SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, July 15, 2010--The mood on the Oklahoma training track this morning was upbeat, as several of the horsemen we spoke with in the wake of the New York Racing Association’s decision to shutter the detention barn in favor of stringent new security policies with tougher penalties were happy about recent developments.
We followed up briefly with some of those same horsemen who gave us their input on a June 12 column that called for the closure of the controversial detention facility.
The good mood, however, doesn’t reflect continuing concerns about the leveling of the playing field. “You know cheaters will find a way if they want to badly enough,” said one. “I’ll believe it when I see it,” said another. “I’ve been around this place a long time.”
All the horsemen we spoke with were willing to give the new process a chance, happy that new robust testing regimens will be accompanied by equally stringent penalties that punishes cheaters who come up with “positives.” Every one were in favor of the new three strikes and you’re out policy.
Most of the procedures put in place are scheduled to commence starting July 23, opening day of the Saratoga race meet. The rules are consistent with the uniform regulations authored by the Association of Racing Commissioners International (RCI).
Trainers of horses testing positive for Class A drug violations will face a minimum mandatory one-year disbarment from entering horses or being allocated stalls at NYRA racetracks for a first offense. A second mandatory disbarment for a second violation will last for a duration of three years. A third violation will result in permanent disbarment.
Of particular significance is the measure stating trainers serving disbarments will not be permitted to transfer their training responsibilities to family members or current employees, a common practice that has made a sham of the suspension process in the past.
According to a statement published by the NYRA, an ongoing effort to further enhance the new policies and procedures over the next 12 months will closely monitor the re-instituted procedure of allowing private veterinarians administering Lasix to horses on race day.
Further measures call for re-examining TCO2 testing policies with respect to historical TCO2 levels, assessing appropriate penalties for violators, and regular reporting on the results and impact of the elimination of the security barn to the Special Oversight Committee of the NYRA Board of Directors.
Regrettably, the NYRA missed an opportunity to list on the official track program, right alongside the trainer’s name, the name of the attending veterinarian. Some horsemen use more than one vet, but making the name of the vet available allows the betting public to track who dispenses medications when certain horses show sudden and dramatic improvement.
“The out-of-competition drug testing program combined with the new assembly barn and ‘in-today’ procedures will provide NYRA with potent tools to confront today’s challenges of detecting performance-enhancing substances and allow us to stay one step ahead of potential abusers,” said NYRA president Charlie Hayward in the release.
“The science empowering cheaters has changed since 2005 and these new procedures will ensure that NYRA’s countermeasures keep pace in order to preserve the integrity of the sport.” Racetracks have always had a difficult task trying to keep pace with Big Pharma’s R & D people. But continue trying they must.
On its face, the measures taken by NYRA more than compensate for the elimination of the detention barns--not that the barns didn’t serve some purpose. Suspected abusers left New York soon after they were instituted, or after they stopped winning with their normally dramatic regularity. Other suspected abusers who took up residence in New York, mostly during the Aqueduct sessions, left after learning it wasn’t as easy to win at 35 percent as it used to be.
The elimination of the detention barn coupled with new testing policies, procedures, and sterner penalties for violators, is the most comprehensive action we’ve seen NYRA take on any difficult issue in the modern era. For that, they are to be commended.
The proof, however, ultimately will reside in the execution of its plan, employing the fine tuning needed after noting what works and what doesn’t. Continued vigilance is not an elective. In the morass that has become New York racing, track management has devised a plan that surprisingly provides a reason to feel optimistic going forward.
In considering the sport’s survival, all have a vested interest in rooting for the contraction model put in place in New Jersey, hopefully reversing recent fortunes in the Garden State and provide the industry with a viable blueprint. At once, what happens on this side of the Hudson counts, too. If successful, real security measures taken by the NYRA will have a positive effect on the entire industry.
