But not this time, not this year, not in the Year of Rachel Alexandra, who is bigger in life than Smarty Jones was in this decade, bigger than two-time Horse of the Year Curlin, bigger in life than even Barbaro was in death.
No, Rachel Alexandra became big news when she won on an extraordinarily successful Kentucky Oaks day program by an extraordinary margin, then became bigger news when she was bought for an undisclosed high seven figures by the outspoken owner of the 2007-8 Horse of the Year.
Then came the national headlines when, with one more day of rest than the gelded Derby winner, won the Triple Crown’s second jewel for post 13 despite a bit of a tangled break before forcing the pace and slipping and sliding her way home first on the Pimlico surface.
Then she became a margin horse, winning the Mother Goose by 19-¼ lengths, just like she spread-eagled them in the Oaks, and she did it in fast time, too.
Not long after she shipped to Monmouth Park and on an awful day--not Breeders’ Cup awful, but bad enough--spanked the Belmont and Tom Fool winners.
Now, according to NYRA staffer Jenny Kellner, she will try to emulate Lady Primrose, the last three-year-old filly to beat older males in a Grade 1 race in New York. For those readers who might have forgotten, that victory came in the 1887 Manhattan.
And that’s what makes Saturday’s race such a big deal.
As the great Charles Hatton might have written, when recalling great horses that have won a particular event: “The winners of the Woodward reads like a roll of drums.”
Consider: Ghostzapper, Saint Liam, Mineshaft, Skip Away, Cigar (twice), Holy Bull, Alysheba, Spectacular Bid (walked over), Affirmed, Seattle Slew and Forego (four times).
Actually, can’t believe Forego won four straight. In it’s way, a tougher accomplishment than Kelso’s five Gold Cups because of the JCGC’s uncommon distance and lesser competition. Of the above, only Holy Bull won the Woodward at three. And all, at one point or another, were Horses of the Year.
And that, too, is what makes this Woodward such a big deal.
Are there the likes of the above lined up against Rachel Alexandra on Saturday? No. But Asiatic Boy is 7-for-17 lifetime, earnings of over $3.2 million. Bullsbay is a multiple stakes winner and in career form, off a stunning Whitney win. Cool Coal Man won a restricted stakes under 123 pounds over the track by 12-3/4s on August 10; his mate is the 2008 Belmont winner.
It’s a Bird is a multiple graded stakes winner. Jim Dandy winner Macho Again completed the Whitney exacta this year and Past the Point was second in this race last year. All carry 126 pounds, of course, the filly 118, given the age and sex allowance at nine furlongs.
The filly will start from post 3 in a field of eight, with seven betting interests, and was installed the 1-2 early line favorite. “It’s tough competition, Saturday,” said Calvin Borel who’s won all eight of his rides on her.
“We’re stepping up to the plate and we just have to put them in the gate to see what happens. This has to be the toughest race for her, stepping up to older horses.”
“She was entered off her talent, not her age,” said assistant trainer Scott Blasi. “She’s beaten those (three-year-old males) before. She’s run against them twice. This was kind of a new frontier. The timing was good into this race and she’s come into it very well.”
At the post draw, Borel was interviewed by track announcer Tom Durkin, who wondered what Borel’s strategy would be. From post three, does he establish early position with her? When does he know when to step on the gas and when to stop with her?
“I get along with her because I let her to her thing,” Borel answered. “I talk to her and she listens on command.”
“That’s not like any woman I’ve ever known,” said Durkin drolly.
“That’s why I don’t think she’s a woman,” Borel quipped, drawing some good-natured jibes from those in attendance.
“We pointed her to this race to tackle history, so that’s what we’re doing,” said co-owner Barbara Banke, a.k.a. Mrs. Jess Jackson.
“We want to prove she’s a great horse, one for the history books. It’s going to be interesting to see what happens.”


02 Sep 2009 at 08:22 pm | #
FYI: Rachel Alexandra slipped and slided on the Pimlico surface, NOT because it was wet, but because it was BONE DRY and dusty. They did not wet down the surface because they thought it would rain that day and it didn’t.
Nice article otherwise.
03 Sep 2009 at 03:23 am | #
Good catch, Pixie. But I think Calvin said it was wet and I took him at his word. I was not live on the scene Preakness day. Thanks for contributing to this.
