For years, the National Racing Museum and Hall of Fame believed that early in Kentucky Derby week would be a good time to announce the names of that year’s inductees since the national sports media are all in one place at one time. Sensibly, this is no longer the case.
But this regrettable tack still goes these days with many organizations, especially regulatory agencies, still believing it’s better to get the news out while the whole world is watching what’s gong on both inside and outside the fences of America’s racetracks.
Notes to industry: Since the advent of the 24-hour mainstream media news cycle, either the world no longer cares or can only accept the never ending sensory bombardment one sound byte at a time.
The news business is no different than any other industry these days; one person now does the job of three and they, too, are on overload. That dandy new testing rule will need to wait until the Triple Crown is over. It’s about immediacy and priorities.
The State Racing & Wagering Board sometimes falls into this trap, getting news out at the most visible moments. But they have been on a major roll recently—that’s if you’re willing to overlook the apparent failings of their regulatory responsibilities in L’Affaire NYRA.
Fortunately for the agency, the organization involved in the imbroglio left an e-mail trail that in a small way mitigates its shortcomings in the matter.
As Association of Racing Commissioners International President Ed Martin said Tuesday, the case brought against Standardbred trainer Lou Pena by the NYSRWB as reported online in Standardbred Canada is "a game changer with wide ramifications for racing regardless of breed.
“This is a new chapter, make no mistake about it,” Martin added, noting that New York’s reliance on veterinary records as evidence of an illegal administration rather than a laboratory finding is a new regulatory strategy other agencies would emulate.
Triple Crown bid or not, no responsible journalist could ignore a headline that links the number 1,700 with alleged administrations of legal substances by one Standardbred trainer.
Under the circumstances, trainer Lou Pena did the only thing he could do: Cry racial prejudice.
Today, May 30, the same day the NTRA is hosting a Triple Crown national teleconference that includes Penny Chenery (owner, Secretariat), Ron Turcotte (jockey, Secretariat), Sally Hill (co-owner, Seattle Slew), Billy Turner (trainer, Seattle Slew), Patrice Wolfson (co-owner, Affirmed), (Steve Cauthen, Affirmed), the SRWB announced the “installation of strict protocols for horses and participants taking part in June 9 Belmont Stakes.”
While this announcement might be viewed as opportunistic--that the protocols could have be installed with less fanfare--it’s most important that the world knows, especially in the current environment where the use of even legal medication is a page one story and the Triple Crown aspirant’s trainer, Doug O’Neill, has had his dubious past questioned by national media starting around 7 p.m. on May 5th.
All Belmont horses will be stalled in Belmont Park’s secured stakes barn beginning June 6, subjected to out-of-competition blood testing and will remain in that barn until the race’s conclusion.
The blood tests will be sent to the Board’s Drug Lab that night for immediate review and the stakes barn will be monitored by SRWB and Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau personnel in addition to the NYRA security contingent.
The security procedures include limiting personnel who are allowed to enter the area, noted in entry-exit logs. Personnel entering a horse’s stall, including his trainer and NYRA veterinarian must also be logged and include a reason for the visit. Veterinarians will be escorted into the stall by security personnel.
Equipment, feed, hay, bales, etc. will be searched, horses assigned specific stalls, no human consumption of food or beverage will be allowed inside a stall or within proximity, only NYRA vets can administer raceday Lasix and the press will assigned to specific designated areas.
Beginning Belmont eve, June 8, no vet may visit a stall without making an appointment with SRWB investigators, providing written notice of intended treatment. On June 9, treatment will only be permitted for emergency or by agreement with the Stewards. SRWB investigators will provide surveillance and the stakes barn will be restricted to only Belmont Stakes horses.
In addition, the NYRA will have additional roving security teams during Belmont Stakes day, overseeing the handling and movement of Belmont Stakes horses and additional security measures will be taken inside Belmont Park on raceday.
Should I’ll Have Another be good enough to enter the Triple Crown pantheon, second-guessing the connections will be a part of the Belmont Stakes aftermath. For the good of the game, that will be a very good thing.


30 May 2012 at 04:12 pm | #
Oh my goodness; it’s 9-1-1 all over again; bring on the men with the automatic weapons in dark clothing.
