SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, December 8, 2010--This is not to minimize what happened 69 years ago Tuesday, God knows. But December 7 has another reason to add to its infamous legacy; the beginning of the end of the modern era of racing in New York.
Unknowing editorial writers at major New York dailies, most of which have been calling for the shuttering of New York City Off-Track Betting for years, are probably still dancing in the newsroom.
You can get those “good riddance to bad rubbish” headlines ready now.
The problem is they knew very little of what they were talking about, just like some Albany legislators, who look at polls and editorials but never inside themselves if they can help it.
What happened Wednesday, on balance, was not a good thing. It might be good sometime in the future. That’s if the future doesn’t run out of racetrack.
Of course, everyone knows about OTB’s past. The New York Racing Association had a chance to embrace the concept in the early 1970s, but figured it wouldn’t have the kind of impact that it did.
Who wants to bet in some seedy storefront when you can come out to the races and enjoy a day of sport? But they forgot the business they were in, a market they once had all to themselves.
Now racing finds itself in a position where without help from their competitors--off-track betting and casino gambling--it couldn’t survive without first changing the business model in a significant way. And pronto.
Create a new paradigm, lower the cost of the gambling product to effectively compete with your rivals, or die. As “Larry the Liquidator,” who knew how to use other people’s money, once instructed:
“You know the surest way to go broke? Keep getting an increasing share of a shrinking market. Down the tubes. Slow but sure.” Has anyone perused national betting trends in this brave new Millennium?
Everyone, including headline writers, knew the problems associated with the City-OTB model: Excessive patronage; gross inefficiencies; too many vice-presidents driving too many company cars; betting parlors allowed to go to seed, etc., etc.
But many of those vice presidents and most of the cars have been history for some time now; so are some of the worst, most inefficient stand-alone parlors. There have been layoffs and buy-outs. OTB was making some headway; slowly, yes, but surely.
Following bankruptcy, a plan was hatched for modernization. No plan is perfect, but elements of a new vision made sense. It isn’t right that the NYRA was left holding an empty bag that was supposed to be filled with 27.5 million dollars.
Statutory law notwithstanding, 35 cents of every dollar was bet on NYRA races at NYC-OTB last year, nearly a quarter of a billiondollars worth of handle. The contentious shotgun marriage came down to this; these spouses needed each other.
As part of the reorganization, the NYRA gladly would have let NYC-OTB off the hook for the $27.5 million in exchange for rights to OTB’s phone betting and Internet business in perpetuity.
So would have the state’s other racetracks, albeit to a far lesser degree. It might have taken some time to get even but this was going to be a home run ball grooved right down the middle.
Every track in the state depended on NYC-OTB handle. Without it, it will interesting to see how long some of the tracks can keep opening their gates. How many race days will their barn areas be able to support if horsemen can no longer make a living?
City-OTB may not be too big to fail, but they were big enough so that every track in the state that benefits from their handle can.
The New York State Racing & Wagering Board already has begun studying the possibility of rule changes to facilitate phone and Internet wagering at venues that already come under NYSRWB aegis.
The bill that would have made the reorganization of NYC-OTB possible was approved by the State Assembly, but failed to pass the Senate Tuesday.
With Democrats in charge of the Senate’s Lame Duck session until January 1, an alternative Republican bill was not put on the floor for a vote. Three Senators never bothered to even show up.
A pox on both sides of the aisle.
It is unknown what effect an 11th hour proposal made by the State’s other regional OTBs--seeking a reduction in statutory payments to the tracks while keeping their phone and Internet operations--had on the voting process. But it likely didn’t help.
The NYRA balked loudly saying that without the $20 million in statutory payments from the other OTBs, it would be forced to close. So, what are the current real world consequences?
Oh, not much. Only 800 more people out of work and the State, already $10 billion in the hole, according to State Senate Conference Leader John Sampson (D-Brooklyn),* now on the hook for $600 million in pensions due NYC-OTB employees
*updated to original post Dec. 10, 2010
Which reminds us of a song, specifically the third chorus of "Summer, Highland Falls" written by New Yorker Billy Joel:
“And so we'll argue and we'll compromise
And realize that nothing's ever changed
For all our mutual experience
Our separate conclusions are the same
Now we are forced to recognize our inhumanity
A reason coexists with our insanity
And so we choose between reality and madness
It's either sadness or euphoria.”





09 Dec 2010 at 12:56 am | #
Yes, sir. The old industry just keeps improving, getting better & better. I hear ya, JRP.
