Vic Zast

From the perspective of being an owner, an industry pioneer in corporate sponsorship, a track president and fan, Vic Zast writes the "Destinations" column for The Blood-Horse. His five-star ratings of international events have shed light on racing in all corners of the globe - from England, Australia, Hong Kong, Dubai to Japan.

Vic is a regular contributor to, a columnist for the Illinois Racing News and has written on racing for, National Public radio and The Age, Australia's leading daily.

Vic makes his home in Chicago and lives in Saratoga Springs in August.

Most recent entries

Monthly Archives


Saturday, October 30, 2010

Stickin’ to It

(CHICAGO, IL – October 30, 2010) It’s taken about four weeks for a topic I introduced in a previous column to come out from hiding. ( Regardless, the case for and against Zenyatta as the Horse of the Year is now in the realm where the big dogs roam.

The Daily Racing Form’s Steve Crist, one of two living horse racing writers with a plaque in the Hall of Fame, has chipped in with his take after reading that HRI’s John Pricci and Joe Drape of the New York Times, as well as trainer John Shirreffs, had opinions on this matter also. The vote in the court of supremes was 3 to 1 that the unbeaten mare is assured of the Eclipse Award no matter what happens next Saturday.

Crist identified Quality Road, Blame and Lookin at Lucky as potential winners of the Breeders’ Cup Classic that would deny Zenyatta his vote. Suffice it to say, not one of these horses is a horse that anyone outside the sport has ever heard of, and, despite the anticipated national TV audience, will not have heard of next Sunday. Here, then, comes the interesting part. What exactly does Horse of the Year mean? And what good does it bring to the sport’s promotion?

To the gamblers who come to this site, it means nothing. To the horse racing fans, it’s a milepost. But to voters, it can mean getting your back up straight and expressing a truth you believe in. Note the emphasis on “truth you believe in.” The truth is that Zenyatta was dismissed from Horse of the Year consideration in 2008 after going unbeaten and winning the Breeders’ Cup Ladies Classic and Curlin, the twice-beaten winner that year, won despite the excuse that he couldn’t run on grass and rubber bands.

What Crist, Pricci, Drape, Shirreffs or Zast, for that matter, think is marginally relevant. When decisions like this call for wide-ranging ballots, it’s the voices of the many that register. The upcoming midterm elections will prove that when something is put into people’s minds, no amount of logic will ever change it. So, too, Zenyatta’s fate as Horse of the Year is pre-determined.

As my column concluded on October 3 after the Lady’s Secret Stakes, “Win or lose at the Breeders’ Cup, Zenyatta became Horse of the Year by a neck at the wire with a quarter of the year yet to go. As for the long-awaited fate at stake in horse racing’s premium attraction, you can engrave the Horse of the Year title on Zenyatta’s vita.”

That’s the truth, as I wrote it, and I’m sticking to it.

Vote early and often on Tuesday.

Written by Vic Zast

Comments (9)

BallHype: hype it up!

Page 1 of 1 pages