Thursday, February 19, 2015
Big Doings On and Off Track
HALLANDALE BEACH, FL., February 19, 2015—It’s a good thing that Saturday’s card was drawn on President’s Day because handicappers—this one anyway, could use about a week to thoroughly analyze Saturday’s Fountain of Youth card.
Given first impressions of the Canadian Turf and Davona Dale Stakes, another 48 hours of study wouldn’t hurt. There are five more graded events, including the return of Horse of the Year finalist Main Sequence in the Mac Diarmida and another the forever meaningful Fountain of Youth.
And this doesn’t include a stakes-laden program at the Fair Grounds that features the always significant Risen Star, a full-lid for handicappers. Fortunately, Oaklawn Park had second thoughts and rescheduled Monday’s weather-scraped Southwest to Sunday instead of Saturday.
The spin was to give any new shooters and shippers an extra day; trying to avoid butting heads with Gulfstream and Fair Grounds. If that was the case, say it, the move makes good sense. Either way, fans and horseplayers will benefit from avoiding conflict overkill.
Actually, drawing the Fountain of Youth card was more about racing office scheduling than consideration for handicappers and fans. We have written often that in the simulcast era, all tracks should employ a 72-hour entry box; it’s about the customers, not the horsemen.
But then it’s about the horsemen, too. With more time to analyze the races, horseplayers are better prepared. Better prepared handicappers have more confidence and wager more accordingly. This is known as a win-win.
Will a universal 72-hour entry box become a rule rather than the exception? Insist on triple-digit odds before wagering on that prop.
(Meanwhile, expect full analytical coverage of the Fountain of Youth that will debut at HRI in Saturday’s Feature Race Analysis section).
Either way, when you show up at your favorite racetrack, simulcast venue or preferred easy-wagering chair, bring money. You’re going to need it.
Eclipse Justice Served:
The all-powerful powers that be, in this case, the Eclipse Award Steering Committee with influence from the NTRA, National Turf Writers and Broadcasters,
and Daily Racing Form, jointly announced today that that two Eclipse Award categories have been renamed:
The Older Male category has been renamed Older Male Dirt, and Older Female has been newly minted as Older Female Dirt beginning with this year’s voting. Now that wasn’t so hard, was it?
Seriously, we’re very happen all have gotten the message that was backed in many precincts. Champion turf runners of both sexes will continue to compete in those classifications as Champion Turf Horse and Champion Female Turf Horse.
Synthetics specialists will be considered dirt horses. Rightfully, they deserve a category unto themselves and as long as there are enough racetracks ad top class horses that continue to compete on All Weather tracks.
At present, there are 17 categories that honor human and equine accomplishment.
Now there’s an acronym screaming to buy a vowel. So what’s going to happen to televised horse racing since the acquisition/merger of TVG and HRTV.
We’ve gotten some inquiries as to what we think this means, how it will be accepted, and what the face of televised horse racing will look like going forward.
My answer has been consistently the same: I don’t know, to the third power.
What I do know is that racing will have the capacity to reach more homes because TVG does. More live racing, eschewing delayed replays, more post parades, would be good things if it shakes out as promised.
Scheduling should improve, lowering the number of conflicting off times providing, of course, certain tracks get away from lengthy delays that believe will increase handle when the same bettors to their time that it is only a “suggested post time.”
Maybe if tracks offered fewer “Pick” races, with more quality content, the handle will take care of itself. Bankrolls, and patience, are finite things.
Speaking for Toni and myself, we were happy to read that “non-racing” horse programming will be maintained along with specialty shows that HRTV does so well, along with live streaming of its handicapping shows.
Good handicappers are worth their weight in gold; happy-talking-heads not so much.
I’m sure HRI’s Tom Jicha, who spent nearly a quarter-century writing his popular television column for the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel, will have much more to say on Tuesday, right here, same bat time, same bat channel.
Written by John Pricci
Wednesday, February 04, 2015
When It Comes to the Sport, Art Sherman Gets It
PLANTATION, FL., February 4, 2015—Beyond the X’s and O’s of handicapping and cashing a winning ticket, rooting for your racetrack favorites doesn’t stop at the betting window or submit tab.
And it’s not limited to star equines. Indeed, many fans root for or against certain jockeys, even if their allegiance is predicated on pari-mutuel success or lack thereof.
Trainers, of course, are a different story. The “super trainer” is a root-against for most serious fans unless, of course, they’ve singled his runner in Pick 4s.
Wagering notwithstanding, personality rules. Some trainers can be abrasive, dismissive; others are perceived as a mensch and still others feel the love because of their legendary status.
Who doesn’t root for “the Chief,” H. Allen Jerkens, who is that rare blend of self-effacing mensch and
all-time legendary horsemen?
As evidenced by his participation in the NTRA's first national phone conference of 2015, Art Sherman is cast in the Jerkens mold, perhaps more than most prominent trainers of today.
