What happened to Ramon Dominguez last weekend was an accident in the true sense of the term, his mount clipping the heels of the horse he was trailing, unseating Dominguez and throwing him down heavily.
Of course, the fact that thousand-pound beasts racing 40 miles per hour in the closest quarters imaginable is at once a testament to seamless skill and an accident waiting to happen.
It’s the love of the horse that first draws these men and women to the competition. Then it becomes about the adrenaline rush, the thrill of victory, fame and fortune and, at the end, always bringing you and your horse home safely.
Dominguez is a man’s man, not only for what he does athletically but because his family comes first. There were all those years in Maryland when his talent screamed New York but his soul remained free. Dad and mom didn’t want to pull their children out of school, choosing family life over a brass ring.
Of course, fame and fortune has come. Tireless, caring, and as quiet on a horse as you can be with great touch and timing, he stands at the very top of his professional, as a third Eclipse Award as America’s top rider can attest.
Last year Dominguez also earned the George Woolf Memorial Jockey Award at Santa Anita Park for “demonstrating high standards of personal and professional conduct, on and off the racetrack.” He is, as is said, the complete package.
But now he has been moved to New York-Presbyterian Hospital with a displaced skull fracture, a result of being unlucky on the job. The reports say that he has been showing improvement, a little each day. What that means in this scenario one can only guess.
To say that I admire the courage and skill of jockeys who perform their athletic feats without benefit of the occasional time out is to understate the case. Even if I weren’t 150 pounds over, you couldn’t pay me enough to do what they do. Ramon Dominguez is a man who must truly love his work, otherwise he wouldn’t accept as many mounts as he does.
As an owner for a short time, I experienced what everyone says about him, that he’s classy, accommodating and doesn’t like to disappoint his customers, of whom Dominguez has more than his share, riding for outfits big and small alike.
To his credit, Dominguez has remained a home body. Even after moving family and tack to New York, he doesn’t leave home except for the stakes mount that takes him to Anytrack, USA. So he puts up with the New York winters, rides six, seven or more horses a day. And he doesn’t just win; he dominates.
Dominguez will be 37 in November, Given his lifestyle; he could easily ride at the highest level for another decade or longer. Mike Smith, single and living in Southern California, is still going strong and will celebrate his 48th birthday in August. Bill Shoemaker won the Kentucky Derby at 54.
But while Dominguez has won his share of Derby preps, America’s Race has eluded him. While, like Shoemaker, he may be only a phone call away, he hasn’t yet found many serious Derby prospects in South Ozone Park, and that will be especially true these days now that the safety of Aqueduct’s winter track has come into question.
The “inner track” could be considered one of racing’s first synthetic surfaces, a special blend of sand and freeze-retardant chemicals. However, last year’s alarming number of breakdowns resulted in state intervention, but it was determined that is was overly aggressive horse placement in races with disproportionately large purses, not the surface.
While nowhere near the number of catastrophic injuries as last year, there has been a spate of breakdowns recently, and over-racing is no longer considered the major culprit. In fact, a recent study indicates the opposite is true, that the number of starters is down.
Since the first of the year, in fact, Aqueduct has had the fewest number of starters per race in the Northeast, an unacceptable 6.98 runners per race compared to more than nine at Penn National and eight at Charles Town and Parx.
Like Aqueduct, purses at these tracks are fueled by mandated shares of casino revenue. And despite the disparity in number of starters between New York and Pennsylvania, New York’s purses are more than double those at Penn National.
Like people, racetrack surfaces grow old and tired. The winter track has been in existence for more than three decades and has withstood long, hard winters admirably.
But the constant adding of chemicals, known by horsemen to be very abrasive to a horse's lower extremities, especially when dirt wedges beneath bandages meant to protect and support. The inner dirt surface has become a painful irritant.
If Aqueduct Race Track has any future in the current political and economic climate, time has come to bite the bullet and invest in a synthetic surface, notably Tapeta, which has a reputation for translating form better to dirt tracks more than any other synthetic blend. Horseplayers appreciate that.
