And are we talking nine furlongs or 10?
These are questions for another day. This is a time for celebration of a marvelous filly, and for a celebration of the game. We don’t like to run fillies against colts in this country. Maybe we do, but certainly not enough.
But for the second time in three years, the storied Woodward was won by a filly, this one a four-year-old, not a three-year-old; this one a finisher, not a speedster; this one in a pitched battle for Horse of the Year.
Just like the three-year-old heroine of the 2010 Woodward Stakes.
Parenthetically, the surface was one that required Jackson Bend 1:22 to win the Grade 1 Forego a half hour earlier. He needed only 1:20.91 to win the James Marvin earlier at the meet on a surface that was a lot more glib.
Further, the filly was hung out there in the three-path at mid-far turn before making her rally, a tack that has been very anti-profile almost the entire meet.
But there was Harve De Grace at headstretch, going on the attack after Rule, fighting her way to the lead. In the end, she was 1-¼ lengths to the good of Flat Out, who came on late to catch a tiring Rule for the place.
Harve De Grace required 1:49.18 to get her job done. When Rachel Alexandra won this race two years ago, the running time over a surface that played a lot quicker than Saturday’s, was 1:48.29.
And so let the Horse of the Year games begin. “I think we were in the picture before,” said winning trainer Larry Jones. “Maybe it was a low-profile picture, but I think this puts us up there with everyone else.”
Read Blind Luck and Tizway here. Indeed, it will be interesting to see which horse is ranked in the top spot in the NTRA poll released Tuesday.
The next start for Harve De Grace will be either Keeneland‘s Spinster or Belmont Park‘s Beldame. Blind Luck is being pointed toward the Lady‘s Secret in SoCal. Tizway has a date October 1 in Belmont’s Jockey Club Gold Cup.
“We gave her a chance to show how good she was,” said owner Rick Porter. “She deserved a chance to show it. I think she’s one of the best, but I think between now and the Breeders’ Cup, we’ll find out who’s the best.”
They're Ba-ack
That’s Nick Zito and Jackson Bend, both. Not that they’ve been away that long, or were very far away.
For Zito, it was this winter and early spring, when Dialed In ruled the three-year-old roost and Zito had a Florida Derby winner that might have supplied him with a third blanket of roses, courtesy of Churchill Downs.
That could have made up for 2010, for those many losing Grade 1 photo finishes, but it was not meant to be. Today it was, and it felt good.
“It worked out perfectly for him,” Zito said of the talented four-year-old who won his first graded stakes. “We all got excited [on the turn]. Tom Durkin’s call was right on the money, ‘Jackson Bend’s starting to run’.”
And run he did, improving his record to 7-5-2 from 20 starts and now an equine millionaire as well.
Jackson Bend is a good colt that got caught up in the 2010 Triple Crown chase but might have found his true niche sprinter, or as a miler. Zito got the four-year-old colt back on track, and himself back in a Grade 1 winners’ circle.
Personal Ensign Fails to Make the Grade
Don’t want to say that the Personal Ensign was disappointing but first, of course, we were expecting Harve De Grace vs. Blind Luck so how could anything else measure up?
Both those fillies have grand plans but to give away a big payday and a Grade 1 title, well it must be sporting of them, right?
Here’s all you need to know about the 64th running of the Personal Ensign. You could have claimed the winner on June 15 at Belmont.
What’s the matter with you? Like you had something better to do that afternoon?
All you needed to do after that was prep in the ungraded Sky Beauty 16 days later, was purchase her privately, send her to trainer Marty Wolfson, cross-enter your new acquisition at Monmouth Park and Saratoga on July 31, choose the “tougher” spot in New York, then win the Grade 1 Ruffian and “get out” on the filly.
And now you’ve got a horse that’s really worth something, a six-year-old Grade 1-winning mare. But why stop there.
Read the trades and the Internet, rejoice when you learn that neither of the divisional leading fillies will attend, return to your Monmouth base--that’s if Mary Wolfson is your trainer.
Then, work her twice, ship back up to the North Country again, blow her out, run her in the Personal Ensign, and become the only dual Grade 1 winner of Saratoga 143.
