But before getting to the Dwyer, there is first the matter of the 9th race, the New York Stakes, a prelude to a Grade 2 Double into the Dwyer. The New York will be run at 10 furlongs on Belmont’s inner turf course; the Dwyer is a mile and a sixteenth over Big Sandy.
A cursory look at the past performances indicates that both events are two-horse races. But as you look a little more closely, so much for cursory looks. First the most probable winners:
Making her third start off a layoff looking to complete a sweep of the Sheepshead Bay and New York Stakes is Aruna. Her class lines speak for themselves; she’s a multiple graded turf winner and a Grade 1 heroine on Keeneland’s synthetic Polytrack oval.
In taking the Sheepshead Bay, it was as much a credit to Ramon Dominguez’s ability as the mare’s, Dominguez pulling the string at mid-far turn, at once swallowing the pacesetter and blowing the race wide open.
As much credit goes to Graham Motion, who’s profitable lifetime with his repeaters, at the graded level and in third-off-the-layup scenarios. Yet, she might not be the public’s choice; that distinction likely will go to a 4-year-old making her U.S. debut.
It will be Banimpire’s first start for Chad Brown and the first since owner Martin Schwartz shelled out $3.1 million to call her his own based on her sophomore form.
Brown’s been taking his time with her, putting her through her paces at Saratoga’s Oklahoma training track. Brown’s profitable with his new acquisitions and learned from Bobby Frankel how to get horses ready, especially turf horses, off long layoffs.
But there will be challengers to the favorites. Hit It Rich (5-1) is coming off a Pace Low in which she earned a lifetime best performance figure, showing incremental improvement for Shug McGaughey; as honest as they come.
Mystical Star (4-1) is likely to be overbet. In her last race, she beat the gate—illegally—dropped a million lengths out of it, then put in a huge rally that got her within 1¾ lengths of Aruna in a remarkable performance.
Fourth finisher Principal Role (8-1), beaten 2¼ lengths, had virtually no chance given the race shape but still finished well and is very likely to go forward in her third start off the layoff for Bill Mott. She should be a generous price.
The trick will be to get alive into the Dwyer that figures to be a match between trainer Michael Matz’s Teeth of the Dog (5-2) and Rick Dutrow’s Zetterholm (3-1).
After finishing fifth in the Preakness, Teeth of the Dog came back to win the Easy Goer overnight stakes on the Belmont undercard, his first start over the surface and at today’s trip. It was a lifetime best effort but not one likely to have taxed his reserves.
When last seen, Zetterholm was a good, late-run fourth in the Preakness and has worked purposefully coming up to this G2 test. He’s 2-for-2 lifetime at an analogous distance and 1-for-1 at a one-turn route.
But his strength is the fact that with three wins from six career runs, he’s the winningest member of the field and in that career, his performance figures never have taken a backward step; a perfect developmental pattern.
While significantly slower on performance figures, Morgan’s Guerrilla (4-1) deserves a look-in here. His tactical speed likely will serve him well in this relatively paceless group and the presence of Dominguez obviously helps his upset chances.
And even Fast Falcon (10-1) shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand. His last effort, second to Teeth of the Dog, was his best ever when measured against the speed of the track; he gets five pounds from the favorite, is working sharply, and picks up Rosie Napravnik.
If the Late Pick 4 is your play, you probably could use all of the above. If it’s the Double, a 2x2 is the most probable result, and if interested in an upset, Zetterholm seems the one most likely to succeed.


30 Jun 2012 at 07:58 am | #
Yes, Virginia, there is racing elsewhere today beside Belmont Park. By my count 44 other racetracks are in full operation across this Obama led country this Saturday. Unfortunately, only a handful of racetracks are mentioned at HRI, to the detriment of the industry.
“Play it again Sam”. It’s all about gambling, about picking winners, about cashing tickets, about making money. “Thanks Sam”.
You all have heard or read the maxim ‘if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck then it is probably a duck’; the conclusion determine from observation, deduction, and reason. However, when it comes to Thoroughbred racing empirical evidence in front of everyone’s nose is ignored. Enthusiasts blindly refute reality, what they are observing with their own eyes, and choose to believe that Thoroughbred racing as a gambling venue varies significantly; that gambling at a few select racetracks offers one a better opportunity to pick winners - to the applause of a few trainers, jockeys and of course turf writers.
Every year since HRI came into existence, I have asked the following question: Would someone out there please step forward and explain to me how a stake race differs from a claiming race other than in purse and perhaps time; how stake races are easier to pick winners, offer a better chance to make money, and are more exciting. Todate only one bloke has replied, commenting that he knew the difference, but did not elaborate further. The answer determined by observation, reason, and common sense is that there is no difference; how can there be a difference when all Thoroughbreds racing have the same bloodlines decending from prominent sires, and no human on this planet can with his eyes determine how fast a race is being run?
Not long ago I asked if ten claimers and ten stake horses were placed in a corral with halters off could the stake horses be determined? Mr. Pricci said he could pick them out.
