax money in the short term in order to grow the bottom line. Those dollars were put into a marketing strategy that would have casinos profit from racing and racing profit from casinos.
From a racing perspective, the goal is to re-invent, re-structure and re-introduce racing as entertainment to the latest trends in consumer profiling while also efforting to grow casino revenue through the use of the more aggressive marketing techniques successful in other areas.
Improving the product by racing fewer days for higher purses and putting a focus on opening and closing days--considered the leveraging of entertainment strategies with popular promotional programs--Gural’s approach not only has increased buzz but grew the bottom line.
For example, “we lose money on our concerts,” explained Gural. “We put on concerts that would cost $40 but we charge only $10. And we give away concert tickets free to our regular customers.”
To mitigate the effects of negative perceptions created by gaming, Tioga has given back over $100,000 to the community since it opened, those dollars going to the United Way, American Cancer Society, American Red Cross and the Boys and Girls Clubs of America.
Things haven’t worked as well at his other venue. “It was a terrible decision,” Gural said of his buying Vernon Downs. “It’s too close to Turning Stone. [The Native American owned and operated casino] pays no taxes and allows smoking. The only advantage we had was a liquor license. Now they have one. They pay no taxes and we have a 50-50 partner [New York State].”
In high tax jurisdictions such as New York’s, Gural’s philosophy of combining database marketing with customer loyalty programs has delivered the highest ROI per marketing spend by driving repeat visitation, with monies efficiently targeting customers who wager most often.
To achieve this, venues need to reinvest in its middle and low market customers, spending aggressively to acquire customers which fuels the marketing program, techniques Gural believes will allow gaming venues in this state to compete with Native American properties and casinos in neighboring states.
At the heart of all this has been lower taxes and incentive programs helping venues to grow their business. In 2004, the tax rate was lowered from 71 percent to 68, with an eight percent marketing allowance.
Four years later, the tax rate was further reduced, the marketing allowance increased to 10 percent, including the creation of a 4 percent capital award that promotes growth via the construction of new hotels and the like.
Beginning in 2005, lower taxes allowed all state-based properties to grow their video gaming business, with revenue increasing from $205-million to over $1-billion four years later, more than tripling in that five-year span.
Significant gains were achieved when Gural convinced lawmakers to subsidize the Free Play pilot program he created. As an incentive, Gural rolled the dice and guaranteed a 3 percent increase to the Aid to Education Fund, pledging to write the check himself if it didn’t. Like Namath, he made good on his guarantee. “A real no-brainer,” he called it.
The Free Play Pilot Program subsidy consisted of the elimination of taxes on $20 Free Play coupons distributed to Tioga’s customers. To get those chits, however, horseplayers had to exit via the casino.
Gural convinced the lawmakers by proving that, despite New York’s having 50 percent more people, Pennsylvania, albeit with better locations, did double the business. Why? “Because Pennsylvania gave away $140 in Free Play, New York about $38 million.”
The principles of the subsidized Free Play Pilot Program is that it drives increased aggregate customer visits from established customers and those which the organization could not afford to subsidize before, as well as encouraging more visits from newer customers.
These marketing-based reimbursements grew the revenue and resulted in bigger and better promotions, with increased investment advertising geared to attract new customers and more live entertainment.
The most impressive results from the subsidized Free Play Pilot Program was a $14 million total contribution to Aid to Education, this year’s amounting to $1 million more than last year, $500,000 greater than the 3 percent increase Gural guaranteed.
Additionally, head count increased 19 percent with new customer intake up 52 percent, rated customer visits up 45 percent. Consequently, revenues have grown from $22.2 million to $27.9 million, up 25 percent. And the program has helped New York compete. Pennsylvania’s gross revenue in May of 2010 declined 6 percent, resulting in Pennsylvania escalating its Free Play rewards program.
These initiatives--the convincing of New York State to lower taxes so that casinos might invest in synergistic marketing strategies that grows business; the minimizing of the negative effects from gaming’s border wars, and reinforcing the notion that occasionally one needs to spend money in order to make it--are proof that sound strategies work.
At 68, Gural’s young enough to help lift racing out of the abyss to a new promised land, one in which the game is perceived to be special again and embraced by the main stream. That goal likely will take more time than he or any of those within earshot of his keynote address have left.
There’s little doubt that such a philosophy, like the one employed in Western New York and the Jersey Shore, can help lead the way. But only if racing executives, on balance, submerge their egos and jump on a bandwagon currently rolling in the right direction.
24 Jun 2010 at 02:03 am | #
First of all Tioga is small potatoes compared to Monmouth Park. Secondly, isn’t Gural doing just what casinos have been doing for decades? giving back to their customers via incentives. BTW, isn’t all casino gambling identical, meaning that all casinos offer precisely the same thing, no quality or superiority involved (stake vs claimer) thus people are not lead to believe that one casino’s gambling is superior to anothers.
