Nor is it about whether the Travers colts can run as fast as Alabama heroine Questing: one and one-quarter miles in 2:01.69. (We're taking 'over' the total).
Instead, this is the Saratoga meet where sport has played a subordinate role to politics and New York racing’s future--that is if the present Governor will allow Thoroughbred racing to have a future as we’ve known it and, if he does, what that future would look like.
The big question re all that is who will handle the reins, who will be chosen to right a ship that has been listing since the NYRA’s former management ignored the sun-setting of a takeout provision that cost horseplayers across the country $8.5 million.
And if Mr. Cuomo someday decides to cut off the VLT largesse because machines don’t have families, don’t need health care, and don’t need a pension for the day they just can’t do it anymore, what then?
That is the day when all that is left in the horseplayer, the most underappreciated, taken-for-granted and, at times, abused customer any going concern ever had.
Who will remain on the job at the New York Racing Association after the state-loaded Board of Trustees is named is anyone’s guess. One would have to think that NYRA staffers, at least, are safe. They're the ones who
show up every day and put on the show, even on dark days.
The New York Racing Association has been on automatic pilot for some time, even before the top executives were terminated. Without the racing office, officials, administrators of every stripe, and the horsemen that have remained loyal to New York racing throughout, this show would not have gone on.
As an official said to me the other day, “the ship might veer off course a little from time to time, but the crew is still down in the engine room working.”
Sadly and expectedly, politicians should have kept their mouths closed rather than open them and remove all doubt that on matters pertaining to racing they’re in over their heads.
Assemblyman J. Gary Pretlow has been serving New Yorkers from the 87th district for 20 years. Laudably, he was the author “Cynthia’s Law,” which established that reckless assault of a child should be a class D felony. The measure also raised awareness for shaken baby syndrome. This is what public serice should be about.
But as the Chair of the Assembly Racing and Wagering Committee, his role has been passive. Recently, Mr. Pretlow came to the defense of acting NYRA President Ellen McClain, stating that she’s getting a “bad deal” from the shakeup expected to take place at meet’s end.
Ms. McClain has excellent credentials in the business community and was hired as NYRA’s Chief Financial Officer. She should return to that post when changes finally are made. When it comes to the demands placed on a racetrack CEO, she is out of her element and overmatched.
Mr. Pretlow, racing is not a business in which a top-class manager can show up, surround himself with the best talent available, then make the right decisions that not only affect the bottom line but the lives of thousands of extended members of this state’s huge racing family.
Everything that happens on the racetrack, whether it occurs on the backside or the front-side, is in lockstep with everything else. Wagering is not the only area where the term commingling applies.
Do I have any special knowledge about who will take the reins? No, but I hear rumors like anyone else. As for former President Charlie Hayward’s replacement, the names heard most often are Lou Raffetto’s and Bill Murphy’s, by a margin of about 2-1.
Both men are very well respected within the industry and by most horsemen, and generally are loved by anyone who has worked under them. Both have vast experience and credentials. Either would make a worthy successor.
Raffetto is currently President of the Thoroughbred Owners of California, where his tenure has been fraught with difficulty as the problems facing the industry are especially sensitive out west.
In working for the California horsemen, he’s run afoul of horseplayers with respect to the takeout issue. But it should be noted that when he was COO and President of the Maryland Jockey Club, he reduced takeout at the now defunct Laurel summer meet. There is evidence all over, especially now at Del Mar, that lower trakeout and fractional betting in tandem works, and it works big-time.
In addition to high-level management positions at Laurel and Pimlico, Raffetto has groomed and trained horses and served as a racing secretary. Other positions he held included assistant general manager at Monmouth Park, Executive Vice-President of Racing at Suffolk Downs and CEO of the National Steeplechase Association.
Murphy was a Vice President and General Manager of Racing Operations at Gulfstream Park and at Thistledown Race Course. He too groomed horses, was an assistant starter and the youngest track superintendent ever appointed at Hialeah, and the Director of Operations at Detroit Race Course. Murphy current serves as an Expressbet executive.
