All is right with the pecking order in the older filly and mare division again, now that the champ, Royal Delta, is back, and back in a big way in the Grade 1 Beldame. “I’m glad for Royal Delta,” said Hall of Famer Bill Mott. “She got beat last time, came back, and avenged that loss today.”
It might have been “only” a Grade 2, but the result of the Kelso Mile put a smile on Barclay Tagg’s face, which some might think is an accomplishment all its own.
But when you consider that talented miler Jersey Town snapped a 47-race schneid dating back to June 16, it became more of a momentous occasion.
Next up was the G1 Vosburgh, a bellwether event for the sprint division that’s currently looking for a definitive leader. It’s the Breeders’ Cup Sprint that generally determines the title, and it’s often won by an ascending 3-year-old.
Enter The Lumber Guy, The New York Bred Lumber Guy. Will he follow in the hoof prints of Squirtle Squirt, Cajun Beat and Silver Train, three sophs that won The Sprint event since 2001?
“I like 3-year-olds vs. older horses this time of year,” said trainer Mike Hushion, who did a masterful job preparing the gray Grand Slam colt for his first start since the Peter Pan here in May. “They’ve gone through that maturing. I’ve been telling Barry [owner Schwartz] for the past five weeks that he’s been working like the real deal.”
The first of two Grade 1 turf events, contested over yielding ground--the product of two inches of rainfall for more than a 24-hour period—was a beauty with the first four finishers; Nahrain, Zagora, Dream Peace and I’m A Dreamer, all having a serious chance to win in the final 50 yards.
But it was Nahrain, good enough to finish second in last year’s Breeders’ Cup Turf as a 3-year-old and in the fourth race of her current form cycle, who was sitting on a top effort, drawing out to a half-length advantage at the finish in the last three strides of the G1 Flower Bowl.
“She showed us when she was third at the Curragh in her last start that she was coming back to herself,” said trainer Roger Varian of the European import. “It was the first race this year where she finished strongly to the line.”
Thirty four minutes later the boys got to go 1-1/2 miles in the G1 Joe Hirsch Turf Classic. Billed principally as a two-horse match between Arlington Million hero Little Mike and America’s emerging turf star, Point of Entry, it revealed much more about the latter.
In winning the 1-1/2 miles event, Point of Entry, by virtue of his third straight Grade 1 victory, revealed himself as a serious Horse of the Year contender. He has shown the kind of consistency at the highest levels that has been lacking in virtually every division this year.
It was also the third consecutive Grade 1 score for newly enshrined Hall of Famer Johnny Velazquez, who put on a mini-clinic before a disappointingly scant crowd of 8,639, and his fourth straight when added to his first graded race, Keeneland’s G2 Elkhorn.
In Saratoga’s Sword Dancer, Point of Entry displayed an unusual turn of foot, the kind normally reserved for the very best of the turf breed. But in yesterday’s bog that resulted in a half-mile in :51.99, Velazquez was forced to press the issue--putting pressure on Treasure Beach to put pressure on Little Mike.
But it was more than that, it was Hall of Fame instincts as Point of Entry looked like he was having some difficulty with the ground. “It seemed like we were going slower and he was having a little bit of a hard time with the ground,” the rider said.
“The turf scared me more than anything,” said his Hall of Fame trainer, Shug McGaughey. “”I was afraid going into today that all the rain and a big heavy horse like him, it might not be his race.”
Approaching midstretch is where Point of Entry showed a new dimension; the ability to grind out a victory. He reached even terms with Treasure Beach--who was loving the ground with jockey Jamie Spencer herding Point of Entry out further in the middle of the course—then finally began to assert himself.
Once he cleared Treasure Beach, his stride lengthened by Velazquez took no chances, staying active right to the line. “I was worried about somebody getting through [inside]. When I asked him to go, he went.”
