SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, May 19, 2010--That howling whoosh you might have heard coming from the North Country on Tuesday was the huge sigh of relief emanating from people living in New York‘s Capital District, especially in this “city in the country.”
For the last two months, this community, from breeders to horsemen to the merchants on Broadway, has been in a full court press trying to make certain that this July and August would be no different than last summer’s place to be.
The wish was simple: To be sure that the land of “history, health and horses,” wouldn’t become, well, history.
“I was afraid this town was going to look the way it did in the 1970s,” said Jackie Clark, owner of Broadway Salon in downtown Saratoga, after hearing that the race meeting would proceed as scheduled.
Canceling the Saratoga session, still the most prestigious race meet in the country, was unthinkable. “There will always be a Saratoga” went a popular refrain. But in the last week to 10 days, that speculation sounded more like a prayer than fait accompli.
The situation came to a head within 72 hours. On Sunday, New York Racing Association president Charlie Hayward said the NYRA was considering closing down on June 6, the day after the Belmont Stakes. “When we run out of money, we stop,” Hayward said about the possibility.
"That's not going to happen," Gov. David Paterson told the Associated Press two days later. "We have a plan to loan NYRA, in the short term, money to get through Saratoga, and we're working on a long-term plan to help beyond that."
The long and winding road to the Aqueduct Racino has been lined with broken promises and aborted timetables. Until a loan accord is signed, no one should rest easy.
“Before any taxpayer money is used we would like to know how much money NYRA actually has,” said Austin Shafran, spokesman for Senate Conference Leader John Sampson. “We’ve heard conflicting reports as to whether they have the money to continue operations through the Belmont Stakes.”
As they say on the racetrack: Whoa!
Maybe Mr. Shafran should have said something like: “This isn’t supposed to be about taxpayer money; it’s really about a $17-million advance on the $300-million up-front money to be paid by the VLT franchise awardee.”
Or, he might have asked rhetorically: “Aren’t we [state government] in default on an agreement that was supposed to fund NYRA’s operation starting in April of 2009 if the VLTs weren’t on line?
“Wasn’t that part of the franchise deal in which we got title to three racetrack properties valued at about $2-billion?” So don’t we owe them $30 million?”
“And another thing: We’re responsible for New York City Off Track Betting now, right? Does that mean we’re on the hook for their $17 million, too? And we‘ve stopped giving them a piece of the handle action, right?”
Let me answer those statements and hypotheticals for you, Mr. Shafran: You bet your hindquarters you do.
The New York Racing Association, its horsemen, employees, and citizens from Albany to Schroon Lake are no longer waiting to exhale. But neither can they breathe easier. Despite Paterson’s assurances, this is no done deal. No wonder NYRA executives have had no comment since the announcement.
When the idea of a $17-million front-money loan first surfaced, it sounded like a no-brainer. It is, after all, free money from the private sector against future VLT earnings and not a “taxpayer bailout of rich horse owners.”
If that were the case, it would have been better categorized as a taxpayer bailout of hard working underpaid backstretch personnel.
Any monies fronted NYRA would have “bailed out” hundreds of backstretch families which without racing would be forced from their palatial backstretch barracks and into nap-sacks lined up outside the gates on Hempstead Turnpike and Union Avenue.
The Saratoga race meet, the only NYRA session where significant profits are still possible, needs the town to prosper as much as the town needs the NYRA tax monies and tourism that horse racing generates.
Hotel reservations and home rentals, understandably slow at this juncture, might have dried up completely had the latest fiscal impasse lasted any longer. With the Monmouth summer meet set to begin Saturday with daily purses averaging a million dollars, the battle for quality horseflesh already is being waged.
Well healed horseplayers could opt for a shore thing instead of their favorite mountain racing retreat. With its three-day weekend schedule, Monmouth Park becomes a very attractive destination option.
Paterson’s fix, announced at a Tuesday press conference, is a temporary patch. The oft-started and stopped search for a VLT operator is now being conducted by the State Lottery via gubernatorial decree. Former Gov. George Pataki tried that tack five years ago, but that political football wound up getting kicked wide right.
Based on projected handle from the Aqueduct racino, $3.65 billion would have been wagered since enabling legislation was enacted. With 90 percent returned to winning players, that’s a $365-million shortfall to the state and the NYRA. That excludes $90 million the state already gets in franchise fees and taxes from on- and off-track interests annually.
From the very beginning, all anyone needed to do were their jobs in the public interest. But, per usual in the Empire State, if a proposal doesn’t fly politically, it remains grounded until a situation becomes dire. And then, even when they fix it, it’s never completely right. Stay tuned.





