OCEANPORT, NJ, June 14, 2010--Distracted by the final Derby preps, the Triple Crown, and the fact that neither had raced since before the first Saturday in May, I had forgotten just how great the Princess and the Queen are. See how they run, indeed.
Whether they win by margins, or whether they keep you in suspense until the very last jump, defending Horse of the Year Rachel Alexandra and undefeated champion race mare Zenyatta are still the best equine show on Earth.
Neither female was expected to lose last weekend and neither did. One provided a jaw slacking display of wanton speed and high class. The other left you breathless, demanding that you rise from your seat and yell your brains out to win just one more in a row.
Bye-Bye Cigar. Bye-Bye Citation.
“And I don’t care how many state-bred sprinters you beat 19 straight times ‘Queen of New Mexico Racing‘. I’m the ‘Queen of the World’ and I’m coming after your record with a vengeance right soon. My name is Zenyatta, hear me roar.”
If you love racing, it was quite the weekend.
As one of Rachel’s biggest boosters--since she dismantled eight fillies in the ungraded Martha Washington last February at Oaklawn Park, never dreaming she would become what she would become--I, too, thought her best days might be behind her.
Sometimes gut-wrenching is more than just a descriptive phrase; sometimes it describes an action that turns out to be the fait accompli.
In what was the greatest performance given by a three-year-old filly vs. older males in the modern era, the Woodward just might have reached the bottom of her, a place where the tank is depleted, the will to compete gone. It happens.
And when she twice went down to defeat, showing none of her characteristic grit, it was beginning to look as if start number three in her Horse of the Year defense could be her last if future results were not more Rachel-like. The manner of her Fleur de Lis victory was Rachel-like. She's back.
There were signs that this time it could be different. Referencing her schedule from last year, note that her preparation for Saturday’s nine furlongs was a carbon copy of her three-year-old training regimen at Saratoga’s Oklahoma training track.
Following her defeat to Unrivaled Belle’s in the La Troienne, Rachel returned to work for the Fleur de Lis 10 days after that Grade 2 Oaks Day loss. Thereafter, it was the Steve Asmussen signature schedule for her; every seven days with clock-like regularity.
First up was a soft half-mile, followed a soft five-eighths. Then, a solid five furlongs, 1:00.40, termed breezing, with a solid gallop-out. Next was a serious six furlongs in 1:11.20, breezing, with a strong gallop-out. Then finally a five-furlong lung opener five days before the race.
As I watched the serious running unfold three furlongs from the wire on Saturday, I found myself becoming annoyed with the rider--and I stated here after he won his second Derby that Calvin Borel belongs in the Hall of Fame.
First, Calvin took Rachel to the outside on the first turn, a little abruptly over heels, although it had the benefit of floating Distinctive Dixie a little wider than Robby Albarado probably wanted. Next, he asked Rachel to engage Jessica Is Back for the lead--no cheap speed mare she.
On the far turn and with reins dangling, Calvin peered over his right shoulder to see Distinctive Dixie make her challenge three wide. Rachel held her safe for about five strides on her own but, after straightening away, Borel began throwing crosses with three-sixteenths to go.
The response was immediate and generous: Rachel opened three, then five, and had 10-1/2 when she cruised past the wire, reigns dangling once more, in a worthy 1:48.78. Of greater significance, she raced the distance 59/100ths faster than it took Blame to run down Battle Plan in the G1 Stephen Foster.
At first, I wasn’t impressed that Zenyatta had been assigned 129 pounds for Sunday’s Grade 1, the same impost she carried winning the Vanity last year. Then I realized the second highweight, St Trinians, was getting nine pounds: Not insignificant, considering she won four straight so impressively this winter she was favored over 13 males in the Santa Anita Handicap.
For tenacity and drama, Zenyatta’s 17th straight without defeat was as profound as last year’s Clement L. Hirsch. Within a quarter of a mile, she went from cinch, to gonna-get-beat, to OMG she’s going to win!
The head-shaking aspect is that for all the drama, courage, and derring-do, she flicked her ears milliseconds before reaching the wire. Such a tease, that Zenyatta.
So racing’s two biggest stars returned to doing what they do best. One wins by margins whenever possible; the other is bent on challenging herself and Mike Smith both, as if to ask “what more can I do to prevent this from becoming a complete bore while I continue to endear myself even more to my adoring fans?”