Sherman is preparing California Chrome for “The Rematch Sans One,” his confrontation with Shared Belief, and maybe that’s as it should be?
How often does the previous year’s juvenile champion get to meet next year’s three-year-old champion and Horse of the Year in such an early season matchup?
Bayern will have to sit this one out, no matter how regrettably, no matter how much racing fans are clamoring for Breeders’ Cup Classic Redux. Instead, Hoppertunity will represent the Baffert shedrow.
“I get goose bumps when I think about [Saturday’s rematch],” Sherman said on Tuesday’s call. “There’s a lot at stake. Whatever happens, we just want to [see both horses] have a fair run at it.
“Me and Jerry [Hollendorfer, trainer of Sherman’s main rival] go back a long time, we’re good friends, but we’re both very competitive.
“Shared Belief is a really nice horse. I felt bad for him in the Breeders’ Cup. I’ve wanted to meet [Jerry’s] horse heads up for a long time.”
Sherman will get his wish this weekend.
Then, if all goes well for the Horse of the Year 2014, it’s off to the United Arab Emirates for the $10 million Dubai World Cup.
“The owners would like Chrome to meet the best horses in the world,” Sherman explained. “Perry Martin makes all the decisions.”
“To me it’s a long way. I’ve never been there. I’m told it’s beautiful. I’ve spoken to a lot of people and they say it takes about three months [for horses] to recover [from the trip].
“[California Chrome’s] adaptable and he’s the best shipper in the world. I can’t make any excuses there, but he’s got a lot of races to go.
“After this race he’ll be really strong for Dubai. He’ll have to be at his best to run with the best in Europe.
“I’m delighted to have a chance to train him as a four year old. I just wish I could keep him in America. There are lots of good races and you don’t have to travel that far.”
And that’s the shared belief of the group that owns Saturday’s main rival.
“We talked about [Dubai] among our partners,” said Hall of Fame trainer Jerry Hollendorfer on the call earlier. “We haven’t ruled it out but I don’t think the interest is all that high.
“A lot of horses went over there and weren’t quite the same. It depends on the makeup of your horse when they can come back, but I wouldn’t criticize anyone who wants to run for a big purse.”
And there lies a fundamental difference between the two camps.
“It’s just a logistics problem with the World Cup,” said Hollendorfer, who’s saddled over 6,800 career victories. “A lot of horses would need time off.
“We just enjoy running in the U.S., home in California…there are a lot of nice races, the Pacific Classic, lots of nice races in New York. I don’t want to talk for Jim Rome and our other great partners but we just want to enjoy that as much as we can.”
Hollendorfer played down the match race storyline some, saying that this is “the race we pointing to no matter who was running. This is just the next race [on the schedule], then we’ll find another one. You have to beat all the horses.
“The significance of the race is that this is what the fans wanted to see. It would be better if Bob’s horse [Bayern, not Hoppertunity] was in there. This is the way racing is supposed to be. I’m sure Art’s looking forward to this as much as I am.
Indeed, he is, and in more ways than one.
“I said at the time I thought it was a mistake [to retire California Chrome after his three year old year]. That’s what happens to our game. You lose a lot of fans when you don’t have the stars.
“When I was a kid [and exercise rider for Swaps], sixty-five or seventy thousand people came out to see Swaps win the Hollywood Gold Cup. Now people don’t want to get off the Freeway and want to bet on their I-pad.
“He’s the people’s horse, why all the need over money? When this horse came into the ring, fans were yelling ‘Chrome, Chrome’, and I thought ‘wow, look at that.’
“I just love to see people enjoy the sport. There’s nothing like being there. I want it here for my kids to see when I’m not around.”
Written by John Pricci
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Criticism In Easy, Solutions Are Hard
HALLANDALE BEACH, FL., January 29, 2015—I am no fan of winter racing in New York and haven’t been since the beginning after learning that a new specialized winter track would need to be constructed inside Aqueduct’s main dirt oval.
My reasoning was that if one of the best dirt tracks in American racing couldn’t stand up to the elements at this time of year, that the surface might not be safe enough to minimize risk to horses and jockeys, then maybe racing in winter is a great idea after all.
Cold-weather animals or no cold-weather animals.
Just like liberal race-day medication rules, I believed then as now that perception is everything when it comes to gambling reality.
Aesthetically, with no opportunity to race seven furlongs or a one-turn mile for a third of the New York season, the product would bear no resemblance to what America’s horseplayers expected from New York racing; decidedly less-than.
At one time winter racing made economic sense beyond filling state coffers; it helped the New York Racing Association squirrel away enough money when the “good-horse circuit” returned to race at Belmont Park and Saratoga.
And this was long before anyone dared conjure up the two-headed casino dole monster.
Back in the day, when racinos became the
fashionable solution, legal pari-mutuels at racetracks was the bridge states used to elbow in various forms of casino gaming, including slots dubbed Video Lottery Terminals as to sidestep casino gaming bans.