To digress a bit, didn’t the NJSEA’s management pump their chest out and announce that there would be fifty days of racing with a million bucks in purses each race day. The following are the total purses for the first twelve race days: 5/29 $903,050; 5/30 $809,350; 5/31 $885,400; 6/04 $522,002; 6/05 $844,050; 6/06 $700,290; 6/11 $470,176; 6/12 $986,600; 6/13 $715,550; 6/18 $622,101; 6/19 $848,190; 6/20 $816,500. See any totaling $1,000,000?
And, something else of interest: On only three race days did the on-track handle exceed the total purses, and Monmouth is only getting roughly 20% of the on-track handle as income. A financial bloodbath is occuring at the Jersey shore.
Other tidbits: Average attendance for the twelve race days averaged 11,335; and the per capita amount wagered was an awesome $67.
Yup, less racing is the way to go (increase purses and reduce racing days) as long as the racing association receives casino slot revenue or dole and the state kicks in with millions of bucks. Any thought of increasing race days and substantially reducing purses, ya know, to try to operate profitably is anathema to racetrack executives.
24 Jun 2010 at 03:28 am | #
The fact that you missed significant key point such as Gural’s ability to convince lawmakers to reduce taxes so that those dollars can go back into the business--that the goal at most venues today is survival first, then maybe growth.
Or that the major racing days at Monmouth are still ahead and their average might grow to reach the $1-million average--granted, it’s not as snappy promotionally as “$793.000 daily in purses!”
Or that field size has increased to a lofty 9 starters/race during a horse shortage.
Or that all sources handled has increased by about 150 percent.
Or that Tioga showed an increase of 1% while the national average handle is down double digits.
Or that Tioga’s giving “free play” to horseplayers, too.
Or that the ocean is filled with whales AND guppies.
Actually, why do I bother trying to inform some horseplayers at all...?
Or be positive when some racing executives think outside the box trying to reverse their fortunes in a pro-active way...?
Or that Monmouth’s philosophy is using live racing to market a sport while concentrating on off-track teletheaters, phone wagering or Internet betting as the distribution arms of the future...?
Or, as Mr. Corrow asserts, just sit back, do nothing, enjoy the status quo, and have the market place put you out of business.
And I’m thinking, too, about how “Mr. Philly Park” and “Mr. Finger Lakes"--both racinos BTW, refers to a harness track located in exurbia as “small potatoes.”
The only way you’ll be happy is when the game dies completely because no one tried anything different to try. Because you’d rather be right and resentful or try to fashion a solution as some racetrack executives are trying or, worse, the lowest of the low, a turf writer who tries to shine a light on what’s working and what’s not?
Knock, knock, knock. “Who’s there?” Nobody. “And what do you want?” Nothing.
Sir, could you be a bigger hypocrite?
24 Jun 2010 at 03:42 am | #
Mea culpa for all the typos, folks. But it’s what can happen when you react instantly to the same old record of negatively, played over and over, and can’t wait to respond. Again, sorry, guess I just don’t suffer fools as well as I used to.
24 Jun 2010 at 03:55 am | #
I totally appreciate knowing about Mr. Gural’s strategies that are bringing his racino profits. Please keep informing stakeholders about what is working. Stakeholders need to try realistic, creative strategies to attract younger fans and that could result in a profit. The industry is in trouble, especially thoroughbred racing in NY, and I hope its leaders have the courage and vision to try new strategies.
24 Jun 2010 at 04:08 am | #
Concerned,
Trying to keep people informed is he purpose of this drill. I, too, hope NY’s leaders have the courage to try something new. Interesting that SRWB Chairman John Sabini went on record to say that NY should be looking at the Monmouth Park model.
Thanks for your input.
JP
24 Jun 2010 at 04:15 am | #
Kudos to preech the positive thinking turf writer with the glass is half full approach!
24 Jun 2010 at 04:58 am | #
Mr. Pricci: You are violating your own policy by getting personal. I don’t believe that I am a fool, negative, or a hypocrite. I am merely reporting financial facts on Monmouth’s lastest venture.
Sure, attendance has increased at Monmouth, field size also, and handle is up. What you didn’t mentioned is that purses have increased also, thus negating all other gains.
What Monmouth is attempting is financially impossible. So, I am a fool for presenting facts that indicate that Monmouth will not be profitable?
The latest buzzwords are ‘thinking outside the box’. Fine, but I know of no business that has been or will be successful if the bottom line is continually red.
24 Jun 2010 at 05:01 am | #
The Monmouth model of three day per week racing is probably a bit extreme for most circuts.
