Early in Preakness week, Mr. Gallup announced that after his minions went out to take country’s temperature, they found that 38 percent of the respondents wouldn’t mind if thoroughbred racing, and dog racing, for that matter, went on holiday and never came back. Ever.
Arguably, it could have been worse. It could have been George Bush-type numbers. The industry shouldn’t despair, however. It did take Bush II almost eight years to reach the negative 71 percentile.
PETA, with their outrageous charges against trainer Larry Jones and jockey Gabriel Saez, stopped short of playing the Hitler card that Bush used against Obama this week. In PETA’s defense, at least they’ve accomplished some righteous goals.
So either Big Brown failed to spark the imagination, or a lot of Gallup’s 38 percent live in New York’s Capital District, not likely since the during racing season Albany becomes a suburb of Saratoga. The sport has loyal fans in the Capital District.
Maybe Gallup’s 38 percent live near the real Capital, near 1600 Pennsylvania, because they certainly didn’t show up at Pimlico with a mind to set any handle records there. It was sunny and fast in Baltimore despite Friday’s deluge, with only one of four scheduled turf races lost. But early handle figures were off double digits, big-time double digits.
Filly fallout? What else could it be?
As Preakness day lengthened, fans began trickling into the Teletheater, slowly, and it felt as if a switch were being tripped, but it produced little more than a flicker, really.
The field for the Grade 2 Dixie was now approaching the starting gate as a national television audience tuned in to watch--what else--a roundtable discussion about how the industry can best protect its equine athletes.
The discussion began nearly three hours after a peaceful demonstration across the street from the Pimlico stakes barn was concluding. There would be another to follow, with more scheduled three weeks from now downstate at Belmont Park.
A Person for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said she was contacted this week by people from inside the racing industry supporting PETA’s goals, namely the end of two-year-old racing, a shorter season, and better control over both controlled and not-so-controlled substances.
And you know what you can do with those whips!
So it was up to Big Brown to save not only a Black-Eyed Preakness but maybe an entire sport, at least for the next three weeks.
If the Preakness performance doesn’t do just that, then maybe it’s time to turn out the lights because the party will be over. Big Brown was nothing short of sensational.
Kent Desormeaux made his second winning Preakness ride look a little stressful early, but very easy late. After breaking sharply, he settled the colt inside, the preferred tack when going around two Pimlico turns.
Big Brown wanted to go, and if there was anyone capable of staying close to him in those early stages, that would have had him right where they wanted him: How’s that Big Boy, here’s a little dirt for your face.
But Riley Ticker and Edgar Prado elected instead to deny Gayego what was becoming a soft lead. While they put some mild pressure on the leader, Big Brown, still under a half nelson from Desormeaux, was taken to the outside to sit just outside the pacesetters.
All were in their comfort zones now.
As the leaders curled into the far turn, Desormeaux let out a notch of rein and joined the leaders three abreast. Leaving the three furlong marker, Desormeaux, via his body language, communicated to Rick Dutrow and anyone else paying attention that he had the speed horses at his mercy.
At the point that Big Brown and Desormeaux straightened away into the lane at Old Hilltop--the same spot where he blew the Derby wide open two weeks ago--he laid his Preakness rivals to waste with what is becoming his patented electric kick.
When the opportunity presents itself, the Cajun Hall of Famer doesn’t wilt in the spotlight‘s glare. And so Desormeaux began showing off his “big horse,” gearing him down, sneaking peeks back, styling, and saving something for another undefeated rival laying in the weeds at Belmont Park.
At this moment, that colt, Casino Drive, is the second fastest three-year-old in America going long this year. His Peter Pan victory was frighteningly reminiscent to that of Coastal in 1979, who prevented Spectacular Bid from becoming the fourth Triple Crown winner of the decade, twelfth in history.
Since Affirmed in 1978, 11 three-year-olds have won the first two jewels in the crown. Big Brown makes it a dozen. A dozen for a dozen, on Affirmed‘s 30th anniversary. Nice symmetry, that.
So now maybe the sport’s business will turn around at Belmont Park in three weeks. Incomplete estimates from Capital OTB indicated they will be off about $200,000 in business from last year, $2.1 million to $1.9, excluding the finale from Pimlico.
But the very best of all is that the horses completed the course safely. Now, at a place they call beautiful Belmont, a sport might fight back from adversity on the big brown wings of a thoroughbred race horse.


