And so, once again, the fillies shall lead them.
It was only a week ago that we posited here how this might be the fourth consecutive year in which the Horse of the Year title when to a horse of the distaff persuasion.
Perhaps racing events this past week might not have furthered the cause of fillies or mares that would be recognized as best in show, but the ladies sure dominated events on the racetrack, the only place it matters.
On Thursday, the remarkable undefeated 2-year-old filly champion of 2010, Awesome Feather, made her first start since winning Florida’s Sunshine Millions Distaff in January.
Not only did she not disappoint but once again she dominated her rivals in fast time. Indeed, Big Sandy was on the quick side, but 1:33.47 is really rolling at any track not named Turf Paradise.
Besides, hard-hitting older allowance/optional claiming males raced the same distance in 1:34.10.
Dealing with tendon issues is extremely tricky, of course, requiring considerable patience and expert care. Credit principal owner Frank Stronach and trainer Chad Brown here.
The day after, when it was known that she came out of the race well, the owner told Brown to continue taking care of the filly, and if that means skipping the Breeders’ Cup Ladies Classic, so be it.
And you know that as the master of Santa Anita Park, Stronach would love nothing better than to show his filly off to the world. Because of his responsible attitude, Stronach is an upperdog whose horses are easy to root for.
As if dealing with extensive tendon issues weren’t enough, Brown has had to manage the expectations that come with training an undefeated race horse, a streak that now has reached 10.
Subsequent to the result, Brown said his wish is to get to the Breeders’ Cup Ladies Classic for a showdown that many people would like to see.
Saturday at Philadelphia Park, er, Parx, that showdown became at least a three-filly affair—and not to forget this excludes the older defending distaff champion, Royal Delta, and her very unlucky rival, It’s Tricky.
Showdown might not be a big enough word.
Much was made of the fact that Pennsylvania’s only Grade 1 stakes, the $1 million Cotillion for 3-year-olds, only drew four competitors.
For those critics, this question: What if you were the owner of any 3-year-old filly in the land not named Questing or My Miss Aurelia, would you be knocking down the racing office door to get into the fray?
And, remember, please, there is more pressure than ever to “do the right thing by the horse.”
The obvious overmatching of race horses for the purpose of earning minute shares of a big purse does not serve the best interests of the Thoroughbred.
And these were female giants that were on display in the Cotillion, make no mistake. Steve Asmussen has won well over 6,000 races; he knows how to do this.
The face that he ran an undefeated champion off a single sprint win against the most celebrated horse of either sex at Saratoga was no accident. Clearly, only the barn knew how good this filly, even as an undefeated champion, truly is.
Indeed, My Miss Aurelia’s horizons might still be limitless. Yes, the rail and the surface at Parx was dead on Saturday--an inept, unmitigated disgrace—and she raced outside Questing, who was setting the pace at least 3 paths out from the rail.
And you cannot make an excuse for a horse of Questing’s obvious quality that gets to set early split of :25 and :50. Further, she benefitted from old-pro handling by young Irad Ortiz Jr., who herding My Miss Aurelia and Corey Nakatani for all they were worth, perhaps taking advantage of Questing’s propensity to drift in the stretch.
(The dry surface and dead inside did Pennsylvania Derby favorite Alpha no favors, and neither did the recurrence of his obstreperous gate antics. Ortiz later returned to win the Pa. Derby with a clever rating performance aboard 20-1 Handsome Mike, a race that was inscrutable to comprehend from flag-fall to finish).
So, in the tradition of Meadow Star and Lite Light, with a lot more physicality, these two fillies put on a million-dollar exhibition down the stretch and, while the final margin was wider on the line, the issue was in doubt until the final strides.
So, hopefully, these fillies, Awesome Feather, and next week’s Personal Ensign fillies, Royal Delta and It’s Tricky all make it into the Santa Anita starting gate on the first weekend in November.
Whether or not a Horse of the Year title is in question remains a backstory for now. At this point in time, the Ladies Classic is the marquee event of Breeders’ Cup XXVIII.