JP
03 Sep 2009 at 05:18 am | #
The Woodward Stakes
Post time: Saturday 09/05/09 at 5:50 p.m. EDT at Saratoga Race Course in Saratoga Springs, N.Y. Purse: $750,000. Distance: 1 1/8 miles. Television: MSG Plus, TVG and HRTV. Radio: WQKC 1450-AM.
Rachel gets post #3 and carries 8 pounds less than her older male rivals…
Zenyatta need not apply. LMAO!
This race will fill the race track stands. Many established fans will see or watch online.
NOT one new potential fan will hear or see this race. None will be curious enough to read about something they have not already been introduced to. It is huge. It is history. The potential to even create new history is huge. Second filly to ever attempt this race. And is the established fav to win it!
For the general public, they offer local am radio? My god, the Paulick-Hope supporters must be peeing themselves right now.
http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/rachel-v-zenyatta-theatre-of-the-absurd/comment-page-2/#comment-16122
Never argue with fools - first, they’ll try to get you down to their level and then defeat you with experience.
If you don’t know where you are going, any road will get you there.
Folks, this is the depth and density of the stupidity and self-serving attitude regularly shown by this industry.
R.I.P.
03 Sep 2009 at 08:58 am | #
“But not this time, not this year, not in the Year of Rachel Alexandra, who is bigger in life than Smarty Jones was in this decade, bigger than two-time Horse of the Year Curlin, bigger in life than even Barbaro was in death.”
I don’t know what you’ve been reading (or, perhaps, smoking), but if you are comparing Rachel’s popularity to that of Smarty Jones or Barbaro, you are way, way off. For starters, you can check search engine histories to see how the filly stacks up against these two colts.
She’s a magnificent filly and her accomplishments merit inclusion with those two, but Rachel has not transcended racing into mainstream media other than the Vogue feature, which hit a niche target market of women.
Perhaps defeating older males will vault her to such heights, but I seriously doubt it. The Woodward just doesn’t have enough significance outside of the industry for a win to be appreciated by the masses.
But Rachel, as well as Zenyatta, have given racing fans something to celebrate following what was possibly the worst year in the sport’s history and I thank her for that.
03 Sep 2009 at 09:26 am | #
John:
Let’s hope for the best on Saturday!
However, for those of us who were there, at Belmont, on that Saturday in September 1977, as the great and mighty Forego won his 4th straight Woodward, will never forget Chic Anderson’s call. It gave me goosebumps that day and still does everytime I watch that race. Forego was a great horse; we’ll see Saturday if Rachel can even be mentioned in the same sentence as Forego!
03 Sep 2009 at 11:34 am | #
Roger sounds like someone who goes down to the local airport to watch rabbits and planes race. If he ever sees a rabbit win, it will be a fluke. Fast rabbit but a fluke. Because you get more hits on google from the word airplane than you do from rabbit! Clear as mud!
Forego was a monster. Their have been a very small number of monsters. Everyone of them was born. Raised and trained to racing. Then won each race one at a time on 4 legs with a jock on their back.
Without discounting any historic effort, only an idiot of enormous historic proportions would classify Rachel as ordinary. She now has to step up and race older males because she has proven that ALL the males in her age group are really girls… Get real… Her accomplishments already rate historic note. This one race is big enough to vault her to legendary status. I hope she wins it by many lengths.
Her handlers all have as much heart as she does. Unlike a mare I could name who continues to duck real competition. I expect history to be made later in the year, too. It will not be pretty for the Zenyatta lovers. Necrophilia will only carry you so far. lol…
03 Sep 2009 at 11:38 am | #
Roger, the year ain’t over, and besides what’s wrong with a gelding who was a champion as a 2yo. going to Kentucky via New Mexico via a pull behind is not a good story[and may I add his story is not yet been completed].RA has her work cut out for her...regardless of the name of the race, the body of the Woodward has everything...speed, class, closers...if she pulls this off, she surely goes to the head of the class[but my money says no]...it is a short but unique field, and I don’t see anywhere in this 9 furlongs where she gets a breather![Paul...a friend of mine had Honest Pleasure, and he still thinks he won!]
03 Sep 2009 at 04:21 pm | #
I didn’t and don’t question Rachel’s ability. There are scores of methods of measuring popularity/interest about a topic or subject through various media, including search engine stats. The assertion that Rachel has become bigger than Smarty or Barbaro is simply unfounded, unless the author can produce some statistics to prove otherwise. I suspect the lack of a compelling story behind her, a la the assorted tales of Smarty’s early injury, trainer’s murder, owner on an oxygen tank, etc… or Barbaro’s gallant battle to survive, is one of the major reasons she has not been embraced outside the industry. Personally, I don’t believe she has received nearly the mainstream hype worthy of her accomplishments.