I really miss the handicapping puzzles & statistics tracking. I DO NOT miss the industry practices & the price one’s soul must pay to play. Even Satan will bargain. It would seem that this industry is secretly controlled by Republicans. Show no mercy, take no prisoners. Now that is much more realistic than Go, Baby, Go!
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/60268/safety-alliance-participation-falling-short?&utm_source=DailyNewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20101209
Safety Alliance Participation Falling Short
By Tom LaMarra
Updated: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 6:39 PM
Posted: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 6:18 PM
When it is released in early January 2011, the second report from the National Thoroughbred Racing Association Safety and Integrity Alliance independent monitor may have this message: Not good enough.
The alliance, which began accrediting racetracks in 2009, said its goal was to have 30 facilities fully accredited by the end of 2010. With less a month to go, the figure stands at 19, with another track on the way.
During a Dec. 8 presentation at the University of Arizona Symposium on Racing and Gaming in Tucson, the alliance provided an update, which included a video message from former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson, the independent monitor. Thompson issued the first annual report a year ago.
“I’m disappointed with the actions taken this year, and hope we do better in 2011,” Thompson said, noting the accreditation goal won’t be met. He offered no other details on the upcoming report.
So far this year only three tracks have been accredited: Canterbury Park, Golden Gate Fields, and Sunland Park Racetrack & Casino. Finger Lakes Gaming and Racing was inspected the week of Dec. 6 with accreditation pending.
Last year, 16 tracks were accredited. Alliance executive director Mike Ziegler, on hand in Tucson, said Thompson’s message speaks for itself.
“I believe the message is loud and clear: We need to get more tracks accredited,” Ziegler said.
To that end, the alliance said Dec. 8 it will offer a “co-op pricing program” whereby accredited tracks will receive a credit against next-year NTRA membership dues for any alliance accreditation fee less inspection expenses. Future accreditation fees will be tiered based on purses offered for NTRA-member and non-member tracks, officials said.
Cost has been a concern of some racetracks, but there are other reasons for their non-action. Pre-race veterinarian inspections of all horses are required for accreditation, and not all tracks offer them. Also, tracks are reluctant to undergo inspections for fear safety inadequacies will be exposed; expenses related to upgrades factor in the mix.
Interestingly, of the 19 accredited tracks only five have racetrack gaming in an industry with about 15 such facilities that offer Thoroughbred racing. No tracks in Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, or West Virginia are accredited; major winter racing facilities such as Gulfstream Park and Tampa Bay Downs in Florida and Oaklawn Park in Arkansas aren’t either.
Steven Koch, vice president for Thoroughbred racing at Woodbine in Canada, said track operator Woodbine Entertainment Group believes it is “imperative” the industry support alliance efforts. He said being accredited offers opportunities for advocacy regarding the public and its perception of horse racing, which took serious hits in 2008.
Woodbine was credited for having 13 “best practices” in the area of safety, he said.
“It’s a reinforced opportunity for self-review,” Koch said of accreditation, which must be undertaken every two years. “Accreditation is earned, not given.”
Tom Metzen Sr., active in horsemen’s groups in Arizona and Minnesota, said the program already has had benefits for Canterbury Park. He also suggested horse owners should apply some pressure on tracks to be accredited.
“I’ve been in the business 50 years and have spent a lot of money on horses,” Metzen said. “I like to run them at safe racetracks.”
Mike Campbell of the Illinois Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association said he will suggest the organization’s board at a meeting Dec. 13 “insist racetracks fall into compliance.” The Illinois THA represents horsemen at Arlington Park, which is accredited, and at Hawthorne Race Course, which is not.
“If the racetracks don’t do it, the horsemen’s groups should,” Campbell said.
The 2011 code of standards is not yet available, Ziegler said. There could be some new parameters regarding jockey safety in light of recent discussions.
Read more: http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/60268/safety-alliance-participation-falling-short#ixzz17bpDO3kt
09 Dec 2010 at 04:03 am | #
RU,
To be frank, I’m not sure this program isn’t as much about PR as it is safety. Seems to me that either you’re doing a good job in this area or your not.
Many procedures and standards have been put in place that didn’t exist before. This is progress and to not acknowledge that is unfair.
I’ll say this. For someone who’s walked away from the game, as you’ve said on previous posts, sounds like you’re still passionate about the game of have a personal ax to grind.
Hopefully, it’s the former, not the latter. If not, that’s fine, too. But you seem to spend a lot of time researching something you say you no longer care about.
Thanks for the link but I’ve seen Tom’s post. Have been following the events in Tuscon and might comment on some later date. Glad you’re still reading about the game.
Thx,
JP
09 Dec 2010 at 04:36 am | #
I love this game. This is my game, this is your game, this is our game.
