This remark will not sit well with the outspoken legions of devoted followers of Barbaro, Rachel Alexandra and Zenyatta; they believe what they’ve said has been sensibly objective. Yet, aside from the dull and persistent insider topics pertaining to takeout, integrity and synthetic tracks, just about all other recent talk has focused on the three charismatic, and somewhat polarizing, horses. And the talk of their exploits, in the main, has reflected an obsessive character.
“Internuts” have dominated the idiom. When Barbaro was sent to surgery, they kept watch of his hospice on the blog sites like guard dogs at the gates of a cemetery at midnight. When the filly Rachel Alexandra concluded her magical three-year-old season, they crowned her the Horse of the Year nearly five months before the balloting took place. The verbal jousting between forces over whether it was Rachel Alexandra’s owner or Zenyatta’s, who prevented the horses from facing off, was amusing and testy.
An inordinate amount of insults demurred to turf writers who dared mention, albeit well intentionally, that Barbaro’s plight was futile from the start. Assumptions of bias were quickly ascribed to anyone who noted that Zenyatta was cautiously campaigned, although that’s clearly the case. In some quarters, the over-promotion of these genuinely admirable competitors produced the reverse effect of what was intended. Undoubtedly, there’s a current of ridicule among writers for readers unwilling to stare facts in the face. Don’t expect anyone to admit it.
Wendi Gardner, an associate professor of psychology at Northwestern University, believes that the over-the-top fan worship for Zenyatta has to do with belonging. She believes that the Zenyatta fans may have attached to a group and are finding identity within the group. They are, as a matter of fact, not dissimilar from faithful TV viewers who become attached to the characters of a popular show such as Friends, for which the audience would live and die with each challenge that the cast faced.
“Getting devoted either to a person or character, or in this case an animal, is a fairly common phenomenon. It’s called parasocial attachment,” Gardner explained in a telephone interview. When asked why the fans of the once-beaten mare often overstepped the facts when defending Zenyatta, Gardner answered, “We, as humans, throw out logic when evaluating, protecting or defending those we love.” About the insults the Zeniacs lob at people with dissimilar opinions, she then added, “Even though this seems to make no sense because these people have no real relationship with this horse in any way, their emotional attachment to the horse, like you’d have for a child, would explain the over-emotional protection they display in their behavior.”
Gardner further noted that Americans, in particular, love an underdog, and suggested, perhaps, that Barbaro, Rachel Alexandra and Zenyatta are underdog archetypes. To wit, the tag can be easily applied to Barbaro – an injured horse that fought for his life against the odds; Rachel Alexandra – a female horse that took on male horses regularly and Zenyatta – a standard-bearer for West Coast racing that excelled despite East Coast detractors.
A reason seldom expressed for why these horses are so revered is that they seemed to possess human traits. Barbaro, upon occasioning trauma, transformed himself from a non-thinking animal to a sensible hospital patient. In holding off Macho Again, Rachel Alexandra exhibited the persistence of the goddess Selene and the daring of Amelia Earhart. Zenyatta pranced to her appointments like a prima ballerina, with an emphasis on prima. She pawed the ground, turned her gaze to her fans and exhibited a showgirl’s personality in the paddock and post parade. By channeling a human dimension, the three horses became subjects of hyperbole.
For purely selfish reasons, the sport loved the chaos. Those were pink and green mass-produced signs that the fans held for cameras. The Breeders’ Cup and NTRA rode the wave of hysteria to effective results – ratings climbed, attendance soared and the sport received rock star attention. In becoming an avatar of unrealized dreams, Zenyatta ascends now to the status of an idol that even life’s losers relate to. There was no risk to having her run in the Classic. Horse racing would come out of top no matter the outcome.
Two weeks into the Breeders’ Cup aftermath, Zenyatta’s tale grows. Her fans won’t give in to defeat; their adoration for her seems unshakable. Can you imagine what might happen if Jerry and Ann Moss don’t say “no mas” and decide to campaign the beloved mare longer?
On the other hand, if Zenyatta is retired as expected, sometime after the crocus bloom, at a point after the embers of debate over Horse of the Year honors appear reasonably doused, the balance of power among the fan base as currently constructed will return to its natural state – a state of day-in, day-out stasis. No horse on the horizon seems suited to replace the fervent, irrational and fun draw of those gone. There’d be peace. But we’d be in for a dull spell.
You're invited to visit Vic Zast at Facebook.com/viczast and Twitter.com/viczast.



15 Nov 2010 at 05:17 am | #
This week I’ve decided to select the “Worst Comment of the Week” instead of the best “Comment of the Week.” Consider it a parody of the “Worst Person in the World” segment from the TV show Countdown with Keith Olbermann.
As Olbermann has explained, the selection is not to damn someone personally but to show others how wrong it is to behave a certain way.
For ending Comment #27 by writing “Peace,” Jim C. gets the prize for “Worst Comment of the Week.” Jim C. tried to trivialize his insults in prior comments by writing, “I was just taking exception to your comments” after writing, “Vic, go fly a kite. Really, get lost” and “You’re such a petty, small-minded hater.”
“Peace? I was just taking exception?” C’mon now.
15 Nov 2010 at 07:47 am | #
In a recent commentary you stated that turf writers do not promote racing, they just report; and that I did not know what the word promotion meant.