So here we are today. Novice and casual horseplayers, along with the vast majority of frequent bettors, are waiting with bated breath for Saratoga to open, as if the racing is any better than at other racetracks.
I’ll take a daily look at the Saratoga entries, looking for the shippers from Finger Lakes and
Suffolk who ‘pop’ with regularity at Saratoga - further empirical evidence that parity exists.
Great cards at Philly and Delaware today. The temperature may be a huge factor in performance.
30 Jun 2012 at 08:34 am | #
Now that’s the WMC all know and love--although it might be an imposter since the real Wendell always would say, before his self-imposed exile: “The Beat Goes On,” not “Play It Again Sam.”
That one “bloke” who replied to you likely said that he’s a fan of the sport. And if memory serves, there was more than one who said he preferred to see the best horses run. Apparently, so do most bettors: They vote with their dollars and handle is consistently higher on the big races.
Put two running backs in a helmet or two center fielders in a baseball uniform; would you rather watch the .220 or .330 hitter, the journeyman running back or one who gains 1500 yards per season?
Hope you have some good fortune at Parx and Delaware today; I’ll be concentrating on Belmont and Monmouth Park--and I can’t wait for Calder’s “Summit of Speed” program next Saturday and the PPs for the Suburban Handicap, which looks like it’s coming up huge.
And you’ll just have to take my word on this: When I run into a fellow horseplayer at the Saratoga harness track--my OTB venue--and the conversation turns to horses, players ask who I like in the big race; not the third from Philly, or even Saratoga, for that matter.
BUt you’re right about one thing. Extremely hot weather can wreck havoc with the form, so be careful out there!
JP
30 Jun 2012 at 08:49 am | #
Gotta hit the road for the casino racebook. Will get into the use of the adjectives ‘best’ and ‘quality’, along with the .220 and .330 players.
Later.
30 Jun 2012 at 10:39 am | #
Happy Saturday Major and Minor Leaguers!
Play it again Sam! Indeed!
The New York (GRII) - Hit It Rich...Shug
The Dwyer (GRII) - Teeth Of The Dog...Matz
The Shoemaker (GRI) - Suggestive Boy...McAnally
The Triple Bend (GRI) - The Factor...Baffert
Long live the SPORT of kings! John Henry rose from claimer to stakes champion. The only way to measure greatness is to run against the best. A famous trainer once said, “don’t tell me the time of the race, just who they ran against”.
and the beat goes on?
Red and white, blue suede shoes, I’m Uncle Sam, how do you do?
Gimme five, I’m still alive, ain’t no luck, I learned to duck.
Check my pulse, it don’t change. Stay seventy-two come shine or rain.
Wave the flag, pop the bag, rock the boat, skin the goat.
Wave that flag, wave it wide and high.
Summertime done, come and gone, my, oh, my.
I’m Uncle Sam, that’s who I am; Been hidin’ out in a rock and roll band.
Shake the hand that shook the hand of P.T. Barnum and Charlie Chan.
Shine your shoes, light your fuse. Can you use them ol’ U.S. Blues?
I’ll drink your health, share your wealth, run your life, steal your wife.
Wave that flag, wave it wide and high.
Summertime done, come and gone, my, oh, my.
Back to back chicken shack. Son of a gun, better change your act.
We’re all confused, what’s to lose? You can call this song the United States Blues.
Wave that flag, wave it wide and high.
Summertime done, come and gone, my, oh, my…
30 Jun 2012 at 11:11 am | #
NEW YORKER Turf
#3Principal Role gets win 1 1/4 specialist in England
24.0 yl
#1 Aruna 22.4
#4 Mystical star 23.4
#6 Banmpire
Dwyer GR 2
unstoppable will be hard to beat
23.2
Teeth of Dog 23.4
Zetteholm 23.4
Monarchi 23.3
30 Jun 2012 at 05:47 pm | #
Hey Gents, it’s a humbling game. Couple of quick hits:
Kudos to Jose Lezcano, the difference in the New York, IMHO.
Teeth of the Dog showed another dimension; excellent effort and ride from Rosario, who broke in front and would not let the Zito colt by.
Zetterholm? I know what you were thinking jock, but what were you thinking? Taking horses out of their game is never a good idea, is it?
01 Jul 2012 at 07:48 am | #
The following has been written by me at HRI many times; consider the babble a 6th printing of a book.
Sporting events involve human beings, and people go to watch these events for a variety of reasons. At sporting events there are no betting windows, no gambling whatsoever; people are there simply to watch and enjoy the competition. Spectators at sporting events can, by observation, determine the ‘class’ level of the event: professional, college, high school, et cetera.
A thoroughbred is a thoroughbred, and a horse race is merely a horse race. People go to horse races for one purpose only: to gamble! Without the ability to gamble horse racing would not exist.
