New meaning attached to the saying when the ultimate Horse of the Year won the Woodward Stakes at the end of a gender-bending Saratoga meet in which Linda Rice became the first woman to win the trainer’s title. If any doubt that females had risen to a higher place in the male-dominated game remained, Zenyatta dispelled this notion by capturing the Breeders’ Cup Classic in early November.
Rachel Alexandra on the East Coast and Zenyatta on the West divided emotions equally. They concluded their seasons unbeaten. They accounted for 100 percent of the Eclipse Award votes in the Horse of the Year category. And, most significantly, they let it be known that American girls, like their European counterparts, had as much right to the sport’s biggest prizes as the boys.
Although a colt’s head appeared first in the spotlighted mirror at Churchill Downs several weeks ago, Zenyatta ended 2010 at the top of the sport or, at least, a notch down from the top. Three races earlier, on the same starry card, Goldikova, a five-year-old Irish-bred mare from France, won her third Breeders’ Cup Mile, an unprecedented feat. She became Cartier Horse of the Year subsequently.
Since 1887, only 10 fillies have earned the USA’s Horse of the Year accolade. But since 2002, there’ve been two. Zenyatta came second in the voting in 2008 and 2009. Rachel Alexandra won in 2009. And Zenyatta will finish first or second again in 2010. In addition, Rags to Riches accomplished something in 2007 that no other filly had done in 102 years – she won the Belmont.
“I would say we have been lucky to see several very talented females allowed to show their superiority over several seasons, while their high-profile male counterparts have been rushed off to stud,” noted Terence Collier, director of marketing for the sales company Fasig-Tipton, via email.
Despite the past decade, Collier isn’t convinced there’s a long-term shift toward females dominating males on the racetrack. “Females beating males in the USA delivers superstar status much more readily here than it does in other parts of the world,” Collier said, implying that the “Year of the Girl” could be a Yankee affect.
“It is not surprising that superior females attain higher visibility,” Collier said. “The North American and European Thoroughbred industries tend to retire their superstar males to stud very quickly and the top females will often race longer,” he noted.
To Collier’s point, Blame was a four-year-old colt that had won eight times in 12 starts before he conquered Zenyatta. But the rest of the Breeders’ Cup Classic field was composed of two five-year-old colts that were 30-1 and 20-1 in the morning line, four other lightly-raced four-year-olds that collectively won fewer than half of their 23 starts as three-year-olds and five sophomore colts, of which only two or three will be invited to the breeding shed next spring.
If the market is any indicator, it, too, appears unconvinced that the ladies’ time has come. A good filly will bring approximately 80 percent of what good colts bring on average and sales toppers are usually males at the yearling sales. Prices at auction for fillies and mares coming off the racetrack have dropped drastically in the last three years, even as Zenyatta and Rachel Alexandra were living out their fans’ dreams. The primary cause for the drop, of course, is the depressed economic conditions.
Collier’s ephemeral viewpoint is shared by Ben Huffman, the racing secretary at Churchill Downs, the only track at which fans have seen Zenyatta, Goldikova and Rachel Alexandra each compete. Zenyatta and Rachel Alexandra raced at Oaklawn Park, but Goldikova didn’t. Zenyatta and Goldikova raced at Santa Anita, but Rachel Alexandra didn’t.
“The big three just happened to come along three years in a row. Also, the willingness of the owners to race these mares past the ages of three, four and five years is remarkable,” Huffman said, which suggests that if one was retired earlier that there might be less notice of how female horses have excelled in recent years. Nevertheless, the weight of evidence in favor of females raises at least a suspicion of misogyny.
Huffman recommended that horse trainers, not he, give an assessment of the relative difficulty of races for colts and geldings versus those for fillies and mares. He couldn’t say whether American-raced males faced more competitive challenges than females or whether it was harder for a male to distinguish himself. But he said, “I do believe lofty purse money for 2-year-olds and 3-year-olds can be tough for owners and trainers to resist, therefore decreasing the chances of an older horse campaign.” Could there be a correlation between the sales value assessed to sires and the requirements of achieving that status?
Regardless of who or what is to be believed, female horses have enjoyed a long run of success. Choose your own measure of time to determine if their ascendancy is a fad or a trend. But, one thing is certain - it’s not the “Year of the Girl.” It’s the decade.
You’re invited to visit with Vic Zast on Facebook and Twitter.


22 Nov 2010 at 03:49 am | #
I imagine that Kristen Hall was like many of the people who read last week’s column and left comments; she is probably not a longtime fan or hardcore horseplayer. But her Comment #34 was positive, displayed intelligence and seemed to reveal that she understood what was written. Amidst a sea of classless comments, Kristen Hall’s heartfelt remarks were refreshing. Kristen Hall’s Comment #34 is the Comment of the Week.
22 Nov 2010 at 08:33 am | #
You wrote:
“Blame was a four-year-old colt that had won eight times in 12 starts before he conquered Zenyatta.”
The Webster’s Dictionary definition of “conquer” follows: “to gain mastery over or win by overcoming obstacles or opposition.”
Blame did not gain mastery over anybody. Blame won a horse race and did not “conquer” anybody, any more than Haynesfield conquered Blame.