Obviously, either man would be well qualified to help lead New York racing back to its classy roots. And both understand the plight of the horseplayer, being bettors themselves. If not, their tenure would have unwanted distractions. The pools need to be fed. Like the adage says; you need to spend money to make money.
Should either man assume the role, or whoever it may be,he needs to seriously consider making Richard Migliore the operations face of the new company.
Well-liked by racing fans, respected by horsemen, a hands-on practitioner, bloodstock consultant and now media-savvy talent, Migliore has an eye for the details that have been ignored for years, not the least of which is the plight of the horseplaying customer.
In the interests of full disclosure, I am friendly with all three of these men. None have lobbied for my support, which is probably wise on their part. But I have lots of friends in this business and the ones that stick know my philosophy: Be good to the game that's been good to you.
Time has come to go back to the future.



20 Aug 2012 at 02:52 pm | #
Well-done, John. You take a number of stands, then support them with data or comments.
20 Aug 2012 at 04:05 pm | #
John, C’mon. Lou is another guy that hates the low takeout P5 and wanted to raise the WPS to 16%. The Laurel thing where he lowered takeout for a short time is irrelevant. During the TOC decertification he left a dishonest message on someones voicemail that was played on the radio. He basically called people who signed a petition and tried to get them to withdraw their petition through dishonesty.
20 Aug 2012 at 04:14 pm | #
I have been mystified for decades, as I simply cannot understand or appreciate just what the difficult decisions are for the CEO of NYRA or the COO. I know the racing secretary works hard to write a condition book and to coddle trainers to enter horses; and that the many CFOs, for years and years, have been frustrated with how precious money was flittered away on purses, expense accounts, and executive ‘bennies’, their pleas to stop the flow of red ink ignored by the CEO and the directors - thus the revolving door of CFOs.
What are the decisions that need to be made that warrant the salaries paid to the executives and the need for a twenty-six member board of directors?
Maintain the track, the stables, and the other buildings; routine daily work. Isn’t the food and beverage subcontracted?
Seems to me that NYRA, as stated above, pretty much functions day-in and day-out without any need for executive directives or director proclamations.
Every year it is the same ole stake races week after week, with the same usual suspects training and riding, and turf writers rendering opinions on the entrants - no executive decisions need to be made here.
Is NYRA management, and the directors, faced with decisions involving product obsolescence, product design, sources of raw material, upgrading machinery, product pricing, training a sales staff, delivering the product to the market place, technology changes, competition, et cetera.
And now, with casino dole flowing in handily, there is no worry on meeting payroll, or any other financial obligations. Management can now direct their attention to rebuilding Saratoga into a palatial destination.
About the only things I can come up with that might require a management decision is whether the deodorant pads in the urinals should be white or pink, or if the give-a-ways that inflate attendance should be hats, t-shirts, umbrellas, or cups.
20 Aug 2012 at 04:50 pm | #
Mr Corrow --
If they really want to “class up” the joint, there is no need to decide between pink and white. Ice is the best..
20 Aug 2012 at 04:52 pm | #
Horse Racing needs honest people who don’t fall apart under pressure.
Horse Racing needs forward thinking people who are willing to innovate and and make adjustments when they are called for.
Treating Horseplayers like their personal piggy banks, which is what they’ve done with SB1072 in California, is disgraceful.
You got me going this morning John. LOL
20 Aug 2012 at 05:20 pm | #
Ponder this: Does NYRA really need horseplayers anymore? With slot revenue pouring into their coffers, do they really need or care about the 20% takeout earned from on-track handle, or the 4%, or so, from off-track wagering?
The obnoxious purses now being offered, which are not sustainable from takeout or signal fees, clearly indicate that my $100 contribution per day is comparable to trying to raise the ocean level by throwing a penny into it - no significance whatsosever.
20 Aug 2012 at 05:44 pm | #
Wendell,
Your last comment (#6) exposes the mirage of your self-professed economic expertise.