The record will show that Flat Out won the 2012 Jockey Club Gold Cup in a stirring stretch duel with the suddenly rejuvenated Stay Thirst, who did all the hard work, was pressed every step of the 10 furlongs by two rivals—one an uncoupled stablemate—and aided by a glib inside path, lead for all but the last two jumps.
In the process of winning his first race of 2012, Flat Out defeated dual Grade 1-winning stablemate Ron The Greek, G1 Donn winner Hymn Book, and G1 Whitney winner Fort Larned. In fact, it was his first win since taking last year’s JCGC and third without a loss at Belmont Park. The other big winner yesterday, besides Royal Delta and Point of Entry, might have been Wise Dan.
It’s fun to conjure up what might happen if, for some reason, Royal Delta decides to run in the Boys Classic instead of the Girls Classic, and wins? Want to question Mott on Breeders’ Cup Day?
It’s not like the connections of Royal Delta didn’t ship a half-world away to take on males in Dubai.
And what if Point of Entry wins his fourth straight Grade 1 in the Breeders’ Cup Turf over footing that will suit him a lot better than yesterday’s?
It’s the reason they run races. Stay tuned.


01 Oct 2012 at 02:33 am | #
Preeeeeeach,
My thoughts on the Good, the bad and the ugly on Super Saturday.
The Super Good:
You can “Flat Out” pick ‘em, in our HOMETOWN! It pays to make a visit to HRI, thanks again! Another fellow Strong Islander, AKA the pick six king is pretty good too in his HOMETOWN!
Flat Out is now a member of an elite group that includes Kelso, Slew O’ Gold, Creme Fraich , Skip Away and Curlin to win the JCGC more than once. It was an exciting race to the wire.
Royal Delta may now be one BC race win away from the Hall Of Fame. Ladies or Classic it doesn’t matter. The Mott barn is loaded, this is his HOMETOWN, Yankees cap and all.
Nineteen years ago, Shug won five of the six stakes races on Super Saturday. He won only one this past Saturday, but Point Of Entry has to make the Black and Cherry group proud as any in their HOMETOWN. They don’t make many of them anymore with stamina in the USA, but POE shows you can. A win in the BC Turf against Europe’s best, is good enough for me for HOY.
The Bad:
Only 8,639 showed up for a great day of Horseracing. Yes the weather was not the best. Yes you had to compete with College Football, Baseball pennant races and the Ryder Cup. No excuses though, the “Sport” of kings is on its death bed. Big Beautiful Belmont Park looked like a ghost town. Yep “newly enshrined Hall of Famer Johnny Velazquez, put on a mini-clinic before a disappointingly scant crowd of 8,639” in our HOMETOWM.
The Ugly:
On track handle $3,302,319, total handle $20,148,052 won’t cover the purses. Yes TVG did sponsor the JCGC and MSG covered the races on TV. Casino dole covered the rest. But Casino dole won’t last forever.
Call it a bad economy. Call it more competition for the gambling dollar. Whatever?!?!
Unless something is done to atract more players(lower takeout...hello), we may never see this kind of quality of horseflesh at our HOMETOWN again.
the beat goes on? thoughts?
I was eight years old and running with a dime in my hand.
Into the bus stop to pick up a paper for my old man.
I’d sit on his lap in that big old Buick and steer as we drove through town.
He’d tousle my hair and say son take a good look around this is your hometown.
This is your hometown
This is your hometown
This is your hometown....
01 Oct 2012 at 03:25 am | #
Way to do it JP, to wit: Flat Out.
TTT
01 Oct 2012 at 04:33 am | #
Thanks T.
Cat, great observations. Glad you weighed in on purses, handle and casino dole; Wendell can take the day off.
The good was very good indeed. Royal Delta and Point of Entry, excellent!
I can’t believe the filly’s owner would dole out $8.6 million, go to Dubai, then not go to the Boys Classic with H of Y on the line. How does that make sense?
I can see Billy not being so high on the idea, however, since he would forgo a chance at $7 million in purses instead of “only” $5 million.