Above, you imply that the legions of followers of Barbaro, Rachel, and Zen are the so-called fans of racing. I wish to point out that it has been turf writers, again coast-to-coast, who were at the vangard of this frenzy of adoration for three thoroughbreds; turf writers who wrote about nothing else for days on end to ad nausseam. I would say that most turf writers had ‘parasocial attachment’.
Fans receive their information from turf writers, who were at the forefront in placing Barbaro, Rachel, and Zen on pedestals. Damn shame that more time by turf writers wasn’t spent on convincing fans to gamble on the hundreds of races run everyday.
If the numerous commentaries by turf writers solely discussing Rachel and Zen this year were not examples of promotion of them, then I have to agree with you that I do not understand what promotion of anything is.
BTW, how many of the multitude of fans who expressed their adoration for Barbaro, Rachel, or Zenyatta gamble on the horses, go to a racetrack more than a couple of times a year, been inside a racebook or racino, or have an ADW account? I wonder how many turf writers have also. Actually, though, whether these fans contributed to handle is now irrelevant, as all racetracks are or will soon be supported by slot revenue, making takeout from handle irrelevant.
In a couple of months most turf writers will get another case of parasocial attachment when they start pounding the keyboard on the three-year-olds heading down the road to the Kentucky Derby. No doubt Uncle Mo will get lots of ink, while racing at numerous other racetracks fall below turf writer radar.
15 Nov 2010 at 08:45 am | #
Dear Mr. Zast:
Must hasten to comment on your latest topic, “Psycho Talk,” at the risk of perhaps becoming next week’s recipient of “Worst Comment of the Week.” That does not scare me; I ate snakes in the army.
The title, “Psycho Talk,” first few paragraphs, and “Worst Comment of the Week, combined, could be construed as being written by a master agent provocateur, intended both to aggravate the “Internuts,” as you call them, or silence/censor, those who oppose ideas. This I find “amusing and testy.”
“Broke crookedly from the starting gate”? Many would argue that this should read: “broke violently through the starting gate, pre-race, probably sustaining a bone injury; a bone injury that would become catastrophic when Barbaro was wrongfully forced to re-enter the gate and break again”? Should one be labeled an “Internut” because they offer a different point of view on a blog site that entertains and elicits responses?
Personal attacks against individuals for voicing their honest opinions; whether those attacks are direct, “or masked by clever wording,” are always wrong, and every attempt should be made not to engage in such activity. But sometimes, whether we be “Internuts,” “Zealots,” “Turf Writers,” or a combination of the three, we just can’t help ourselves. Perhaps Wendy Gardner could give us some “psycho babble” regarding the correlation and motivation between the title, “Psycho Talk,” placing a “Worst Comment of the Week” at the end, and the assertion that “Internuts dominate the idiom”? Or maybe she should just label me a paranoid schizophrenic. Stand in line.
Would remind turf writers, that they are the ones who choose the topics, which topics are usually extremely controversial, and a neutral passerby reading comments from the turf writers and the so-called “Internuts,” would be hard pressed to delineate between the two.
Have to go now, don’t want to be late for my midnight watch at the cemetery.
Peace out.
Sincerely,
Top Turf Teddy
Pari-mutuel Investment Analyst
15 Nov 2010 at 09:33 am | #
Oh for goodness sake!!!! Can’t we just enjoy these precious animals for what they are? Beautiful, talented and charismatic athletes that people love watching. Why do people that love them have to be psychos? Why can’t we just love them and cheer for them and suffer with them when things don’t go right without being perceived as pathetic people who have nothing better to do and have miserable little lives. Good Lord, Rachel and Zenyetta gave me some of the most fun times in my life. And when I had my cancer surgery, it was Rags to Riches who got me out of bed to watch her run a race for the ages in the Belmont beating Curlin. So, no I’m not a nut case because I adore these wonderful animals. I’m a human being that adores beauty, grace and talent and will continue to laugh and/or cry with them.
15 Nov 2010 at 09:48 am | #
TTT,
Clever wording? Really? I couldn’t get past the first couple paragraphs. The torture he put the poor English language through was unbearable. How many times must he have had to waterboard the staunch noun zealot to get it to masquerade as an adjective? He then lashed “topic” with the redundancy of “pertaining.” Topics by definition pertain to this or that. “Somewhat polarizing?” No such thing. It must be of the extremes or it isn’t polarization. Finally the death blow - “dominated the idiom.” Oh, the awkwardness.
15 Nov 2010 at 10:10 am | #
When was the last time a top horse was pulled over with a bunch of weed in their car or was accused of beating their spouse? Can’t say that for other athletes.
Horses are great to idolize because they are magnificant specimens that we ascribe certain attributes to: courage, heart, a will to win, etc. And they can’t hold press conferences where they refuse to answer questions and decide to interview themselves.
Americans are in love with horses, plain and simple.
If you don’t understand the kind of connection people have with horses, my guess is that you were able to watch the movie Seabiscuit without shedding a tear.
I feel sorry for you.
15 Nov 2010 at 11:27 am | #
Let me add my own psycho babble to the conversation. What we need in this game is more stewards, veterinarians, jockeys, trainers, owners, zealots, Internuts, turf writers, and patrons, who suffer from Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and hypervigilance with respect to the caring and protection of the horses, and weed out those delusional individuals who suffer from a Narcissistic Personality Disorder and God complex.
