(CHICAGO, IL – May 24, 2010) Students in Texas that read high school history books may buy into the idea that Saratoga’s upcoming 40 days aren’t going to be affected by Monmouth Park’s “Elite Summer Meet.” But realists who see things for what they are may be worried.
“The Shore’s Greatest Stretch” felt the rumble of 231 thoroughbreds this weekend, and many of them might have never left the concrete surroundings of Queens, NY but for purses almost twice those at Belmont. Moreover, horse racing in New Jersey, although far behind New York’s in graded stakes and all-sources wagering, is providing an escapist alternative to people fed up with tunnel vision and politics. It’s going to be an interesting summer.
Monmouth opened Saturday with two minor stakes and 11 other races worth $812,000. In response, at least a dozen trainers ordinarily found placing a saddle on horses at a NYRA venue gave the leg up on jockeys beneath a different stand of shady trees than those to which they’re accustomed. Todd Pletcher, Rick Dutrow, Kiaran McLaughlin, Bill Mott, Nick Zito, Chad Brown and Linda Rice were among the New Yorkers who trekked horses south for the bellwether card. Gary Contessa and Barclay Tagg joined the early adopters on Sunday.
“I don’t think it’ll have any effect on the meet,” P.J. Campo, NYRA’s vice president/director of racing, stressed unconvincingly during a Friday morning telephone interview. But it would seem that there are two types of horses most vulnerable to wanderlust – the promising juvenile who can face softer competition while running for a purse of $75,000 against maidens and the horse finding his current circuit too tough and can jell where the getting is easier. For example, Ibboyee, a New York-bred, failed in four open company tries at other tracks before winning Sunday’s Spend a Buck Stakes at Monmouth.
“Whenever these articles appear, they mean nothing to me,” Campo said about published reports that questioned the quality of his horse colony. He was on form to wish Monmouth luck, but dismissed its experiment off-handedly. “C’mon, these guys have a hundred horses on NYRA property,” he chirped, in referring to Pletcher and Dutrow et al. “People want to race at Saratoga, be at Saratoga and win at Saratoga,” he insisted.
Still, the racing secretary witnessed a mini-exodus from NYRA’s horse dorms this weekend. Pletcher (in fairness, a Monmouth regular) entered four horses Saturday and four more on Sunday in New Jersey. In comparison, he ran only three in New York. Similarly, Dutrow entered five on the first day and two on the next in New Jersey. In the same timeframe, he had only one run at Belmont. Regardless, an erosion of talent seems the least of worries.
Last summer, faced with a deepening economic recession and ideal weather, NYRA officials were elated that Saratoga’s attendance fell only two percent. But the year before – the basis on which the decline was calculated – attendance dropped nearly nine percent. In particular, the first and last weeks of the meet drew crowds of barely 10,000 people - way below the daily average - and Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays were atypically slow.
The legions that did show encountered a building that’s getting shabbier by each pigeon visit. As charming as Saratoga’s historic edifices may be, they’re displaying the cumulative effect of year after cash-strapped year of saving on maintenance costs. The television sets are the kind that you’d find at a homeless shelter. Grime has nested in the crevices of seat hinges, hand railings and floor boards. Each year management tries to spruce things up by slap-dashing some fresh paint in visible places. But the paint is beginning to look like caked-on
maquillage on an old Paris street-walker.
“We can’t offer any details now,” Dan Silver, NYRA’s director of communications said when asked about this year’s improvements. “We might have some announcements on that in the next few weeks,” he noted, either unclear of what his response should be or troubled that it wouldn’t be uttered properly. It was clear that any revelation of spending when the Legislature was considering a loan for the struggling franchise was imprudent. But, that aside, it’s improbable that any change of substance will occur for at least another season.
NYRA officials, of course, realize the need to modernize. They have conducted numerous studies for resurrecting entire sections to original status. Substantial money’s been paid think-tanks such as the London-based Turnberry Consulting to scheme how to invest the projected Aqueduct VLT proceeds. Dreamers have mused over adding an air-conditioned structure for dining on the west end of the stadium. At the same time, “If you build it, he will come” may not be the value-prop it was once.
Guilt by association has damaged the Camelot quality of Saratoga. In its attempt to gain the notice of government, the horse racing industry has heaped so much negative publicity on itself in terms of its inability to exist without subsidy that patrons must wonder what is wrong with the sport. Each time an article that addresses the problems appears in
The Saratogian newspaper, angry readers come forth like an oil spill. The worm is turning on NYRA despite that its business model was constructed on assumptions that the State created and then failed to deliver. Faith in the franchise is evaporating like a cold pad of butter on a hot cob of sweet corn.