Funny, Shug’s name came up in the press box Saturday, too, especially after Johnny won three straight G1s.
Finally, I’m not a country guy, but love Montgomery Gentry: Check out a song called “My Town” or “This Is My Town.” Think you’ll enjoy.
01 Oct 2012 at 07:51 am | #
#1: Thanks for writing that takeout and signal fees were woefully short of covering the purses; by my #2 pencil, they did not even cover half of the purses ("What we worry? We got slots and sponsors and our executive pension plan is paid in full for the remainder of the year.").
As to the stake races that are suppose to be the ultimate representative of thrills, excitement, and payoffs (the size of the purse obviously making it clear to all) a comment on the stake races: The Beldame - over on far turn (nice price $3.70); The Kelso - over at top of stretch; The Vosberg - over mid-stretch; The Flower - finally an exciting race; The Joe Hirsch - over mid-stretch (nice price $3.50); Gold Cup - nice TWO HORSE race.
Was impressed that of the on-track patrons, totaling 8,638,the average per capita was $382. Trouble is 40,000 on-track patrons were needed.
Me? I worked Philly Saturday. Went with a plug in the middle leg of a pick three with forty life time starts, catching a $593 payoff. Oh, I know, Mr. Pricci and others do not wager on Parx because of takeout.
Takeout, the reason Thoroughbred racing is heading south at a fast clip. To me, the number one reason racing is pretty much had it is because few people leave a track, racino, racebook, or OTB with more money than when they arrived.Is takeout the problem or the failure of bettors to pick winners? Would any of you bettors give a hoot about takeout if you were picking winners at a 75% clip?
If an exacta with 26% takeout paid $100, what would you receive if the takeout was 16%? You would receive $113.50. How do you feel if with ten minutes to post the exacta was projected to pay $140? At two minutes post $120, and you bet.
At post time $100. Obviously, takeout is not the only variable, is it? So, what happened when the payoff went from $140 to $100? Blame takeout!
01 Oct 2012 at 08:58 am | #
#4: It’s all about “MY WAY”. Whatever works well for yourself and gives you confidence. For you it’s Parx Casino and Racetrack(not Philly anymore btw.). For a good friend of mind at the Race Palace OTB it’s Calder. For me it’s the NYRA tracks(preferrably on weekends live at Belmont) since my father introduced me to the sport.
I will never for the life of me understand your reasoning of takeout. Yes it’s all about picking winners. It’s also about maximizing ROI when you win. We can’t control late fluctuating odds of course, but takeout is straightline.
The question is how do we get back the players who’ve left the game? How do we get potential new players? How do we keep existing players liquid? The only answers I have are:
1)Enticement for higher payouts through lower takeout. In line with other casino and sports gambling wagers.
2)Get rid of drugging horses for public perception of keeping the game up and up.
You say that signal fees are 3 to 5%. How do you know this? The Race Palace and OTB Forum on LI give track prices. The local OTB’s take 5% off track prices. Does anyone know what the overall signal fees are?
the beat that you started btw goes on… old school for you…
And now, the end is near;
And so I face the final curtain.
My friend, I’ll say it clear,
I’ll state my case, of which I’m certain.
I’ve lived a life that’s full.
I’ve traveled each and ev’ry highway;
But more, much more than this,
I did it my way.
Regrets, I’ve had a few;
But then again, too few to mention.
I did what I had to do
And saw it through without exemption.
I planned each charted course;
Each careful step along the byway,
But more, much more than this,
I did it my way.
Yes, there were times, I’m sure you knew
When I bit off more than I could chew.
But through it all, when there was doubt,
I ate it up and spit it out.
I faced it all and I stood tall;
And did it my way.
I’ve loved, I’ve laughed and cried.
I’ve had my fill; my share of losing.
And now, as tears subside,
I find it all so amusing.
To think I did all that;
And may I say - not in a shy way,
“No, oh no not me,
I did it my way”.
For what is a man, what has he got?
If not himself, then he has naught.
