What is certain is that this is one free running top class animal that didn’t deserve his fate. Did Bob Baffert actually suggest to Mike Smith, that if the opportunity presented itself, to bottom out the field? Baffert said Sunday that he’ll wait a week before deciding on a Preakness run.
The $48,046.40 Question: What if the first four finishers did not come from the Raise A Native sire line? Even If I’ll Have Another is a grandson of the prolific Distorted Humor, did you think the colt’s father, Flower Alley, a $7,500 stallion, would have this kind of recent Grade 1 fortune? First Lilacs And Lace, and now this guy.
Let It Rain: What if biblical rains did not descend on Louisville late Friday afternoon and into Saturday morning? Did all the sealing and floating pack the surface down to the degree that speed kept right on going, from the Kentucky Oaks right through the 13th and final on Saturday night?
And does the Equibase chart expect anyone who witnessed the Oaks to believe that the official surface designation should be "fast?" Wouldn’t a designation of “wet-fast” been closer to reality, and less misleading?
What is Churchill Downs going to do without track superintendent Butch Lehr? Wasn’t it amazing how the track harrowed up fast for Saturday’s third race? Churchill in the spring is so fast-drying, in fact, that water trucks were on the track prior to the Turf Classic--the race before the Derby--applying some H2O despite an anticipated elongated delay. Churchill might be the only surface that doesn’t cause this handicapper to freak out when the track comes up “sloppy.”
Proud As Peacocks: Undercard coverage by the new NBCSports Network was first rate and a stark improvement over similar coverage of recent years. You might not always agree with analyst Jerry Bailey, but he never fails to impart useful information to neophytes and veteran fans alike.
Host Laffit Pincay III—we don’t have to refer to him as LP3, now do we?—was a revelation; easy listening, good banter, doesn’t get in the way of a story, and asks insightful questions. Reporting turns by Gary Stevens, Randy Moss, Jay Privman and Donna Brothers hit the right notes. On the network side, viewers were treated to a side of Bob Baffert never before seen. Terrific feature.
No More Rag-Tag Trips: Union Rags will never get a chance to reach his full potential this year until he gets a different rider. Julien Leparoux is top class, but his style doesn't suit the colt. With Hall of Fame Johnny V. likely committed to Preakness probable Went The Day Well--who galloped out like a wild horse--and with Hansen unlikely to try the Belmont, Ramon Dominguez is probably available at this point in time.
Michael Matz’s choice of the Belmont over the Preakness would more likely be about the five weeks than the marathon trip. As for getting the distance, Union Rags is going to need to be more Nijinsky II and less Dixie Union. Meanwhile, a Preakness run has not been ruled out.
Headless Horse Sees All Tracks Alike: Dullahan may be 0-4 on dirt but certainly doesn’t give the impression that anything but turf or synthetics is beyond him. After breaking inward at the start and knocking Union Rags around, he too was forced to steady while in close quarters at the first turn; nothing serious but certainly making for a few uncomfortable moments.
The colt finally settled nicely on the backside but was forced to angle out about 7 wide into the stretch. It took him awhile to find his best stride but when he did, he set sail for the wire only to fall short by 1¾ lengths. Did he have 1¾ lengths worth of trouble? Quite possibly. The connections are sitting on the Preakness fence.
No Comment, No Time, No Obligation: Eclipse Award winning turf writer Claire Novak tweeted yesterday that when a reporter asked Eclipse winning trainer Steve Asmussen if he had a minute to talk about the finish of Derby horses Daddy Nose Best and Sabercat, 10th and 15th, respectively. The answer was “no.” When asked what would be more convenient later on, the answer was “next year.”
With all the interest in the Derby, with the positive press his horses got Derby week, and with the sport under siege, it would have been nice had Asmussen, who does not avoid the spotlight when things are going well, found a few minutes to tell fans what he thought might have happened to his entrants. And that’s a bad job on his part.


07 May 2012 at 06:16 am | #
I love the Kentucky Derby, even after losing my Asmussen, and for the first time in my life, my horse finishing last. But they say, a miss is as good as a mile, and no truer words were ever spoken with respect to this game.
