SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, July 7, 2010--Mace Siegel, one of the early patrons of thoroughbred racing in Southern California, is much in the news recently.
Foremost, he has an idea to save the game in SoCal. Like all plans that might have a chance to work, he wouldn’t share details with former LA Times sports editor turned columnist, turned racing writer, Bill Dwyre, who broke the news this week.
“I’m going to fix this,” Siegel told Dwyre, and of his intention to put fannies back in the seats at Hollywood Park, turning it into the playground of the stars it once was when Hollywood legends such as Al Jolson, Bing Crosby, Walt Disney, Cary Grant and Fred Astaire put their fannies in Turf Club seats.
Recall that it was Siegel who talked Frank Stronach into giving the Oak Tree Racing Association a new lease on an old life, this anyway. So don’t sell this octogenarian short.
That one intention gives me a rooting interest in Siegel’s Rail Trip, racing in Saturday’s Gold Cup and bidding to become the third horse in history to win multiple runnings of Hollywood’s signature event. The great Native Diver and Lava Man were the others.
But this is about a two year old that recently Siegel purchased after the colt finished third in his Kentucky Oaks-day debut, a maiden coming from far back to finish second in the Grade 3 Kentucky Juvenile Stakes, beaten a scant 1-½ lengths.
According to HRI sources, Boys At Tosconova, named for a restaurant frequented by the original owners who gave $35,000 for him as a September 2009 yearling, was purchased by Siegel, after Rick Dutrow’s green light, for $500,000 for a 75 percent interest. The original owners retained the rest.
In today’s Kentucky Derby market, Siegel could turn around and sell him tomorrow for 10 times that amount, at least, but at 84 he has all the money he can spend. And Derby Fever can be a particularly virulent strain.
In his first start for Dutrow last Friday at Belmont Park, Boys At Tosconova broke his maiden--in spades. But don’t take my word. Here is a copy of the Equibase chart footnotes, where seldom is heard a hyperbolic word:
“Boys At Tosconova, away in good order, accelerated suddenly after entering the turn, splitting rivals en route to grabbing the front, lengthened the advantage at every call,
without working up a sweat [italics mine], then cruised on to the finish line, a handy winner.”
The timer stopped at :56.26 as Boys At Tosconova finished first by an even dozen, after posting splits of :22.35 and :44.48. “I gave him a 78 final figure and a pace number of 87,” said Equiform Data’s Cary Fotias.
“I know it’s only five furlongs, but that’s the fastest number I’ve ever given a two year old this early in the year, and I’ve been making numbers since 1992.”
Some historical perspective, using the Equiform scale.
Chilukki, the sensational fast Bob Baffert-trained filly, eventually a graded stakes winner, earned a 77-½. Very fast, indeed.
The underappreciated Grade 1 winning Formal Gold came out running a 77 with an 84 pace figure. And he debuted as a three year old. In his next start, he returned with a 78-76 compression line (the pace number is generally written first).
A “compression line” is any debut figure where the pace and final figures are within four points of each other, in either direction.
In a perfect world, a compression line indicates two things; both of which are positive. A compressed figure can indicate that no matter how high a figure a horse earns, it is less likely to bounce because the distributed his energy in an efficient manner.
Further, it can be a sign that a horse is suited by style to handle added distance. That’s not a given, but empirically it has proven to be a very dependable barometer when coupled with pedigree, company, and other traditional handicapping variables.
To further illustrate, Curlin debuted in February of his three year old year and ran a 78-76-½ compression. His second start showed two more favorable patterns.
In start number two, Curlin ran a 68-75, a “reversal,” as he distributed his energy later in the race, indicating that he is likely to improve at longer distances.
The victory was also a “soft win,” this pattern indicating that he didn’t need to exert the same energy as he did in his previous start, meaning that could be more in the tank for start number three.
For Curlin, that was his visually impressive victory in the Arkansas Derby, in which he ran a 78-½ final figure. In most years, an 80 will win the Kentucky Derby.
Remember Smarty Jones? He ran an 87-72 winning his debut, then returned with an 87-77 in start two. Of course, he debuted as a fall two year old.
Dutrow is already talking up a campaign that works backwards from the 2011 Kentucky Derby, promising not to over-race the colt this year.
While it’s fashionable to skip the Breeders’ Cup Juvenile with a “Derby horse,” an exception might be made this year because the Juvenile is run over the Derby track.
In all probability, this colt will race only once at Saratoga. But as promising as his victory was, he will need to be all that if he runs into a colt named Kantharos. [Check the video of his 9-½ romp in Churchill’s G3 Bashford Manor. His Equiform figure was unavailable as of this post].
Said Fotias: “Boys At Tosconova is by Officer. I’m not sure about the Derby, but I do know he’s my early favorite to win the Met Mile.” Stay tuned.
07 Jul 2010 at 11:58 pm | #
Reminds of of how the turf writers jumped the hoops for Maimonides a few years ago up at the Spa after he broke his maiden in similar fashion. Most of these precocious two year olds turn out to be one hit wonders.