20 May 2010 at 01:52 am | #
Mr. Pricci: You comment, “Any monies fronted NYRA would have ‘bailed out’ hundreds of backstretch families which (sic) without racing would be forced from their palatial backstretch barracks and into nap-sacks lined up outside the gates on Hempstead Turnpike and Union Avenue.”
Such monies will also guarantee timely payment of the executives pension plan and continue to meet the weekly payroll of NYRA, where a huge percentage of the money for the payroll is absorbed by Charles Hayward and upper management. You point out that 90% of VLT revenue is returned to winning players; seems to me that 90%, or thereabouts of payroll is returned to a select few.
Just where has Sir Charles and the corp of directors set an example of austerity by reducing their salaries, expense accounts, and other ‘bennies’, or reduced stake purses?
20 May 2010 at 02:42 am | #
Wendell,
I just love it when you stick your foot in your mouth.
Apparently you missed the announcement several weeks ago that the overnight stakes races NYRA has been running have been canceled.
In addition, some graded stakes races have been canceled, and others have had their purses reduced.
Not paying attention, Wendell?
20 May 2010 at 03:55 am | #
Nick,
Shouldn’t NYRA also be thinking of either reducing the number or racing days, or the number of races per day, preferably the former, since that would reduce overall operating expenses. And maybe that should extend to executive salaries, too, except P.J. Campo, who already is underpaid given his responsibilities and value to the company.
Wendell,
Why am I not surprised you are incapable of seeing any situation beyond your narrow view? Executive compensation might be an issue, but has little to do with the much bigger picture, one that reaches outside the racetrack gates. Thanks for taking the time.
JP
20 May 2010 at 03:55 am | #
Video slots are for losers. The losers at NYRA want losers to bail them out of their hole. Also, Saratoga businesses who have been gouging visitors for ages have it coming to them if people don’t show, or go to Monmouth instead. $300 for piece of crap hotel rooms for the privilege of being in Saratoga and overpaying for food? Sca-roo you!
20 May 2010 at 04:09 am | #
When’s the last time anything promised by David Patterson actually happened??
If I were NYRA, I wouldn’t be filling out the deposit slips for the $17M “loan” just yet.
20 May 2010 at 04:14 am | #
Owen,
Hope you’ll enjoy your summer in the Hamptons. Or are you more of a Nantucket or Kennebunkport kind of guy?
20 May 2010 at 04:15 am | #
“Fats,” that’s exactly the point.
20 May 2010 at 04:34 am | #
JRP,
Of course NYRA should reduce racing dates/races.
To do the former they would need approval from the NYSRWB, which means they MIGHT get that approval by 2015.
My surmise is any proposal to reduce NYRA race dates would be opposed by OTB, since its handle on NYRA races has always been more, even in winter, than on other tracks like Gulfstream.
Don’t forget, NYRA fired a dozen management level employees several weeks ago, at a cost saving of approx. $1.25 million.
20 May 2010 at 05:24 am | #
Mr. Pricci: You comment that “executive pay might be an issue;” IMO it is a very big issue when the salaries, pension and medical payments, expense accounts, and other ‘bennies’ paid to the executive officers are humongous when compared to what all the other employees are paid.
Mr. Kling: So then, why is NYRA threatening to go out of business? How come the cancellation of overnight stake races and some graded stake races, and a reduction in some stake purses haven’t stemmed the tide of red ink? Isn’t it obvious that when handle and signal fees declined, Sir Charles and company kept stake purses predominantly at prior years’ levels that were no longer supported by takeout from handle and signal fees? That the $105 million given them from the state was chewed through while NYRA management crossed their fingers hoping that slot revenue would come soon so they could continue with their behavior, ignoring the bottom line entirely?
Sure, the business surrounding Saratoga racetrack benefit tremendously financially when racing moves upstate; however, the entrepreneurs have been gouging racetrack patrons for years along with NYRA itself; seems that both have killed the goose.
20 May 2010 at 06:08 am | #
Wendell,
It’s not brain surgery. NYRA is owed $17 million by NYC OTB, which isn’t paying. In addition, NYRA’s monthly revenue from NYC OTB has been cut by $2 million (each month).
A normal business would stop sending its product to another business which isn’t paying its bills. However, NYRA can’t because of NYS racing law. It has to provide product to a scofflaw customer.
And while we’re on the subject, remember—NYC OTB is owned by NY state. That means NYRA is being stiffed by the very people who are wringing their hands over whether it should get a bridge loan to keep operating, and keep thousands of direct employees and indirect ancillary businesses operating. This Wendell, is the craziness which is the NYS racing environment.
While it is certainly a debatable point how much NYRA management should be paid, executive compensation is a red herring issue. If NYRA’s top 3 officers worked for free and got no benefits, the annual saving would be no more than the monthly payment reduction from NYC OTB.