Even with VLT money now in NY, your $100/day, and mine, and JRP’s, and Andrew’s, and CFOTIAS’s, funds at least 75% of the purses.
20 Aug 2012 at 07:21 pm | #
Andrew, admittedly I’m not privy to what’s going on behind close doors in California.I can neither affirm nor deny what you claim re Mr. Raffetto’s “dishonesty.”
If that’s true then shame on him and the air needs to be cleared, one way or another, and the issue addressed in an honest, open fashion. If not, then that would be, sadly, business as usual.
But lowering takeout is never irrelevent. It shows an understanding of the marketplace and the concept of churn.
In SoCal, Raffetto was working for the horsemen who, to my understanding, were in favor of raising takeout. Wasn’t that the stance taken by Mike Pegram and his trainer Bob Baffert?
If the membership that hires a man insists that he represent their interests, what are his choices?
20 Aug 2012 at 07:48 pm | #
When he came to California he came in claiming he was his own Man and wasn’t just a puppet for Pegram. He had about a month to prove himself and all he did was to prove that wasn’t anything close to his own man.
Yes, his job is to advocate for Owners, or should I say certain Owners.
He’s completely over his head out here in my opinion, with no solutions just politics.
20 Aug 2012 at 10:36 pm | #
Mr. Kling: Let’s go with your finding that our wagers fund 75% of NYRA purses; thus, casino dole is used to fund the other 25%. Why? Why does NYRA chose to use the casino dole to further increase purses, when the purse of each race is distributed to nine people (owner, trainer, and jockey via W/P/S)? Why doesn’t NYRA give the first 5,000 people entering the track, after having paid for parking, admission, and track program, a voucher for $25? Think the casino dole would be more effective in obtaining NYRA’s objective: increasing attendance and handle? Duh?
Why NYRA receives any casino dole is beyond belief; they waste the dole like drunken sailors.
A fine example is this past Saturday, when NYRA offered purses totaling $1,772,000; the same plodders would have entered the same races for purses half that amount. Takeout on handle and signal fees did, barely, cover the purses; unfortunately the day’s operating expenses and fixed costs weren’t covered, no matter how many dogs and beers were purchased by track patrons. Where is the effort by NYRA to use these Saturday’s with stake races to make some serious profits? The day, as is every Saturday, was again a financial loser - purses why out of proportion to perceived income.
Go Cuomo!
20 Aug 2012 at 10:41 pm | #
Wendell,
We’ve been thru this before, so take notes this time so we don’t have to do it again. Ok?
IT’S NEW YORK STATE LAW.
The VLT revenues are distributed according to law, and NYRA would be breaking the law if it did otherwise.
Comprende?
20 Aug 2012 at 11:17 pm | #
Yes, Mr. Kling, we have been through this numerous times already. And, if it is N.Y. law, then change the damn law! Gov Cuomo, where are you?
It is a damn shame what could be done with the casino dole to improve racing’s fate.
Go Cuomo! You are on the right track!
20 Aug 2012 at 11:40 pm | #
I’d like to know who the genius is that decided to widen the turf course. It looks like the horses are running in a ditch on a dirt race. It was hard enough to view the races before with all the obstructed views, now the rails from the turf course too! (Yes, I use binoculars)
And what about the grounds? The backyard has almost no grass left. It’s starting to look like a desert with all the dust.
Try to find a seat on a busy day without paying for it. Even if you find one, it’s gone after you get up to place a bet. People just move your paper off the seat and take it.
The day lasts forever. I’ve just about had enough of the ‘Spa’ for this year.
21 Aug 2012 at 12:11 am | #
Having just completed one of my better days wagering on Philly races, I am in good spirits, and will now crack another Fosters.
The previous commentator, DennyM, seems frustrated with Saratoga. I can imagine why. I realized decades ago that Saratoga was not a place to gamble on the ponies. The last time I was at Saratoga was 1976, when my daughters were very young. As I recall I spent about $44 on their dogs, soda, and ice cream back then; imagine what the cost is today.