TTT
15 Nov 2010 at 11:52 am | #
How true, Kristen. If it wasn’t for “us loonies”, the game would be just for the hard gambler who could care less of the horse’s well being only his his tickets. No one would care about this blog or any blog. Now that Zenyatta is retired, it seems a big void will happen on these sites as she has generated a lot of interest which of course has been started by the authors of these blogs. Not many of these beloved animals keep returning to the track at the age of 6. She was not only a 6 year old mare but a 6 year old HEALTHY mare which is pretty much unheard of in this country. How many times are these animals side-lined, then brought back, only to be euthanized on the track? I could list a hundred easily that should have been just plain retired. Yes, we “crazies” do get excited because to have a mare around this long and sound and fun to watch and who gave her heart out each time (haters like that or not) was a thrill and a boost for this sorry, dying sport is VERY rare.
15 Nov 2010 at 12:32 pm | #
Here’s maybe some different perspective:
As Kristen said, when was the last time .... Our country has had so many very hard things to deal with in the last 9 years - terrorist attacks, government taking more and more control over our freedoms all the while fighting among themselves for power, two wars, the worst recession of my life, high unemployment, big business running amok and no one holding them accountable. All of the previous troubles have come about because people made wrong choices. But there was Barbaro, who could very easily have been immediately put down. But he was fighting to live and the people around him were fighting for him to have that chance, too. Isn’t that admirable? And Rachel was given the opportunities to show what she could do. Maybe it was a little too much, but her efforts opened the door for horse racing to be noticed outside of its little circle. And Zenyatta. She is who she is because the people around her made very good choices. They didn’t push her or milk her for everything she had. As a result, she’s 6 years old and has never had an injury or illness that’s caused her to miss anything put before her. And she is so friendly and kind because she’s been so loved and cared for. Do you think that is what draws people to her, that trust and love? There has to be something more to her than just her record for her to have made such an impact in the non-racing public. So I’m a huge fan of Zenyatta and all the people associated with her. It is encouraging to know that in this world that we live in, that has so many things seeming to go wrong, that there are people who do the right thing just because it’s the right thing. All I know is I love Zenyatta and smile every time I see her photo.
15 Nov 2010 at 12:35 pm | #
Is this a parody or joke? It certainly isn’t informed journalism. The author is clearly annoyed by what he considers to be over-zealous fans, but in the process he conflates an awful lot of people who happen to appreciate horses as individuals rather than viewing them as interchangeable running machines.
My psychological take is that he feels that by demonstrating his “objectivity” he will appear superior to said fans and probably fancies himself a better and more knowledgeable horseman. Not only is this demonstrably false, the writer’s sour grapes surely are not endearing him to the industry leaders, who constantly bemoan the shrinking fan base, by equating fans with nutcases.
Even if this is a deliberate provocation to gain readership, it is drivel.
15 Nov 2010 at 12:40 pm | #
It says in the Bible that Jesus will return, but in what form is unknown.
It now appears that Zenyatta is the New Jesus and we must rejoice for Jesus Zenyatta has saved us.
15 Nov 2010 at 12:43 pm | #
I wish the people who fall in love with one horse like Zenyatta could also share some of their passion with the many other great horses out there. Hollywood Park was packed when Zenyatta ran in the Lady’s Secret, then the next day, with multiple grade 1’s being contested, it was like a ghost town. Horse racing isn’t going to survive that way.
15 Nov 2010 at 01:09 pm | #
Mr. Zast,
I will make this short and sweet.
We zealots don’t need to defend ourselves. We are already crazy, and the horses are our therapy. Just curious… (because you don’t really seem to like anything to do with Horseracing ....) why do you write about it?
15 Nov 2010 at 01:27 pm | #
Vic said: “Assumptions of bias were quickly ascribed to anyone who noted that Zenyatta was cautiously campaigned, although that’s clearly the case. “
Obviously, the point of your latest article was to denigrate Zenyatta supporters, cast them as psycho an loony. In your mind, only the detractors have legitimate opinions regarding her place in the horse racing pantheon.
Vic, back to your quote above. Let’s just stick to the facts, please. Name one U.S.-based mare in the past 20 years that REGULARLY ran against males. Just one.
Also, when Personal Ensign was making her wonderful run at perfection, did you ever ONCE knock her connections for not running her enough against males, or for leaving New York about as often as Woody Allen? If not, then why impose the double standard on Zenyatta’s connections? Because she is a West Coast-based horse?
I am interested in your response.
15 Nov 2010 at 01:53 pm | #
Regularly, meaning frequently or always?
I’ll give you 3...♥
Rachel Alexandra
Genuine Risk
Xtra Heat
15 Nov 2010 at 02:00 pm | #
Vic, I enjoyed the piece. Admitting to being zealous at times, it gave me insight as to how to “handle” the all to often personal attacks. Then I read the comments. What am I missing?
15 Nov 2010 at 02:11 pm | #
I said mares.
Rachel Alexandra was retired as a filly. No doubt she had an ambitious three year old campaign. But when she turned four, she ran only against females, and only once in a Grade 1.
Genuine Risk did not run as a mare, and only ran three times after her 3 year old campaign.
Xtra Heat, a sprinter, qualifies.
My point is that it is unheard of for a 6 year old U.S. based mare at the G1 level to regularly run against males on the main track at a classic distance. Again, nobody ever criticized Personal Ensign for not running often enough against males, or for rarely leaving New York. But Zenyatta encounters this double standard.
15 Nov 2010 at 02:16 pm | #
You have to admit that Mike Smith had one hell of a ride and Zenyatta had one hell of a run. Any jockey/trainer/owner only can wish to have done what they have done. Mike Smith could of said that was it and 19/0 is how I want to end it and the trainer and owner would of agreed. Now go make a movie and show us fans one more time just how greedy you all were and how Zenyatta lost her only race.