You also wrote in your “Comment of the Week”:
“Amidst a sea of classless comments, Kristen Hall’s heartfelt remarks were refreshing. Kristen Hall’s Comment #34 is the Comment of the Week.”
Many would probably agree that this should read:
“Amidst a galaxy of righteously indignant comments in response to my pedantic, condescending, subliminal, filibuster against horse lovers, fanatics, and advocates, Kristen Hall’s Comment #34, was the lone comment that did not address my wrongful portrayal of loyal and adoring horse fans.”
Let this thing die Vic, for everybody’s sake. The horse you are riding is gasping for air in the stretch, your tail is swishing, and you’ve gone to the whip one too many times.
22 Nov 2010 at 09:45 am | #
Great Vic,
Now does Kristin Hall also receive a free “Comment of the Week” parking space too? We don’t want her walking to far.
Are you this stupid, Vic? Comment of the Week?
Do you have your child’s “Student of the week” bumper sticker on the back of your car too?
22 Nov 2010 at 10:03 am | #
“Admist a sea of classless comments”
Vic-If saying I think your articles on the whole are awful, then call me classless! I could care less!
22 Nov 2010 at 10:51 am | #
Quality Road is the better horse. These girls are as overrated as the pole dancers at my club. See one, see all. You can take that to the bank.
22 Nov 2010 at 11:19 am | #
Wow! How crazy that I check the comments and my name is in several of them! Thanks, and I will take that free parking spot
I am definitely not a hardcore horseplayer. I have always loved horses, though, and would watch the Triple Crown races with my dad (on TV). I can vividly remember Spectacular Bid winning the Kentucky Derby (I think I was 7 years old at the time).
I was talking to my dad last night commiserating about Zenyatta’s loss (yes, I am still grieving!) and we talked about how my little brother and I won $155 at Canterbuy Park (in Shakopee, MN) by betting on a long-shot named Grass Powered that was ridden by Sandy Hawley. I was probably around 12 when it happened and I remember all the details! The family was broken up in to teams of two (obviously a parent placed the bet) and when we won in the last race, one of my older brothers said, “The worst part is that we’ll never hear the end of this!!”
When looking for a trail horse to buy this past year, I almost bought a horse that was a grandson of Seattle Slew even though he was clearly wrong for me.
I would not be a good hardcore horseplayer because I tend to bet with my heart.
Thanks for choosing my comment as comment of the week! In doing so, you have made my day!!
22 Nov 2010 at 11:23 am | #
Thank you for naming Kristen the comment of the week-it is amazing that weeks later people are grieving the loss of Zenyatta-much like the Loss of Jesus when he was crucified.
It is amazing how much the new saviour is so much like the old saviour.
22 Nov 2010 at 12:14 pm | #
Cot Campbell from Dogwood Stable weighs in on “Horse of the Year”:
http://www.dogwoodstable.com/podcast/mp3s/2010_breeders_cup.mp3
22 Nov 2010 at 12:29 pm | #
Whenever there have been good, and even not so good (Zippy Chippy - gotta love him), horses that have stuck around, they develop devoted followings. We all know John Henry. I’ve had a few others - Einstein (got my sons to go with me to see him), Winchester, Wandrin Boy, Global Hunter, Cetewayo. Some of those were never big name horses, but they’re favorites partly because they stick around. Lookin at Lucky could have developed more of a following, but the owners followed the rule and retired him. At least he had more races than most of the recent 3 year old retirees.
22 Nov 2010 at 02:40 pm | #
Troy,
Thanks very much for forwarding the link with Cot Campbell’s take not only on Zenyatta but the Breeders’ Cup as well. Always interested in his opinions; a gentleman and true lover of the game.
JP
23 Nov 2010 at 06:27 am | #
Racing International says this about Zenyatta..."In all the bad times since 1917 in America, whether War or Depression or the despair of today, a truly great and innocent horse has emerged to inspire and help a nation heal its pain.
Man O’War, Seabiscuit, Secretariat, and Zenyatta are those horses. Zenyatta, the only female of those great horses, has become greater and more beloved after losing the BC Classic...”.
http://blog.racingint.com/2010/11/16/zenyatta-for-horse-of-the-year-2010.aspx
23 Nov 2010 at 08:13 am | #
John- Thank you for posting that link. It describes to a T every reason I love this horse.
23 Nov 2010 at 06:52 pm | #
John the greedy breeders looking for the quick dollar in the U.S. horse racing industry have destroyed it.
Horse last for no longer than three years anymore. The Kentucky Derby,triple crown and the breeders have killed their own business.
It will be three years since a Ky. Derby winner has won another race. Take the derby winner since 1987 and there have been 13 grade 1 wins after the Belmont and Ali Sheba won 7 of them. Derby is kiss of death and all the sport’s writers just ignorant the facts. The reason the girls rules is because they aren’t ruined in the Ky Derby.
Breeders get D Wayne and Todd and after they ruined them as 2 and 3 year old their done. That’s what I think. Screw horse racing and Blane and Lucky and all those no account owners,trainers and breeders for what they did to a great game. Girls Rule.
Buddy