SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, July 2, 2010--These two headlines were culled from Friday posts at Equidaily.com:
“VIDEO: Rachel arrives at her summer home in Saratoga.”
"NYRA PREZ: We are puzzled and disappointed that Rachel Alexandra, who performed so well at Saratoga last year, is passing up the Grade I Ruffian to run in a non-graded race at Monmouth Park over the same distance.
“We remain hopeful that the Saratoga fans will have the opportunity to see Rachel later in the meet."
I’m only sorry that Charlie Hayward uttered that last sentence at all but understand why he did.
To me it sounded a little like [name your favorite official, celebrity, or New York City mayor here], anyone synonymous with New York, pleading with LeBron James to come to town and shoot some hoops for the home team.
But this is what can sometimes happen when owners act “in the best interests of the horse.”
And I would doubt it but if a conference call were to take place among Bob Kulina, Hayward and Hal Handel, in all likelihood it would be Kulina who would utter the words: “It’s not personal, it’s strictly business.”
Generally, the line made famous by Michael Corleone is really disingenuous at its core: It may be just business, but it always turns out to be personal.
That’s doubtful in this case since these three men genuinely seem to like one another. Kulina and Handel are even former colleagues at the New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority.
But I’m not sure Hayward and Handel will be tipping any toll takers on the New Jersey Turnpike on their way back to Oceanport, New Jersey anytime soon.
Nevertheless, boosting the purse of the ungraded Lady’s Secret and moving the date back from August 1, Haskell day, to next Saturday, July 24, is a great business move.
First, it gives Monmouth Park another big day. Rachel probably will put an extra 5,000 fannies in seats, which amounts to lots of hot dogs, beer and admissions, not to mention gaining a measure of star power for the storied New Jersey venue.
Further, Rachel’s appearance on Haskell day would detract from Monmouth’s signature event. There would be one day is big time media coverage instead of two. The Haskell traditionally fills the place. Add Rachel and it would turn into a logistical nightmare.
And it might have been one of those cases in which another famous Garden Stater, Yogi Berra, might have proven prescient, or, to paraphrase: “It could be so crowded that nobody will show up.”
Lengthening the race from 8.5 to 9 furlongs is strictly an accommodation to the horse, or to two horses, the other being Zenyatta. As for other female tomato cans that might show up for this ungraded stakes, $400,000 is an attractive pot.
Since only 55% goes to the winner, to offset the cost of paying Monmouth entrants back to last place, the inflated purse guarantees at least two runners-up a good payday.
But make no mistake, you can bet Monmouth tried its damndest to make a dream matchup happen, made overtures, but the Zenyatta camp “graciously declined.”
“I’ll see your Apple Blossom and raise you a Lady’s Secret,” might have been the more apt response.
From the Rachel camp’s perspective, this much is clear: They wanted an easy prep race for their filly. The Grade 1 Ruffian would have been much tougher. There are some very high quality older fillies throughout the country not named Rachel or Zenyatta.
Of course, Rachel’s connections have the right to run their filly where and when they wish. But that doesn’t make this 11th hour announcement any less tacky.
New York Racing Association officials are embarrassed and angry, as they have a right to be. As I write this, I’m wearing this year’s baseball cap giveaway at the Spa, a nice looking burgundy number with the name Rachel spelled out on the back, in gold.
I’m wondering if it’s too late for NYRA to change the cap’s theme and color scheme prior to August 8th. “Get me Global Sourcing International on the blower, and make it pronto!”
If it weren’t in their best business interests, NYRA would be perfectly with
their rights to ask Steve Asmussen to take his horses off he grounds. Stall assignments still come under the purview of the racing secretary’s office.
But it’s better for NYRA’s bottom line that they bite this bullet and get Rachel to run in the Personal Ensign on Labor Day weekend. Forget about her trying to repeat last year’s Woodward triumph.
If for some reason, scheduling or otherwise, Rachel wanted no part of the Ruffian, I don’t think she’s willing to set her sights on Quality Road just yet, either. That meeting would only come for all the marbles.
Of course, the 10-furlong Personal Ensign, farther than Rachel has ever run, fits snugly inside the wheelhouse of the 2009 Breeders’ Cup Classic winner. At 7 p.m. EDT on July 24th, the ball will be back in Zenyatta’s court.
It’s too bad that these fillies are so damn good and are being campaigned in this manner. In one case, the big mare leaves town. In the other, the big mare very rarely strays far from home.
03 Jul 2010 at 06:38 am | #
John:
After two years of this Rachel/Zenyatta soap opera, can we finally move on. In the final analysis, all of the misplaced anger and finger pointing has been in vain. I believe that all of the strum und drang has once again merely proven that we need a central authority in racing.