Other options for summer fun are entering the minds of the faithful. It’s too late to create an upbeat impression for this year’s Saratoga meet to match the optimism that’s sweeping over Monmouth. Even if the dithering politicians save the day with the dough they owe NYRA, nothing corrective to the core problems will happen in New York until there’s a comprehensive overhaul. At this point, getting a law passed seems a pipedream.
Vic Zast posts daily on Facebook and Twitter
23 May 2010 at 06:48 pm | #
Comment removed for personal attack on writers
24 May 2010 at 12:43 am | #
Vic,
The quality and field size of Belmont’s Saturday and Sunday cards belie the optimism being mouthed by P.J. and Charlie Hayward.
The key point both have missed is Monmouth’s purse levels, AND not requiring a stay in a security barn, will suck in practically every shipper from nearby tracks like Philly, Delaware, and Penn National. Those numbers alone means shorter fields at Belmont, no matter how much the NYRA boys tout their “full stalls.”
NYRA’s Pollyanna tune is akin to the snowball expressing optimism on its way to the hot frying pan.
24 May 2010 at 01:13 am | #
Can’t any of you turf writers ever get around to why NYRA is bankrupt and realize that by fall the NJSEA will also be bankrupt. I am tired of turf writers blaming the model established by the New York legislature for the NYRA franchise as being the cause of NYRA’s bankruptcy. The fact that it is specified that a percentage of takeout from handle and signal fees must go for purses is not the problem; if it were, then how come NYRA operated profitably for decades? NYRA, again, is in bankruptcy because the management maintained the purses at levels that were not supported by the drop in handle and signals fees (if not, then why did NYRA’s management ‘borrow’ money from the horsmens’ purse account?).
Soon Saratoga will be in direct competition for the gambling dollar with Monmouth. Isn’t that wonderful? Now, more than ever, Thoroughbred racing needs a commissioner with authority, who can set racing dates and purses amounts for stake races, so that competition among racetracks is reduced, not increased.
I’m also tired in hearing about Pletcher, Zito, Baffert, Dutrow, et cetera, when there are thousands of other trainers across the country legitimately training horses with their hands on the horse, not on a cellphone. Were any of these ‘big eight’ trainers actually at Monmouth, and put the leg up?
Come fall, NJSEA will be in dire straits financially.
When to hell are racing associations going to get together and get organized? I personally hope that NYRA never gets a dime from slot revenue, as the management will spend it like drunken sailors on renovations at Saratoga and increasing purses.
If both NYRA and the NJSEA cut purses substantially, stop competing with each other and have different race dates, they both would be profitable. Then, perhaps, other racetracks around the country would get the idea. Oh, I know this can’t be done, as then the ‘quality’ of racing will be reduced - Bull!
It’s way to late for the dog to finally wag its tail.
24 May 2010 at 01:19 am | #
Yup, the Internet at its worst: Gutless wonders shooting messengers.
But maybe “Vic Zast” is right, Vic. Maybe we should be writing for the trades that actually prohibit negative comments or screen them first.
At HRI, we’re proud that--personal attacks and foul language nowithstanding--readers have the freedom to take whatever position they wish.
JP
24 May 2010 at 02:07 am | #
Look, Mr. Pricci. If you don’t want me to comment at this website, just tell me to stop.
I am merely telling it like it is, and if the truth hurts, I’m sorry. You know damn well that what Monmouth is doing is ridiculous, that going into competition with Saratoga accomplishes nothing but hurt each racing association further.
It is beyond belief that racing associations across America can’t operate financially successfully without slot revenue or casino dole.
The only solution is for all racing associations to get together, create a commissioner, and then get organized; their first objective should be to stop the ‘who got the biggest purse today’ syndrome; and the second is to assign race dates in various regions.
I’m angry because I will be seventy-three this fall and fear that I am going to outlive Thoroughbred racing. I’m angry because turf writers haven’t, in unison, slammed NJSEA for doing such a shameful thing as to go into direct competition with Saragota, where neither will achieve anything except more red ink.
I’m just damn mad. Again, if you don’t wish for me to comment anymore, then just say so.
24 May 2010 at 02:23 am | #
JP,
I hope you can continue weathering the drive-by impersonations and name-calling that seem to increasingly plague the better racing forums that support free discussion. I’m sure many other HRI readers also appreciate your patience and efforts here to stimulate the spirited and entertaining debate proven consistently capable of attracting a challenging audience.
24 May 2010 at 02:25 am | #
“inconvincibly”?
24 May 2010 at 02:39 am | #
Typo fixed. How’s that work for you, Chris? You know the old joke, don’t you? “You spend a lifetime...” Nah, I won’t go there.
24 May 2010 at 03:39 am | #
My personal score in terms of dollars wagered Saturday and Sunday: Monmouth Park $2460 - Belmont Park $0. Both racetracks are owned by their respective states. I am supporting the one that at least is trying to do something about the state of horseracing.