15 Nov 2010 at 02:24 pm | #
The statement in your article:
“Rachel Alexandra – a female horse that took on male horses regularly”
This statement gives the impression that this happened more often than not; and that sex was not a consideration when deciding where she would run; this is not the case. I believe (correct me if I’m wrong) she took on male horses 3 times in a 19-race career. Moreover, she was denied the opportunity of an attempt at the Triple Crown, when her principals avoided the males, and chose the easy money the day before the Kentucky Derby, a race she most certainly would have won.
TTT
15 Nov 2010 at 02:30 pm | #
wow your sad article about people’s love for horses is so off the mark..how sad you even get paid to cover horse racing…
15 Nov 2010 at 02:35 pm | #
Vic,ditch the sublime poison pen and bask in the sunshine of the reflected glory that the 3 horses you are so dismissive of,brought back to the seriously floundering sport.Zee,RA and Barbaro brought back a resurgance in existing fans ,and attracted desperately needed new fans.As a long-tine racetracker,owner/trainer,I see the rapid decline in purses,racing dates,near-empty grandstands and,worst of all,horses with an EXTREMELY GRIM future facing them.
@Kristen:loved your brilliant comment!
@Elle:couldn’t agree more!watched Xtra Heat at Laural beat the boys 3 X’s,beating Disco Rico once and I think he may still hold the track record for 3/4 mi.
15 Nov 2010 at 02:37 pm | #
Vic,
Please let you next article be about how Life at ten should of been scratched out of the B.C. and how the stewards and the person in charge at Churchill Downs should be fired for letting fans bet on a horse that was sick and should of been scratched. I want my money back and I am sure thousands of other people would like there money back to. Todd Pletcher is just as guilty as the stewards and Vets that were in the paddock area if Todd himself was even in there after the bell had wrung. Todd Pletcher must of known after see the horse up close something was wrong and did he even listen to his Jockey or not. Todd I want my money back for what I and millions of the betting public thought was a sound horse at the time.
15 Nov 2010 at 02:38 pm | #
p.s. I would have added Personal Ensign to the short list.
15 Nov 2010 at 02:38 pm | #
Ok, let’s see if I’m reading correctly...a sport that is desperate for new fans actually generates thousands of new fans thanks to several high-profile stars who captured not only our attention but our hearts.
Ah, but those new fans aren’t from the preconceived mold of what the horse racing fan should be - so we really don’t count, and, worse still, obviously we’re psychos because we care about the equine athletes perhaps a little more than we care about bellying up to the wagering window (although I, for one, made plenty of trips to said window while at Churchill weekend-before-last).
Thanks very much for your warm welcome to the sport, Vic. Much appreciated.
(And, believe me, there will be other horses to focus our attention and adoration upon, next year, and the year after that, and the year after that....)
15 Nov 2010 at 03:20 pm | #
The condescending attitude of this article is an example of what is wrong with a great deal of the journalism of the turf. People are just too emotional...other people, mind you. And we need to talk to psychologists about them. Oy, what condescension. Please, do racing a favor and get over yourself.
15 Nov 2010 at 03:39 pm | #
Vic when you find yourself standing in the unemployment line Know its because you slander the ones who have tried to give racing back to the people. Right now because of the ones you belittle you have a new lease on your profession.Racing has its dignity intact and a huge new group of fans. Because the Sport of Kings was in a downward slide til saved by a Queen accept her gift and write again!
15 Nov 2010 at 03:46 pm | #
Vic is a gambler and has no soul. Most gamblers don’t have a real feel for the horse. They can make alot of money betting horses and maybe even writing about them, but it doesn’t mean they have a feel for the horse. Believe me when i say most of these guys haven’t been backside or touched a horse or fed a horse a carrot or just sat there and watched a magnificent specimen of equine flesh hotwalk for a half hour. Lack of connection to a real animal will cause witers to write stupid stuff like this.
We’re just stupid, adoring, unbalanced fans who don’t bet as much, so we are to be ignored or treated like children. Like we all needed some shrink to tell us why we like a horse…
15 Nov 2010 at 04:00 pm | #
Card carrying zealot here! But the writer has left out many of those who inspired as much zeal as the tbree who aer the subject of this article. Seattle Slew, Seabiscuit, the great Ruffian, Secretariat, Affirmed, little Smarty Jones, Afleet Alex, Go For Wand, Big Brown, Eight Belles, Cigar, Street Sense, Curlin, geez, I could write all afternoon.
I love athletes who give their hearts and all to do what they love. These athletes don’t complain about their bosses and trainers, that they’re underpaid, not given enough recognition, not enough press, that they work too hard, the schedules are too long, the opposing athletes are stupid, inept, etc., etc. They don’t spit, scratch body parts that should only be scratched in the privacy of one’s own stall, however they might occasionally defecate or expel gas at a gallup, they don’t wreck cars or drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs, (Note I said DRIVE) and they don’t fight and get into brawls and assault others or force themselves on those who are unwilling.
There’s a lot of stuff in this world to feel bad about. Watching a supremely trained and toned athlete do what they do best for the sheer joy of it is something to feel good about. Not to mention that these athletes are incredibly beautiful to watch, and somewhat of an affirmation that beautiful animals excel in a sport without asking for anything in return. Except maybe a can of Guiness. Perhaps Mr. Zast has never learned to appreciate that great athletes aren’t always those who pose and preen and generally behave obnoxiously for attention, and are paid outrageous sums to boot.