And so here we go again. When and where will they meet? And what about that possible series of races bandied about this winter? Working backwards from the Breeders’ Cup, there is time for two meetings, certainly one, before the ultimate match in Kentucky.
The place that makes the most sense is Saratoga. The date, August 29. The race, the G1 Personal Ensign at 10 furlongs, a distance to which neither camp should object, even if superficially it would appear to favor Zenyatta.
Given the potential for the ‘Father of All Travers’ on August 28 to settle three-year-old supremacy, the ‘Mother of All Ensigns’ could complete the biggest weekend in Saratoga history. And that's saying a lot. After the pummeling New York racing has gotten this year from external forces, even the NYRA deserves a break.
The great match need not take place until post time for the Breeders' Cup Classic, but the sport deserves a break, too. What’s needed now is a serious pitch to the connections to make the match happen, followed by a serious pitch to get it on network TV.
16 Jun 2010 at 03:36 am | #
Maybe it’s because I am a realist or maybe I am tired and worn out from the months of “Rachel and Zenyatta must meet” frenzy and all the related often times downright absurd internet fights over who is better, but I am absolutely fine with the prospect of waiting for the Breeders Cup for Rachel and Zenyatta to finally meet, if they ever do (and there is part of me that thinks it will never happen). Now admittedly I still have a bit of post Vanity buzz since I was lucky enough to be in attendance on Sunday. However, the Breeders Cup really is the most fitting place for them to finally meet and if it is in the BC Classic than it has the potential to be a truly sublime race with the addition of Rail Trip, Quality Road, Blame, etc… I would be very, very surprised if Rachel and Zenyatta met before the Breeders Cup.
16 Jun 2010 at 05:27 am | #
Johnny, you hit the big time!
I received an email this morning from a NON-racing fan who was sufficiently impressed by this article that she, having received it from a third party, sent it along to me.
My wife is on quasi-suicide watch (all Dixie Cups & feather-dusters have been confiscated), after we skipped racing this weekend in favor of a trip to Baltimore to see the Mets plays the Orioles.
(The O’s - “winning” at @ a .250 clip/crawl & in a position to eclipse the 1962 Mets’ 120-loss season - reminded me of my typical racetrack days: Getting a few hits; putting nothing together to score runs; & finally just assuming that everything will go wrong! They’re so demoralized, the Mets’ three Play-Dough victories should count for nothing more than one World Cup tie score).
When we returned she saw that longshot “Mrs. Don” scored big at Monmouth Park on Sunday. Yikes!
I think it was Herodotus who created a pearl of wisdom for the ages: If you want your horses to run big, get outta town.
(Rumor has it that the entire Roman garrison in England was comprised of soldiers who, having lost a month’s salary not by dice but by a nose once too often, had volunteered for overseas duty - thus turning ancient London into an oddball outpost of the forerunner of the Foreign Legion.)
Good luck with the Z-RA re-match aspirations. I think it might finally come to pass when Ethel Merman and J. Lo are sharing the stage as co-presenters during the 2011 Tony Awards, but it doesn’t hurt to hope.
16 Jun 2010 at 05:34 am | #
P.S.: There I go again; scratch the “re” in “re-match.” This is why they don’t let me play with matches.
16 Jun 2010 at 07:10 am | #
Geez, Don, you covered a lot of ground. Suffice it to say that the greedy geniuses who are the Mets and Yankees hierarchy priced their tickets so high that fans of both teams have to venture up and down the East Coast. Throw in gas money and a couple of crab cakes and you probably still will come home with a little change in your pockets.
Also, glad to hear that I have “arrived,” but I think I’ll be sorry if I follow-up on the Dixie Cups-feather dusters reference. Sounds like it could get ugly.
Theresia, when I see you woul like to hear more about what Hollywood Park is like these days although, according to Jim Rome, there was lots of energy in the building. Heard that Bob Baffert came out to see the Queen and he didn’t have a horse in on Sunday.
Of course, I don’t have a lot of confidence a pre-BC event will happen. I’ll say this. I hope the temptation to win 20 straight doesn’t weigh too heavily. I am well aware that both gentlemen pay the bills and are entitled to do what they wish. But for all they have given the game, hasn’t the sport improved the quality of their lives to the extent that a little pay-back would be in order. In the final analysis, it’s just a horse race.
Thanks both.