24 May 2010 at 03:42 am | #
Wendell, please, the comment referred to the person who identified himself as “Vic Zast.” Clearly, it wasn’t.
This is not about you--or me.
JP
24 May 2010 at 03:49 am | #
Indulto, thanks very much for trying to be the voice of reason in the Internet wilderness.
I hope to keep providing “spirited and entertaining debate proven consistently capable of attracting a challenging audience.”
JP
24 May 2010 at 04:14 am | #
Vic:
The truth does not rely on wide spread appeal or acceptance to exist. It is, after all, the truth. Virtually all of the so-called American dream is based on fantasy. It is said that Satan’s true power comes from his ability to wrap a lot of lies around a little truth and then get the world to believe all of it.
Is there any politician, major business enterprise or other “for profit” institution you can think of that does not fit that description?
Why is racing any different? It isn’t. Monmouth cares about Monmouth.
I really think more than 80% of racing will have to fail completely to get any changes that will have a long term positive effect on those who support the game. As it is today, it is a pyramid scheme. Most of the USA’s economy is the same.
Now, with those at the bottom no longer having the ability to float the top, it is falling apart. Time to pay the piper. The deal with the Devil has come due. And he does not accept cash, checks or plastic. Get the blood and souls ready.
Type on, word merchants, type on!!!
24 May 2010 at 04:29 am | #
The Chinese call your theory I-ching, Dennis in Ohio. It’s a form of ying-yang.
I-ching holds that change doesn’t exist until the status quo gets so bad that it’s no longer able to survive. In other words, institutions must be near-death before someone can convince others to revive them with alternative thinking.
We have I-ching in spades in horse racing, probably the same in the economy, politics and social behavior. Saratoga is far from change, but Monmouth must have been close to its end for what has happened to have taken place. This does not mean it’ll work.
I, personally, think they didn’t go far enough - 40 days of nine races would have been better. But I’m applauding their initiative and supporting them by betting on Monmouth races.
24 May 2010 at 05:28 am | #
For the most part I agree with wmcorrow. NJSEA is spitting in the wind if they think their last ditch efforts of providing a million dollars a day in purses could be successful. wmcorrow is right when he says NJSEA will be broke by the end of the year. wmcorrow is also correct when he says that Thoroughbred racing needs a commissioner to regulate the game. Unfortunately, there are too many inflated egos (mostly racetrack management) to ever make that happen. He is also correct in stating that if the forum is available for racing fans to use, why should we be subjected to criticsm for expressing our views. Last time I checked, it it still a free country.
24 May 2010 at 06:32 am | #
“I’m angry because turf writers haven’t, in unison, slammed NJSEA for doing such a shameful thing as to go into direct competition with Saragota, where neither will achieve anything except more red ink.”
Wendell, I’ve got news for you. Since the end of WWII, New Jersey has always had a track up against Saratoga, whether Monmouth since the 70s or Atlantic City before that. And I must say AC probably did well in the attendance and handle department vs. Saratoga back in the 50s and 60s. And before Saratoga tried to be all things to all people with their stakes schedule, it was AC that would get the best grass horses in the country.
My point is that Saratoga has never been completely sacrosanct. Before OTB came along and killed attendance at Aqueduct and Belmont, it was a one-month drag on NYRA’s business. We have room for two good tracks in the Northeast, and NY and NJ should provide it. Aim your bile, if hopelessly, at factories like Philly Park which rob NYRA and NJ of horses that could fill out their programs.
24 May 2010 at 06:59 am | #
I heard that NYRA’s plan to avoid direct competition with Monmouth Park was to close Belmont on June 9 and cancel Saratoga?
24 May 2010 at 08:50 am | #
All these people so angry about what NJ has done. How about directing that piss and vitriol at the Blind Idiot in Albany, or the circus of dead clowns that masquerades as a legislature in NY? Don’t like what’s happening to Saratoga? Look in the mirror New Yorkers. It’s your own fault for tolerating these people; their mismanagement of NYRA/OTB; and the complete farce that government’s involvement with racing has become in NY, and for that matter, every other state in the Union. The problem is that control vests with the “steak eaters” not the “stake holders” in racing. I am not a member of a tea bagger bunch or a right wing wacko, but government has had its slimy hands on the neck of horse racing and all it has done to date is choke just about every ounce of life out of it.
Private enterprise has the ability to create a national commission, right now, but why would current track management cede control to an entity that believes in transparency, integrity and honesty? All they want is slots and cushy jobs without accountability. Why would owners who employ known cheats risk having their drug store cowboys and snake charmers banned for good? All they want is wins. It’s the great accommodation. The day Steve Assmussen is banned from a private race track by management because of repeated drug rule violation is the day I will believe there is hope. The day Patrick Bianconne is banned from Keeneland’s grounds for any and all purposes is the day that faith may find reason.