30 May 2012 at 06:29 pm | #
JRP,
FYI: The twitter world was aflutter with turf writers and a trainer or two complaining about this move.
Me? I’m all for it. It’s about time.
30 May 2012 at 09:39 pm | #
Time for the status quo people to face reality, don’t you think? Who could object to silencing paranoid, know-nothing critics that would assume O’Neill took an edge should his horse become an immortal? Besides, what are critics of this measure afraid of?
I campaigned AGAINST the use of the detention barn on a daily basis, but don’t see this safe-than- sorry measure as another but a practical idea in these troubled times.
31 May 2012 at 06:18 am | #
As I’ve written in the past, you can’t have laughable barn security, which is what has always been, then expect trainers to be able to ensure the integrity of their animals; it is not possible. But this measure is closing the barn door after the horse has escaped. What saddens me, is that it makes it appear, when the focus is heightened on the sport, that the horsemen are nothing but a bunch of criminals. Stringent barn security should have always been the rule; then, harsh punishments to deter cheaters could have been implemented, and we would not be in the predicament we are in now. Trainers who have been punished for individual infractions within the current framework cannot be banned from the game based on a group of men’s unilateral decision using vague rules and terms. This is far worse than the double jeopardy rule in law. Trainers who would cheat do so because the system, as it stands, sucks, and it allows them to do so. Change the system, including race-riding rules. It’s now or never.
TTT
31 May 2012 at 07:33 am | #
This smells like the paranoia Doug O’Neill rule. First NYRA says I’ll Have Another can’t run with a nasal strip(which was ok at Churchill and Pimlico btw) then this just 10 days before the Belmont Stakes.
I’m all for protecting; the bettors, the prestigious Triple Crown and the integrity of the sport. My question is the timing. You can’t make up the rules as you go along. Why wasn’t this addressed before the Triple Crown started? Why are the rules different at every track. Seems like we need a governing body for all tracks to be equal with the rules. A commissioner for horseracing anybody? Mr. Pricci are you available?
Today is Joe Namath’s B-day 69, I’ll “guarantee” that we’ll be talking about I’ll Have Another more after the race if he loses, than if he wins the Triple Crown, and that’s a darn shame.
31 May 2012 at 07:57 am | #
Yes, Cat, I’m available for Commissioner. Chances of even being considered? Less than zero. I’d like to think it’s because you can’t trust an honest man. Certainly DON’T have all the answers but would die trying to find them.
Agree the timing stinks on this, but no one knew how any of this would play out. Sadly, if IHA loses the Derby, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. Agree that O’Neill isn’t racing’s only “problem” and that this is 11th hour. But, again, let there be no doubt about the ability of the horse should he become immortal. In these times, we would owe that to I’ll Have Another.
Didn’t touch of the nasal strip but know this is a long standing rule in NY. Whatever any of us thinks, a rule’s a rule. No one made that big a deal when Hansen couldn’t have his tail colored in NY. It only became a story in Ky. when it was discovered the colt had it removed the afternoon of the race--which probably effected his performance more or less than a nasal strip would.
Spoke about this with Richard Migliore at the Met Mile. He said he never believed it did any good anyone, and no one’s doubted Richard’s expertise as a horseman.
TTT, I understand fully what you’re saying and you’re right. Tight security should be the every day, every race rule, not the exception. The only thing I find curious is how many people object. I understand how this one-time action looks. But aren’t we all protesting too much?
Critics can’t decry the status quo then strenuously object when regulatory agencies do their level best to insure a Triple Crown playing field. NYRA has enough issues to deal with already, don’t you think?
Finally, did anyone forget the fallout from Big Brown? Is that what we would want to see again should something go wrong in 10 days? And what if, God forbid, there’s an accident? Want to deal with the fallout from that?
31 May 2012 at 09:26 am | #
JP, this knee-jerk reaction is all show. Things will go back to business as usual right after the race. If you will recall the Pick 6 fix, whereafter they cut off betting a couple of minutes before post when there was public uproar, then right back to business as usual in the interest of maximizing profits if money is still pouring in (at least that is my take).
Security should be iron-clad. They could have implemented all these safeguards for the Belmont without holding a parade, further defaming Mr. O’Neill, who will now probably be blamed for the Kennedy assassination.
