There are not enough racetrack managers who understand how to maximize revenues because they forget that, in addition to providing great theater and exciting, colorful sport, they are in the gambling business.
Do you know what the requirement should be for getting a top level job at a successful, well known racetrack venue? Or put another way; do you want to see takeout rates plummet? Here’s how:
Any executive holding a title above that of a middle manager should be compelled to bet his annual salary over the course of one year! I don’t care if the degree of difficulty is no more complex than making a show bet, let these executives learn about the business of wagering first hand.
The reason trickle down economics doesn’t work is because the spoils never reach the level of those for which tax breaks are needed or were intended. It’s mostly flim-flam for those at the top to hold on to what they already have.
But the kind of tax cuts we’re talking about hear--lowering parimutuel takeout--gets profits to climb back to the top because those buying the product simply have more money to spend on what they want: Action and an opportunity to make a score.
The issue of takeout has become more salient with every monthly decline in national wagering handle. This is not a new phenomenon; it’s been happening for years now.
“What can we do,” racing executives ask? “The problem is in our state houses, not our board rooms.”
There is one way for them to be heard, but first they would need to fill their sacks. So the problem may lie inside their trousers.
Racing executives need to occupy their state capitals. Explain to lawmakers that if they cannot be allowed to lower parimutuel taxes to compete with other forms of gambling, customers will continue to go broke at a faster rate and disappear altogether.
Give them the Jerry Maguire line: “Help me help you!”
The Horseplayers Association of North America very recently did a detailed study of the effects of raising takeout and lowering takeout on betting handle.
Invariably, lowering takeout raises handle and raising handle decreases it. Tampa Bay Downs would be a prime example of the former; Santa Anita sadly would be an example of the latter.
And the value of the good will created by the former and bad as a result of the latter? Priceless.
In some examples, the numbers relating to the takeout results in the HANA study were astounding, yet historically predictable.
From 2009, when the takeout at Tampa Bay Downs in the Pick 4 pool was 20%, to this year, with an 18% takeout rate, handle nearly doubled at 97%. Revenue increased by 77%.
Parenthetically, it is not coincidental that in recent years Tampa management has found a way to reduce takeout in some of its pools and the bettors have responded. Eureka!
This year, Tampa is lowering the takeout in the straight pools and introducing a 50-Cent Pick 5 at a 15% rate.
HANA also measured the effect of raising takeout, using the Pick 4 at Laurel as an example. During a five year period, takeout was increased from 14% to 25.75%, an astounding 84% increase.
Anyone with a modicum of common sense and an understanding of Takeout 101 is not surprised that average wagering handle declined by 53% and the revenue from takeout declined by 13%.
The one year Laurel experimented with lowering takeout, wagering handle increased by 16%. Imagine what that number might have been if the trial had not been conducted during their short summer meet, while competing with Saratoga and Del Mar?
Parimutuel racing, like any other product, must be priced properly or the customers will find an alternative game to play, it’s that simple.
The HANA study correctly concludes that the current takeout rates at most tracks are unsustainable, and that if online poker is legalized, its much lower takeout rate would blow horse racing out of the gambling business for good.
Then where would those executives find the next cushy job with lots of zeroes before the decimal point? And who would American breeders sell all those pretty horses to?
Tomorrow and for every day that follows, racing executives should be thankful they don’t have to support their families by betting for a living. Most wouldn’t know the first thing about it.


23 Nov 2011 at 06:22 pm | #
cart before horse. takeout can lower when handle increases.the takeout movement would be wise imo to get on the advertising bandwagon. there’s an unlimited internet market out there. who will be the first racing (journalist) to figure out this simple concept.
23 Nov 2011 at 10:58 pm | #
It’s funny how Las Vegas didn’t wait to put the “cart before horse” with slot machines. Years ago they lowered the takeout on slots from the stratosphere to 1 or 2 per cent. Surprise! Slots displaced table games as their biggest money maker. That can’t be done with horse racing but 10 per cent takeout sure has a nice ring to it.
23 Nov 2011 at 11:44 pm | #
greywoof there’s research out there that says that takeout affects, in terms of participation, about 2% of the players. i am 100% for lower takeout. u must however associate takeout with operating costs. until operating costs are met takeout will be high. Hence wisdom to the goal dictates that HANA and company get behind internet marketing--and I mean on e.g. ESPN instead of Paulick Report. As for Casino tracks, same deal. the horse racing operation has to pull its weight through marketing that has yet to be done anywhere in the usa as far as I am able to tell. when will they start marketing horse racing like poker. When will the first Zenyata vid appear on ESPN with today’s pick 6 pots and easy directions on how to bet??? there’s an unlimited market. then u lower takeout. instead of before. ridiculous to talk about until there’s marketing because the tracks can’t meet their expenses. I’m all for lowering purses and adjusting them to reality also.
24 Nov 2011 at 07:40 am | #
fb0252, As Mr. Pricci has demonstrated, lower takeout increases revenue. I’m all for promotion and marketing. However, the two proposals are not mutually exclusive. Lower the takeout and increase revenue. It can only help the tracks and increase purse sizes for the horsemen. You’re not saying that increased profit (after expenses) somehow increases track expenses, are you? Las Vegas didn’t promote the slots first and LATER drop the takeout. They dropped the takeout first and THEN advertised the high return to the public. I was here when it happened, actually since 1981.