18 May 2008 at 09:36 am | #
I think we have reached the point where we are over analyzing the effect of Eight Belles on the popularity of the sport. The Preakness simply wasn’t that interesting a race because it drew such a weak field. I’m as diehard as they come and I wasn’t very interested in the field. I didn’t even bother with the Pimlico card because it just wasn’t that strong and the weather was iffy.
But I was at Belmont, I did bet the same way I always do and I will be there in three weeks along with a VERY big crowd.
Horses break down. Nothing will ever change that fact. If Ruffian and Go For Wand didn’t kill the sport then neither will Eight Belles.(How many PETA supporters even knew she was alive before Derby day?)
This sport has many more pressing issues that have to do with low attendance and low handle. Maybe if they learned how to properly take care of customers and stopped taking ridiculous takeout amounts without returning it to fans in the form of better customer service then the sport would start to grow.
I spent 7 bucks yesterday for a stale pretzel and a small soda. THAT will keep people away from the entry gates and the windows. Sitting on rusted, chipped seats at Aqueduct will keep people away from the entry gates and windows. Overpriced programs(which stink) and no appreciation for the fans will keep people away from the entry gates and windows.
Let’s get refocused on what is truly wrong with the sport. Horses have always, and will unfortunately continue to, breakdown. Nothing will ever change that fact. It is part of the game. How could anyone ever know that a horse has a hidden flaw or injury prior to a breakdown. Should we ban boxers from hitting each other? Football players from tackling each other? Baseball players from pitching inside? Racecar drivers from exceeding 55 miles an hour?
Let’s get real here. Enough already.
18 May 2008 at 10:56 am | #
Dear John:
It seems to me that the entire racing industry is putting all their hopes in the Big Brown “basket”. Perhaps, some sober reflection is more appropriate than coronating a King whose rule will be extremely short.
With all due respect to Dick Dutrow’s son and his Long Island owners, the questionably timed rush to syndication is but one of many “questions” that are raised by Brownie’s run to glory. Dutrow brazenly admits that he gives Winstrol to ALL of his horses. While technically legal, how is it even remotely possible to compare this supposed wonder horse to Secretariat, Slew and Affirmed ( Alydar). All three of our 70s Triple Crown winners raced without Lasix, Bute AND Steroids.
Another important question that must be raised is whether we will ever see Big Brown again if he wins the Belmont? People seem to want to forget that the careers of the truly “great” horses do not end at the Belmont Park finish line. Slew and Affirmed both ran at four and even faced each other on two occasions. Big Red ran SIX times after the Belmont, i.e., the exact number of lifetime starts of Big Brown should he win the Belmont.
I will be at Belmont, as I have for most of the past thirty Belmonts. It bothers me to no end that a New York horse can win the Belmont but that we will never see him race again. Please forgive me for my thoroughly mixed feelings about the subject.
18 May 2008 at 04:55 pm | #
Gentlemen,
You’ve given HRI readers and myself much to chew on. Racing simply has the most knowledgable fans, end of story.
Nick, I understand your sentiment; you’re sick of the Eight Belles story. Well, the story will not go away, and this is a good thing. As Larry Jones said, God doesn’t make mistakes and that he doesn’t believe she died in vain.
As unfortunate as it is, she must be a catalyst for change. Your personal complaints are valid but is not germane. Horses MUST be taken care of. Fans MUST be treated with respect and appreciated. These are separate issues, as is takeout. We have written about that here on very many occasions.
Accidents cannot be stopped, they will always happen. You’re right. But humans can see to it that they can try to remove complimentary variables that contribute negatively to the situation. And there are too many examples to go around in this particular space.
Paul,
I don’t expect to see Big Brown race again if he wins the Belmont. Hope I’m wrong.
The sport is not hanging anything on Big Brown. All it can do is accentuate how great the horse can be--how great any horse can be. Like Gary Stevens, I’m not sure I’ve seen a horse with his kind of acceleration. Must have something to do with the one stride he takes to every other horse’s two.
Steroids must be banned starting now and that starts when they’re yearlings before they go to the sales. Actually, I wrote a whole laundry list last week and won’t go into it again here.
I recommend that both of you, and everyone else reading this interested in the subject, read Bill Nack’s column on ESPN.com.
Thanks for commenting, gents.
John