NY state could find the $17 million to “loan” NYRA in a heartbeat if the deadbeat, do-nothing legislature was put out to pasture for awhile. No one would miss it and the money saved would pile up quickly.
20 May 2010 at 07:57 am | #
John:
Thanks for setting the record straight. What concerns me the most is the ne’er-do-wells of this world who seem to think that every professional executive is an evil, money grubbing thief, hell-bent on lining his or her pockets with the hard-earned money of the average shot & a beer guy. Nothing could be further from the truth!
Whether or not you think that Charlie Hayward and the NYRA are doing a good job is not the point. They are our last and best option since any reasonable entrepreneur would not touch New York racing with a 100-mile “pole”. We must get behind NYRA and demand accountability ( LOL) from our Legislature in Albany. We are a national disgrace and other states-Jersey and Penn, for example-are using our criminal failure to act against us. If the Monmouth experiment is successful-and lets all hope that it is-New York will no longer be the preeminent jurisdiction for thoroughbred racing. Moreover, only tens of thousands of jobs and thousands of acres of invaluable Greenspace will then be sacrificed at the altar of Albany’s incompetence! A fitting epitaph for the fiends and scoundrels who line the halls of Albany power.
20 May 2010 at 09:03 am | #
As I understand it, several months ago NYRA’s “good ole boy” Board had the opportunity to eliminate the disruptive security barn and close the training facility at Aqueduct upon conclusion of the meet. The savings would have amounted to approx $300k per month for Aqueduct (x 12 months $3.6 million)and $1.2 million annually for the “prison camp”. So there’s $4.8 million in savings. Also this frees up valued stall space and does not act as a deterrant to horsemen shipping in from outside N.Y. (1,400 in ‘05 down to 600 in ‘09 and growing lower). They also continue to maintain a very high end legal firm (have they won a suit yet). Other than dumping salaries in March and moving some purse funds around I don’t see any further efforts or sacrifices being made to help their situation. The State needs to keep the game going until the slots kick in, but NYRA also needs to help themselves.
20 May 2010 at 10:36 am | #
Mousse, without geting into specifics, I agree with all your sentiments. Good job!
20 May 2010 at 10:58 am | #
JOHN,
THANKS FOR POINTING OUT SOME VERY IMPORTANT FACTS THAT THE AVERAGE MAN ON THE STREET DOES NOT UNDERSTAND.EVERYDAY I TALK TO PEOPLE THAT HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT THE VIDEO GUARANTEE CONTRACT MONEY AND THE FACT THAT THE STATE OWES NYRA THE NYCOTB MONEY.
I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO EDUCATE THEM ONE BY ONE AND WHEN I MENTION THE FACTS THEY ALL WANT TO KNOW WHY THAT ANGLE IS NOT BEING COVERED.ALL THEY HEAR ABOUT IS HOW DISFUNTIONAL NYRA IS AND HOW THE TAXPAYERS HAVE TO CONSTANTLY BAIL THEM OUT.
THIS IS NOT TAXPAYER MONEY AND TO EQUATE THIS MONEY TO CHOOSING HORSE RACING OVER STATE PARKS AND HISTORIC SITES[as one lawmaker did today] CLEARLY SHOWS HOW OUT OF TOUCH THOSE PEOPLE ARE.
YES,NYRA HAS SOME CUTS TO MAKE AND THEY ARE NOT PERFECT BUT THEY ARE THE BEST THAT WE HAVE AND TO ACCUSE THEM OF CREATING THIS PROBLEM IS CLEARLY MIS-DIRECTED SPEW.
THE MEDIA NEEDS TO COVER THIS STORY FOR WHAT IT IS SO THE AVERAGE MAN ON THE STREET AT LEAST HAS THE FACTS STRAIGHT AND CAN MAKE THEIR OWN DECISION AS TO WHO SHOULD BE BLAMED.
THANKS JOHN AND NICK KLING TOO.
20 May 2010 at 11:00 am | #
I know this is not a popular opinion, but the security barn was a lot more effective than most realize.
Anyone who kept careful records, or used DRF’s Formulator program to track trainer stats, had no trouble identifying two trainers who were stopped cold by the security barn.
One averaged 25-30 percent everywhere, including NY. When the barn opened he remained 25-30 percent everywhere but NY, where his results fell below 10 percent winners.
The other went about six months, over 60-plus starters, without a single victory.
Those are facts.
Security barns are standard in harness racing, where apparently they take milk-shaking and the like more seriously than Thoroughbred racing.
The problem wasn’t NYRA, it was the weasel tracks nearby which failed to install their own security barns. The real saving above would have been to close Aqueduct for training. The security barn is a bargain. Remember Jeff Mullins?