In matters of security and integrity, all who are tethered to the game reside in the same fox hole. Suddenly, achieving unity in this fractured sport doesn’t seem so impossible. The NYRA has done a good thing here. If it’s truly sincere about effecting change, it could once again occupy the role of true industry leader. For the time being, anyway, it appears all the dogs and ponies have been laid to rest.





16 Jul 2010 at 12:19 am | #
JRP,
I’m cheered to hear trainers are in favor of tougher penalties.
I wonder if they would be in favor of the State Racing & Wagering Board bringing back its proposal to require a written record of every medication given to every horses—date, medication, and amount.
You’ll recall they cried last year when this was first proposed, saying it would be too much paperwork.
That complaint was preposterous on its face. Livestock farmers who have hundreds, even thousands, of head of livestock, already do it as a regular course of business. Why can’t horsemen?
Keeping these records should be a requirement of getting a license in NY. Then, if post race tests disclose a medication not listed, regulators should find out why.
I’ll give NYRA’s new rules the benefit of the doubt. Let’s hope they work. It will be interesting to see if the trainer who was the source of most of the out-of-town shippers who no longer come to NY returns.
16 Jul 2010 at 02:06 am | #
New york, new york
Start spreading the news, I’m leaving today
I want to be a part of it - new york, new york
These vagabond shoes, are longing to stray
Right through the very heart of it - new york,
new york
I wanna wake up in a city, that doesn’t sleep
And find I’m king of the hill - top of the heap
These little town blues, are melting away
I’ll make a brand new start of it - in old new
york
If I can make it there, I’ll make it anywhere
It’s up to you - new york, new york
New york, new york
I want to wake up in a city, that never sleeps
And find I’m a number one top of the list, king
of the hill
A number one
These little town blues, are melting away
I’m gonna make a brand new start of it - in old
new york
And if I can make it there, I’m gonna make it
anywhere
It up to you ZENYATTA! ..... To be considered the best you have to at least win on dirt on the worlds biggest stage, so come to Saratoga in front of Preach in the race named for me.
16 Jul 2010 at 02:13 am | #
Now, if we could just get rid of the “legal” performance enhancing drugs (lasix, phenylbutazone, flunixin, ketoprofen, and steroids). If the horse is too un-sound to run, it should become a jumper.
It’s comparable to NY States illegal gambling laws, that allow lottery’s, scratch offs, indian casinos, and horse wagering. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
16 Jul 2010 at 02:44 am | #
An open letter to everyone that wants to ban legal drugs in the sport:
I’m sure your heart is in the right place, but if you have ever taken ibuprofen or an aspirin before or after physical activity, you know how beneficial it can be.
To deny the use of these drugs would decimate the sport. If you like 3 horse fields like the one they ran at Hollywood park on Thursday keep spewing your ignorant comments.
16 Jul 2010 at 03:07 am | #
Ace,
How many 3 horse fields do they have in Hong Kong?
There the medication rules are simple—get a positive and you are out—no excuses.
Their fields are large and their handle dwarfs America.
16 Jul 2010 at 03:11 am | #
What a coincidence. I just found this report on wagering in Hong Kong.
Apparently no medication and the recession haven’t hurt them at all.
“That took the Hong Kong Jockey Club’s racing-season revenue to HK$ 74.6 billion (US $9.6 billion), up from last year’s HK $66.8 billion.”
http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2010/07/16/hong-kong-horse-racing-racks-up-96-billion/
16 Jul 2010 at 03:38 am | #
And what about Europe, I think I read that they have much more strict policies than we do. I think it would improve the breed to ban any drug that is being used for race day or training enhanced performance.
16 Jul 2010 at 03:48 am | #
Nick,
As screwed as this sport is in the US, we still out handle Hong Kong. They are were the US was in 1992 (18 years ago). Only imagine if the 35+ jurisdictions could consolidate, collaborate, and repackage this game.