Parenthetically, it’s the same tack the present-day NFL takes when it encourages and commercially promotes weekly fantasy football games: Fantasy leagues, the VLTs of illegal “spread” betting on football.
For many horseracing fans and bettors, New York winter racing has become anathema and, for the second time in three years, race fans and horse lovers from all over America are witnessing another spate of fatal breakdowns, one far exceeding the norm.
Obviously, something is very wrong.
Several years ago, when purse winnings were more valuable than the “equine commodities” that earned those purses, greed won out as both owners and trainers began spotting their horses far too aggressively.
From late 2011 to 2012, 22 horses suffered fatal injuries, animals having become an expendable means to an economic end. More pieces of “equine chattel” were claimed during that period than any other I can recall in four decades covering New York racing.
This season there have been 14 catastrophic injuries in a truncated 26-day session cut short by weather cancellations and a reduced schedule.
But what’s the problem now, when the current meet’s breakdown rate is more than four times the national average? Either no one knows or no one is willing to say, certainly not for the record.
One of the culprits could be the surface itself. Racetracks are organic and, like humans, don’t work as well when they get old.
When first constructed, the track was hailed as a winter racing marvel; deservedly so. It’s only problematic issue was the dreaded freeze-thaw cycle which caused the track would dry unevenly; slick here, firm there. Consistent freezing temps were never at issue.
But four inspections by the Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory proclaimed the track structurally sound and Rick Violette, current President of the New York Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association stated emphatically last weekend “there’s nothing wrong with racetrack.”
(By virtue of his position as the NYTHA chief, Violette also sits ex-officio on the NYRA Board of Directors.
Privately, however, many of Violette’s colleagues currently racing in South Florida but having divisions in New York, as well as several current New York-based trainers, are saying otherwise.
But because the racing office holds the power of stall allotments over trainers, none were willing to say so for the record.
While some in the racing media, to their credit, have brought the issue of winter-racing breakdowns to the forefront, much of the coverage has been one-sided.
Most published reports only have addressed how racing-office misinterpretation of a NYRA house rule prohibiting horses from running back within 15 days of its last race resulted in eight program scratches on Sunday with nine more expected on today’s card.
Horsemen and media have questioned the wisdom of the 14-day ban but if there were recommendations on how to solve the problem of horse fatalities, I missed them.
So, then, what happens now? If a majority can’t or won’t agree that it’s the surface, arguing they know what’s best for their horses and clients, what do they propose would stop the carnage?
Are we to accept more of the same-old unfortunate-part-of-the-game defense? Where is there a leader among these groups who screams “stop the madness?” Where is the Jockeys’ Guild on this? The only one getting any heat at all is the racing association.
Any veteran racetracker, myself included, would identify the 14-day ban and the raising of minimum maiden-claiming levels a sophomoric, Band-Aid fix to a lethal wound.
But why is having horses qualify after having been beaten off such a bad idea, whatever qualifying the workout time to return? Indeed, starting today, there will be a four-day race week for the foreseeable future featuring eight-race cards. How can one reasonably argue that is not at least a step in the right direction? Who speaks for the horses?
Approximately half the recent fatalities were cheaper horses that either raced back on very short rest or had more than two starts within a 30-day period but arguments that no one knows whether over-racing caused the breakdowns, or citing examples of high-class, short-rest, success stories, are disingenuous apples-to-oranges comparisons.
The fact that no one truly can know what the correct time-frame benchmark should be, or that trainers who race back quickly should not be presumed to be animal abusers, is just more obfuscation.
Any trainer at any level worth his salt, if he were being honest, would tell you that every class of race horse has only so many productive furlongs in their racing careers. If he doesn’t he should consider himself a trainer in name only, not a horseman.
Hard and fast rules often does make for poor policy. But while it’s easier for a majority to criticize these hastily conceived stopgaps, I have not seen many, if any, policies that can be considered short term solutions to day-to-day racing as presently constructed.
It’s not unfair to say some highly placed racetrack executives are overmatched in their positions, and legislators who play at being racetrack executives know even less. But given the state of modern racing, do trainers as a group deserve the benefit of doubt?
If that were true, you wouldn’t hear the betting public scream “juice” at racetrack monitors every time a 30% trainer’s horse crosses the finish line five in front.
At the bottom line, what is NYRA’s ultimate goal, or the goal of any track that finds itself dealing with a similar situation? When racetracks stare down the barrel of negative public perception, it must act, do something to abate the damage as quickly as possible.
Again, maybe NYRA’s hastily conceived reaction was trifling but when this issue first surface two weeks ago, we thought a four-day, eight-race card was one winter-racing answer.
Well, in addition to 15-day, 25-length rules, etc., NYRA did institute two breaks this season and currently are carding eight-race programs four times a week. They may be misguided but they’re playing the dead hand they were dealt.
If anyone has an answer resembling a smarter solutionand not just more piling on, I’m sure everyone who loves the horses, and the game, would love to know what they are.
Written by John Pricci