A few years back there was a lot of hubbub over the abolition of slavery, would it have been right to allow it to continue because the slaves had no place to go, or would ruin the Southern economy? I say NO, and for one, I’ll take my 40 acres and a mule!
There is no honor among thieves, and I have no sympathy for the NYRA and their loss of $27.5 Million. You lie down with dogs, you wake up with fleas. This was an unholy alliance from the beginning.
NYC-OTB sucked the life out of racing in New York, and the hardships that will follow its shutdown are inevitable. So be it. It imposed a usurious “surcharge” on the lower class, people who live hand to mouth, a surcharge which went as high as 50% of your winnings, not the 5% they advertised. That on top of the take on your initial bet.
Those dollars that were wagered through NYC-OTB will not all disappear, the question is, if this really is the end of this evil organization, what steps are being taken to get as many of those dollars back to the NYRA (and more), and not through another intermediary (the dreaded middle man).
Will legislators assist the NYRA with funds to get those dollars?
Perhaps they could install betting machines in the City in bars, restaurants, supermarkets, newspaper stores, bowling alleys, brothels, City Hall. This could be done in stages. People who never placed wagers before will do so, the game could become fashionable. Every day would be like the Kentucky Derby, a swanky affair. This is an opportunity. There are many people who would never dream of going inside an OTB parlor, but would wager at an ATM-type machine in a respected location.
Now is the time for all good legislators to do what is best for the NYRA and New York racing; today is the day of salvation.
TTT
09 Dec 2010 at 05:31 am | #
JRP:
If and this is a BIG IF, if exchange wagering was available as it currently exists in europe & the powers that be drop breakage & lower WPS to at least 10%, I would be back into the game today.
Unfortunately, none of this is going to happen in my lifetime. Wall St. & the Republicans will grow hearts before this happens in racing. That is why I think our version in the states is doomed. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Another idea would be modified fixed odds wagering. You get the odds at the time you wager, fixed & printed on the ticket. Those who are causing the odds to drop at the 6 furlong pole will get those odds. Forces the damn powers that be to start taking some serious risk & notice.
None of this will happen. Change for this industry is a facade & lip service. Most will actually close when the casino & government money runs dry. Soon I hope. Maybe, with only 1 or 2 tracks left, some real change will occur.
The industry is rotten to the core & can only be rebuilt if the current version is destroyed completely. And I hate it. The truth that is.
That is my axe. Corruption, greed & lies.
Honestly, I hope I am wrong. Like most with a strong interest, I will continue to watch & wait. I refuse to contribute one more penny to the system as it is today.
Later.
Dennis
09 Dec 2010 at 05:43 am | #
John:
First, love the Billy Joel lyrics ("Songs from the Attic” album...dating myself!)...IMO, in this NYCOTB case, this represents insanity.
NYCOTB has been a parasite since its inception. The fact that there are what, seven different NY OTB ‘operations’ is insane...I understand that they represent the ultimate in political patronage but, in these or any economic times, this business model is unsustainable. Being a prior NYC resident and now living on LI, I have seen the major difference in NYCOTB vs. Nassau/Suffolk vs. Capital etc...NYCOTB was a brick/morter disaster, with most (80%) of their revenue coming from phone/internet accounts. There was no comparison from NYCOTB’s locations to say, the Suffolk location where you used to be an analyst (>10 years ago). BUT, having said that, I have never seen politicians turn their back on political ‘windfalls’ without having an alternative...my guess is that the corrupt statehouse has something else ‘up their sleeves’ as far as the future of NYRA and the NYS breeding operations, something where the politicians benefit (potential privatization??) If NYRA can somehow be allowed to change the restrictive rules (ex. they can’t stream live racing over their website, various restrictive AWD regulations, etc...) they will be the better for it (no pun intended!).
If the NYS legislation does not make changes the breeding operation and subsequent racing will end...BUT, remember this...IF the Saratoga area politicians have ANY political juice left, they will not allow anything happen to “The Spa”, ahd the health of “The Spa is directly linked to NYRA’s success...keep in mind the very reason why a NY State law was passed in the late 1950’s mandating 4 weeks of racing in Saratoga in August...History has a tendency to repeat itself...Comments??
John
09 Dec 2010 at 06:31 am | #
I never thought I’d say this, but this sport is dying.
New Jersey--Maryland--Texas--Ohio are on life support.
California and even Kentucky face huge problems.
And let’s take a look at the mess in New York.
TTT--I’m going to respectfully disagree with your post.
NYCOTB was a parasite. But it contributed 35% of the daily handle at NYRA tracks. A large chunk of that won’t be recovered. A sport desperate for customers just tossed some of their best ones to the street. Very bright.