JP
16 Jun 2010 at 07:50 am | #
We will no doubt see Rachel in Saratoga (her barn is refurbished and ready) but I doubt that the connections of the “Mighty Z” would come this far East. As we have seen, they are ultra conservative with her. They pick and choose her races with a great deal of thought as to how one will lead to the other. They have already announced that she will remain at Hollywood this summer for her training as she was not comfortable at Del Mar in ‘09. They are also VERY aware of the NYRA rules and are reluctant to subject this mare to that kind of stress. John Shirreffs has aluded to the “routine” that he has had to develop to keep her mentally sharp and any drastic deviation from that would not be welcome. So we’ll see how the next several weeks play out but I would not count on seeing her here. In the meantime we’ll have Rachel, QR, and the 3 y.o.s to fill the void.
16 Jun 2010 at 10:45 am | #
Great article,and whatever happens, let’s hope both girls stay sound and happy. At this point, though, I don’t see RA headed for the Classic at a mile and a quarter. I hope I’m wrong. Though she is certainly headed in the right direction, I can’t picture it. But what a race that would be!
16 Jun 2010 at 11:11 am | #
We didn’t promise that the advertisers would see the light, but anyone who has read your column and responds with:
A web of baseball wingdings in Baltimore, ancient London, Roman historians (well, one, misquoted), Ethel Merman, an imaginary Foreign Legion and a Rachel-Z-J. Lo (all Philadelphia Fillies) match race -
(While obeying the admonition, “Close cover before striking matches") -
This is, apparently, a writer’s reward. Yours.
Are you sure you want to keep doing this for a living?
16 Jun 2010 at 11:11 am | #
Z and R: Wow! They will bring racing back to what is was in the seventies. Yea, right!
16 Jun 2010 at 11:12 am | #
P.S. By the way, above, that’s three on a match.
16 Jun 2010 at 11:44 am | #
“…What Hollywood Park is like these days…”
Pardon, please, the interruption. If you’ll look at the Belmont card for Wednesday, June 16, 2010, the game is over. We need a coach to - literally - throw in the towel.
You’d think they’d take the hint with HP recently canceling a card due to short fields.
I suspect the owners have finally woken up, realized that the current setup makes them employees of the NY State legislature - and said the heck with it.
16 Jun 2010 at 11:44 am | #
“the best equine show on Earth” you say? Best in America maybe. Outside of this continent is Goldikova. She just won the Queen Ann Stakes this week at Royal Ascot, again defeating a field of very good colts. She’ll never be likely to meet either RA or Z, as she runs on grass. Nevertheless, that was G1 number nine for her, counting her two Breeder’s Cup wins. As good as these two in America may be, lets try to maintain some perspective as to just where they rate on a global perspective.
16 Jun 2010 at 03:19 pm | #
John,
I beg to differ. I think you’re forgetting about a firebrand called St. Trinians.
This horse had won four races in a row at Santa Anita and was the morning line favorite for the Santa Anita Handicap.
She had a lot of trouble in that race.
I think it’s a threesome now.
PS - after watching the replay of the Vanity numerous times I couldn’t help but notice that St. Trinians sure looked alot like Rachel Alexandra and the way she used to accererlate starting at the top of the stretch to the finish.
16 Jun 2010 at 03:32 pm | #
John, I gave St. Trinians her due in the piece. Meanwhile, don’t believe she can handle either RA or Z.
Bryan, You are absolutely correct. Just saw the replay. Wow! Didn’t think she could be another Miesque but she’s surpassed her. Now six, when does she slow down. I hope not until they decide to send her home. Good job, Bryan.
Thanks Susan. I know what you mean about her not starting. And, yes, what a race it would be.
Don, you are a wild man.
Mousse, you are absolutely right about her temperament and routine. And we wrote the detention barn piece last week. I agree with the 10 or 11 trainers whom I spoke with who think it’s a failure. There are beter ways to police the game more effectively.
Thanks all!
JP
16 Jun 2010 at 05:10 pm | #
OK John, you said the same thing I did, but didn’t include her in the threesome.
If you want to include Rachel Alexandra, you should include St. Trinians.
John, I counted at least twelve paragraphs for Rachel Alexandra and about six for Zenyatta.
John, please.
Rachel Alexandra is NOT back to her 2009 form.
The field she defeated was ultra inferior (perhaps east coast tomato cans are a popular saying) and was backing up as she (RA) was pulling ahead.
I looked at numerous replays and came to the same conclusion - she is not back to her 2009 form, but did get a much needed win.