Why people who are serious gamblers desire to wager on Saratoga races has me bambozzled. I can understand vacationers enjoying their excursion to Saratoga, but to gamble?
Thoroughbred racing to me is about making money, and racing at Monmouth, Philly, Delaware, Laurel/Pimlico, Caldor, et cetera offer far better opportunities, and winning percentages, than Saratoga races.
So, DennyM, next year try another racetrack. You will discover that racing is exactly the same, and you won’t be dealing with two-year-olds trained by the same usual suspects, nor hurdle races, and turf writer hype. And, you will not have to worry about your seat or ability to see the race live; and, you will know where the cashier’s window is, having been there already.
21 Aug 2012 at 01:23 am | #
wmc, I am frustrated. Perhaps it’s because I’m having the worse meet ever. But, it’s also I’m getting older and can’t spend the whole day on my feet anymore (especially for 10, 11, 12 races a day). I grew up in Queens going to Aqueduct and Belmont and never paid for a seat unless it was for preferred seating near the finish line and that was for maybe $2. Since I moved upstate 15 years ago, and my sister lives 30 minutes from Saratoga (I don’t need a hotel room), I started going to Saratoga. But, I’m getting tired of it. $3 grandstand, $5 clubhouse admission, on a weekday it’s $7 for a grandstand seat in the stands and $11 clubhouse (don’t know how much on the weekend, but, a guy sells seats for $20 to $100 outside the gate). A form is necessary, I bring my own lunch to save money.
The other day I went to the harness track after the thoroughbreds. Much more reasonable, no admission, free seats, a program is $2, there’s a simulcast facility, a reasonably priced snack bar (special on PBR beer $2 for 16 oz, thought you’d like that wmc). Next time I go visit my sister maybe I’ll just go there for the whole day. Otherwise think it will be the OTB. Not ready to totally give up on betting Saratoga, but, you got me thinking a bit about alternatives.
Come to think of it, the best times I’ve had in the last couple of years was when I was in Florida visiting my mom and went to Pompano Park nightly. They run for $5000 purses and you see the same horses every week. There’s a small, but, enthusiastic crowd (mostly reirees). Yes, I think I see my future. If I want to bet thoroughbreds, the simulcast is right next door at the casino too.
21 Aug 2012 at 04:38 pm | #
Lou Raffetto would screw up a one flavor ice cream counter & he talks outta both sides of his mouth...GMAFB!!!…
21 Aug 2012 at 05:15 pm | #
As a full-time player at GP for many years, I can say that Mr. Murphy was arguably the worst Stronach stand in that that venue has seen.Most notably, he brought in his pal, Couch as racing secretary and they did their best to cheapen the product to Thistledownian levels.
Also, a good way to think of NYRA as a business entity is to think of the USPS. They are expected to operate as businesses but are not allowed to make their own business plans.
21 Aug 2012 at 05:18 pm | #
Two words that plague American horse racing: Status Quo. There isn’t a single person within the NY State government on any level that has demonstrated an acumen for entrepreneuralism. The state government’s participation, management and oversight at this early stage and in the future does not bode well for NY horse racing. It would be great to see someone in this fiasco actually show some imagination. We need a Jeff Seder - we need someone who has succeeded in taking a business and turning it into an innovative success. We need audacity: but that word is antithetical to the political world for the most part. And without audacity - NY racing is doomed.
21 Aug 2012 at 11:39 pm | #
I am not optimistic here. I don’t believe in any way the governor is interested in helping horseracing. To me, the only reason the governor took over the NYRA was to make certain that he could promote his casino agenda without resistance from the NYRA. I believe that casinos will be put on both Aqueduct and Belmont properties. I also expect one of those tracks to close as a racing facility. As a result, his pick to head the NYRA will be a person who will cooperate with his agenda. It probably will be someone we have never heard of.
