Plenty was wrong with the 27th Breeders’ Cup to leave the impression that Friday and Saturday weren’t the sport’s finest moments. It was forty-five degrees colder in Louisville than in Southern California, where the Breeders’ Cup should have been held. In addition, the legendary Kentucky hospitality was lost on out-of-town guests that felt cheated by two-bit taxi cab drivers charging three times the normal fare and over-hyped restaurants serving overcooked vegetables. Beginning with the first Breeders’ Cup race, after which a flyweight bout between Calvin Pacquiao and J.J. Castellano broke out, a series of other unusual happenings took place.
Heavy favorites Midday and Blind Luck, perceived as invincible, lost on Friday. Fred Brei, the cheesy owner of Awesome Feather, pitched the sale of his champion like a snake oil salesman in a post-victory interview, dulling the rare thrill of winning by reminding the world that the sport was first and foremost a business. On Saturday morning, Sir Michael Stoute, the trainer of Workforce, declared the grass course too firm when it wasn’t and scratched the Arc winner from running. John Velazquez aboard Life At Ten informed the vets that his mount didn’t seem right in the warm-ups before the Breeders’ Cup Ladies Classic, was told to pound sand, and then sat helplessly on his horse as it ambled about in last place as if out for an aimless jog. Another horse was euthanized; another vanned off in discomfort.
On Wednesday evening at the Muhammad Ali Center, the National Turf Writers Association held its annual Awards Dinner. As these nights generally go, dinner follows a cocktail hour and a silent auction raises money for charity. There are long-winded speakers. But this wasn’t the case at this soiree as the six people who came to the podium embraced brevity – at least in the sense that they spoke so effectively that you didn’t care how long they went on.
The legendary founder of Dogwood Stable Cot Campbell introduced Michael Blowen of Old Friends Equine with his usual charm. Blowen, in turn, charmed the audience with stories of how he changed his life from being an entertainment critic for the Boston Globe into a horse rescuer. Then Arlington park operative David Zenner explained why Neil Milbert meant so much to the art of turf writing and the Chicago Tribune vet spoke of how much the sport meant to him. The evening’s last honoree, Richard Migliore, had Bo Derek to present him to the lectern. If Derek is a 10, then “the Mig” was a 10-plus. Nobody could have spoken with more heart and poignancy.
All these speakers were preceded by student Patrick Raleigh of Fordham University, the latest and last scholarship recipient chosen by the NTWA for YouBet.com. Raliegh’s impact was stunning, lending impetus to the important questions of why horse racing is such a force in the lives of the people who follow it and why its allure isn’t infectious. More turf writers should have spent the few bucks to hear Raleigh speak of how his dad got him started and how sublime he finds Saratoga. They would have been showm themselves off to be NTWA members for more than the Eclipse Award ballot and they would have left the party, after hearing the speakers, better writers. Is fraternity dead?
Regardless, the theme of horse racing’s singularity was manifested differently on Saturday. As a metaphor for Zenyatta’s dying career, the setting sun enabled thousands of fans to cause flash-operated cameras to twinkle like stars in the grandstand. The racetrack presence of the unbeaten mare, pawing her ground to applause, made Churchill Downs at dusk glow like it’s never shone before. Zenyatta’s failure to catch Blame produced a schizophrenic reaction. People situated close to the finishing post knew she fell a head short of 20 for 20. Those further away allowed hope to affect their eyesight.
Men and women wept openly, unashamed that they as adults were shedding tears because a horse lost a race. Quiet flooded the setting like fog on a golf course. Time stood still, no one moved from his spot. People wondered if what happened really happened. Then the crowd filtered out the building, uttering the murmur that Zenyatta was greater in defeat than in victory. It was a declaration that made no sense whatsoever, but a belief that they wanted to hold on to.
Now comes the invariable argument about which horse – Blame or she should be Horse of the Year. The debate trivializes history. An encounter that was greater than a characterization of worth transpired in the waning hours of Saturday’s daylight under the shadow of the famous Twin Spires, just as an idea more powerful than a student acknowledging his gratitude for the gift of money to pay for his education was spoken by Patrick Raleigh on Wednesday evening.
The Breeders’ Cup remains wonderfully unscripted. There’s only one thing that you can count on. It’s that you won’t experience a similar array of emotions elsewhere.
Vic Zast has attended every Breeders’ Cup end-of-year event since the series began. You can follow him on Facebook.com and Twitter.com.


08 Nov 2010 at 06:14 am | #
I loved what Barry irwin wrote in his Comment Number 9. He said, “When Man O’ War rac against Sir Barton in a match race, they charged for programs and the takeout was 22.40 percent. next question?”