To say the things he truly feels;
And not the words of one who kneels.
The record shows I took the blows -
And did it my way!
01 Oct 2012 at 09:05 am | #
Pathetic turnout.
Races had some marquee names, but, many were absent (blame million $ races last week for 3 yos-only at Parx?).
Field sizes after scratches in stakes races - 5, 6, 9 (8 betting interests due to an entry), 8, 6, 10. Average is just 7 per race.
*
Unfortunately couldn’t access HRI Saturday morning before leaving the house and thus missed your excellent pick. Liked Stay Thirsty (likes Belmont, won at the distance, thought he’d sit a good inside trip, didn’t think he’d have the lead, can’t fault Dominguez for trying it, was pressed throughout and held on well). Only bet to win, oh well.
02 Oct 2012 at 01:06 am | #
While I allow the Cat and WMC to go at it, will address Denny that, yes, 8,639 was pathetic for the JCGC program. All the negative publicity re the NYRA situation probably doesn’t help overall perception and interest.
Field size is directly related to too much racing in too many places where big money is available. All races become less than what they can or should be.
Now while field size in the stakes lamentably was on the small size, all races with the obvious exception of the Joe Hirsch Turf Classic were extremely interesting and bettable. The on-track per capital was an off-the-charts $382 (a figure that might have eluded Mr. Corrow, but then that would mean conceding that people bet more money on graded stakes, just like the research shows).
02 Oct 2012 at 01:38 am | #
Mr. Pricci: Paragraph three in my noteworthy comment above eluded to the on-track per capita figure of $382. Once again, I concur ‘that people bet more money on graded stakes’; however, the racetrack loses a hell of a lot more money on graded stake races (please understand that casino dole and sponsors gifts are not earned income)
I imagine that if a car manufacturer sold cars at half the cost to manufacturer every Saturday, the dealerships around the country would be packed; and this is precisely what NYRA and other racetracks around the country are doing every Saturday: presenting stake races that cost, at a minimum, twice as much as the selling price (purse, Alice).
02 Oct 2012 at 03:38 am | #
Really, I try not to throw my pearls before swine, but I just can’t help myself; could somebody tell the ignorant that the coveted stakes races are what keeps this game going. Without the blue blood buying money that drive this game, you wouldn’t have your cheap claimers to bet in your sleazy OTB parlors. Put that in your pipe and smoke it chief.
TTT
02 Oct 2012 at 03:45 am | #
That was my bad WMC. Noted.
But like TTT says, it’s interest in the big races, and the handle it attacts, that keeps the game going.
02 Oct 2012 at 04:06 am | #
JP,
Just don’t understand the attendance at Belmont. It’s a beautiful racetrack, easy to get to, in a huge market, and has the best races. Yet, less people show up on Saturday than do on a weekday at Saratoga?
*
Wonder how many people lucked into the Pick 4 & 6 with The Lumber Guy? How much more would the payoffs been if he was uncoupled? Are entries a good thing or should they be done away with?
Just wondering what others think.
Denny
02 Oct 2012 at 05:24 am | #
Denny,
Yeah probably more people liked the other half of the entry Sean Avery. But hard to throw out the Hushion horse Lumber Guy in a spread race. I like the coupled entry because one may serve as a rabbit. It also protects the betting public IMHO
Yep the biggest city in the horseracing world and beauty of a racetrack(Belmont), and you can’t attract flies? Saratoga has the advantage of summertime vacation place and old time charm.
Aqueduct drew more gamblers for the one finger push button bandits than racing at Belmont this past Saturday. That’s all you need to know about the direction of this game. Put that in your Fosters and drink it!
02 Oct 2012 at 05:35 am | #
So it is the ‘big’ stake races that keep this game going, hum? And for #9 to cast aspersions on claiming races in sleazy OTB parlors, hum?
#9 holds the same opinion that, I believe, numerous people still have of Thoroughbred racing.
