First, there was the phantom knee ligament tear that caused quarterback Jay Cutler to watch on the sidelines as his Bears teammates went down to defeat against the Green Bay Packers in the NFC Championship game. (He was seen browsing the shops of Beverly Hills with his girlfriend Wednesday.)
Then, on the flip side, Chicagoans watched former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, the clear front-runner in the city’s mayoral race, thrown off the ballot by the court for not being a resident, only to claw his way back into the election like a man possessed with the thought of victory. (He was shaking hands with the electorate at El stops at dawn yesterday despite no indication that the Supreme Court would hear his appeal or vote in his favor that afternoon.)
Quit in terms of the Cutler kind occurs often in horse racing. Nobody calls it “quit,” of course. But nobody calls aiming your horse away from the competition to a lesser race that you can win “unsportsmanlike” either. In today’s ever-strengthening money-oriented society the man who makes the fiscally-sound choice is admired more than the man who shows daring. It wasn’t always that way.
“There’s a big difference now in the owners who are prominent and the old owners that you’re harkening back to,” said horse owner and breeders Jim Squires, the former editor of the Chicago Tribune, in a telephone interview. “These guys are smart enough to know that this is not a business. But, strangely enough, after they get in, they have a big horse and suddenly think that it’s a business and they’re going to make money in it,” the current owner of Two Bucks Farm said.
Squires believes that the new brand of owners applies predictable business principles such as cost cutting and brand management to what is essentially a gamble. Their business approach leads to carefully managed campaigns that are designed to achieve perfection for their stallion and broodmare prospects.
A horse used to be considered a potential sire because he was well-bred, properly-conformed and durable. Proof of such attributes is no longer necessary. Prudence explains also, in part, why the best horses race infrequently, retire early and bankrupt the sport’s history.
“Today, horses will come off the track after four races and the trainer will be featured in some article saying, ‘This is the fastest two-year-old I ever trained.’ It’s amazing that people are taken in by that garbage,” Squires said. “For the last ten to 15 years, the speculators went nuts over first-year stallions, even when they didn’t do anything - they might have run a big Beyer, or they set a track record, or they won a stakes at Saratoga, and that’s all you have to do,” he said, explaining, in part, what goes on. “Well, most of them are junk,” he concluded.
“You want to send a stallion to stud at the height of its popularity and prominence,” Squires continued, underscoring that “junk” is introduced into the breed’s bloodstream because fiscal considerations overrule the sport of it all. Modern breeding and training practices have forced business-driven owners to operate on borrowed time. A permissible medication policy produces few horses that are able to last long, and even fewer horses able to compete at a peak level over several seasons, which, by the way, make the achievements of Zenyatta more astounding than casual fans of the sport realize.
Horses with Triple Crown potential and graded stakes success – the ones that offer the most commercial upside as sires - are at a much higher risk of catastrophic injury that would jeopardize their value than horses without great ability. They’re subjected to harder training, more medications and x-rays, and they most likely have a genetic disposition toward unsoundness that was passed along to them by sires of similar circumstances. The situation has the force of a perfect storm, yet it doesn’t seem to be a storm that will pass over soon.
Too often, the news of the day when it comes to horse racing is about which horses didn’t run instead of which did. Boys At Tosconova will be walking the sidelines when the gates fly open for the Holy Bull. The unpredictable nature of a two-year-old colt’s development is the cause of it – at least that’s what the owner says. Wait another 30 days, and the trainer will say, “Fastest two-year-old colt I ever trained.”


28 Jan 2011 at 05:06 am | #
I’m glad to see this written:
To me, this is one of the biggest problem the sport has, as well as why I think we have seen so many injuries. In my opinion, horses are “babied” the way pitchers have become in baseball too much in the past 15+ years, and it in turn has led to the problems. That’s why I would love to see Comma To The Top (who raced 10 times as a two year old and is expected to run three times before the Derby) win the Triple Crown, as that result I think would make a lot of owners and trainers re-think the way this sport is conducted.