But--maybe Aqueduct could try a three day week during the winter months??
Also--John Sabini is a politician, a NY politician at that. To say I’m leery of anything he has to say would be an understatement.
JP--not trying to score “brownie points”, but you do a great great job. You’re an excellent writer, patient and engaging with whoever participates in a dicussion. Wendell, to me at least is a humerous character. Loves racing, but is stuck in a time capsule. He should be named the official “Horserace Insider Mascot”
24 Jun 2010 at 05:50 am | #
Austin,
Mr. Sabini will have his chance to put his ideas into practice before very long. I must say, too, that I find myself agreeing with him more often than not. He does seem to get it and appears sincere. The proof will be in his actions and not words.
I have to admit that I lost my patience this morning. It’s just so frustrating when the same people detract from the dialogue while unable to make their criticism constructive. Coloring “turf writers” with the same brush is as unfair as it is dishonest.
Again, thanks for the positive input. Your 3-day winter racing meet at Aqueduct sounds like the kind of compromise that always seems to fly in NY. Sometimes I think the motto of Empire State be changed to Land of the Half Measure.
JP
24 Jun 2010 at 05:50 am | #
Wendell,
I come from a long paternal line of bullheaded Germans, with equally stubborn Sicilians on the maternal side, so I know stubborn. However, I have never seen anyone as single-minded or rigid as you. Consider it a complement.
Nevertheless, your continued harping on Monmouth Park demonstrates unequivocally you have no idea what they are trying to do. Here it is. I realize you’ll reject this explanation, but perhaps some open-minded people out there might get it.
1) The Monmouth meet is an attempt to determine what works to bring people back to the track, and to increase wagering and other on-track revenues.
Here’s the part you don’t get Wendell. By raising purse levels to previously unseen amounts, New Jersey officials are trying to ELIMINATE PURSES AS A LIMITING FACTOR in determining what will or won’t work. That way they can determine whether top class racing, bigger fields, etc., is the key to invigorating their business.
In addition, by varying the daily purse payouts, they will have data to analyze and help them determine the tipping point where more or less purse money produces more or less revenue.
So you see, Wendell, it is not about making money in 2010. It is about conducting a laboratory experiment for the future. The alternative is to turn the key and bulldoze the place into oblivion.
2) Here is the rest of the picture your math wizardry fails to calculate.
By geometrically increasing live attendance at Monmouth, New Jersey officials will be able to determine its impact on businesses in the area around Monmouth Park. Will there be more gas, food, smokes, etc, purchased by people on their way to and from the track? Then they can analyze what, if any, percentage increase in business and tax revenue generated off track. In addition, this summer’s experiment could have a beneficial impact on other related agribusiness in the area and state.
So Wendell, what New Jersey is doing is nothing different that any governmental agency investing seed money in an industry in an attempt to create long term profit and viability. This experiment should give the state the data it needs to determine a future course of action.
Got it now?
24 Jun 2010 at 07:20 am | #
Good for Tioga and for the guy being “different”. We will go there someday. They are in a tough situation, as they opened with slots prior to the Penna. ones. I knew people that travelled there, but now remain in the WB and Poconos for the slot actions. Being in Central Pa, much close to attend Penn., thus a small increase is impressive.
Mth is a good thing, only time will tell. Surprised that their not offering the Million a day purse. Nonetheless, with all the problems facing horse racing, lets try something different.
Penna. horse racing must do something. Many problems. Look at the on-track handle of PID and the slot fueled purses offered. Our State leaders see that and has taken money away from the purses ,via the slots, for this year to help the budget. Anyone remember Erie Downs?
24 Jun 2010 at 11:12 am | #
Mr. Kling: I do appreciate your commentary. But, again, all decisions by anyone in any capacity within a racing organization must, repeat must, consider the bottom line.
Mr. Pricci: I want Thoroughbred racing to survive, though I believe that I, being almost 73, will outlive racing. Racetrack management does not improve their product by increasing purses and reducing their meet racing dates. Has anyone given thought to how the overhead is going to be distributed with a shortened meet?; it becomes even more a burden. What is overhead? Think pension, insurance, security, maintenance, interest on debt, advertising, promotional efforts, et cetera. With a shortened meet, these costs must be absorbed at a much larger rate, which is impossible.
It has been very clear to me for several years now that the CFO at racing organizations, coast-to-coast, are totally ignored; that the management doesn’t know a debit from a credit; they seemly can’t comprehend that increased attendance and handle means nothing if at the end of a day the red ink is flowing.
Like the old saying goes, ‘never put a salesman in charge of a company’. What racing associations need coast-to-coast is an accountant in charge that knows what a debit and credit is.
BTY, hit three pick threes today and one pick four. Love this game!