08 Jul 2010 at 03:27 am | #
True enough, Tim, but if you didn’t like “Boys"--have you seen the race, what was your impression?--then, as suggested, check out video of Kantharos’ Bashford Manor, already a two-hit wonder.
Four other things: I did not build the Maimonides bandwagon; I did not write the Equibase footnote; performance figures, no matter which ones you use, provide an objective standard, taking it out of the realm of opinion and, finally, why I used Equiform data to illustrate that it’s important to know how horses run fast, not just how fast they run.
Two more things: I’ve got a pretty good record at this site, indicating I know a little something about equine talent, and exactly when did it become so fashionable to use the term “turf writers” only in the negative?
Ah, the seeds of Wendell beginning to take root.
Sorry to be so edgy, Tim, but that’s what happens when I read comments before I’ve had my coffee.
Thanks for taking the time,
JRP
08 Jul 2010 at 04:31 am | #
“cut fractions”, “compression line”, “pace number”, “handy winner”, “soft win”. I’m sure the same discription could be applied to a first time starting $5,000 claimer who runs away and hides from the field; who would know the difference, as the human eye cannot determine fractions, only a mechanical timer can.
I wish the ‘game’ were that easy, just go with the highest Beyer, pace figure, or chart footnotes; and don’t forget to bring a duffle bag to stash the loot.
So now I can look forward to collecting $3.00 on Boys At Toscanova, or key the horse in a pick three or pick four.
08 Jul 2010 at 05:11 am | #
The 2001 Best Pal Stakes may have been the most impressive 2yo sprint stake of the decade for me. Showing this race the next day on Capital OTB drew unbelievable response but after the Champagne we saw a different Officer and I’m sad to say we saw by far his best going 6.5f! I’m very dubious of Officer as the distance(today’s version) stallion. But as with 8/15/01 hope is eternal!
08 Jul 2010 at 06:03 am | #
Preech, Remember me at 2 the fastest horse ever, the buzz at the Oklahoma training track. Didn’t pan out at 3(derby flop). You never know with 2 year olds going to age 3. Let’s see a Hopeful matchup between B.A.T. and Kantharos so we can get more than $3.
08 Jul 2010 at 06:36 am | #
I have no problem with first-time-Dutrow-for-the-Seigels. Arson Squad tallied in The Meadowlands Cup doing just that.
But in Boys at Tosconova we ARE talking about a loose-on-the-lead maiden winner. One who was being chased by a 92/1 shot who ultimately finished last.
The none of the other six rivals in this race had ever raced before. Who knows if they will ultimately turn out to be maiden $50,000 claimers?
While Boys at Tosconova’s fractions scream quality, how about we see how he handles pace-pressure and show some ability to rate as the distances stretch out before anointing him as the second coming of Henny Hughes.
08 Jul 2010 at 06:42 am | #
Anthony, perhaps the next time we partner, think it’s next Saturday, we can look at the two horses above plus the Best Pal if the boys can find it. Could be a fun segment. (Anyone wishing to see it--whether we do that particular segment or not--can log on top capitalotb.com and click on “Handicappers Report” for live streaming.
To all, this was meant to be interesting, informative and instructive. It’s not about betting on these horses, $3 or otherwise.
Don’t be so hard on yourself, Unbridled. You were just being modest, did not want to make excuses, but you had those bad feet and ran with “egg barn shoes” in the Derby. You were fast and talented. Maybe your owner already had begun planting the seeds of bad karma. You were a cool horse. And, yes, a Hopeful matchup would be lovely.
JP
08 Jul 2010 at 07:13 am | #
Before going over and out on this particular post, perhaps the third time will be some kind of charm. He wasn’t anointed anything. This was about Mace Siegel--his part in this story plus the Hollywood thing-and how his figure compared to proven horses of the past, and what they did in their debuts. Thus, “B.A.T., In Rarified Air.”
C’mon, people.
08 Jul 2010 at 07:18 am | #
Unbridled’s Song,
You were the best horse. Didn’t pan out at 3? You must have forgotten how you dusted your rivals in the Florida Derby and won the Wood Memorial with a bad foot.
Derby flop? I don’t think so. Despite wearing those egg ‘bar’ shoes, you led the field a merry chase into upper stretch, still in front at the eighth pole.
Yep, those sore feet and egg bar shoes finally caught up with you, but despite the fact you shouldn’t have even been in the race because of the feet you missed third by a nose and a neck.
I know you’re probably a modest fellow, but if you’d like to watch yourself in the race, here is the link.
http://www.kentuckyderby.com/history/year/1996
No doubt about it Unbridled’s Song, you were the best.