Have we seen the end of Off Track Betting in New York City? I think at some point it will return.
Hopefully they’ll be a game for it to return to.
09 Dec 2010 at 08:36 am | #
Just got to say to all: “I love you, man.” Matters not whether we agree, the passion is heartfelt and that’s not lost on me. Thanks!
Yes, TTT, we love this game forever, but the creation of OTB was not done at MYRA’s behest but rather the City of NY. As stated, they had a chance to put it under their flag and blew it. But that’s history.
You asked whether NYRA will get help from legislators? These are some of the people that helped kick 800 perople to the curb and asked the state to take on another $600,000 in debt, added to an aleardy $3 billion shortfall.
I had an idea. NYRA wants to sign up the former OTB phone and Internet customers, and SRWB chairman John Sabini wants to retain their business so it doesn’t go elsewhere. But was there any incentive offered, strictly to those customers, a sign-up bonus or the like? That would probably require some form of new statute. If that’s not the case, shame on them. If that is the case; do it anyway and let it wind up in the courts, if it goes that far. Why wouldn’t these bettors go to say, Xpressbet, and get a $125 sign-up bonus? Something, anything.
RU, there’s absolutely no reason exchange betting wouldn’t work here. NJ is trying to get a law passed to allow it there. There’s only a 5 percent takeout, or thereabouts; that’s why handle exploded in Europe, as you already know.
State government is the industry’s biggest problem.
Change takes time--and an interest in doing so. There are more pressing matters, of course, but isn’t raising revenue priority #1? Perhaps, then politics come into play, an arena where progressive ideas usually go to die. Sorry, I forgot, progressive is the newest dirty word, almost right up there with socialist.
And I’ll agree with two components of your round robin: greed and lies or, to be more polite, spin. But corruption is a little strong at the highest levels. There are many honest, well meaning people in this industry but none seem to consistently win the battle with City Hall.
John, agree there is an Albany agenda that we don’t know about. But we are talking one of the more bankrupt state governments in the country, if not THE worst, so it’s difficult to expect they will do the right thing. NYS has a history of compromising itself to death. Again, as stated, a pox on both sides of the aisle.
As far as breeders are concerned, I don’t know what changes need to be made; you’ll need be more specific. Right now, I’m sure they would settle for getting the money they’re owed given the NYC-OTB fiasco, but I don’t know if there’s a process in place for recovering the breeder award fees they’re owed.
Gary, wish I had an answer, not a brilliant one, any answer will do. But I promise to work on it and get back to you all. Wish I could have been of greater help.
Thanks fellas,
JP
09 Dec 2010 at 08:41 am | #
P.S.
TTT, what do you know. Just this minute found a NYRA release in my in box stating they are offering double cash rewards to new customers opening an NYRA-1 account. At least one person deserves a pat on the back for hatching a good idea, one that actually rewards the customer.
JP
09 Dec 2010 at 08:52 am | #
TTT et.al.
Never mind! Just went on the NYRA website, those double cash rewards are only for the first three months of 2011, just in time not to get double your reward for betting on the Wood Memorial.
Further, nowhere is it access--that I could see--just how much that rebate is worth without apparently filling out an application. Turns out to be a temporary fix that runs during a period when interest in NY racing is at a seasonal low, much ado about very little.
JP
09 Dec 2010 at 03:15 pm | #
The saddest part of NYC OTB’s closing is that each OTB parlor had become essentially a club for working class guys (and a few gal exceptions)to hang out in. (There certainly were no financial reasons for patronizing the parlors once an added 6% tax went into effect. And, if one is at all computer literate, the playing options and information offered by websites like XPress Bet are too good to pass up.)
In the past every neighborhood in the city had pool halls or VA clubs where folks could socialize and play cards. There were also the neighborhood candy stores when newspapers had evening editions which attracted crowds to hang out, chew the fat on sports, politics, and the arts (what new movies or TV shows were noteworthy). Now, one has to be a millionaire to socialize - in a club or country club. The quality of life for working class guys has gone down the tubes. This latest example, when OTB’s life ended at 40, just adds another teardrop to an already full bucket.
09 Dec 2010 at 04:12 pm | #
Geezer, I feel you.