US: $12.3B
HK: $9.6B
The Source:
http://www.jockeyclub.com/factbook.asp?section=8
16 Jul 2010 at 03:53 am | #
Nick,
I’m not sure horse trainers and farmers are analogous. Cows don’t race and farmers don’t answer to owners afterwards. Perhaps the vets might supply that list to the appropriate authority; after all, they administer the meds.
PE, didn’t know you could sing. Z would never have to race again to prove her greatness. She’s done more than enough to prove that. I just think about fans who pick up a copy of the 2020 edition of champions to see that she never ran in NY. What do visiting athletes say when they first play or Yankee Stadium, or Madison Square Garden? I just don’t understand; why not?
Ed, might have to agree with Ace on this one. Horses run in the real world where there are no perfect solutions. Perhaps increasing the lead time between administration and race time would be a better answer. I’m for the prophylactic use of medication; I just can’t find the right answer. Hong Kong gets it right because gambling is a part of the fabric there. They are protecting a major industry for themselves and they practically race in a vacuum. And just because Europe doesn’t allow legal medication doesn’t mean they run medication free; I’m not that naive. This is a very difficult issue for me. I don’t want drug-dependent sires and dams either; wish I had an answer I could really live with.
Thanks all!
JP
16 Jul 2010 at 04:47 am | #
JRP:
Farmers have to answer to the government’s food police, and they are a lot tougher than any Thoroughbred owner.
If a dairy farmer has medicine in $2,000 of his or her milk, and it spoils the other $20,000 worth of milk in a tank truck, the farmer pays for the loss of the entire $22,000.
I’d call that a penalty which makes what racing violators get a pat on the hand. Farmers hire vets, just like horsemen. There is no difference. It is a simple matter of professionalism.
Is there some reason horsemen shouldn’t be professional? Don’t bettors deserve a fair shake?
Johnny Stats,
I should have made my comment more clear. Hong Kong’s handle per day or per race meet dwarfs America’s. Sorry.
16 Jul 2010 at 05:07 am | #
Yes, it’s true Nick, but I never cashed a bit on a farmer’s cow!
And the implication that anything less than adopting your suggestion to “don’t bettors deserve a fair shake” paints all horsemen, and the author in this case, with the same brush and is on its face unfair.
I’ve heard you say often when discussing the issue of uncoupled horses that it’s your job as a handicapper to figure the scenario out.
When bettors suspect a particular horseman of taking an edge, shouldn’t bettors note that, too? I think they do. Suspected “juice” trainers in the main are always overbet.
Anyway, let’s try to pick some winners next week!
JP
16 Jul 2010 at 05:31 am | #
JRP,
Of course all trainers shouldn’t be painted with the same brush.
That’s why the honest horsemen should WELCOME rules like requiring medication records, like denying suspended trainers from handing over the stable to assistants or family members, etc.
If horsemen want the support of bettors, they should be willing to give on the transparency issue. There is no reason, be it cost, labor availability, or knowledge of what the vets are up to, why horsemen should have a problem with keeping medication records. Don’t some of the best do it already?
16 Jul 2010 at 12:05 pm | #
Hong Kong runs 84 racing dates TOTAL for the entire year at 2 RACETRACKS.
Comparing their racing to ours is ridiculous, considering we will run more race dates this WEEKEND than they do the ENTIRE YEAR.
However, by banning medications, I am sure we can run all the tracks in the United States 1 weekend a year without medication.
Stop comparing oranges to elephants.
16 Jul 2010 at 12:07 pm | #
http://www.horseracing.com.hk/hk_fixtures_09-10_e.pdf
16 Jul 2010 at 01:10 pm | #
Ace,
Hong Kong handles 3-4 times the money wagered on NYRA’s 3 tracks, and NYRA has the largest handle in North America.
So let’s say you’ll respond by saying NYRA is incompetent. Ok, then divide any other U.S. track’s handle by its racing dates and Hong Kong crushes them on a daily basis as well. Are they all incompetent?
Who do you think is doing it better?