So, blue bloods drive this industry? How, may I ask? They spend enormous money on acquiring yearlings bred from stallions who have won stake races; these blue blood owners could careless about me, or you, or any other person who enters a racetrack through the front entrance (having already paid for parking and admission). These wealthy owners are after the lucrative purses which NYRA and other racetracks are willing to offer, with knee bowed and hat in hand.
Just what have these well-bred thoroughbreds who race in stake races done for the industry, hum?
I will tell you. Not a damn thing! These stake races have bankrupted the industry, which is now on life-support, kept operating from casino dole.
What I find amusing is that there isn’t a person on this planet than can tell the difference between a well-bred thoroughbred and a thoroughbred with nondescript blood lines; nor if a race is a claimer or a stake race without being told; nor, in watching a race, if the race is a claimer or a stake race, again without being informed.
Let’s cut the crap. All Thoroughbred races are virtually identical. No one can even tell how fast a race is being run without, again, being informed by a timer.
Stake races, with the ridiculous purses, have destroyed Thoroughbred racing; simply because these races are not feasible financially, and the fact that they look identical to a claiming race makes staging stake races even more absurd.
People would not give Thoroughbred racing a sniff if they could not gamble on the races; they are not drawn to the track because of stake races. If bettors don’t win, they don’t return. Again, stake races have nothing to do with their chances of cashing.
Isn’t the bottom-line for racetracks the need to operate profitably, to promote racing as a gambling option to casino gambling, and to treat all races on a race card as equal for gambling purposes?
As I have stated over and over, it is hopeless.
Management of racetracks can’t envision that it is all about gambling; turf writers can’t find it within themselves to admit that it is all about gambling, that stake races are just another race to wager on, that the stake race purse in a huge drain on profits, and that for gambling purposes claiming races are equal, just exciting, and look no different.
If the betting window were promoted instead of the damn stake race, things just might improve financially for the industry.
02 Oct 2012 at 05:50 am | #
#13,
Explain to me why Philladelphia Park became Parx Casino?
02 Oct 2012 at 06:03 am | #
#14: For the same reason(s) that numerous racetracks across the country now advertise themselves with the word ‘casino’ at the forefront.
Without the ability to gamble, and without casino dole to fund purses Thoroughbred racing would be history. Without stake races and their six/seven figure purses, there might be hope; only if turf writers, though, wrote about ALL races instead of just a few stake races (with the usual suspects).
02 Oct 2012 at 07:30 am | #
#15,
So Philly Park with their mostly cheap claiming races and very little Stake racing was going to close down until the Casino dole rescue. The gambling public at Philly decided it no longer liked the cheap claiming product. Trainers could no longer survive on the small purse structure.
Play it again Sam!
Once Casino dole started flowing in. Purses rose and the product got better. And now the track is still open. What me worry? Time for a Fosters!
and the beat goes on?
I’ve loved, I’ve laughed and cried.
I’ve had my fill; my share of losing.
And now, as tears subside,
I find it all so amusing.
“No, oh no not me,
I did it my way”.
02 Oct 2012 at 07:34 am | #
wmcorrow,
You’ll probably like this:
On Saturday at Monmouth a horse named How Do I Win ran in a $7,500 claming race.
The horse used to run in NY in graded stakes.
He used to be owned by Mike Repole and used to be trained by Todd Pletcher.
I don’t have the Form, but, from memory think they originally paid $150,000 for him.
He’s a gelding, and thus has no stud value.
They let him be claimed for, I believe $25,000.
He lost. Mountaineer next?
DM
02 Oct 2012 at 08:10 am | #
If people didn’t care about the quality of the fields being offered the handle at Finger Lakes and Saratoaa would be comparable; Fairplex would do the same biz as Del Mar; Ellis Park would be a real rival for Keeneland and Turfway Park would challenge Churchill as Kentucky’s citadel of racing.