09 Dec 2010 at 04:54 pm | #
Geezer:
That is why I believe this is such a great opportunity, if the greedy politicians and legislature would simply grant the NYRA autonomy to make deals with any restaurant, bar, social club, bowling alley, etc., who wanted to put in one or more high-tech, extremely low maintenance ATM-like betting machines, and the signal, if they so desired to have people hanging around, clubs for working class people would spring up all over the City, it would not be long before people that never wagered before would be wagering. Imagine it, having drinks at the Waldorf or the Town Tavern, and playing a few ponies. The machines could be paid for initially by the individual establishments as part of the deal, and the NYRA could pay them back in installments, and own the machine (because they don’t have the capital right now). You can buy stinking lottery tickets on every corner in the City, it should be the same for the Sport of Kings. The technology is there to do this, and if done properly, can be done without a major expenditure. All it takes is the legislature to keep their filthy hands off, and open the way for Nirvana in Manhattan and beyond. If you elect me Mayor, I’ll do my best to see this happens.
TTT
10 Dec 2010 at 04:54 am | #
TTT,
You’re right on. And why shouldn’t NYRA be allowed to open a few nice teletheaters in and around the several burroughs?
10 Dec 2010 at 06:32 pm | #
While it was sad to see OTB close because of the immediate short-term impact, there are some good things that can come out of it:
Obviously, the most notable is NYRA (and the other OTB regions) finally being able to stream their own races and those of others on their account platforms. It’s is utterly ridiculous that people IN NEW YORK are not able to view live streams of races the way those of us outside New York in (almost) the rest of the country can do so.
The other good thing that can come out of it is perhaps NYRA will finally be able to really reduce winter dates, as the days of having to run 95 days between December 1 and April 1 (or April 30) is very much outdated, and in an era of horse shortages needs to change.
Monmouth Park proved people want to bet big fields, and with that in mind, if NYRA needs to run in the winter to keep horsemen who can’t afford to ship elsewhere and come back in the spring in the mix, this is the kind of schedule I’d be looking at for the winter of 2011-’12:
December 2011 (up to the Christmas break): Racing stays on the main track up to the Christmas break (in a change from recent seasons), but with racing cut from five to four days a week, Thursday through Sunday. First post would be 1:00 PM on Thursdays and Fridays as part of an overall change to where even after racing returns to Aqueduct in late October/early November, first post remains at 1:00 PM on weekdays with such cards cut from nine races to eight. Weekends would be 10 races with first post at Noon. December 18 would be the last day of racing before the Christmas break.
After the Christmas Break into January 2012: There would be eight consecutive days of racing from December 26, 2011-January 2, 2012. All cards during this period would be 10 race programs with first post at Noon daily. After January 2, racing would be on Saturdays and Sundays ONLY for the rest of January, plus racing on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day (Monday, January 16). These would also be 10 race programs with first post at Noon until it stays light out late enough to add an 11th race to such programs. Mondays would be held as a reserve day if racing has to be canceled on Saturday or Sunday (except Monday 1/16 since there would be racing that day, with Tuesday 1/17 the reserve day that weekend) and such canceled card carried over in its entirety under such circumstance.
February and March 2012: Racing is four days a week on a Thursday-Sunday basis, plus Monday, February 20 (Presidents Day). First post throughout would be 1:00 PM on weekdays (eight races) and Noon on weekends (11 races thtough Monday 2/20, except for nine on Super Bowl Sunday (2/5/’12), then 12 races the last Saturday and Sunday in February (2/26-27) and the first two weekends in March, then 13 on Saturdays and 12 on Sundays). The four-day race week (eight Thursdays/Fridays, 1:00 PM first post and then a noon post with 13 on Saturdays and 12 on Sundays) could then continue through the end of the Aqueduct main track season in April.
Obviously, the focus on racing in this version would be on weekends with many more races on Saturdays and Sundays as opposed to during the week. That to me, regardless of what happens otherwise is crucial, as weekend handle is far more than weekday handle nowadays in most cases (unless you’re a niche track like Philadelphia Park or Delaware Park, which has its biggest handle on Mondays and Tuesdays). Some might not like suddenly have 11, 12 or even 13 races on a Saturday at Aqueduct or Belmont outside of the major race days, but Monmouth did just fine with 12-race programs three days a week this past season, and those of us who have dealt with Harness Racing are used to 12, 13 and in some cases even 15 race programs on a normal basis anyway (even though some of us who put in a lot of work preparing for a card have to do extra work when we have those much longer cards).
Just some thoughts from someone who grew up in New York and knows how important racing is there.
11 Dec 2010 at 11:21 am | #
Love that the HRI crew is always thinking. The problem is that we’re not the ones doing the implementing.
Taking a page from the Monmouth playbook is something all of racing should look at, not just New York. The problem in the Empire State is politics--and it matters not on which side of the aisle one sits.
If NYC-OTB is not reopened, a long chance but not impossible, its closing could be a catalyst for good. The problem there is the same kind of thinking that created this mess now has to solve it going forward. SCARY.
JP