24 Nov 2011 at 09:09 am | #
John, Happy Turkey to you and all the horseplayers! Encouraging a lower takeout is a [I hate cliches] is a “win win”. Horseman are attracted thru lower takeout. Hence larger fields, more competition, and better prices. Your Tampa Bay analogy was excellent. They took advantage of logistic issues @ GP and once fans realized it was a great alternative they had their niche...You gotta keep moving forward or the cr the competition will!
24 Nov 2011 at 11:15 am | #
John,
Great righting as always. The HANA example you referenced was taken from my website and can be found here: http://www.equinometry.com/2011/11/16/the-effect-of-increased-takeout-percent-on-wagering-handle/
Thanks and keep up the good work,
Lenny
24 Nov 2011 at 03:51 pm | #
Greywoof--e.g. of las vegas lowering takeout and increasing slots is without valid comparison. there’s zero resemblance. However, were HR to be profitable resulting from appropriate targeted marketing, then HR would be in position of Las Vegas. various tracks have experimented with lower takeout. what has that done to date as a e.g. I will pay attention to HANNA “after” they develop a strategy that helps HR instead of lines the few player’s pockets that are members. It’s irrational at present. To me rational is: track finances in line--u first meet expenses by lowering purses and increasing marketing. then takeout.
24 Nov 2011 at 05:30 pm | #
I’m.... speechless.
24 Nov 2011 at 09:04 pm | #
Goer,
The problem with takeout reductions in NY is that it never happens without quid pro quo. It’s not enough that ideas make sense and are a win-win; there’s always the hidden agenda.
FB and Grey,
Entertaining back and forth; thanks.
Nickie,
Good read of the situation.
Lenny,
Mea culpa; confused the sites but not the message. Good job.
JP
25 Nov 2011 at 04:40 am | #
Let’s tell it like it is. Every greedy practice that man has invented since the beginning of time has been used by the NYRA, which is what brought them to the state they are in now. I keep hearing about the large increases in purses due to the influx of casino dollars, but I will believe it when I see it. More likely, rather than raising the purses making New York the highest in the country on a daily basis throughout the year, a token raise in purses is more likely. It is my fondest wish to see them thrive, but unless and until the political thievery stops, it will be business as usual.
TTT
25 Nov 2011 at 04:32 pm | #
Top Turf Ted--who’se greedy--u as horse owner or NYRA???
ur post to me is the symptom of what primarily ails racing--failure to own up. what u’re in the game for is to rip it off for $$$. Let’s start with this assumption and tell it like it is.
rewrite ur post so that it makes sense--Track and owners are all in it together. Owners need tracks on which to race. Thus, owner’s #1 priority is economic survival of “ur” race track from horse side revenue. for what conceivable reason r u (instead of NY) “entitled” to casino revenue?
If the track is unable to meet expenses, then it may expire and u r without any place to race ur horse. So, let’s get this priority straight. Track first, owners and players second. If the tracks indeed are doing what u accuse--ripping u off, then provide some evidence. the evidence would be btw that the track is making profit above and beyond expenses (from horse revenue) and failing to use part of this profit for purses and lower takout. if u’d have some evidence, then ur point would be well taken imo.
26 Nov 2011 at 09:46 am | #
fb0252, if you look at the examples made by Equinometry, besides increased handle, lower takeout results in more revenue for tracks and horsemen. That is what optimum takeout is all about. HANA has never stated that the takeout should be lowered to satisfy the bettor, but lowered to maximize revenue for tracks and horsemen.
The expenses of a track or a casino have absolutely no bearing on what the optimum takeout should be.
As for the cart being ahead of the horse, the fact is that in order to increase handle and revenues, takeout must be lowered first....not the other way around....the way you are stating it should be is the way it has been for years, and you know what, it doesn’t work.
Horse racing is about gambling. It needs to attract gamblers. We need visible winners to do that successfully and the only way to have visible winners is to have a long term beatable game (by at least a few).
27 Nov 2011 at 06:01 am | #
dere fb0252, eye dew the best eye can to get my . across. u ob v us lee like u sing the modern language, which eye am not good at. trying to learn. Excuse me if i falter + use capitalization and such. You also obviously like the “Boss Tweed,” method, which has been employed by the NYRA for years. Good luck with that chief.
TTT
27 Nov 2011 at 07:59 am | #
TTT? A big thumbs up.
29 Nov 2011 at 09:06 pm | #
R I P racing industry… Stronach, CDI, NYRA and individual tracks are creating an ADW environment that will result in a over priced, restrictive splintered model pushing fans, old and new, away from internet wagering altogether. And they will not return.
The powers that be, as stated in the article above, are only concerned with grabbing every dollar today. I doubt most have ever made a racing wager. Current status of all the drug discussions? Status quo. No changes expected.
Well, it seems that the cheating, theft, insider manipulations, larceny, unlimited forgiveness of those convicted, and total disdain for the wagering player are to continue unabated.
Even the hard core fans will eventually be forced to turn elsewhere.
05 Dec 2011 at 07:54 am | #
Do spammers really think this stuff works? Sadly, apparently....