23 Sep 2012 at 08:31 am | #
This article brings up a reminder of a suggestion that was made last year by Steve Haskin: Why not put all of the Juvenile races on Friday, and move the distaff races to Saturday? For several years, the filly/mare races have been nearly as exciting as the Classic, and this year, the Ladies’ Classic could very well eclipse (no pun intended) the Classic itself.
23 Sep 2012 at 08:46 am | #
JP,
Guess I lucked out big-time when Well Spelled came from a way-back last, went 6 or 7 wide on the turn and won The Gallant Bob Stakes one race earlier over Trinniberg.
I considered him an overlay at 14-1 and thus bet him win/place plus boxed the winning exacta!
This dovetails nicely with yesterday’s Morning Line on the morning line. Well Spelled was listed at 6 -1.
I don’t know anything about who makes the ML for Parx, but, even if he was remotely close this was a huge overlay in my estimation.
Additionaly, anybody with a Racing Form who reads more than just the pp’s would have known too. Dave Grening’s page 4 article was titled “Well Spelled Looks For Upset In Gallant Bob”. It’s an enlightening read if you still have your form.
I pointed this out to several fellow OTB patrons, they all ignored it and didn’t bet the horse! This shows that a lot of people want to be smart and bet only their picks instead.
Maybe I lucked out, maybe not.
***
As far as morning lines are concerned; there are two schools of thought. Make a line that tries to predict what the odds will be or make a line as to the actual chances of each runner.
I favor the latter, but, unfortunately most line makers do the former and that’s what I live with.
Still to me the morning line is indispensable.
I could probably write a full blog just on this subject, but, will stop boring anybody further.
Den
PS: Agree, Eric Donovan is extremely good at what he does.
23 Sep 2012 at 10:15 am | #
Denny, you didn’t luck out, you did your homework, as does Dave Grening. Good job by both.
I used him in the P4 as he was off a New Pace Top Equiform pattern but went bust with Handsome Mike. Can’t make that horse, not even a day later.
I sketched out a quick line for the Gallant Bob and considered him value at or around 10-1. Like late developing young sprinters in the fall and, of course, the short game is a Perkins specialty. (Note three very solid works after the NPT).
Anyway, kudos.
Deltalady, could not agree more. When it first started, I was a fan of Breeders’ Cup “Ladies Day” but now believe that the concept really doesn’t work for the sport, although it has become a tradition what with Oaks day concepts gaining wider popularity with the tracks. It probably also helps with marketing/advertising/revenue projects.
I too would like to see the Distaff, er, Ladies Classic, back on the Saturday program.
23 Sep 2012 at 11:54 am | #
Denny M: I’ve never ceased to be amazed at some of the morning lines, where horses listed at 4-1 go off at 9/5 (with no significant scratches, etc.).
Granted, sometimes the job is just ridiculously impossible. But too often, your 10-1’s go off at 5-1; the 20-1’s go off at 90-1, etc.
As the old grizzled whojamacallhim (name forgotten) many years ago said, “Make Your Own Line!”
JP: Is it me, or is there a good reason why I have no enthusiasm for who this year ends up as HOTY?
Just because the award exists, is it necessary to give it out even if there’s no obvious candidate, & we’re taking another look at the results chart of the Illinois Derby, just to make sure that someone wasn’t overlooked?
Not a big deal, just curious.
Also curious as to why Reddam hired a backwater trainer (ranked #269 on the Equibase trainers standings prior to the PD, with earning of $681,000; & you can’t get any more backwater than Industrial Parx) prior to Leandro Mora winning the race with Handsome Mike, owned by Reddam.
Didn’t bet the race; that’s not influencing my line of thought.
(Mora is now #104, with $1,310K earnings.)
As for the Penn Derby, it was evident that people somehow thought that Alpha had placed in the Derby and the Preakness, & then had won the Belmont stakes, prior to winning the Travers.
