COLONIE, NY, June 29, 2010--As it turned out, it wasn’t just me, because the New York Racing Association annual press conference trumpeting the start of another Saratoga race meet, its 142nd race meet to be exact, had a different aura this time.
This time the atmosphere felt more like relief, resignation and hopeful optimism, as compared to the usual drum beats and the waving of pom-poms. But that was only to be expected. No one need recount the reasons why this particular meet feels different than most others.
But, yes, Virginia, there will be horse racing at the corners of Union and Nelson this year, precisely 24 days hence. The racing will be top class, of course. World class? That might be a bit of a stretch.
“It would be inappropriate if we didn’t talk about this and just pretended this is happy-face time. It really isn’t,” said NYRA President Charlie Hayward, explaining that from 2007 to 2009 there was a 26 percent decline in yearling sales, a 20 percent decline in two-year-old sales, and 18 percent fewer foals.
“There’s a real horse shortage and we will see more claimers at Saratoga this year than in the past. We all need to understand the backdrop under which the racing world is operating,” said Hayward.
Despite 3,000 stall applications and a record number of 150 trainers applying for 1,800 available stalls, the shortage is a bitter reality when trying to present full, bettable fields of quality horses six days a week for an extended 40-day period.
If only the NYRA Board of Directors knew then what everyone knows now.
“Because we’ve had a record number of applications, as you can imagine I’m dealing with 150 unhappy trainers” said Vice President of Racing P.J. Campo, whose responsibility it is to fill those stalls and, by extension, Saratoga’s racing programs.
Campo did not dwell on the negative, immediately reminding an SRO crowd of assembled media, dignitaries, politicos and corporate partners that there would be $10.5 million available for 17 Grade 1, 12 Grade 2 and five G3 events, maintaining Saratoga’s standing as America’s most important extended session.
Campo said he expected to see defending Horse of the Year Rachel Alexandra in the Ruffian and Quality Road, the best older horse in training, in the Whitney and Woodward. The 2009 Derby winner, Mine That Bird, will make his first stakes appearance for new trainer D. Wayne Lukas and is also pointing to the Whitney.
In addition, he’s hoping to attract the Derby, Preakness and Belmont winners to the Travers, the first time that would happen in 28 years. The one possible defection could be Lookin At Lucky, at the moment considered to be the divisional leader.
The Preakness winner was scheduled to return to the track Tuesday morning after missing eight days of training with a cough. Unless things go perfectly, his scheduled appearance in the August 1 Haskell at Monmouth Park could be at issue. Many horsemen use the Haskell as a bridge race to the Travers.
And what of the 1,300 pound monster in the room, Zenyatta, currently atop the National Thoroughbred Racing Association national poll and the leading candidate for Horse of the Year 2010?
“The Mosses are from New York, Shirreffs is from New York, and they have expressed an interest in running in New York,” said Hayward, adding that he would reach out to them at some point in the future.
The Personal Ensign on Travers weekend would be a most logical spot. With her connections already stating she would remain at her Hollywood Park base and highly unlikely to race at Del Mar, a surface not especially to her liking, the 10-furlong Grade 1 seems the perfect fit if she decided to accept the challenge.
As of last weekend, it doesn’t appear that Shirreffs is all that anxious to leave the Golden State. “Not really,” he said, when asked if he had made inquiries about shipping to another circuit. Shirreffs has been outspoken about his disdain NYRA’s detention barn.
But that need not be a difficult fix. Surely some accommodation could be made--such as a personal guard in front of the stall of all Personal Ensign entrants--thereby eliminating a worrisome obstacle for a mare that has as many quirky traits as victories.
Continuing the reality bites theme, Hayward said that New York City OTB remains the biggest unresolved financial issue facing his cash-strapped association. NYC-OTB currently owes the NYRA fees totaling about $20-million, a number that’s been growing at a rate of $2-million per month.
One positive development for the association and horseplayers alike is that permission has been granted by the State Racing & Wagering Board to allow racing with uncoupled stable entries.
Given anticipated increases in handle, the elimination of this outdated statute could amount to $7-million at the bottom line, revenue badly needed for purse accounts. More fan friendly measures could be on the horizon according to SRWB chairman John Sabini.
And so it’s against this background that Saratoga 142 will play out. Trying to handicap how it all shakes out is about as easy as divining the trifecta in a turf sprint for maidens out of the 5-½ furlong chute. Chances are you’ll being seeing more of those this year, too.