One thing I would like to see is a “get tough” policy implemented by Churchill on horses getting into the Derby that would require more recent starts than the current system. I would have it set up to where there were FOUR rounds of “preps” for the Derby set up eight, six, four and two weeks before the Derby, with all first preferences given to horses who start first in all four rounds of preps, then in the last three, last two (with first preference in this subset to those who also races in the first round of preps) and finally those who started in the last round of preps two weeks before the Derby (with preferences given to those who started in the six and eight-week, then six and then eight week out preps with the final round). A point system would also be in place where the points would be much higher in the later rounds of preps, and finish position in the better races would be worth more points. This would replace the annual dance with earnings in Graded stakes and would force connections to make four and even five starts before the Derby the way they used to be. As I would have the preps scheduled:
Eight weeks out: Fred Caposella/Whirlaway (Aqueduct), Hutcheson (Gulfstream), San Vincente and Sham (Santa Anita), El Camino Real Derby (Golden Gate), Sam F. Davis (Tampa Bay), Risen Star (Fair Grounds), John Battaglia Memorial (Turfway), Smarty Jones (Oaklawn)
Six weeks out: Bay Shore (Aqueduct, with the main track opening moved up to accomodate it), Louisiana Derby (Fair Grounds), Sunland Derby (Sunland), Tampa Bay Derby (Tampa Bay Downs), Holy Bull (Gulfstream), Spiral/Lane’s End (Turfway Park), Robert B. Lewis (Santa Anita), Southwest (Oaklawn)
Four weeks out: Gotham (Aqueduct, returned to one mile), Fountain of Youth (Gulfstream), Rebel (Oaklawn), San Felipe (Santa Anita), Lexington (Keeneland), Illinois Derby (Hawthorne)
Two weeks out: Wood Memorial (Aqueduct), Blue Grass (Keeneland), Santa Anita Derby (Santa Anita), Florida Derby (Gulfstream), Arkansas Derby (Oaklawn, with the meet moved back to its former closing date)
While in the short run we would see horses fall by the wayside, long term this is designed to strengthen the breed and make those who have bred one way change it for durability, which while it won’t come overnight I suspect would be what we’d eventually see with these changes that are badly needed for the sport.
28 Jan 2011 at 10:15 am | #
The thought that you put into your plan, Walt Gekko, is very impressive. A schedule involving so many racetracks would require a central office of authority for horse racing, but that doesn’t mean that your idea doesn’t bear merit.
In the interview I had with Jim Squires for this blog, the author of “Headless Horseman” provided me with a long explanation for why horses don’t last long or race often that I wasn’t able to fit into my piece. But, basically, Squires argued that horses administered with lasix on a daily basis and pushed to limits in training at a very young age aren’t equipped to withstand the rigors.
According to Squires, one reason you see horses retiring after four, six or eight starts is that their owners and trainers realize that they are time bombs ticking,their bones too brittle to handle one misstep. So they “quit” on them before their time comes to preserve their stallion value.
Fragility now runs through the breed’s bloodstream. It will take years for a new policy of zero medication to eradicate the flaw. And, until then, racing on a schedule like the one you suggest would be impossible
Thank goodness we’re young men.
28 Jan 2011 at 12:12 pm | #
Excellent article. I would’ve welcomed a longer piece with Mr. Squires comments in full.
I like the way you often tackle the tough subjects. Please keep it up.
29 Jan 2011 at 09:24 am | #
I agree wholeheartedly on the lasix issue. I’ve in the past posted a multi-year plan to get rid of it that would start with banning lasix for new foal crops until after the Belmont Stakes in their three year old season along with initially the Triple Crown, Breeders’ Cup and other selected Grade 1 events, working from there to add ALL Grade 1’s and Grade 2’s, then ALL Graded Stakes, ALL Stakes and allowance races at or above a certain amount and finally all races. Phasing it in over a few years would give people time to adjust to the new world and as a whole make the breed much more durable, even if it means having to import horses from places where lasix has continued to be banned for some time for a while.
My plans would also require horses to make many more starts than they do now before entering stud duty to demonstrate durability among other things.
12 Feb 2011 at 11:39 am | #
A comment I left on Paulick’s rant site for his response to an article on this years success story in Califonia racing at BloodHorse.com follows. Middle paragraph responds somewhat here.
----------------------------
CHRB’s Year-End Report Holds More Grim News
----------------------------
#15 about 1 sec ago by SimplyNotSureRU
A real head-scratcher for sure. What is wrong with these fans? We offer the fan the “world”, bobble-head jockey dolls, 50 cent hotdogs and $1 beer twice a year. What is it going to take???
Maybe stop breeding siblings to each other? Concentrate on stamina and speed in equal proportions? Drug free starters for all races? And those damn bettors? How about 10% maximum takeout for “ALL” wagers and eliminate the theft named breakage? Stop outlawing exchange wagering because the bettors want it and you don’t control it? Stop taking wagers at post time and allow cancellations of wagers until race actually starts after all offshore money is posted?
I can tell you that arranging more 2 horse races with cheaper and cheaper stock IS NOT the answer. You idiots will continue to ignore what we have been screaming for decades, faking ignorance and failing, one track after another. Right, Mr. Paulick???
-----------------------------
Breeding and doping has been the key components in destroying the racing stock in this country. Only solution is to reverse course. I do not think the industry has decades left to undo this damage. Fans are fed up. When they go, it simply will no longer matter.