In this regard, I found Charlie hayward’s recent statement concerning “talks” among the relevant parties as to “nationalizing” a schedule somewhat amusing. In this one example of Rachel’s next race, we see, in full blooming technicolor, why Charlie is whistling Dixie. If NYRA and the NJSEA are at each other’s throats, how can we ever expect some cooperation among all of the various conflicting interests?
John, I fear that we are doomed to stakes races with 5 horse fields for the forseeable future. It may be heresy to suugest this opinion, however, maybe our good friend Wendell has accidentally stumled upon the absolute truth. A full field of 5,000 claimers at Moutaineer beats a 3 horse turf allowance at Belmont each and every day of the week!
03 Jul 2010 at 07:38 am | #
Quote from Pricci:
“I’ll see your Apple Blossom and raise you a Lady’s Secret,” might have been the more apt response.”
Are you this immature, Pricci?
Sometimes I wonder if you have a screw loose.
Note:
Zenyatta’s connections do not enter non-graded events. They are only interested in Grade I events (ex: 2010 Grade I Apple Blossom).
Your “Hoax of the Year” has turned out to be an embarrassment to you and her fans, so you’ll try anything (including statements like the one above).
03 Jul 2010 at 07:48 am | #
John Pricci,
Your wearing a burgundy cap with the name “Rachel” on it?????
Do you also have a rainbow sticker on the back bumper of your car?
03 Jul 2010 at 07:56 am | #
Completely agree Hans. Jackson picked the nongraded race knowing there would be zero chance Zenyatta would follow (especially to incredibly speed biased Monmouth). Even if Zenyatta’s connections said they would go if they just pushed it back a week to fit in her schedule (like what Jackson pressed for in the Apple Blossom) do you think Jackson would go for that?
Let’s not forget Zenyatta has traveled out of her time zone over 2,000 miles every year she’s raced and plans to do it twice this year at least. Rachel never does any serious shipping before a race - I think Maryland to Belmont is about the farthest she’s gone at once.
03 Jul 2010 at 08:38 am | #
Brasco,
Take a look at how many different racetracks Rachel won a race at. Do some research!
JD
03 Jul 2010 at 02:00 pm | #
When Monmouth announced that they would be doing $50M in purses in 50 days, you could pretty much go to the windows that something like this would happen. Yeah, sure, Jess Jackson is taking the easy way out but as I’ve mentioned on other threads, the way this year is shaking out the winner of the BC Classic wins Horse of the Year. Just like all the other contenders, Jackson can take the path of least resistance and turn the year into a one-race season. Does the public lose out? Sure but when did that ever matter?
And I agree with Wendell (gulp!) on one account: While I love the spectacle of great horses and great matchups, usually the nightcap at Mountaineer is a better betting race than most of these stakes races, graded or not.
03 Jul 2010 at 05:27 pm | #
Amazing. Even when you attempt to use humor as a tip of the baseball cap to Zenyatta, the zealots come out in force.
“Hoax of the Year?” Will the ZZs ever move on?
Hex, a rainbow bumper sticker? Great idea. Wish I thought of that.
Happy 4th, everyone!
03 Jul 2010 at 06:56 pm | #
Sorry, John. Questions…
Unexplained characters who make inexplicable debuts in fiction & non-fictional accounts leads to…“Who He?” Who is Hal Handel?
(NY racing needing a Messiah - & badly - perhaps it’s a silly question.)
And did Rachel’s connections definitely commit to the Ruffian race – prompting the baseball hat order & delivery – & then renege by switching to MP’s Lady’s Secret?
If they hadn’t legally committed, then why is the Rachel camp’s announcement/decision “tacky”?
Why are NYRA officials justifiably “embarrassed & angry?” Did they justifiably assume that the Rachel deal was “done & done?”
But also, a salute for the wonderful analogy to the demeaning, contemptible process currently in progress – the Lebron James Billion-Dollar Hustle.
I understand that our tri-state Port Authority is brokering a Hudson River Compromise (which will save the other bidders from financial bankruptcy. Skeptical? Call the Texas Rangers comptroller & see if he finds any humor in your query).
James will play half of the season for the Knicks & the other half for the Nets – in exchange for a yearly salary equal to 639% of the 2010 GW bridge toll receipts.
Heck, this makes as much sense as Monmouth Park’s giveaway promotion today.
They haven’t seen a drop of rain in Oceanport N.J. in six weeks.
So with each paid admission, they handed out a nice big green umbrella.