As a handicapper who takes betting the races seriously, I abhor synthetic tracks. Racing on it is not what most gamblers, trainers, breeders and jockeys want, but the time might have come for New York; winter time.
(I wager with a small degree of confidence on Tapeta at Presque Isle Downs and at Betfair Hollywood Park with its Cushion Track surface, the closest of any of the synthetics to dirt racing. However, I generally avoid top tracks such as Arlington, Woodbine, and even the mighty Keeneland, where my play is limited mostly to turf racing. I am not alone in this).
As for winter racing in New York, synthetic tracks--as opposed to chemically altered dirt--might be the only alternative to curtailing the winter season significantly or eliminating it entirely. And it serves the health interests of both horses and riders.
According to the Jockey Club’s Equine Injury Database, horses racing on synthetic surfaces are nearly 28 percent less likely to break down than horses racing on dirt.
And the current inner track, be it the chemicals or atmospherics, is greasy, the ground cupping out beneath the hooves while racing. Having difficulty gaining traction often results in that “bad step” that leads to injury, and worse.
Considering the data produced by more than three-quarters of a million starters, consideration must be given to synthetics for the winter track. Further, the surface allows for safer training in inclement weather. The only isue is that synthetics must be maintained diligently to insure uniformity.
Unlike what happened to Dominguez, not all spills are accidental. Most are the result of injuries, fatal or otherwise. The Deity has been sending Dominguez signs in the past year; a neck injury, followed by a foot injury, now a displaced skull fracture, the result of getting struck in the head by a trailing horse.
According to the most recent Jockeys Guild data, there are 1,700 riders in North America, of which 1,200 are active. Every year on average, two will die as a result of what happens between the fences and two more will become permanently disabled. Over 2,500 injuries are reported each year, making the chances of accidental injury odds-on.
So maybe it’s time for Dominguez and his agent, Steve Rushing, to lower the quantity and up the quality and commute weekly like the movie stars do, making dark day trips between JFK and FLL. Chances are better he’ll find his Derby colt at the good-horse meet in South Florida. But first he needs to recover fully. Godspeed, Ramon.


24 Jan 2013 at 06:48 am | #
The incidence of clipping heels can and does occur at all racetracks, regardless of surface; thus, whether the surface is grass, dirt, sand, or artificial, clipping heels will probably occur.
You write that you abhor artificial surfaces, yet suggest that such a surface should replace the existing inner-track surface at Aqueduct.
I will not wager on a race run over an artificial surface. There are still enough racetracks in operation that have dirt and grass surfaces, such as Parx, Delaware, Laurel, and Pimlico - the epicenter of Thoroughbred racing for gamblers IMO.
24 Jan 2013 at 07:42 am | #
The fatality rate on the inner track in the 2011-2012 season was 4.2 per 1000 starts.
As of this moment it has been running about 2.5 per 1000 this season.
The fatality rate on Woodbine’s Polytrack in 2009-2011, according to the Jockey Club database, was right at 1 per 1000 starts.
At Turfway Park, where the weather is roughly similar to winter racing at Aqueduct, the 2010-2011 fatality rate on its Polytrack is 1.1 per 1000 starts.
To my knowledge there have been no studies done to assess the common belief that there are more soft tissue injuries on synthetics than dirt. If I’m incorrect about that, please provide a source to take a look at.
The bottom line? People who are NOT racing fans will dictate when, where, and how racing will be permitted. We’d better have evidence to counter their arguments.
24 Jan 2013 at 08:37 am | #
The environmental impact and operating costs to maintain synthetic tracks might move more operators in that direction. The amount of water wasted on a dirt tracks versus a synthetic tracks is positively stunning.
If maintenance costs go down (after the up-front investment of installation), could those savings be passed along to you, the bettor, as in lower take out? Probably not. But it’s a thought.
24 Jan 2013 at 08:56 am | #
Nick, the only evidence I have re soft tissue injury is empirical, conversations with horsemen. My sense is that it is real; and there’s also the synthetic fibers inhaled by the horses not on the lead. Will talk with some jockeys about that one.