Yes, there exists what is referred to as ‘class’, which labels thoroughbreds as stake, allowance, or claiming; these classifications are determined by trainers who seek to win purses and place their horses accordingly. Unfortunately people who enter a racetrack through the front entrance cannot by observation ascertain which thoroughbreds are stake horses; they have to be informed via a program or paper stating the conditions of the race (the next race is a claiming race, or an allowance race). Watching a race will not provide a clue if the entrants are claimers or stake horses.
Over the years, and also here at HRI, followers of racing are led to believe that stake races represent ‘quality’ and the ‘best’ racing possible.
Really? Seems impossible to me, when all races are virtually identical to the human eye. No? Then go to a computer and replay yesterday’s race card at Belmont, Parx, and Delaware and OBSERVE the differences.
Sure a stake horse will beat an allowance horse, and a claimer will usually lose to an allowance horse. Accordingly horses race at levels where they can win the purse. A lowly claiming race involves horses that are a few seconds slower yet still offers the same gambling options as a stake race and the same excitement.
Turf writers argue that because handle and attendance is superior when stake races are run they are the best races - a myth of the first magnitude. When has a turf writer ever written about anything other than a dozen or so stake races per year at a few racetracks, along with a few trainers and jockeys. Regrettably, novice, casual, and frequent horseplayers believe.
So my fellow horseplayers, at Saratoga this year do not purchase a program or the past performances; merely watch the horses in the saddling area, the walking ring, and the post parade and determine which are the stake races, worthy of your attention and money.
Forego the terrific claiming races at other racetracks where gambling opportunities are in abundance.
01 Jul 2012 at 08:07 am | #
WMC, the animals ultimately determine what class they run in, the trainer manages his condition and schedule in concert with the owner.
What I don’t understand is this: Why is it all or nothing with you? I would be the first to admit that if it weren’t for horse racing I’d be a sports bettor.
Even despite its sometimes usurious takeout rates, racing is still the best gambling game devised by man and I’ll even credit often myopic track execs who, over the years, has devised interesting wagering menus.
Good horses attracting more handle as myth? I won’t even talk Derby or Breeders’ Cup or iconic meets like Saratoga compared to, say, Delaware Park and Parx. But note the handle figures from yesterday’s Calder schedule and measure it against next weekend’s Summit of Speed program.
Most people who visit HRI concede this point although most, like me, enjoy the game more when they watch the best horses, jockeys and trainers.
How can people tell which horses are better when virtually all are borwn and race in a semi-circle? Well, just like they don’t know for sure who’s going to win a race until the leader crosses the finish line, they’ll know which one is better when in the seventh race the winner goes 6F in 1:12 and the eighth race is run in 1:09.
As far as looking at the animals and telling the difference? Same way you get to Carnegie Hall… practice, practice, practice.
01 Jul 2012 at 11:42 am | #
Commentor #7, thank you for your participation.
The following has been written by me at HRI many times; Just my honest opinion by observation of the SPORT of horseracing for forty something years. I am an avid fan, gambler and historian of the SPORT.
Horseracing is a competitive SPORT that you can legally gamble on at the racetrack. The perception is that animals can’t fix the outcome. Entries, results and turf writers articles can be found in the SPORT section of your newspaper. The Kentucky Derby is a top five SPORTING event in this country. Other SPORTS like baseball, football etc. you can gamble on legally at casinos in Las Vegas, but not at the stadiums because of the human element of fixing the games.
Every SPORT has its minor leagues. Baseball has triple A, double A etc. Football and Basketball use the Colleges. Horseracing is no different, thus the need for small time tracks. Every breeder and owner wants to win the highest purses offered at the biggest tracks more often. When a horse can not compete at a big track. they are sent to the small track, to mostly recoup owners expenses. I am not saying that the gambling aspect is any different at either venue, just the SPORTING competition level is different.
Can some experts tell the difference in the paddock of superior horses? Yes, but that does not mean they will win all the time. Many well bred million dollar looking horses can not run a lick.
Does time of a race tell the whole story? No, if it did, picking the winner from past performances would be too easy. Class, pace, trip, track condition, jockey , trainer and drugs are among many factors to consider. I’ve seen many claimers run faster than stakes horses, doesn’t mean they’re equal.
Who goes to the racetrack or local OTB daily? Mostly old retired people who have time and expendable income. You don’t see many young people going straight from high school and college to make a living at the racetrack. Alot of players are weekend warriors who work during the week. They may follow and play on their computer at work during the work week. That’s why stakes racing is on weekends.
Finally, it is next to impossible to make a decent living solely on gambling. While the SPORT of horseracing offers the best gambling opportunity for using your brain, it’s still unbeatable. The takeout rates are too high. There is too much information today on the internet for any kind of value anymore. So called experts and touts who say they are ahead, also sell their picks and numbers on websites and newspapers. If they are so good, why the need to give out their information?
Horseracing is a SPORT rich in history. Just like any other SPORT that you pay for entertainment. The same gambling excitement can be found at any racetrack big or small city. Yes it would probably not exist without gambling windows for fans. It also would not exist without some kind of SPORTING competition for owners.
and the beat goes on?