Rachel doesn’t show & you’re stuck with the hats.
Rain doesn’t fall & you can still make friends with a useless gift.
What a world we live in…
03 Jul 2010 at 07:06 pm | #
Jimmy D - I don’t need help with research. Jackson only ships rachel short trips at a time. Zenyatta has traveled 4,000 mile plus round trips over multiple time zones every year she has raced. As for racing on different speed favoring dirt tracks located next to each other like rachel does - the much harder accomplishment is going from dirt to cushion to poly to pro ride. If you don’t believe me, try handicapping the SoCal circuit and watch how the form of horses reverse as they switch between the very different surfaces.
04 Jul 2010 at 12:41 am | #
John,
If Jerry Moss had entered Zenyatta in a non-graded stakes race you and dozens of other turf writers would be crucifying him and denigrating Zenyatta. But, of course, if it’s Rachel the double-standard rules are in effect. Instead you choose to focus your column on the business impact on Monmouth and Saratoga rather than questioning Jess Jackson’s decision on it’s own merits and what it says about the quality of Rachel’s 2010 campaign.
And as always, you continue your backhanded insinuations about Zenyatta and stretch all credibility by implying that the two horses are running similar 2010 campaigns.
You said, “It’s too bad that these fillies are so damn good and are being campaigned in this manner.”
Only one of the two is running a sub-standard campaign. Zenyatta has won three G1 races this year. Rachel hasn’t even entered one and is about to race in her second ungraded race of the year.
You said, ““I’ll see your Apple Blossom and raise you a Lady’s Secret,”
Once again the double-standard rules are in effect. So now, because it’s Rachel, entering the non-graded Lady’s Secret is the equivalent of a “raise” in the mythical poker game between RA and Z? Sorry, but the Lady’s Secret isn’t even “calling” Z’s bet let alone raising it.
You said, “If for some reason, scheduling or otherwise, Rachel wanted no part of the Ruffian, I don’t think she’s willing to set her sights on Quality Road just yet, either. That meeting would only come for all the marbles.”
Of course, the underlying implication is that if Rachel were to win the BC Classic “for all the marbles” then of course she would be a legitimate candidate for HOY, notwithstanding her pansy preceding campaign. Love that double-standard again. If Rachel were to win the BC Classic THAT would mean everything. But when Zenyatta did it last year it really didn’t prove anything.
And finally, any suggestion that Zenyatta’s connections might have seriously considered entering her in a non-graded stakes because the race was lengthened to 9 furlongs is simply ludicrous. Zenyatta ONLY runs in G1 races at this point in her career, her last seven in fact, and anything less is beneath her.
04 Jul 2010 at 01:34 am | #
Well, Mr. East Coast biased John Pricci, What do you have to say to what Lost in the fog, just said. You Ra fans have tried to vilify her being in grade 2 and less races and trying to make it look OK, Its not OK, Its down right sickning that a HOTY comes back and is running in these graded races.........What would you all be saying if this was Zen running like this?? I think anyone that could vote for Ra as a HOY again after this disgraceful year of running.
All I can say is we will know for sure that JJ is paying you people off...........I think you voters would be the laughing stock of the horse racing world..........
04 Jul 2010 at 05:27 am | #
Jess and Steve should be praised for this decision. They know their horse better than anyone and have obviously realized she is not competitive at the highest level of racing.
Who are we to question this? They are doing what is in the best of interests of their horse.
Of course Monmouth should thanked for their foresight. I expect other racetracks to follow their lead and create more of these enticing races, so that owners of all sorts of allowance type horses can run for these big pots.
Just what racing needs more of.
04 Jul 2010 at 01:30 pm | #
Will the whiners for Zenyatta ever stop. They’ve been trying to justify Zenyatta’s “supremacy” for almost a year. I’m so impressed she travelled all the way to Arkansas to beat overmatched fillies. The Mosses are such saints. Surely it wasn’t interest in money.
Let me clarify I’m not a Rachel fan but the pontification of Zenyatta is nauseating.
The point of Mr. Pricci’s article isn’t about Zenyatta or Rachel but the economics of today’s racing business. Monmouth has played all the right cards thus far, is proving a roaring success while the NYRA continues to prove it’s incompetency. Let everyone learn from Monmouth. They aren’t perfect, but they at least tried an innovative approach. To those who advocate a central authority, I agree, but I see no leadership in moving in that direction. The NRTA is a joke and has provided no leadership whatsover. So to each his own and Monmouth is leading the way.