B, that’s why I hang with you; you’re also thinking. As to your “takeout rebate” idea, I won’t hold my breath. I won’t re the installation of a synthetic winter track at Aqueduct, either. Would you bet that there still will be an Aqueduct in, say, 10 years?
24 Jan 2013 at 09:35 am | #
JP, I hope the conversations you are having with horsemen regarding this issue are not the same horseman that will tell you that Lasix is good for horses....
TTT
24 Jan 2013 at 10:33 am | #
In that case, there would be about three horsemen that would talk with me. Actually, on this issue, the one’s I’ve spoken with have been forthright.
24 Jan 2013 at 11:04 am | #
As I’ve noted before, there is no point in discussing a synth track until the the long term prospects of Aqueduct are determined. Otherwise it is very bad business and a complete waste of money. We cannot push for this cart to be put before the horse, so to speak.
24 Jan 2013 at 12:20 pm | #
JRP,
People I respect with whom I have spoken also believe soft-tissue injury and other issues regarding synthetics are real. I have no doubt they are sincere and, possibly, correct.
However, I would point out it wasn’t that many decades ago when legitimate scientists believed there were man-made canals on Mars, and we know how that worked out.
24 Jan 2013 at 02:59 pm | #
Wait, there are man-made canals on Mars? Does that mean there are Martian-made canals on Earth?
Remember when Astro-turf was the “in” thing? Polytrack is the Astro-turf of racing. Perhaps Tapeta is the field turf.
Will there be an Aqueduct in 10 years? Probably, but in 20? Definitely not, because I have it on good faith that the earth will have warmed beyond a tipping point—another 2 degrees or so—and all of New York will be mostly under water. We’ll be racing seahorses by then.
24 Jan 2013 at 09:14 pm | #
Best wishes to Ramon Dominguez and his family for a speedy recovery.
I first cashed on him aboard Better Talk Now in the Breeders’ Cup Turf, but have had little success catching him on a non-favorite since.
I’ve long considered cold-weather racing a triumph of greed over sport with insufficient reward for increased risk for most participants in all categories. When did entertainment and discomfort start going hand-in-hand?
The jury is still out regarding synthetic surfaces, and until it comes back with acceptable proof of superior safety on them, adding another polarizing controversy to the lasix ban dissent is sheer insanity. In the absence of statistical certainty, Maybe New NYRA should poll their customers as to their preference.
It is the New NYRA board that is putting the cart before the horse. The rest of are just enjoying idle speculation
It will be interesting to see how the settlements with Hayward, Kehoe, and McClain turn out.
http://www.drf.com/news/hayward-and-nyra-settlement-dispute
25 Jan 2013 at 12:05 am | #
The evidence seems compelling enough with a sample of over 750,000 starters and the statistical findings cited.
As stated, I intensely dislike synthetic surfaces, but what is the alternative; new dirt with new chemicals, or shutting the winter NY game down?
I don’t support NY winter racing but there are jobs at stake; it’s not an easy one, just like the Lasix issue.
27 Jan 2013 at 09:06 am | #
John I agree w/ the tapeta surface[unlike others I think the “inventor” Mike Dickinson came up w/ a legitamate “alternative”. I would disagree with you on the “inhalation” arguement. With the location of some of our favorite race tracks and the “air quality” that surrounds them, I would place “fiber inhalation” low on the priority list when considering the chemicals put in the “dirt” surfaces to prevent freeze conditions, and the particulate[dirt] that is inhaled at conventional surfaces. These and the physicality of the horses’ breathing issue while in competition[imo] should be of a larger concern.
29 Jan 2013 at 10:08 am | #
Remember the days when being great handicappers at Delaware Park were useless; want a winner, just bet Dominguez, even if he was riding a burro.
TTT
31 Jan 2013 at 10:28 am | #
Nickie, agreed vis a vis pollution and freeze-retardent chemicals. But the inhalation factor is real according to jockeys I have spoken with.