15 Nov 2010 at 04:40 pm | #
PROUD Psycho here! Happy to be in the padded room with the rest of my Zenyatta- adoring fans.
Just for the record, I’m no recent convert to the sport. I was born into a family of folks who have thousands of pleasant ( and sometimes painful) memories at the track. There have been horses throughout the decades who capture our imaginations and Zenyatta is one. Say what you will, but you can’t deny that the excitement generated by this mare has probably created many new fans ( and bettors). It will be somewhat duller when she retires but I will await the next beautiful animal to make my pulse beat faster as she and numerous other amazing thoroughbreds have done through time.
15 Nov 2010 at 04:44 pm | #
I think he’s just trying to be noticed by writing such drivel. The Ann Coulter of Horse Racing. Stupid man to slam the folks who add to the coffers, and in record numbers due to their collective psychosis.
15 Nov 2010 at 05:42 pm | #
TOP TURF TEDDY said: “Broke crookedly from the starting gate”? Many would argue that this should read: “broke violently through the starting gate, pre-race, probably sustaining a bone injury; a bone injury that would become catastrophic when Barbaro was wrongfully forced to re-enter the gate and break again”?
Seriously, Teddy, breaking through the starting gate is NOT what caused Barbaro to break a hind leg! Are you kidding me??? You must be drinking your bathwater. Those starting gates are spring loaded and magnetized, they are SUPPOSED to break open on contact. Can you not imagine what kind of injury would have happened if they didn’t?? I sometimes wonder if the internet is a good thing or a bad thing....responses like yours and many others make me feel like it’s just too easy to be hateful, ill informed and and irritating. Why don’t you get yourself some knowledge about this game before you pop off?
15 Nov 2010 at 06:13 pm | #
#1 Worst Comment of the Week:
I nominate your post #1, above, for worst comment of the week. In the comment of mine you claim was “worst of the week,” I was objecting to Vic’s contention that Zenyatta losing by a nose diminished her legacy. This is what I said:
“As for your comment that Zenyatta’s second place finish diminishes her career, diminishes her body of work, and diminishes her legacy, it is apparent that, after all these years, you are too literal-minded to comprehend and appreciate the nuances and complexity of horse racing. I expected more from you. You are the kind of character who, after watching the 1978 Jockey Club Gold Cup, would say that Exceller turned in a better performance than Seattle Slew because Exceller won the race.”
If you do not think Zenyatta’s performance enhanced her legacy, then you do not know how to watch a horse race.
15 Nov 2010 at 06:18 pm | #
The Barbaro saga was yet another black eye for racing. Barbaro was somehow better after his death than he ever was during his racing career.
Oh, and somebody finally won “The Yumfecta”, but because that horse is still alive (barely) it went unnoticed by the media and the masses.
JFK, like Barbaro, wouldn’t be regarded as much were he still alive.
Barbaro’s connections were the ultimate in selfish, and yet they were all too happy to accept credit from the unknowing and the unwitting. Had Barbaro been just another $1500 claimer at Timonium, he’d have been put out of his misery as soon as help arrived at his side on that fateful Preakness day in 2006. Instead his connections made him suffer, and suffer, and suffer, all in hope that he might return them untold millions in stud fees.
At least Oswald didn’t make (John F.) Kennedy suffer…
15 Nov 2010 at 06:18 pm | #
People don’t have time to get attached to most race horses these days, especially when they are retired as a 3 or 4 year old. It’s just amazing to me what she has accomplished - as a six year old mare!
So Zen kept running, kept winning, and kept adding on fans.
When they make a movie about her, I hope they show someone like me (not in the racing industry) having lunch with friends, asking, “Have you heard about this mare, Zenyatta?” I imagine a lot of people had the same conversations with their friends.
I invited those friends over to watch the BC with me and had a bottle of champagne ready when Queen Z crossed the finish line first. When she crossed it second, after that amazing home stretch rally, we popped the cork in her honor anyway.
I hope to do that again when she wins Horse of the Year.
15 Nov 2010 at 06:21 pm | #
I’m finished reading anything written by Vic Zast
15 Nov 2010 at 06:22 pm | #
Dear Lisa J:
You are entitled to your opinion, and apparently you do not believe I am entitled to mine. Your personal attack is not appreciated, and is laughable.
I made no mention regarding the strength of the starting gate, or that the gate caused the problem; those were your extrapolations, which are also not appreciated. I only said that Barbaro violently broke through, which is what I saw, and maintain is what happened. The power generated from those back legs was tremendous, and in my estimation most definitley caused an undetected injury, which was compounded the second time he left the gate. He should have been inspected with close scrutiny, which he was not.
It amazes me that you have been able to gauge my knoweldge of the game based upon my belief that Barbaro was injured when he broke through the gate. Again, laughable.
With respect to drinking my bath water, Lisa, I am a real man, and I take showers, and don’t have any bath water. However, I do admit to drinking my toilet water, just to build my character. You should try it, as you certainly need some character building, and learn not to attack people you know absolutely nothing about.