.
24 May 2010 at 05:00 pm | #
Zed are you an idiot? Your immature remarks ie..teabaggers and RW Whackos confirm that yes..you are an idiot. Anybody knows that the left wing extremists in NY state have screwed up, but idiots like you keep voting them in.
24 May 2010 at 06:46 pm | #
Comment removed as it was written by someone other than the real Vic Zast.
24 May 2010 at 11:15 pm | #
BloodHorse.com Breaking News
New York State lawmakers on May 24 approved a $25 million loan for the New York Racing Association, keeping the racetrack operator solvent for at least the rest of the year and avoiding a shutdown of its operations.
For more information go to http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/breaking-news/57171
24 May 2010 at 11:33 pm | #
News @ http://www.bloodhorse.com
Hollywood Park Cancels Live Racing May 26…
Pointing to an insufficient number of entries, Hollywood Park announced that it has canceled its May 26 program. Live racing will resume at the Inglewood, Calif., track on May 27.
======================
Handle Still Strong at Monmouth; Ibboyee Wins
Monmouth Park followed its record-breaking opening day with another strong showing May 23. A total of $7,046,389 was wagered on the 11-race program, an increase of 126% over the corresponding day last year.
======================
Attendance, Handle Way Up at Monmouth Park
Attendance and betting soared for opening day at Monmouth Park May 22, the first day of a 50-day meet offering $50 million in purses. On-track attendance increased 74% over last year’s opening day.
25 May 2010 at 12:03 am | #
As these stories & others illustrate, the cancer running through racing is wide spread. Monmouth, hopefully, will be a bright spot for at least this meet. Cali racing is hurting bad. NY racing struggles on. And the blight is not limited to just these states. One is hard pressed to find positive indications of long term survival. Government regulation; rigid management/business models & a stagnant user base are the factors one finds. Each passing losing season/meet increases the odds against the changes the industry must make. For many decades including now, they simply refused. That has & is morphing into a case of no longer having the options/money to change.
Entire article at:
http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_15154196
Santa Anita owners defend voiding Oak Tree contract
Brenda Gazzar, Staff Writer
Posted: 05/24/2010 07:12:51 PM PDT
Santa Anita Park’s new owners defended cancelling its lease earlier this month with the Oak Tree Racing Association, which runs the traditional fall meet there, saying the contract did not account for the true economic cost to run the track.
MI Developments, which has come under fire for the move from the horseracing industry, is scheduled to meet with the charitable association’s director on June 4 to discuss another lease proposal. However, Oak Tree’s traditional fall meet at Santa Anita could be held at Del Mar or Hollywood Park if the two parties are unable to renegotiate an agreement.
“The deal they got was the best deal in America,” said Dennis Mills, vice chairman and chief executive officer of the Canada-based MI Developments, which recently acquired the track from Magna Entertainment Corp. through bankruptcy proceedings.
“It’s a phenomenal deal and everybody’s turning the tables on us, but they don’t understand what we’ve brought to the table,” Mills said. “We brought the team that executed, we brought the facility, we brought all the capital expenditures. We brought the race track. Did they make a contribution? Yes, but it was an absolute fraction of what was invested in that facility.”
Echoing former Santa Anita President Cliff Goodrich’s remarks to the California Horse Racing Board last week, Sherwood Chillingworth, the director and executive vice president of Oak Tree, said Monday it was the racetrack that had a very good deal.
“They get 75 percent of our profits,” Chillingworth said. “We pay them $2.5 million a year in lease rental, which was designed to cover capital costs...and we gave them $3 million to redo the track three years ago and we didn’t have to give them anything...Where can you get a better deal?”
Goodrich, who negotiated the deal, told the CHRB that the Oak Tree lease “greatly favors the landlord.”
Chillingworth said Oak Tree renovated the park’s backstretch recreation hall for $875,000, built an equine hospital and paid $80,000 to put in air conditioning into the director’s room, Chillingworth said.
MI Developments, which is chaired by Canadian mogul Frank Stronach, voided the Oak Tree contract after acquiring Santa Anita .
Read entire article at: http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/news/ci_15154196#ixzz0ovsQynhU
25 May 2010 at 06:15 am | #
Dennis,
How about a nice McD’s fish sandwich???
25 May 2010 at 04:33 pm | #
Blah. Blah-blah. Blah-blah-blah. Blah. Blah-blah. Blah-blah-blah. Blah. Blah-blah. Blah-blah-blah. Blah. Blah-blah. Blah-blah-blah. Blah. Blah-blah. Blah-blah-blah. Blah. Blah-blah. Blah-blah-blah. Blah. Blah-blah. Blah-blah-blah. Blah. Blah-blah. Blah-blah-blah.