As for the meager turnout on Super Saturday, I return to a previous post of mine: when racetracks devalue its feature races by running them early in the card in the hopes of goosing Pick 6 pools with impossible to handicap state-bred races for beaten claimers, why should the public place any value in “the big races.”
One other small factor. If you don’t live on the island but in the Bronx or Manhattan, isn’t it something like $14-$16 in tolls to get to Belmont. Add on parking, admission and $7 for a Form and you’re stuck a nice amount when you walk in the door. If you’re coming from nearby NJ, tack on another $12 for the GW tolls. You could bet the entire card on the phone with that kind of tariff and watch on TV.
This doesn’t even take into account traffic, which as often as not is maddening.
02 Oct 2012 at 08:33 am | #
tvtom,
5 of the 6 stake races were part of the pick 6. The reason why stake races are not part of the pick 6 is because of small fields and a big favorite single. Obviously the track wants a carryover. It’s a guaranteed handle increase. Playing the pick six with a carryover creates the rare instance of no or little takeout for the player. The no takeout factor because of carryover money makes it the best bet at the racetrack. Of course you need a big bankroll for a realistic shot. I am able to pool up with friends to compete. See Steve Crist on ABC ticket maker.
As far as an excuse about tolls causing people to not attend the races. Why are they able to go to Yankee Stadium to see a baseball game or the Meadowlands to see a football game? Same tolls. Same parking costs, programs etc. Let’s just admit that people have checked out of horseracing.
02 Oct 2012 at 08:45 am | #
#16: In your last comment, substitute ‘NYRA’ for ‘Philly Park’, and ‘allowance/stake’ for ‘cheap claimers’ and you have described with accuracy the goings-on of racing in New York.
#17: The plug could very well appear at Parx. A look at entrants on today’s card at Parx has the following sires: Honour and Glory, Awesome Again, Speightstown, El Corredor, Awad, Smoke Glacken, Two Punch, Afleet Alex, Albert The Great, Louis Quatorze, Giant’s Causeway, Defrere, Tapit, and Saint Liam; and these sires were from blood blue stallions. Solid blood lines appear every day at all racetracks across the country. Why some are at Finger Lakes and some at Saratoga or Del Mar is a matter of five or so seconds (a few blinks of the eye). So how can racing be any different from one track to another? But it apparently is, just listen to turf writers.
#18: Quality or class of racing does exist. But, what does this have to do with gambling on the nags? Horses are supposedly placed where they can win. You, me, we bet on the race. Are my chances of cashing better when wagering on a stake race or a claimer at Finger Lakes? If you are a seasoned ‘capper you find the races that fit your handicapping style, which for me is claimers that run five or seconds slower - big deal!
02 Oct 2012 at 08:58 am | #
It would have been hard to keep stakes out of the Pick Six on Super Saturday but this was the exception. The Royal Delta-It’s Tricky showdown, anticipated to be better than it turned out, was kept out and probably would have been if it had been the single stakes of the day. You seem to be conceding my point when you say it’s done to build up big Pick 6 carryovers. But the vast majority of the pool comes from a handful of players and syndicates, so few you could keep one concession stand open for them and there would be no waiting.
I said the cost of getting to and into the track was a potential small factor. People go to the Meadowlands or Yankee Stadium a few times a year and given what tickets cost now, money isn’t an issue with most of them.
02 Oct 2012 at 09:06 am | #
#20,
Exactly! We have a winner! Small track or big track. Claiming track or Stake track. Doesn’t matter! Horseracing is surviving on casino dole.
When the casino dole stops coming in the tracks will close.
Once again anyone??????
The question is how do we get back the players who’ve left the game? How do we get potential new players? How do we keep existing players liquid? The only answers I have are:
1)Enticement for higher payouts through lower takeout. In line with other casino and sports gambling wagers.
2)Get rid of drugging horses for public perception of keeping the game up and up.
02 Oct 2012 at 09:19 am | #
tvtom,
It doesn’t matter how many people are playing the pick six. It matters how much handle is being created. Carryovers create handle. We are talking survival here.