Hateful and ill-informed; why, because I do not have the same beliefs as you? I am neither. Irritating, most assuredly, but wait until you talk to me in person; you will pull your hair out. Apparently you believe whatever tall tale the money powers would tell you who will load any animal into the starting gate in the interest of the almighty dollar. Barbaro - Life At Ten; same old story. It is you that needs to start thinking for yourself, and get a grip on reality. Keep believing what they tell you; the world is filled with robots like yourself whowill believe whatever #### and bull cover-up story comes down the pike.
Enjoy your fantasy world.
TTT
15 Nov 2010 at 06:38 pm | #
Vic, I am laughing my head off at the replies to your posting. I have very little to add since they seem to cover most of what I wanted to say. They are right on target and most of them reflect a great sense of humor, something you don’t usually see in “internuts” or “psychos.” The only insult you missed was to say most of us are women. You
are a gem Vic.
I have been watching racing for a fairly long time. I am not new to it. I love all the horses who run their hearts out for us, win or lose. They are not a “bet” to me.
As for the three you mentioned, I saw the plight of Barbaro and I donated money to Univ. of Penn. to the Barbaro Fund. I also donated money to Old Friends for horses that need homes. This is a charity that Ann and Jerry Moss support. So we “psychos” do have our useful side. We also buy the tickets to see the races. Vic, you need to calm down. You are certainly entitled to write what you want, but this seems like alot of angst over nothing. Much like writings from an “internut.”
15 Nov 2010 at 07:00 pm | #
Mr Vast,
I wonder, how in the world did you get your job covering horse racing? Obviously it had nothing to do with loving horses. Mabe just loving gambling? Turf writers that write like you do will turn people away from the sport. There is nothing wrong with loving the horses. Why can’t we have different opinions than you? I suppose that you do not like the horse racing movies that have come out, because you can’t place a bet on those.
15 Nov 2010 at 07:12 pm | #
LyndaP31,
He’s f_ucking old. That’s why.
Old people complain.
They’re ####### miserable.
15 Nov 2010 at 07:14 pm | #
Blame it on the French Vic, they came up with this pari mutual thing[it’s all subjuctive my good man]..empirical evidence is not after all what this game is about....and beside me thinks you should be worried about your parking meters in the “Windy City” and where that cash is going. [keep that credit card handy]
15 Nov 2010 at 07:23 pm | #
LyndaP31:
Vic Zast probably complains because he doesn’t feel good. Old people usually ache all over. Godd_mn, Zast probably has arthritis in is knuckles and has a hard time even writing articles (let alone...getting up out of his chair).
There are “very few” older people that don’t complain in their later years. I can count on my hands (the very few elderly people that don’t complain).
15 Nov 2010 at 07:42 pm | #
So, Will the REAL Mr./Dr. Vic Zast please stand up! I know you need to write to garner a reaction Mr. Zast, but, at least TRY to stay on the same side of the fence in your opinion’s.
You cannot have it both ways, or maybe you think you can? Sounds kinda “Psycho” to me Vic.
Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde Vic?
Here are your words from Jan. 30, 2007:
“And, lastly, there were Barbaro’s fans to admire. For them, the daily news of the up and down struggle of the horse’s convalescence might have been a balm, but their infectious involvement in the lives of Barbaro, the Jacksons and Richardson was staunch. In times when the unanimity of humanity is unfound, the collective and unswerving support that they lent Barbaro and each other was admirable.
Many people might see Barbaro’s passing as nothing more than another sad turn in a sport already too burdened by tragic accident for its own good. Some may even turn bitter to horse racing as a result of the steady focus that Barbaro’s fight for life gave to the problem.
Nevertheless, Barbaro’s death will have a resounding effect that over the years will only grow larger and more phenomenal than it is already. The definition of greatness is found in the moments of transcendent effect similar to what happened Monday.
With the passing of Barbaro, for many reasons, the sport of horse racing lost a great one. Tomorrow, like the meaning of the image in a photo, his myth begins."---Vic Zast Jan. 30, 2007
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/16876039//
15 Nov 2010 at 07:55 pm | #
Hopefully Mr. Zast has learned not to mess with the fans. The fans who keep this game on the map… a small map but at least a map.
Look what Zenyatta’s fans did for 60 minutes or just to that little Autistic boy that visits her. How about what Barbaro did for the equine industry as far as research, rescue,(yes, how many of the fans of Barbaro have helped save the throw aways from slaughter) Rachel ran and gave to cancer research as well as Zenyatta. Any of Zenyatta sales a portion has to go to a charity. Yes, her owners donate all over the race track and to Old Friends. Now...Mr. Zast what do you donate to this sport besides your rude comments dealing with the racing fans. It seems you are the zealot,crazed person that needs to be addressed by your bosses. You need a new venue.
15 Nov 2010 at 08:48 pm | #
Vic, I really think that Zenyatta was or IS the most popular horse in horse racing history. There’s a video on youtube on a man doing a college cheer right before the BC Classic. He’s yelling: “Give me a Z!” and the crowd would answer “Z!”, “Give me an E!” and the crowd would yell “E!” etc. This kind of stuff happens at the Michigan/Ohio State football game, not at the race track. Or what about Zen’s connections letting ANYBODY who shows up at Churchill or Hollywood come and pet or kiss the most popular RACE HORSE ever? It was a perfect storm that Zenyatta would end up with the Moss’ and Shirreffs! Conservative campaign? If Zenyatta was raced like a gladiator, she would have been gutted like Rachel and retired a long time ago. How many owners/trainers wait til the horse is late in her 3YO season to start for the first time? Zen’s connections LOVE her way too much than to put her through 8 races with males. You see what that kind of campaign did to Rachel? THREE’S OBVIOUSLY A DIFFERENCE IN OPINION BETWEEN JESS AND JERRY/ANN. Jess put duct tape over Assmussen’s mouth, Jerry lets the public pet Zenyatta. If you had to go partners with one or the other, who would you take: Jackson/Assmussen or Moss/Shirreffs? Jackson got his precious Horse of the Year trophy, but Zenyatta is the all-time leading money leading mare.