30 Jun 2010 at 02:06 am | #
Hey Mr. Pricci,
Thanks for the report from the press conference. With respect to the six day schedule, and in light of a potential horse shortage, might NYRA reduce the number of races per day--to, say, 9 and 8?
Thanks,
eric s.
30 Jun 2010 at 06:20 am | #
Eric,
The answer is yes. Forgot exactly what Mr. Hayward said some weeks ago in response--it never came up on Monday.
I believe that we’re looking at nine race cards weekdays, 10 on weekends, probably 12 or 13 Travers day.
However, that’s what they said last year, and when the meet got off to a fast start, they began adding races.
You’ll be told that that’s what the horsemen want, but it’s not what NY racing needs right now, at Saratoga or anywhere else.
Good question, thanks!
JP
JP
30 Jun 2010 at 09:18 am | #
Hey John,
Did anything happen regarding racing on Palm Sunday?
Always been a pet peeve of mine.
Thanks,
Fats
30 Jun 2010 at 10:47 am | #
John last year I got a nice e-mail from Mr. Hayward responding to my inquiry stating that fewer races would be run with 9 on weedays and 10 on weekends. That never even started they went 10, 10 9(twilight), 11, 10 and even 10 on Monday!!!
Hopefully things will change this year but I doubt it. I really have no idea who the target audience is as it certainly is not us the horse players.
Will miss opening day for the first time in 25 years and I am not sad about it. Wish you and all your readers a happy and healthy meet.
30 Jun 2010 at 11:01 am | #
Mr. Pricci wrote:
One positive development for the association and horseplayers alike is that permission has been granted by the State Racing & Wagering Board to allow racing with uncoupled stable entries.
_____________________________
While the new uncoupling rule is step in the right direction, it is my understanding that an occasional coupling may appear in the past performances due to “partial” common ownership.
For example, a Dubb or a Robbins horse coupled with another horse they may have partial ownership of in the same race.
And what of the Main Track Only horses?
While they may not be coupled, their presence in the body of a turf race skews the morning lines absolutely.
Why doesn’t Mr. Donovan create a dirt ML and a turf ML. Makes sense does it not?
30 Jun 2010 at 11:35 am | #
In most cases I would be for this uncoupling but my work from the last two charts weekly shows that allowance races run on the dirt have had an average of 5.2 horses per heat from the seven races run at Belmont. Allowing this will result in more of these heats. During that period Mth ran 6 at 7.3 per race and CD ran 8 with an average size of 7. Look at what the reduction of entries needed for tri wagering did, more and more 6 horse heats. One note of interest was the fact that NYB won at least 2 of the Mth allowance races. Stay well all,
30 Jun 2010 at 01:16 pm | #
Don,
I see where more five horse races can be made to go with six with a trainer starting some other runner just to make the race go, if that is your point.
Sky,
Your interpretation of the entry exception I believe is correct. It was never fully explained, I did not read the new statute, but did understand there would be “rare exceptions.” It’s really silly, I think.
As far as MTOs, I don’t bother to add up the book in those races but it’s my understanding that MTO lines only refer to that horse if the race is taken off the grass. Lines on also-eligibles to do effect the odds in the body of the race. Lines for turf and rescheduled races is another matter.
Making a good line takes time. Some races you can do in five minutes if you’re skilled. In other races, an hour wouldn’t be enough. On balance, I think Eric does a good job. I’ve made lines for publications and racetracks at various times. The job’s a lot tougher than one might think.
Fats,
Think I might have been among the first to have that in print, writing last Wednesday that the Palm Sunday law would be revoked. And it was; there will be Palm Sunday racing in 2011.
Thanks all.
JP
30 Jun 2010 at 02:54 pm | #
John, sorry if I was not clear. I do not want 6 horse fields with 26% takeout. It has gotten that absurd. Stay well,
30 Jun 2010 at 10:16 pm | #
RUSSIANS STEAL OFFICIAL NYC-OTB/NYRA SECRETS
“But, yes, Virginia, there will be horse racing at the corners of Union and Nelson this year…”
AH…nuts. Cancel the Finger Lakes track vacation reservations.
One of the apprehended Russian spies - assigned to spy on our brilliant American (government-subsidized) business secrets – worked as a mole at NYC-OTB.
Despite her arrest, the purloined information is now irretrievably in the hands of the Kremlin.
“Estonian OTB – positioned on Zayat Cement Barge #19 in Pirita River - will be of superlative value to our International Nudnik Network - DA?!”
Their projected bankruptcy/reorganization is tentatively scheduled for June 1st, 2011.