The Triple Crown is a noble and cherised part of Americana, and they are allowing it to be turned into a front page story for the Enquirer, or an even worse rag, the New York Times.
Secretariat, where are you?
TTT
31 May 2012 at 12:17 pm | #
It baffles me how many people here, and on the Paulick Report, are blaming NYRA about the nasal strips & these new security rules.
Earth to world - is the NYS racing and wagering board, not NYRA, who is responsible for both. If you’re going to complain, aim for the correct target.
At the minimum, these security protocols should be in place for all graded stakes, not just June 9.
IMO, the security barn should never have closed. The notion it disrupts a horse more than, say, a 4-5 hour van ride the morning of a race, who then gets unloaded into a receiving barn, then goes to race in a few hours, is a tenuous complaint.
It was inconvenient for horsemen, and as we all know, they rule over bettors at the track.
31 May 2012 at 05:33 pm | #
Top turf teddy keeps talking out both sides of his mouth. WhaT DRIVEL!
31 May 2012 at 05:55 pm | #
OK, NK.
Per your request. I’ve re-lyricized my re-lyricization.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUjf37kU0Ts&feature;=related
With apologies to Benny Davis and Harry Akst:
Nasal Strips
“I’ll Have Another” uses
Nasal Strips
At least he did on his two
Previous Trips
Nasal Strips
All the other states permit them
Why in New York must he quit them?
Nasal Strips
Brought him to Belmont with a
Chance to make history
Well it would ruin the day
If New York stood in the way
Of a Triple Crown victory
Racing rules
Aren’t uniform because some
Clueless fools
In charge of racing from
State to State
Just won’t cooperate
Rather than work together
All they do is ignore each other
Nasal Strips
Help prevent bleeding in a horse
That could win an Eclipse
Somebody send a memo
To Governor Andrew Cuomo
And the JOcky Club’s Dinny Phipps
31 May 2012 at 06:41 pm | #
Breaking news ...
NYRA just announced that no GRI lead ponies allowed for the Belmont Stakes. Lava Man is out!
01 Jun 2012 at 07:50 am | #
Did you ever notice that Lava Man, when he was racing, couldn’t be beaten in So Cal, but when he left the state he was an also-ran? Seems dougy couldn’t brew up his magic . . .
01 Jun 2012 at 07:56 am | #
CALDER WANTS TO BE THE FIRST TO CHARGE RENT TO GROOMS!
Calder Race Course, a Racino in So Florida which is owned by the venerable Churchill Downs, which makes gazillions off it’s casino and racetrack holdings found a way to squeeze out more profits. Charge grooms $2.50 a day rent for tack rooms. At the 2009 Breeders’ Cup at Santa Anita, your’s truly saw Zenyatta win standing right at the finish line on the Santa Anita apron for a grand total of $10 (the price of general admission). That same viewing spot at Churchill for the KY DERBY (PRESENTED BY YUM BRAND$) or the BC, would have costed in the thousands of dollars..,furthermore, if at CD and you forget to announce the Yum Brands part, you could end up in handcuffs.
Way to go Churchill, take it out on the lowest guys on the food chain!
02 Jun 2012 at 09:52 am | #
NK,
I agree with this from your Friday column:
“The SRWB should be applauded for these safeguards, and ought to consider using them for all graded stakes races in New York. Racing fans and honest horsemen deserve nothing less.”
What do you think the chances are that they will ban lasix from 2YO graded stakes s well?
You haven’t really weighed in on nasal strips other than to give SRWB credit for the ban. I’m all for ensuring that IHA wins the TC legitimately, but I also fear a backlash nationally against racing in all states if IHA bleeds from the nostrils on Belmont Day without the strips.
07 Jun 2012 at 08:05 am | #
Due to the circumstances surrounding “The Belmont Stakes”, I have no problem with the detention barn. As far as having a permeant detention barn,I thought it was a waste of time and money.It didn’t accomplish anything. Trainers who were winning,continued to win. New trainers without credentials became “super trainers” while the detention barn was in effect.
07 Jun 2012 at 10:03 am | #
Heh, Markinsac, in the 7th at Belmont today, they named 3-Doublespeak after me. You may want to put down a few quid.
I agree with you, Top Turf Teddy is nothing but a loser and a jerk.
TTT