15 Nov 2010 at 08:53 pm | #
Mr. Zast.....are you pro or anti horse racing? Yes, Barbaro, Rachel, and Zenyatta have garnered a legion of loyal fans. I fail to understand why that is a bad thing, especially in a sport that is struggling. Why are fans not allowed to be passionate about a favorite horse? Why do you see it as a bad thing for the sport?
Without Zenyatta, I would never have gone through the hassle of attending the Breeder’s Cup this year. Without my fellow psychos, we would never have attended racing at Churchill Downs or Keeneland the last three years. I’m sure the owners of each track are happy to have more fans, psycho or not.
And lets not forget the money raised for laminitis research and horse rescue. I sure the jockeys are upset with the psycho efforts to make tracks and racing safer--for the HUMANS who also participate in this sport. Come to think of it, if we’re passionate about Zenyatta--or that $5,000 claimer---why should you or anyone else care?
15 Nov 2010 at 09:13 pm | #
Vic,
I have read and re-read your article. And I still don’t get it. What’s your point?
Please help me out with this one. Are you trying to say that the turf writers are the only ones with competent opinions on horses? And are you trying to say that some fans of Zenyatta are completely delusional and shouldn’t be heard.
Vic, to be perfectly honest, your article comes across as somewhat elitist, but I’m not sure. Are you bothered by all the attention that Zenyatta has created? Vic, seeing all the positive influence generated by Zenyatta I really don’t know how you could of come up with something negative. I just don’t know. Maybe it’s you that has a problem.
15 Nov 2010 at 10:00 pm | #
Dick Dastardly aka Vic Zast is hoping for the frost. In his dreams he’s trapped in a paddock. There are cameras, sound equipment, owners morphing into fans, squeezing in front of journalists. The walking ring is surrounded by mass humanity, waving signs, shouting her name, taking her picture. They are waiting for Zenyatta.
Vic is somber, rife with humorless jibes, waiting for the sea of teal and pink to move from the paddock to the track. You see the whites of his eyes as he shies from the Posters....from the comment posters, as he runs for the safety of the Press Room.
He dreams of deadlines and heros; of a sport with no form. Of a sport without hope beyond the glassy Racino barriers and endless decaying grandstand that is Hollywood was Hialeah and may be the future.
It’s still not too late to conquer the enemy. The enemy is an empty racetrack and the Teal and Pink masses are waiting to fill the stands.
15 Nov 2010 at 10:14 pm | #
There is a Youtube video (link below). The scene is Churchill Downs, following the running of the Breeders’ Cup Classic. A young family was there from South Dakota. They drove all the way to Louisville to see Zenyatta. (Last year, they drove all the way to California for the Breeders’ Cup Classic). They waited outside Zenyatta’s barn to have their baby daughter photographed with Zenyatta. John Shirreffs accommodated them. The name of their daughter is Zenyatta Alexandra. She was born on Kentucky Derby day.
C’mon, Vic. Even you could smile at such a scene.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBrvvLhhC80
15 Nov 2010 at 10:52 pm | #
Geez,
You guys are a bunch of Internuts.
15 Nov 2010 at 10:55 pm | #
Jim C. says:
“They waited outside Zenyatta’s barn to have their baby daughter photographed with Zenyatta. John Shirreffs accommodated them. The name of their daughter is Zenyatta Alexandra. She was born on Kentucky Derby day.”
Such Midwest bias. If that family is from NY that kid would have been named Alexandra Zenyatta.
15 Nov 2010 at 10:59 pm | #
Dwelt,
If they named her Alexandra Zenyatta, she probably would be retired at 4 and not have a chance at immortality.
16 Nov 2010 at 12:21 am | #
Mr Zats is a sad, soul-less man...a baloon popper at best.
So much about what he has written here is plainly wrong. He does not GET IT. Lord help him.
16 Nov 2010 at 01:51 am | #
The Fobot photo of Zenyatta passing Blame AFTER the BC wire is a true classic.
They drew a straight line when viewing from an angle.
They’ll be starting a campaign soon to save all of Santa’s reindeer.
What a bunch of goofs!
16 Nov 2010 at 04:00 am | #
Mr. Zast, the “worship” of these horses is just about the only good thing in this hateful, hurtful world. When day after day, we are confronted by loss of jobs, angry political rhetoric, and the shrill whine of the likes of Sarah Palin, the only refuge is in something good, exciting, exhilarating, and honest--an athlete who tries his or her best. If this bugs you, then let’s never have another superstar. No ESPN coverage. All of racing will be like Aqueduct in February. And you won’t have a job. You deserve that.
16 Nov 2010 at 06:15 am | #
WAIT EVERYBODY!!! I THINK VIC’S ON TO SOMETHING BIG HERE!!!!
Vic, are you suggesting that there are people who follow certain “sporting events” and root for a certain individual, team or outcome even if they have no monetary or personal gain except for *gasp* feeling good if they win? Are you suggesting that these same people follow the wins and losses and other stats of their favorites with great interest? These people even wear the colors of the “team” they are supporting, going so far as to don hats??? That. Is. So. Weird!