How easy is that? Can you beat virtually the same group you handled by 5-¾ lengths in the Ruffian, plus another faster filly, Pachattack, but one’s who’s never run on dirt in 23 starts?
Now, take the lead in a relatively paceless race and if you can run your final quarter mile in :27.28 seconds; race horse time--if you’re a top trotter or pacer.
Bob and weave your way home for an eighth of a mile, and no one’s good enough to catch you. Not Pachattack who was left for dead at the five-sixteenths, and not Tiz Miz Sue, who had every chance with momentum and a quarter-mile to catch the leader, but remained one-paced.
Sometimes in life, lucky and smart, is better than being of championship quality.


04 Sep 2011 at 08:40 am | #
You all know that Thoroughbred racing has been declining in popularity for many years. The infamous McKinsey & Co. report mentioned that fact in their initial opening comments, and further mentioned that 50% of race days fail to generate enough takeout to cover the purses.
You would think, like the Super Bowl; World Series; PGA Masters, Open, and British Open, and other professional sport ‘big events’, that Travers Day and Woodward Day at Saratoga would be huge successes financially. A look at the tape, er figures:
Travers Day Woodward Day
Attendance 43,050 24,430
Total Purses 2,274,000 1,696,000
On-track handle 8,172,452 4,642,436
Off-track handle 24,844,931 19,316,831
The average per capita wager of those in attendance both day was $190.
Doing the math using a 21% mix for takeout on- track, and using 5% as the signal fee charge (generous) for the off-track wagering, it appears that total takeout for Travers Day was approximately $2,900,000, exceeding the purses by a mere $626,000. It seems that Woodward Day the total takeout was about $2,000,000, exceeding the purses by $300,000. Not whopping profits for the ‘big event’ days. Now, the question becomes, “did the admission, beverage, and meal receipts exceed the expenses of operation for the day (primarily salaries and food expense) and the costs of overhead (pensions, utilities, insurance, maintenance, et cetera).” I don’t think so.
As to the Travers Stake race, the total handle was $7,959,767, generating about $717,000 in takeout and signal fees. Unfortunately the purse of the race was $1,000,000.
And the Woodward race, the total handle was $3,278,427 earning about $264,000. The purse for the race was $750,000.
Both stake races were financial disasters.
Maybe the patrons drank a lot of beer, but the figures suggest that neither day was profitable, the obvious reason being that purses are to high, not supported by takeout and signal fees - McKinsey & Co. got one thing right!
As I have stated numerous times, NYRA has not had a profitable Saturday of racing in decades. But, it doesn’t matter anymore, as NYRA as won the lottery, uncovered the mother lode. Gee, NYRA won’t even need any bean counters anymore: the revenue from slots is a coming - drink up and let the good times role (Pletcher, Baffert, Mott, Zito,
et cetera are salivating).
04 Sep 2011 at 12:55 pm | #
Preach,
Does HOY have any meaning anymore after the last two years results? Unless Tizway, Blind Luck, Harvey and Acclamation all meet up in the BC Classic and settle it on the racetrack, it’s just a popularity contest.
Drums keep pounding a rhythm to the brain
La-dee-da-dee-dee
La-dee-da-dee-da
And the beat goes on
And the beat goes on
And the beat goes on
And the beat goes on
And the beat goes on
And the beat goes on!
04 Sep 2011 at 03:28 pm | #
John,
Havre de Grace’s win in the Woodward should have absolutely no bearing on the Horse of the Year Award. Yes, congratulations to her to beating the the males. But the males that ran in this race were dismal, at best. On a scale of 1-10 with the the field for the BC Classic being a 10, then the recent Pacific Classic was a possible 6 and the Woodward a very generous 1. She beat nobodies in the Woodward and will account for nothing towards her as a Horse of the Year candidate, but will count towards her standing for the “Older Female” Eclipse Award. Nothing more.