20 May 2010 at 11:33 am | #
Pricc:
I want to go along with your premise in the worst way, but aren’t you suggesting the same thing that got Enron in trouble? I can say you are. Calling future earnings of something that is not yet in existence income was ok with Arthur Anderson and look what happened to them. I just thik that is digging the hole deeper for another darker day.
20 May 2010 at 11:33 am | #
Could someone please come out and say how much NYRA is losing per month over the course of a year? Seems to me they got over a $100 million not to long ago and they are no longer are responsible for property taxes which is a substancial savings.
I am a lover of the game and my three weeks in Saratoga, but the set up of three tracks seems to lead to bigger and bigger loses as time goes on. It appears now that are going to be getting less money from the OTBs so further loses may be forthcoming. I found Mr Hayworths comment that 20 million is a good start a little scary.
Lets be honest many tracks have shown growth in handle this year and even though I never saw the #s from Aq I suspect they declined with the product they put out. Stay well all.
20 May 2010 at 12:30 pm | #
Mike,
I totally understand your concern, but I don’t understand how the two are analagous. Even if the projections are off by 50 percent, we’re still talking huge dollars for the state and the venue. And while transparency may be lacking, accountability is not. Thanks for your time.
JP
20 May 2010 at 02:11 pm | #
This Thoroughbred Times article explains NYRA’s decision to keep Aqueduct open for training; in the context of this summer’s Monmouth meet, NYRA didn’t need to give NY horsemen another reason to move elsewhere.
http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/national-news/2010/March/31/Aqueduct-will-stay-open-for-training.aspx
20 May 2010 at 09:06 pm | #
Have been watching as racing history continues to be made and its future continues to shrink.
I understand your emotional argument for a place you hold dear. Understand it but not completely in agreement. It is only one small example of the tremendous greed demostrated by humans every day all over the globe.
Personal greed. Give me mine and to hell with everyone else. That is racing’s mantra. A mantra shared by most of the world.
The world’s oceans are being emptied without real regard for the future. And poisoned by others for things like oil without regard for the creatures living in them. Forests stripped of their trees and creatures, the land stripped for its minerals.
Obama is seeking 3.5 billion dollars for world hunger while he and the rest of Wall Street’s government ignore the millions who are homeless, hungry or being quickly forced into homelessness through unemployment right here in the good ole USA. The rich are not complaining.
Race tracks continue to gouge those who support the sport as does the areas surrounding these tracks during major meets. It is a fact. Greed the motivator.
Last week a school advertised 7 teaching positions. 3,000 applicants responded from all over the USA. I think Obama and Wall Street should start a tax supported multi-billion dollar fund for education across the big pond, don’t you?
Let us all raise our glasses in a toast to greed every where. After all, it can always be justified if you are one of the lucky ones who can afford it or, even luckier still, profit from it…
Note: Ohio announced what they call progress on their move to add casinos here. Two of the finalized rules are NO free drinks and slots will return 85% to players. There is that greed factor, again! Their motto is rape it and kill it as quickly as possible rather than woo it, love it often and live long and prosper together. The fiscal health of these casinos, just like racing, will end in dust and confusion.
24 May 2010 at 09:32 am | #
Hopefully they go bankrupt and go under and New York racing is wiped off the face of the earth.
As the old saying goes:
“West Coast: The best are here- Zenyatta they fear”
24 May 2010 at 12:53 pm | #
THE DEATH OF RACING IN NEW YORK,IF THAT WERE TO REALLY EVER HAPPEN WOULD SPELL THE END OF THE SPORT AS WE KNOW IT.
I SAY THIS IN A JOKING MANNER BUT THE CASINOS DO NOT WANT US AROUND DIRTYING UP THEIR PROPERTIES,THEY ARE TRULY NOT OUR FRIENDS BUT RIGHT NOW SEEM TO BE A NECESSARY EVIL.
HERE IS THE JOKING PART,I HOPE HORSE RACING WILL NEVER BE MENTIONED IN THE SAME BREATH AS DOG RACING AND JAI-ALAI.
IN CASE THE LAST COMMENTOR HAS NOT NOTICED WEST COAST RACING HAS ALREADY BEEN DEAD A LONG TIME.
THE SPORT,THE COUNTRY AND THE WORLD ALL NEED NEW YORK RACING.
24 May 2010 at 11:18 pm | #
BloodHorse.com Breaking News
New York State lawmakers on May 24 approved a $25 million loan for the New York Racing Association, keeping the racetrack operator solvent for at least the rest of the year and avoiding a shutdown of its operations.
For more information go to http://
http://www.bloodhorse.com
/horse-racing/breaking-news/57171