22 Aug 2012 at 12:01 am | #
John, this statement that NYRA has been on auto-pilot just sounds like political propaganda to me. I say this with all due respect to you. Large organizations just don’t operate that way. Under Charles Hayward’s leadership, the NYRA has become a very player-friendly oriented organization. One only has to go their website daily to see that. Also, the NYRA’s live feed is outstanding all day long. These things do not happen by accident. The take-out error was just that, an error in the interpretaion of the process of executing the law. With Charles Hayward gone, I rexpect the player-friendly trend to be reversed by the new appointees. From my view here in Boston, I saw no problems with the NYRA other than they got in the way of the political slots freight train.
22 Aug 2012 at 02:33 am | #
John Pricci and all that of been brave enough to comment on this thread.... I have some news for you, that I present as a lifelong owner and exercise rider. All that you have discussed has merit and value, however, YOU ARE PAWNS and INNOCENT VICTIMS, I believe, of what goes on behind closed doors on the NYRA backstretch, in addition to that of the powers that be managing handle and take out. What I mean specifically is the excessive drugging, and multiple injections of horses that goes unreported to the public. The betting public does not have all of the information NECESSARY to make an educated wager based on the true condition of any entrant in a race. Until all veterinary records become public, and New York State takes disciplinary action against offenders of the Education law the integrity of betting on thoroughbred horse racing continue to be a farce. The only real profiteers are veterinarians and trainers. I stopped to betting on horses when I started galloping horses and saw what really went on in the barns on the backside. If I were a betting person today, I would call for a boycott on horserace betting, and no wagers be placed nationwide until racing cleaned up its game and allowed horse players to really know the odds of what they are betting on....
22 Aug 2012 at 08:01 am | #
The Governor may WANT to change the laws that give NYRA the VLT revenue, but Cuomo also must walk a very fine line if he wants to run for President in 2016. If Cuomo does do what many expect, I expect in return to be a serious round of lawsuits both by horsemen and by now-former NYRA members. Even if those lawsuits eventually proved to be frivolous or the state won those outright, those suits could prove damaging not to his bid to be re-elected as Governor in 2014 (that he is expected to easily win), but in his run for President two years later. The “bluebloods” will save their ammo for the Presidential campaign and will use anything that hurts horsemen full-bore against Cuomo both in the Democratic primary and if he wins that the general election.
Cuomo has to think ahead to 2016 in any moves he makes now, and that is why I don’t think it’s quite the slam-dunk most think it is that Cuomo will try to hurt NYRA, even if a former NYRA board in 1994 did back George Pataki over his father, something Cuomo probably has never forgotten.
22 Aug 2012 at 11:57 am | #
Migliore in any capacity would be superb. He has an indomitable will, and in that crazy world, if you’re working with less than that, you’re a goner.
Steve has survived at least two decades of everything that’s gone on in the NYRA circus. It’s time that he get the nod as the track’s ombudsman, with a contract that states that he cannot be fired for the duration of his term.
Given that stability, I’m positive that he’d be able to fix whatever he sees is not going as planned.
And while he’s doing it, he’ll be able to convince people that what he’s doing is the way to get it done.
22 Aug 2012 at 11:42 pm | #
Susan: I feel your pain.
Walt: Steve Who?
Sal: Political propaganda? For whom? I suggest you talk with someone who works here.
BTW: If you’re in Saratoga for the races, have you walked around and taken a good look?
23 Aug 2012 at 02:31 am | #
John wrote:
>Sal: Political propaganda? For whom? I suggest >you talk with someone who works here.
John, I’ll have to take your word for it here. I will not get up to Saratoga or downstate this year. I really don’t want to approach anyone online.
It frustrates me to not see many stand up for a man who gave many good years to racing and kept the NYRA afloat in a contentious political environment. Symbolically, it looks bad for the whole game.