And bother with the Beyer numbers, Steve Crist of DRF has a good article about that.
John, you need to seperate yourself from your admiration of Rachel Alexandra, which is not a bad thing, to an honest viewpoint of reality.
Many RA fans feels that she needs a least another win, preferably against stiffer competition, to get her ready for a race against Zenyatta.
And John, you got tell me the honest truth, why should Zenyata go to New York?
The connections of Zenyatta, after being shunned two years in a row, mostly from the east coast media, said that they’re not after the HOY, but to enjoy Zenyatta and have Zenyatta enjoy herself.
They do, however, have the Breeders’ Cup Classic in the plans.
Then, please, why should Zenyatta go to New York?
16 Jun 2010 at 07:40 pm | #
Whoa,Nellie! Forget Rachel and Zenyatta for a moment. The one who’s breaking records is you, John. Nobody has written horseracing this well since, I dunno, can I say Red Smith? Yes, I can.
You know, a lot of people who have a gift for printed gab love our sport.
Of active writers, Steven Crist was terrific when at the NYTimes, and sometimes still is in the DRF. Steve Davidovitz is surprisingly good, and Andy Beyer can still write this stuff in his oddly analytical way. Joe Drape is more than OK, but would be much better as he showed in “Wink” if his editors actually liked the sport.
Bill Finley remains as youthful as ever, but his best game was that unforgettable piece the morning after two old men and Sea Hero took home the roses in Kentucky.
There are writing skilled enthusasts everywhere you look. Marketing ace and former racetrack exec Vic Zast. The Saratogian’s eternally optimistic Mike Veitch. Of real note, the amazing Bill Heller—turning out those books each one fresher and better than the one before.
But to find someone who catches the fire of Zenyatta and the grace of Rachel the way you do, the way you make those racetrack afternoons eternal, you have to go back.
Bill Nack was and is superb, but I still prefer Whitney Tower in his prime. And speaking of Whitneys, Virginia Kraft could take your breath away before she married into the family game. Red Smith, it goes without saying. Turn left on Union Ave and go back 100 years. Indeed.
Smith was awfully good, but a little bit cute for he was a true master of all the tricks of the professional wordsmith.
For me, the guy you most remind me of in so many different ways—a vibrant comparison with this wondrous article on Rachel and Zenyatta—was a guy who also made Spring and Summer and Fall afternoons last forever.
You know who it is. Four horsemen and a handy guy named Sande. That’s who. You do the same thing. You catch the instant in a word or two that keep it alive as long as we are. Quite something.
Yeah, yeah, then why ain’t you rich?
As another pretty good racing writer might have said, just about everything is six-to-five against, John.
Thank you for a brilliant article.
Bill Nack has been awfully good, but I’d take Whitney Tower in his prime.
16 Jun 2010 at 07:41 pm | #
Commentator Don Reed wasn’t very pleased with Wednesday’s race card at Belmont. I can’t understand why, the races looked to me no different than any other day at any time of the year.
Personally, I liked the card very much, winning the early double ($42.20), and pick three $83.50; then finishing the day off with the last two pick threes paying identical $26.60. Like stealing!
Delaware, one of my two favorite racetracks, didn’t deliver today.
Just finished ‘capping Thursday’s Belmont card. Looks good to me. Maybe I have got it all wrong, I thought it was about cashing tickets, but from the comments above, I guess I should wait until Z and R meet and collect a $3.20 exacta.
16 Jun 2010 at 08:19 pm | #
You have to be a novice in horse racing to say “bye Bye Citation, bye bye Cigar”. Zenyatta has had 3 races in her lifetime against top horses.
16 Jun 2010 at 08:36 pm | #
I doubt the matchup will ever take place. There’s no reason for Zenyatta to travel to New York with the BC Classic as her ultimate goal and Rachel Alexandra isn’t going to be running in the BC Classic but rather more likely the Ladies Classic on Friday. I don’t see Rachel teeing it up against “The Amazon” and a field of the top male horses at the classic distance of 1 1/4 miles. She can’t win at that distance against a field of that caliber. The Apple Blossom was our best chance to see the two girls in the same race and we all know what happened there…
17 Jun 2010 at 03:43 am | #
Fog, tend to agree, but ou never know. Hey, with the Ladies Classic sceduled for Friday night, Z should eschew the Classic and meet Rachel in prime time. Like Bob Kulina, guess I’m just a romantic optimist.