08 Jul 2010 at 10:24 am | #
Nick, I know I was the best of my generation if not for the quarter crack foot problems, but after my 2 year old season and breaking the record in the Breeders Cup I was destined for TRIPLE CROWN glory. Thats why I said it didn’t pan out at 3. Greatness only remembers the classics. Thanks for the replay though, interesting that my offspring do well on the track, but may have inherited my foot problems, like the great Eight Belles. I was only making the point to Preech’s article about buzz of 2 year olds being campaigned backwards to the derby this early!
08 Jul 2010 at 11:05 am | #
John,
John,
I enjoy your site, but I must take issue with one of the statements in your comment (no. 2) above. You state that “performance standards, no matter which one you use, provide an objective standard, taking it out of the realm of opinion.”
The final time that a horse posts in a race is an objective fact. A speed figure/performance rating or whatever else you call it is a subjective interpretation - or opinion - on how fast or slow the horse ran. That’s not to say that the opinion is not well-grounded in fact, but it is still an opinion.
By way of example, last year, the Zenyatta - Rachel debate on many internet sites was permeated with statements that “Zenyatta was not as good (i.e., too slow)” because she hadn’t earned lofty Beyer figures, with the figures cited as if they were gospel truths. The Breeders’ Cup showed that those opinions to be wrong.
08 Jul 2010 at 12:00 pm | #
U.S.,
I hear you. You should have been a Triple Crown champion, assuming the Belmont distance didn’t trip you up.
Since you’re a horse, you should know better than anyone how amazing your Derby performance was with those unwieldy shoes. It would be like Usain Bolt competing in the 100 meter dash wearing rubber galoshes over work boots.
Now that I think about it, you might have become the best horse of the decade, or darn close to it.
08 Jul 2010 at 01:11 pm | #
John:
I’ve always thought that Slew’s Champagne was the greatest performance by a two-year-old in the last half-century. Devil’s Bag and Arazi each showed domination but were mere pretenders.
In any event, nothing is more invigorating than talking about precocious two-year-olds on the eve of Saratoga. All of racing’s problems seem to fade away when our cars are pointed towards Exit 14 on the Northway!
08 Jul 2010 at 02:40 pm | #
Nick, Thanks for the love, but might of been the best reminds me of the saying .....If the Queen had balls she’d be “Kling”. HaHa
Preech, You could say from the top of stretch in the derby it was the beginning of a nightmare for EP.... another day, another story perhaps.
08 Jul 2010 at 03:01 pm | #
Paul,
Because of its timing, my first year at Newsday, Seattle Slew has a place in my heart beyond his greatness. In the very first column I wrote, I predicted Slew would win the Triple Crown. What the hell did I know? At that age and stage, you know everything.
Who knows, maybe this will be the group that turns into that great three year old class? Hope springs eternal with the babies, fun watching them develop, or not. But always interesting.
Juvenile racing at the Spa, two weeks and counting down.
09 Jul 2010 at 01:06 am | #
Mr. Pricci: “Juvenile racing at the Spa, two week and counting down.” You also should inform your readers that a) there will be no need to bring a duffle bag to collect any loot, 2) there is still time to contact your local bank loan officer to establish a credit line, 3) to make sure your ATM account has ample funds, and most importantly 4) that wagering on yearlings is the worst possible wager.
21 Jul 2010 at 04:15 pm | #
From NY to Cali to Texas and points in the middle.
Double digit losses in attendance and handle. NJ has decided to split the loot between slots and themselves. The tracks are for sale at the bargain low price of $1 a year.
JRP: If you have some success pick’n at Saratoga, you can own TB racing in NJ for the price of a dog n’ beer. Texas will be flipping a coin soon. They want to sell. Cali is for sale. NY may decide to sell but will take at least 3 decades to decide on a meeting to decide when to decide to decide. If you get my meaning.
This entire industry considers the player as an after-thought. Racing has ignored the players for decades & now the players are ignoring racing. Seems fair to me.
Racing WILL NOT change anything that could posiibly attract players to return or to try gambling on their overpriced highly questionable product offering. All I see is more pigs lining up at the trough with the slop supply shrinking faster than the farmer can replace it.
How long does a pie last when 30% chunks are yanked out at every turn? And your wagering choices are limited to 4 or 5 entries with 2 listed as odds-on in the Morning Line?
And 50% of the carded races are for 1st timers or those who have not won a race in 30 starts or that can be claimed for the price of a 1990 Kia Rio?
$6 to park close, $5 to get in, $5 to $25 for a seat with or without video, $5 for the Form, $2 for a program, $3 for plain dog & bun, $5 for small glass of warm beer (tap), 30% take w/breakage on every bet, 3-1 up to 6-1 starter’s odds dropping to odds-on 48 seconds after the race starts, horses having lost 20 or 30 races running backwards suddenly waking up & running 5 seconds faster than their best lifetime, jockies hand riding odds-on favorites from the gate to the wire, coming in last, race after race & no questions asked, stewards that seem to have no rule books or direction, etc., etc. Chaos. I should be hired to write ads for this “sport”.
Gotta go. Got a poker game with ZERO take. Imagine that.
RIP Racing Industry. Karma is a bitch.