I better switch to a sport where there aren’t weirdo, psychos that do those things. Like football, uh, or baseb, errrr, darn, ummm...hockey? gosh.
Yep Vic, you’re right. We wouldn’t want horseracing to go down those roads. We all know how bad super fans are for mainstream sports. No one watches the Super Bowl after all.
So, all you crazy fans, please keep it down and keep horseracing quiet and polite. Unless, of course, you lose a bet. Then you can tear up your ticket, throw it on the ground, stomp, scream and curse but other than that, “SHHHHH!!!!” Don’t you DARE feel good about anything you are not financially invested in, but if you must, for Vic’s sake, keep it to yourself. We can’t hear the crickets in the stands.
16 Nov 2010 at 08:01 am | #
Karen (9) hit the nail right on the head. Everything in racing (and in America for that matter) has been intensified since 9/11.
People act like they have 10 minutes to live, live mostly in the moment and don’t think about the future.
This is why they act nutty when it comes to their equine heroes.
This is why the starting gate for the Derby overflows.
16 Nov 2010 at 08:42 am | #
Here are the known phobias beginning with the letter Z: (1) Zelophobia- Fear of jealousy; (2) Zeusophobia- Fear of God or gods; (3)
Zemmiphobia- Fear of the great mole rat; (4) Zoophobia- Fear of animals. I’ve just notified the American Psychiatric Association of the latest and rather bizarre “Z” phobia that is spreading like wildfire: Zenyattaphobia. It is characterized by a fear and loathing of an equine female specimen considered by public opinion to have achieved greatness commensurate with her male counterparts. The symptoms are: (1) hysterical repetitive rants on horse blogs regarding HOY; and (2) thumb sucking near the finish line in a fetal position.
16 Nov 2010 at 08:59 am | #
Vic, baby, Post No. 57 above, was first posted on November 6, 2010, A.D., in a Bill Christine article (link below). Was this your rebuttal, or just coincidence?
http://www.horseraceinsider.com/lines-in-the-sand/comments/11062010-the-best-story-finished-second/#comments
16 Nov 2010 at 12:19 pm | #
This blog got so very entertaining after it’s brutal and negative beginning. Kudos to the very creative and funny people with such good ideas. The black cloud that is Vic Zast dissapeared. See what some positive Zen-like energy can do???If you want to sign a petition for Zenyatta for HOTY, check this out.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/zenyatta-for-2010-horse-of-the-year/
16 Nov 2010 at 05:22 pm | #
You might get caught for plagiarizing, but your commentary should be entitled Much Ado About Nothing....These groupies know nothing of the historical perspective of greatness.... from their 12 month experience with the game.
16 Nov 2010 at 06:22 pm | #
OK, Danzig. That’s why the following people are on record stating that Zenyatta is the greatest filly they have ever seen:
Steve Davidowitz
Steve Haskin
Jerry Bailey
Randy Moss (the pace figure maker, not the WR)
John Pricci had Zenyatta in his top 12 fillies of all-time (he did not rank them within that 12). Even her biggest detractor, Andrew Beyer, has stated that her supporters have a legitimate case to make for her being the best filly of all-time.
16 Nov 2010 at 06:27 pm | #
Hey danzig. I’m a zealot. How many times did Man O’ War face only one opponent? How many times did Personal Ensign race? How many of those races were at Belmont Park? How many times did she face males, and how many did she face? Was Personal Ensign great from a historical perspective? Who was Pretty Polly? How many times has the winning horse in a major mile and a quarter race finish the last quarter in less than 24 seconds?
Please enlighten us. What is “the historical perspective of greatness”? Is it animal, vegetable, or mineral?
17 Nov 2010 at 08:21 am | #
Just for your information Vic Zast is or was a Perfume salesman! As a racing fan started writing stories about Saratoga. About everything other than horses,little titbits about the fun of Saratoga. They were well written and entertaining now he thinks he knows something about horse racing and feels he has to be NEGITIVE ! Vic go back to what you know..smelling good!
17 Nov 2010 at 09:19 am | #
Pooohey..
17 Nov 2010 at 12:11 pm | #
Dwelt, Alexandra Zenyatta is very funny.
JP
17 Nov 2010 at 05:40 pm | #
I do not know Vic Zast or his source, Wendi Gardner. As a retired psychologist, I can say I’ve never heard of “parasocial attachment”, and suspect this is nothing short of another failed attempt years ago to have the APA (American Psychological Association), have SDPD (self defeating personality disorder),be included in the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual, in order to obtain insurance reimbursement.
18 Nov 2010 at 02:27 am | #
If the Internet is to be a forum for journalism, it can’t be a Petri dish for defamation and disinformation.
After thinking hard on whether or not I should reply to this week’s readers’ comments, I wrote a response.
http://bit.ly/dm1SoO
18 Nov 2010 at 04:50 pm | #
I have been a psychologist in practice for almost 40years...I too have NEVER heard of “parasocial attachment”...I did see dedication, bonding, attachment and devotion..for or to a great animal..(or it can be a person)..there is NOTHING pathological about that..it brought people together, got people through bad times, made new friendship and promoted generally healthy competition....To your article I say.Baloney!! Love is love no one says it has to be a person. The love of money from the handicappers side and the abuse of animals should be addresses not dedication.
20 Nov 2010 at 09:13 am | #
Vic - sorry to be responding so late. Another great article with incredible responses!