23 Aug 2012 at 03:43 pm | #
I wrote this on the Paulick report in response to Sean Kerr asking where Charles Hayward showed any audacity:
“Every time Charles Hayward stood up against the Legislature and Governor he was audacious. The politicians brought the NYRA to the brink of financial disaster so many times it was outrageous. Many of those times Hayward fought hard to make them live up to their promises and allow the NYRA to operate without interruption. Ultimately this would cost him his job.
One time he actually had to file for bankruptcy protection until the Legislature came to its senses. If he didn’t the racing would have had to shut down. Hayward fought through this political minefield bravely, never once allowing his own people to suffer.
Another time he used the NYRA’s claim to ownership of the property as a lever for continued funding. In reality, the NYRA could have never made that stand up in court, but it worked to keep the game running and get additional funding.
But, then again, it could be something as simple as hiring Andy Serling, a real and controversial player. To me, Andy has added so much to the horseplayer. Or it could be the hiring Maggie Wolfendale who has the guts to tell the viewers what horses really look like in the paddock, as opposed to the usual every horse looks good the other tracks feed us.
Or maybe, it is just something as minor as telling the condition of the turf course by 8 A.M.
That is off the top of my head. If I think harder, there is lot more that describes the man both as audacious and entrepreneurial.”
I still feel the game made a huge mistake in not standing behind Charles Hayward. And quite frankly, I can’t help but to feel that saying the NYRA was on auto-pilot is just not fair in the totality of what Charles accomplished at the NYRA.
24 Aug 2012 at 03:13 am | #
Hi, Sal. I admire your thinking on this, & I’m glad you wrote what you did.
I think the whole thing is tragic. But CH was caught lying, & the clarity of the evidence of his having lied was so obvious, he simply had no defense & no choice but to resign.
Even if in the previous week, he had single-handedly put out a fire in the Belmont Grandstand - the size of which rivaled what burned Arlington to the ground - that superheroic feat could not have saved him.
What really makes your stated case so commendable is that Heyward directly paid the price for the completely irresponsible ten-year delay in establishing the AQ casino.
He didn’t want that 1% takeout reduction to go into effect because of NYRA’s precarious finances at the time when it was supposed to have been readjusted downwards. So nothing got done.
But if the casino had been built within a reasonable amount of time, say by 2006, by 2007, NYRA could have reduced the takeout by 1.5%-3% in various categories & no one would have cared because the casino money would have been rolling in.
Had there been one resopibile governor & one capable governor, replacing, respectively, Spitzer & Paterson:
1) The casino project would have been completed five years ago:
2) Hayward would still be the NYRA CEO; &
3) The NYRA board coup d’etat would have never happened.
THIS IS THE PRICE OF CORRUPTION:
A very capable, & personable CEO’s career came to grief, & for no good reason at all.
24 Aug 2012 at 01:58 pm | #
Don Reed wrote:
“I think the whole thing is tragic. But CH was caught lying, & the clarity of the evidence of his having lied was so obvious, he simply had no defense & no choice but to resign.”
Don, I pretty much agreed with everything you wrote except the above statement. It doesn’t take away from the essence of your premise though.
Charles Hayward was fired by the NYRA Board of Directors. He did not resign.
The only public accusations against Charles Hayward came from the NYSRWB Interim Report. It has been reported that the NYSRWB did not interview Charles Hayward at all before they issued their condemnation of Hayward. Also, the NYSRWB members denied any knowledge of the mis-execution of the law and denied having received an email from Hayward asking for their counsel on the takeout process. They said the spam filter ate it. So, how is it that an agency possibly complicit in the take-out error makes any judgment on other people in the matter?
Maybe, there is some likelihood the Hayward lied about the take-out issue. But, there is a greater likelihood that the Governor got rid of Hayward and the NYRA board of directors for political reasons related to the casino bill.
My greatest issue with this whole matter is that not many in the racing world publicly stood up for Hayward and the NYRA board of directors. To me, it was more about standing up for RACING, than it was for the individuals.