05 Sep 2011 at 06:41 am | #
Wendell,
I believe you’ve made this case before. So, then, what is the answer? Putting on races no one cares about? Saratoga wagering will likely be up very, very slightly. National betting trends for month of August down 12%. Speaking to your overall point, there’s clearly one course left: Shut all the tracks down, then there’s nothing more to criticize.
Cat,
Sonny & Cher? Wow, been a while since I heard that diddy.
John,
Whether you agree with H of Y result two years ago, the Woodward put Rachel over the top with voters. And you know what they said then? That she beat nobody.
True or not, people have been knocking horses for time in memorium with “who did it ever beat?” You beat who lines up against you, that’s all any horse can do. In this country, females beating males is still a big deal. It is with me, at least.
The second horse, Flat Out, was also second to Tizway in the Whitney. Is Tizway nobody? By your logic, Tizway beat nobody, too.
Thanks all. Happy Labor Day everyone--those of you fortunate enough to have jobs.
JP
05 Sep 2011 at 07:54 am | #
Mr. Pricci: Every comment I have made this year, I made last year and the year before. I merely am continually buttin’ that damn, hoping that the ‘decision makers’ of the industry will finally get it.
Handle is down 7.7% to date this year; it has decreased every year for sometime now. Shouldn’t it be obvious that the way Thoroughbred racing is currently presented to the public isn’t working?
Yesterday, at the local OTB joint, I didn’t hear anyone talking about the Travers or Woodward Stakes. Nor, did I hear any conversation about Horse of the Year or what horse is the current divisional leader in various divisions (divisions that few horseplayers know exist or care about.
What I did hear is, “who da ya like in the next”?
Yes, there is clearly one course left, and it is not shutting down racetracks; it is marketing and advertising Thoroughbred racing as a gambling entity more interesting than sitting comatose in front of a slot machine. Instead of showing stake races on TV, use the money to show the public people, repeat people not horses, gambling at the racetrack.
On TV here in Connecticut, just about every evening a spot commercial appears on the screen showing people gambling either at the Mohegan Sun or Foxwood casino. The message: people at the casino are having fun while gambling!
But, actually, I don’t repeat myself anymore than turf writers do. Turf writers could use lasts year’s commentary this year, just change the name of the horse; you probably won’t have to change the name of the trainer, as it will probably be Pletcher, Baffert, Zito, or Mott.
As I have already commented, NYRA will soon be rolling in money; thus handle will be irrelevant as will any effort to operate profitability (as if there was ever any effort). The golden years of racing on the NYRA circuit will soon be upon us.
I will try to not repeat myself in future commentary, which may be impossible to do as it is the same year repeated over and over again (proof that Einstein got it right).
05 Sep 2011 at 08:58 am | #
Wendell,
Your message IS worth telling, over and over. But I any many of my colleagues fee--and have written--the way you do.
But the American public, having been dumbed down for three decades,would rather not think when they gamble.
Interesting that every serious better I know, finds that the biggest enemy to horseplayer profits is a lack of focus, sometimes painfully obvious afterwards--not playing ther red board here, just acknowledging reality.
And they’ve made those screamingly excited fans arm pumping and rooting from the bets they’ve made and that hasn’t worked, pre- and post “go baby go.”
Let’s try to come up with a campaign, based on your model. I promise that would be quite the challenge. Maybe others might feel free to do the same. I pledge to give good ideas the exposure they deserve.
JP
05 Sep 2011 at 10:14 am | #
JP,
Had a problem at the Laurel simulcast with the cancellation of the last race at Saratoga. I had a late double ticket of 1-5 stamped 5:40 PM. Off time for the 11th race was 5:42 PM. Much confusion after the 11th race without any audible; took awhile for the prices to go up & then a big sign came across the screen Race Cancelled. The printout of the race said DD 1-all 6.60. Laurel tote SUPERVISOR tells me that I would only receive my bet back & not the consolation double because my horse was srcatched. After some heated discourse, he walked away from. If I placed my bet 2 minutes to post time & it was OK then, when did the horse scratch? I see you write sometimes about stuff like this, I hope you’ll be able to help me find the answer because Laurel didn’t have one
Laurelman
05 Sep 2011 at 02:06 pm | #
Here we go again with the endless debate and speculation over HOTY. Will this reverse the decline in handle nationally? Not if HRI readers are distracted from betting with talk about voting. LOL
Will the BC Classic winner be bypassed for the fourth year in a row? That would show the BCL a thing or two and probably put a lot of turf writers out to pasture.