16 Jul 2010 at 01:46 pm | #
Its a friggin island full of gambling degenerates, fed by a pro gambling culture, with no football, baseball, etc.
JFC, you cannot compare Japan or Hong Kong to this country.
Wake up.
16 Jul 2010 at 04:18 pm | #
Does all this mean that Steve Allday might never come to NY to pre-race 1 of Todd’s horses again?
16 Jul 2010 at 11:37 pm | #
Ace,
Ok, here’s one for you.
When New York became the last state to allow race day lasix we were told it meant more out-of-state shippers and larger fields.
Neither has come to pass. The decline in field size in NY is the same, or greater, than the rest of the U.S. There is no statistical data you can cite which suggests lasix has made the slightest difference at keeping horses on the track in NY.
This should have been the perfect laboratory experiment for why race day lasix should be allowed. It failed. And don’t say NYRA’s security barn discouraged shippers. The security barn started more than 10 years after legal race day lasix in NY.
So tell me, where is the evidence lasix has made any difference?
17 Jul 2010 at 10:32 am | #
Question.
Why did your “The Boss Would Know What To Do” Column vanish off the Pricci menu?
Thanks.
18 Jul 2010 at 06:49 am | #
Pricci, let’s say you owned Persoal Ensign. It’s August and the Breeders’ Cup is just 3 months away. Are you going to ship her to Del Mar so the great horse racing fans of California can see her race? Hmm? It’s funny how when the shoe is on the other foot things chage.
19 Jul 2010 at 02:21 am | #
Long time no see! Is that Scott Lake and his “posse” that I just saw entering P.J. Campos’ office at Saratoga? It’s amazing how things never change on these blogs etc where everyone is afraid to name names, because they are afraid for one reason or another. Call it like it is, stop protecting those who have virtually ruined this great game of our’s and call ‘em as you see ‘em!
19 Jul 2010 at 02:49 am | #
By the way, does anyone have a clue to what ever happened to the “GREAT” Spooky Mulder, who was trained by the aforementioned Mr Lake? Would like to know, and hope that somebody out there has a pleasant story to tell about ole Spooky and that he is living on some farm getting alot of TLC for which he truly deserves! I bet that horse could tell us about his exploits through the years, if only!
27 Jul 2010 at 02:00 pm | #
Don, the “The Boss Would...” piece appears in the Featured Bloggers section, not the column section. A column is usually written for Friday; blogs on all other days.
Markinsac, I have seen Zenyatta run live at last year’s Breeders’ Cup and God willing will do so again. This isn’t about seeing Zenyatta race in Saratoga for me. It’s about getting these great fillies together, period. Believe what you will.
Stan, first time I’ve been accused of protecting “the guilty,” but I suppose there’s a first time for everything. When people are proven guilty publicly, they are fair game. I have lots of suspicions, but they’re suspicions I can’t prove.
Doug, first time I’ve seen an Allday reference in a while. Can’t speak to your comment, but I’ve written over and over that the name of the attending veterinarians be printed on the official track program.
And now, with the elimination of the detention barn and vets are allowed to administer care and legal medications pre-race again, there should be a renewed push to do so.
Thanks all, it’s good to be back, indeed.
JP
28 Jul 2010 at 05:46 am | #
Anyone who thinks a 20 year lousy jockey type who suddenly becomes a miracle worker trainer (Rudy Rodriguez) without cheating is a damm fool. Take Endless Circle as perfect evidence.
Claimed 3 starts back for 14K, a cheap 6 year old NY bred who never ran a Beyer above 83, suddenly strings together an 89, 90, and 94 this past Monday running 2nd to Checklist in a NW3. Furthermore a front running type, Endless Cirle charges off the pace on Monday like he was Forego. Drugs, drugs, and more drugs.
To allow a @#$^bag like Rodriguez to turn betting in New York on it’s ear anytime he enters a horse (27-74 37% this year) is BS.
Until bums like this clown are exposed and removed from the scene, everything NYRA is spewing regarding testing is useless nonsense.