Mike, wasn’t comparing her ability to Citation and/or Cigar, just the accomplishment.
Joe, the check is in the mail.
Thanks all.
JP
17 Jun 2010 at 03:52 am | #
Please excuse the typo, Joel.
P.S. Not sure I could carry Nack’s laptop, and let’s not forget Paul Moran and Bill Christine and…
But thank you. Nice to know there are still people who love the marriage of the sport to the printed word.
JP
17 Jun 2010 at 05:39 am | #
Great letter, Joel. Say, if I could write that well, I’d sign my full name.
WMC: I wasn’t “displeased” about the BP field sizes – I was mortified.
When field sizes can moonlight as Gary Coleman’s stunt double, we’re in deep trouble.
Hope we’re keeping you laughing, JP (and not for the wrong reasons!).
17 Jun 2010 at 05:44 am | #
I just don’t understand why her streak and Citation/Cigar’s streak is considered the same streak? She broke Personal Ensign’s streak a while ago and that’s the streak for Grade I females. If they wanted the Citation/Cigar streak they needed to run against males.
Moss should be shunned for wasting her career, running against California Polycrap stiffs. After she won the 2008 Ladies Classic, she should have run exclusively against males.
Zenyatta should have had a Goldikova-type career.
17 Jun 2010 at 07:07 am | #
Mike, an interesting notion vis a vis Cigar-Citation’s streak vis a vis Personal Ensign’s, in that the boys obviously competed in open races. And perhaps if her career were more Goldikova-like, she might have garnered more mainstream attention last weekend, as opposed to going virtually unnoticed by anyone outside racing’s periphery.
Don, most of you do keep me smiling most of the time. But wasn’t the Gary Coleman analogy just a little cold?
17 Jun 2010 at 10:17 am | #
You’re right. I should have referred to Jerry Bailey.
17 Jun 2010 at 10:58 am | #
JRP,
I think the reason as you said ..."going virtually unnoticed by anyone outside racing’s periphery.”
You mean anyone outside the realm of east coast bias, right?
The closer and closer Zenyatta is getting to “circle of greatest” or immortality the more and more of her detractors have come out, especially from the east coast.
And they have been especially harsh with their criticisms of Zenyatta.
There is a total meltdown going on within the envy-crazied east coast media.
Some are demanding that she travel to New York - “You got to go to New York, everybody goes to New York, Yankee Stadium is in New York, Madison Square Garden is in New York, New York is the end all-be all, gota go to New York.”
“If you can make in New York, you can make it anywhere...”
Just in the last few days you had Amanda Duckworth from ESPN saying the weight that Zenyatta carried Sunday was virtually nothing and no more than an excuse.
Then you had some radio host called Byk from At The Races (New York) that went ape crazy over a guest that claimed that Zenyatta was the greatest female racehorse of all time.
It’s a complete meltdown of these envy-crazed east coast people.
God, I love it.
17 Jun 2010 at 12:05 pm | #
Johnny, and without getting into the argument of Z versus RA (which is an unresolvable debate), you’ve got that right.
My hometown and surrounding East coast does include a sizeable segment of self-satisfied yahoos who think that they are God’s gift to the United States; and from that tawdry league of insufferable egotists, comes the noise and not the light.
It never ends. Tune them out.
17 Jun 2010 at 05:25 pm | #
Mike said: “I just don’t understand why her streak and Citation/Cigar’s streak is considered the same streak? She broke Personal Ensign’s streak a while ago and that’s the streak for Grade I females.”
While it is true that Citation and Cigar won 16 straight races, neither was UNDEFEATED while doing so. Each lost both before and after their streaks. Personal Ensign WAS undefeated until her retirement, and Zenyatta is still going strong after 17 wins and no losses. She’s got the longest undefeated streak in top competition since Kincsem’s 54 straight in 1870’s Europe. For Zenyatta, Eclipse’s 18 (England, 1780s) in a row is next. She’s now third ALL-TIME, ALL WORLD. That’s the big deal.
LauraS
04 Jul 2010 at 05:05 pm | #
LOL. Now the comparison is to Goldikova.
I don’t think any handicapper worth his whatever would bet on Goldikova against top quality 10 furlong horses at the highest level.
There is a reason that Goldi who was being considered for the classic twice (since synth is akin to turf) was entered twice in the mile.
That last 2 furlongs would be very very tough for her.