John Pricci’s whole column was based on some optimism about the next leader of NY racing. I am sorry not to share in this optimism. I believe the governor is looking for a follower (of his agenda), not a leader of RACING. Let’s hope than John is right.
08 Sep 2012 at 09:03 am | #
Governor just want to present the right site of the society. But how about the negative and dark of the world. How many People was affected for the meanning politic competition. Maybe, I perfer to spend time on shopping a good tods shoes online
08 Sep 2012 at 11:17 pm | #
Sal: Sorry that I haven’t responded sooner, but somehow, the notification process (message to my email box) didn’t activate.
If the good fellow with his hearty recommendation of Australian Shoes hadn’t graced us with his quip, I would have never known of your necessary correction:
Yes, CH was fired, he did not resign; my mistake!
I think I’ve been brainwashed that “all execs resign under pressure, but technically, they do resign.”
Note: If Hayward didn’t make physical copies of his emails that alerted the NYSRWB, why not?
I am constantly stunned by (not in this case, just generally) the stupidity of this current utterly illiterate generation that thinks that by extension of computers alone, they can actually read their college diplomas.
And from that premise, hence the deluge of criminal convictions of nitwits who in earlier generations (NO comparison to Hayward is intended whatever).would never gotten themselves into these self-incriminating positions -
Being constantly aware that if they didn’t want to see It on the front page of the New York Times, the rule was: Don’t Put It In Writing.
Cuomo cynically taking advantage of the issue is beyond doubt. If he had intended to clean house, as a general rule of his current employment, then Silver would have been investigated from the get-go, in the “Grope-ez” fiasco (instead of Lopez being the sole investigative target).
THANK GOD he’s not my governor.
At any rate, for whatever reason, this was a convenient way for Cuomo to dump Hayward. Whether or not the 1% had been adjusted when it should have been, I feel, Cuomo could not care less (if NYS doesn’t get its taxes from one source, another minutes later scoops up what was missed).
There was no need for NYS to resist following their own legal directives about lowering the takeout by the now infamous 1%. That the lowering didn’t get done is irrelevant.
Be well.
Handprint: Nice site, but why the lady with the semi-open blouse? It’s not a site that would logically attract men (being a National Trust For The Feet of Australian Women).
You might enjoy The Cruise of The Raider Wolf by Roy Alexander (1939). Order a copy on Amazon books!
09 Sep 2012 at 06:42 pm | #
Don, I am sure the NYRA still has the record that the email was sent to the NYSRWB. It did not matter because the NYSRWB was cast as the judge and jury of this incident. An under duress of legal action, the NYRA board fired Hayward and the chief counsel. Then, under duress many of the NYRA board members agree to resign their posts and turned the franchise over to the Governor. This is what I have read.
09 Sep 2012 at 10:09 pm | #
If it is true that the NYRA board under duress fired Hayward, then I suspect at some point we may see him and other former board members suing the state, claiming the NYRA board forced their dismissals, claiming that Cuomo threatened them in ways that could be not too good for Cuomo, especially since as noted he is looking to run for President in 2016. Even if such a lawsuit proved frivolous, it could severely damage Cuomo’s bid to become President four years from now.
09 Sep 2012 at 10:15 pm | #
Walt, the more I think about it, the more I believe Cuomo has not heard the end of this. It will have to wait for another day, as you suggest.
09 Sep 2012 at 11:01 pm | #
STB: Agreed. There’s no point going to the judge stating that you have proof that the other party was notified if the other party is also the judge.
I also - as a veteran of many onerous, stinking jobs between 1977-94 - thank my lucky stars I no longer have to answer to such malicious, incompetent people. No matter if you do an OK job, a great job, or call in sick every day of the year, they’ll torpedo whatever good you’ve accomplished. Better that you did nothing,
09 Sep 2012 at 11:03 pm | #
[continued from previous post] because nothing ruined is still nothing (as opposed to watching something acommplished being reversed).
13 Sep 2012 at 06:34 am | #
This is very useful for me.Can you share with us something more like this ??? Thanks. Thiet ke logo