03 Sep 2009 at 08:00 pm | #
Roger,
Your assertion that Rachel has nothas not received mainstream hype worthy of her accomplishments is in all likelihood true. Guess I looked at her world through binoculars.
I’ve never heard tell of the amount of people who showed up at the Saratoga training track Monday at about 5:45 AM to watch a workout, advertised to be little more than a maintenance breeze.
People came out to see her, to see what greatness looks like. The search engines will start rocking on Sunday is my guess.
There were hundreds of extra people in the paddock today to watch her stand in a stall for about 15 minutes. I have NEVER seen that before, not even in Saratoga.
Fans were standing five deep around the ring to get a glimpse of her, possible only when she left that stall and walked up the path that led back to the Okla. training track across the street.
My frame of reference might have been a bit miopic but it doesn’t change the reality. I was there for Barbaro, for Smarty, for Secretariat, Slew, Ruffian and Forego. Perhaps because she, too, is a filly, but I’ve not seen a thoroughbred elicit the kind of excitement that she does.
Maybe, in this day and age, we’re willing to embrace anything that is honest and true and extraodinary. It’s a feeling. I hope you get to experience it one day. If she wins Saturday and all goes well health wise, her four year old debut will make mainstream headlines. I guarantee it.
Thank you one and all.
JP
04 Sep 2009 at 01:23 am | #
I was also up at Saratoga on Thursday and can confirm what JRP witnessed. When Tom Durkin announced that Rachel was in the paddock it was as if all thoughts of the next race and handicapping vanished as the crowd rushed towards Rachel.
I waited for her to walk the path back to the Oklahoma and as I walked the fence alongside her for the entire distance I understood what a special animal she is.
Rachel is big, muscular, graceful and very confident.
Whether she wins Saturday is another story as Saratoga is the graveyard of favorites.What was important for me was getting to see this great athlete.
I actually thought of WC Morrow, who can’t see beyond the handicapping aspect of the game and misses out on the physical presence these animals possess. My guess is that he is stuck at some bull ring like Finger Lakes and has never had the opportunity to see a champion up close. Too bad as Rachel is impressive .
Tim
04 Sep 2009 at 06:52 am | #
Tim Pastrick: Your wrong about me Tim. I have been there, seen it, and done it. For the record, I have been within a few yards of the following thoroughbreds: Dr. Fager, Damacus, Forego, John Henry, Ruffian, Spectacular Bid, Bold Forbes, Arts and Letters, Majestic Prince, Buckpasser, Secretariat, Alydar, Affirmed, Seattle Slew, Conquestador Cielo, Easy Goer, Sunday Silence, and numerous other stake winners at Belmont, Aqueduct, Santa Anita, Monmouth, and Hollywood Park.
If there were no betting windows, I wouldn’t have seen any of these thoroughbreds. BTW, after years of being upclose, I still am unable to note any difference between a stake horse and a claiming horse. It is a figment of your imagination, nurtured by turf writers, that has you believing that Rachel looks any different than any other horse; nor does a stake race look any different than a claiming race.
04 Sep 2009 at 09:21 am | #
<It is a figment of your imagination, nurtured by turf writers, that has you believing that Rachel looks any different than any other horse; nor does a stake race look any different than a claiming race.>
W.C. ,
I have never listened to what the turf writers have ever said about any animal. In fact, I despise most of them as I have seen a few of the beat writers from the Albany, NY area in action and have not been impressed. Amused would be a better word. Having said that I disagree with your belief that all horses are the same. They are not, just as no two handicappers are the same. I was once a bird dog for spotting talent during my umpiring days and I can tell you that there is a difference between athletes. Horses are athletes!Some are blessed with physical ability but lack the mental capacity to excel. Some have it all. Mr Morrow, Rachel has it all and I don’t need any turf writer to confirm this. Try to enjoy this unique animal.
Best of luck to you.
Tim
04 Sep 2009 at 12:57 pm | #
Good back-and-forth, gents.
Wendell, I looked at horses for, I don’t know, 20 years, before judging a horse’s physical attributes kicked in. It’s not the strongest part of my game but I know what good horses look like and bad horses look like.
Tim, you forgot one thing. She has a pretty head, that is to say distinctly feminine. More than anything, it’s the attribute that I admire most.
Good stuff. Thanks.
JP