When Rachel Alexandra won her Woodward, she beat the winners of that year’s G1 Whitney and G1 Stephen Foster. Even with a win in open company, however, who is prepared to vote the 2011 Woodward winner HOTY over Blind Luck at this juncture?
Zenyatta beat arguably the best open company in her BC Classic, yet couldn’t pull off HOTY with multiple G1 wins. Was it simply because all the rest were restricted to females or because all the races were on synthetic surfaces, or rather that all the races were run in CA? Was Rachel’s real charm that she won in AK, KY, MD, NJ, and NY?
Tizway and Stay Thirsty are supposedly pointed for the JC Gold Cup. If either should win that but not the BC Classic, would voters reward victories confined to NY? Similarly, even a win by Acclamation in the Goodwood on dirt might not be enough without the BC Classic.
Is there an existing G1 winner capable of winning two of the remaining two-turn G1s, e.g., JC Gold Cup (BEL), Goodwood (SA), BC Classic (CD), Clark (CD)? Is there a current non-winner of a G1 who could win three of them?
Could a horse whose only G1 win was the BC classic win HOTY—say an unknown who came out of the clouds to win it after winning two of the remaining big-purse G2s, e.g., the Super Derby (LAD), PA Derby (PRX). IN Derby (HOO), and HAW Gold Cup?
Maybe we need a contest to map out the HOTY winner’s campaign? The winner not only has to pick the HOTY, but must correctly predict all its victories from this point on.
06 Sep 2011 at 06:23 am | #
Laurelman,
NY is closed until Saturday. I will try to find some answers when authorities get back to work. At that point, I will call Laurel as well. Have you tried the Maryland racing commission for a copy of their rule re: cancellations?
Stay in touch.
JP
06 Sep 2011 at 01:27 pm | #
Laurelman:
Your wager went into a co mingled pool. Can’t understand how there was a problem.
easygoer/JP/WMC:
Racing certainly can do a better job of marketing itself.
I’ve always agreed with Wendell that this is a gambling sport and shouldn’t be presented as anything else. If people didn’t wager the game would be dead....finished.....over.
People who profess their love of the game, but don’t wager add nothing to a racetracks bottom line.
A couple of thoughts for NYRA moving forward:
1-- How about adding a Pick 5 wager? People like this bet. Alot. It’s been a success everywhere it’s been instituted.
2--Twilight Fridays have proven popular for several years. How about night racing? Thursdays and Fridays? Yes you’d have to install lights and get some legislation passed.
But look at the results at Churchill, Turfway and Hollywood Park? Cheap beer, a band and who do you think showed up? Younger people. New potential customers. And since most of us serious players have ADW’s anyway, the newbies didn’t even get in the way!
06 Sep 2011 at 08:59 pm | #
Havre de Grace’s win in the Woodward yesterday should have absolutely no bearing on the Horse of the Year. Yes, give credit where credit is due. She showed up and won. Congratulations to her.But the field she faced was dismal. None of those horses were good, yet great. The 2011 Woodward consisted of no-names. HdG’s win will only be counted towards her “Older Female” Eclipse Award against her rival, Blind Luck, and nothing more. At least, at this point. Music Mastering Services
17 Sep 2011 at 09:21 pm | #
Our refreshers can help you sharpen your skills and provide you with the experience of having someone independently observe your driving skills and provide you with the appropriate feedback to enhance your skills. Many senior drivers have found this useful, particularly if they are approaching the stage where they need to have their license renewed.
Penny Auctions | Penny Auction Site
17 Sep 2011 at 09:22 pm | #
If your parents are agreeable, you can help them assess their current driving skills by checking with the an occupational therapists, doctors, or recommend a driving instruction “tune up” by accredited driving instructor Silver bullion