They’ll probably make the same mistake the next time Handsome Mike gets carded in a race. I’m thinking, the Breeders’ Cup - with Reddam thinking he’s got a hot horse, instead of one of the greatest bounce beneficiaries of the decade.
23 Sep 2012 at 08:13 pm | #
CORRECTION: I erred (big time!) by identifying Leandro Mora as a “backwater trainer,” having forgotten that he’s substituting for O’Neill, the regular trainers of Handsome Mike, & in fact, is not based at Parx, but in California.
Normally, I’d also be eager to apologize for such a muff, as well as posting this embarrassing correction (in this instance, the more embarrassing, the better).
But anything to do with O’Neill is fundamentally a disgrace that merits little or no redemptive action on the part of people who, like myself, were revolted by the specter of a trainer - scheduled for a 45-day suspension (starting on July 1st) - intentionally being listed, in June 2012, as the trainer of record of a horse which could have won the Triple Crown by winning the Belmont Stakes.
“What A World We Live In”: Even a recent baseball cheat - a San Francisco Giant apprehended & suspended for drug violations this year - has voluntarily taken himself out of future consideration as the possible league batting champion.
23 Sep 2012 at 11:18 pm | #
Mr. Pricci: Re - Pennsylavania Derby. I don’t understand why you make the comment ‘the dry surface and dead rail inside did Alpha no favors, nor his gate antics’. Both Alpha and Handsome Mike raced pretty much the entire race in the two and three paths respectively, and Handsome Mike pulled away to win impressively. Where are the accolades for this thoroughbred? And, what was ‘so inscrutable to comprehend’?
23 Sep 2012 at 11:59 pm | #
WMC, Handsome Mike raced in at least the 3-path, maybe the 4-path, and while Alpha wasn’t on the fence, he was on the slower portion of the track: 8 of 9 dirt winners received wide rally comments.
Dominguez, who never makes excuses, only said he tried to “get to the outside” the entire race but the slow pace had the horses bunched up and there was no room to get out.
Handsome Mike won a race--in very slow time--in which none of the major horses ran to their best ability. This does not disparage the horse’s win, just stating the obvious.
Did you see where the Gallant Bob winner came from?
Don, there’s no accounting for the way horses are bet ultimately, no matter what the morning line states. “Hot” horses or ones that are “dead” on the board occur in every race and generally are unknowable, except for a strongly rumored first starter, etc.
Rather than acknowledging something that happens in virtually every race, why not make a study of how those hot and dead horses do at your track, or for this trainer, etc.? You might be surprised how helpful your observations might be.
Some years, the Horse of the Year is not an obviously dominant horse. In those cases, you count up the Grade 1s, look at who beat who and under the prevailing conditions and go from there. Individual voters can leave certain categories vacated if they wish.
24 Sep 2012 at 01:19 am | #
Mr. Pricci: Apha was on the lead going around the first turn along with Handsome Mike, thus there was no need to get outside. I believe that in both stake races, the jocks tried to establish a slow pace. Handsome Mike pulled away down the stretch, thus he was not tiring. In the 7th race, the fractions were 23.1 / 46.4 / and 1:11:8 going a mile and seventy - big difference in splits when compared to the two stake races.
24 Sep 2012 at 12:14 pm | #
The quintessence of horse racing: a difference of opinion. Viva that.
27 Sep 2012 at 07:18 pm | #
At this point ...
Anyone who cares about NY racing would be telling the Breeders’ Cup folks to take a long walk off a short pier.
Since the BC started I have seen every race live (in person or on TV). But no more. I won’t even download the PPs this year.
Think about it. The BC has effectively destroyed the racing calendar after the TC races. Crist (and maybe others) complain about the Hopeful being downgraded to G2, but what is it now other than a glorified allowance race? (Has NY written any actual allowance race for 2YOs yet?)
The BC has sucked everyone in long enough. It’s time to end it; and maybe the Handicap Triple will mean something again. Not paying attention is the way to kill it.