What a game, heh?
TTT
07 May 2012 at 06:33 am | #
I guess you can say it was a matter of time before Flower Alley would produce a G1 winner, even though a perfect trip and ride where the determining factors. Grandpa did produce Funnycide after all, but Alley also made some nice scores at 3. GradeII Jim Dandy, GradeII Lane’s End, Travers GradeI and ran second in the Breeders cup to Champ Saint Laim. So the talent was there.
07 May 2012 at 06:46 am | #
Seriously, John, why would anyone want to say anything to Claire Novak?
07 May 2012 at 07:15 am | #
T, it’s the old George S. Patton refrain from the movie of the same name: “God help me I do love it so.”
DH. you’re right about about Flower Alley, a fact that just got lost on me except for the Jim Dandy and Travers, of course. Also forgot he was second to Saint Liam. Don’t know what this old schooler would do without Google these days.
Allstar, sorry but that was totally unfair re: Claire. She’s a nice woman, respectful, and award winning because she does a good job. She was doing a free lance piece for Bloodhorse, also dissed in this instance.
Sorry, again, but at this tie of year trainers take on the role-whether they seek it or not-as ambassadors for the game. And most certainly don’t mind the self-promotional benefits that go with the territory.
Asmussen is not alone and I’m sure that he might have, as other trainers might have, been misquoted or misinterpreted in the course of events. But that goes with the publicity limelight; trainers at this level are paid to deal with these “inconveniences.” It is said that this game keeps you humble; certainly not the case here.
I’ve always tried to remember one thing a Hall of Fame trainer told me a long time ago: “No one’s bigger than the game,” he said.
07 May 2012 at 07:59 am | #
Is it “against the law” here to talk about blood tests on the winning horse? Considering the history of the connections, I have a sour taste after my two selections finished 2nd and 3rd. I know, just a poor loser, I reckon.
07 May 2012 at 08:45 am | #
Woof, well aware of O’Neill’s reputation but all horses are post-race tested, especially under this microscope. Admittedly it’s sometimes difficult to find a handful of wildly succesful trainers with records that are free of blemishes.
Sadly, while the situation is not ideal, serious bettors often factor their suspicions into their handicapping and wagering, which can be needlessly costly.
On to Baltimore.
07 May 2012 at 09:39 am | #
JP, I was at the Hopefull last year during the slop fest when local trainer Terry P. won and I think this horse ran 6th or so and got hurt. Connections shipped cross country for that race, and came up a slop fest. 19 stall was a tough spot never to win from, but racing dynamics unfolded like a cinderella story. Came back strong as a 3 yr old. and continues to impress. SARATOGA!!!!!!!!!!!
07 May 2012 at 09:59 am | #
Believe in thorough drug testing of horses (and trainers)…
Can’t fault Mike Smith; there is nobody else I’d rather have on the front end. The scenario developed as it did, and will not second guess the outcome. We all know the best horse very often does not win this race.
TTT
07 May 2012 at 11:11 am | #
DH, could we please get to the Belmont first?!
Right, T, as Bukowski might suggest, “drug tests for all my friends.”
07 May 2012 at 12:42 pm | #
I can’t imagine that Leparoux keeps the mount. If for no other reason, and there certainly are a few, sometimes change for the sake of change can be a good thing.
09 May 2012 at 02:28 pm | #
Seems to me there are smple ways around the on-track bottleneck:
1) A cell-phone app exclusively for on-track dime super bettors
2) Betting Cards like those for the P6 at HOL which are filled out by the bettor and then automatically scanned rather than punched by the teller; and which are accepted at both the windows and self-service machines.
a. Typical combination structures and instructions for calculating the total amount of the wager could be printed on the card. On Derby day, one or more exceptions tellers could only issue refunds for—but not correct or re-enter—problem tickets.
3) Separate queues exclusively for dime super bettos with bet cards.
a. Multiple express windows for experienced bettors that require varying minimum transaction entry intervals and kick slower bettors off automatically
b. Two windows reserved for refunds only
4) Video stations to provide instruction for filling out bet cards and determining the best queues to utilize for one’s experience level.