05 Jul 2010 at 03:25 am | #
I do not think Mr. Kulina will call a press conference when stakes horses stabled on the Monmouth Park backside shuttles up the NY Thruway to participate at Saratoga this year.
Let us hope Rachel stays healthy in the interim to contest what will be a huge day of racing interest from coast to coast.
Mr. Kulina was all smiles on U.N. Handicap day. That office is making all the right moves. In a case of improvisation I saw this surprising sign hanging at the grandstand entrance.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/the_knight_sky/4760307670/sizes/m/in/photostream/
This piece of experimentation with Twilight Racing makes sense while the Churchill Downs meet has been completed. Zigging when everyone is zagging.
05 Jul 2010 at 03:29 am | #
Sorry about that.
This is the sign....
http://www.flickr.com/photos/the_knight_sky/4760421064/
05 Jul 2010 at 10:01 am | #
“Mr. Kulina was all smiles on U.N. Handicap day.”
I’ll attest to that. He looked radiant - as if an enormous load was off his back. To his credit, no one is more deserving of the salutes coming his way – having been there in the years when the ship was dead in the water.
Now, let’s get back to reality-based horse racing and focus on the ugly side of success.
I’m looking at potential developments that frequently occur after famine ends and feast begins.
1. The annoyance factor:
Those who originally fight against reforms that later succeed - with a straight face – then take credit for having been the original supporters of the successful reforms.
There currently must be at least a dozen highly annoying Monmouth Park executives, union officials, and others who are now busy publicly congratulating themselves for having thought of and having supported the reforms long before Kulina did.
Even though they didn’t.
2. Maintenance-deferred time-bombs will deflate the initial joy of success:
“How do you get to the main building?”
“Go in through the main entrance, drive through Detroit, and then look for the valet parking sign.”
How much money do you think it will take to completely rip up and redo the acres of 1950s iron-rusted concrete and weed-infested MP parking lots?
This is only one of many postponed projects that must be addressed.
And if they’re done badly – the odds are always 2/5 that this will occur – they’ll end up wrecking the place - like when they tore down the old MP indoor tote boards that provided us with instantly VISIBLE current odds - as opposed to TVs idiotically positioned fifteen feet above your head.
Even the idiots who put mini-TVs in airport and restaurant restrooms knew that they had to be eye-level with the captive members of their audience.
I’ll repeat that for emphasis:
The people who install TVs in public, commercial restrooms know more about where TVs should be physically located than the American racetrack geniuses.
3. What will the union members at the track feel is their due after years of belt-tightening?
4. A.N. Wilson remarked about the post-war 1950s, “Londoners could believe Harold Macmillan’s smug political slogan that they had ‘never had it so good.’
“If this was true for the law-abiding, it was by extension good for the criminals, since at least there was some money to steal after the austerity years.”
When profits resume, so does the re-infiltration of the pickpockets, conmen and women, and the thieves.
Give credit to the alert Oceanport police department that - I was told by two of their patrolmen last weekend - is now wisely assigning officers on patrol within the main building.
05 Jul 2010 at 05:17 pm | #
Yes. I did notice the police presence at the first aid booth (Grandstand Walking Ring).
Hang on to your wallets !
I could live with the weedy, gravelly parking lot.
Have you seen Aqueduct lately?
We never had it so good. :D
06 Jul 2010 at 08:32 am | #
KS: The only time I’ve been in AQ in the last ten years is a testament to the deadly dangers of winter cabin fever.
One February, the weather was relatively decent & we were horse itchy. Off in a cab we went to the track.
Getting there was no problem. Then the fun started.
We planned on having lunch in the restaurant. Not knowing the way to its entrance, we ended up guessing - going up four flights of nondescript stairs, without any posted directions.
There, we confronted locked doors - behind which was the restaurant hallway. Down the four flights we went, & eventually found the right way, traversing the ground floor & then up once again.
We were one of two parties in a cavernous, depressing enclosure that reeked of fallen empire.
At the end, the waiter handed us the other party’s bill.
And on the way home, we got more of what we deserved. The highway was ripped to shreds by construction crews; we crawled along at 10 mph when we weren’t inert; & arrived just in time to witness the first Robin of Spring.
NEVER again.
I have no idea what shape the AQ parking lot is in –
Other than the item in the news about a notice to all New York small aircraft pilots forbidden emergency landings in that area; the wildly uneven parking surface would act as a fatal catapult into Sheepshead Bay for any & all light aircraft attempting to land after running out of fuel.
You get a free desert at the Bumble Fumble restaurant on the third floor of MP’s main building, having been the first racetracker in the 21st century to have quoted the long-forgotten Harold Macmillan. Eat it wisely.