The remark put a smile on my face and made me wonder how many people need programs when only two horses raced. I understand, nonetheless, that the point was made for a different purpose. Well done.
That said, the ultimate kudos for Comment of the Week go to Davod for Comment Number 3. (You’ll get the joke of my typo if you go back to David’s comment.) But I liked his fight, his belief in certain issues and the impactful way he told me (and the readers) why I might be wrong.
08 Nov 2010 at 09:07 am | #
Sorry your vegetables were overcooked. I heard about the cab drivers, that is an issue that needs to be addressed/regulated.
Too bad you are a Churchill hater. I thought it was a pretty good show.
Considering they out handled and out attended the perfect weather BC at Santa Anita must mean something I guess.
Maybe it was just the allure of dirt vs. poly.
We’ll find out in 2013 when it returns west.
08 Nov 2010 at 09:13 am | #
May I say, Mr. Zast, that I regard this...as a magnificent piece of writing.
And, yes, the Breeders’ Cup properly belongs at Santa Anita.
08 Nov 2010 at 10:40 am | #
“Then the crowd filtered out the building, uttering the murmur that Zenyatta was greater in defeat than in victory. It was a declaration that made no sense whatsoever, but a belief that they wanted to hold on to.”
Vic, go fly a kite. Really, get lost. Zenyatta’s performance was by far the best in the race. Blame had a perfect trip in his own back yard. Zenyatta covered far more ground, and had far more traffic issues, yet only lost by a nose. (It was a nose, not a head, Vic. The win photo shows her nose in front of his ears. For it to be a head, her nose would have to be behind his ears).
You’re such a petty, small-minded hater.
08 Nov 2010 at 10:47 am | #
Every continent has their stars - Europe had Sea the Stars and still has Goldikova, Japan had Vodka, I don’t know who Australia has right now, but I’m sure they have someone - we have Zenyatta. While it is gamblers who support the business, it takes fans to keep it going. How many fans has Zenyatta brought in? Probably tens of thousands, if not more. While many of those fans won’t be big gamblers, they go to the tracks and buy all the crap - the overpriced food and souvenirs - that help support the tracks. Those fans are the ones who spread the word about the wonderfully awesome mare with style and personality. How many of those fans will stay interested in horse racing? Now, that’s the question. How can the industry be attractive enough to keep them? We need to build up and support stars instead of picking them to pieces and knocking whoever likes them. As they used to say when I was growing up ‘You catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar’.
08 Nov 2010 at 11:28 am | #
Well said, Karen. Now for you, Jim C.
In the first place, congratulations on your pun. I believe that’s what English scholars would consider the last sentence of your comment.
Secondly, please take your argument over what was the correct margin of Blame’s victory to the chart writers, not me. They are calling it a “head,” not a “nose.”
Lastly, you don’t really believe that Zenyatta’s 19 for 20 record is greater than 20 for 20, do you? I stand by my original writing – that declaring the loss greater than a victory makes no sense at all.
Jim C., there are several affordable remedial reading programs available on the Internet. They teach you to read what the words are instead of reading what you want them to be.
08 Nov 2010 at 11:45 am | #
Well written article. I’m a huge Zenyatta fan and don’t see how you’ve insulted her here.
But I must say that I think the results of the last three Breeder’s Cups are the best argument against parking it at a permanent host site. In 2008, 2009 and now 2010 “horses for course” at least hit the board in most of the races.
From a handicapping perspective it’s easier to make money by heavily betting the horse for course factor. But from a “championship” perspective it gives an unfair advantage to horses that prefer the host site’s conditions.
So I’m of the opinion that the Breeder’s Cup should be rotated between at least 4 different tracks. I for one do not want to see the championship designation continually given to horses that only do well at one particular track. Not to mention the boredom factor of keeping it at one site all the time.
And finally, I love cooler weather and doubt I’m alone in that preference. So you warm weather folks need to just buy yourselves a good coat instead of insisting that the BC be permanently moved to a hot climate.
08 Nov 2010 at 12:05 pm | #
Not to be confused with Jim C. I reflect on my two day trip to the BC. I paid the overpriced hotel bill, ate food priced for someone who doesn’t care what it cost much less how it was served, and about those cab fares man what a rip off. I enjoyed every second of the races and will be back for next year. Thanks for writing a wonderful unscripted column and helping an old race fan understand that there is so much more to learn about this great sport.
08 Nov 2010 at 01:07 pm | #
Louisville and CD provide a cheap trip for me - a short six-hour car drive from Chicago. The CD staff is accommodating; no complaints from writers in the media center. Holding the event in horse country provides the BC with greater local notoriety - thus, the high attendance and betting.
BC Ltd was ready to name Santa Anita the site for five years and then Frank Stronach booted Oak Tree out and petitioned the Cal Board for new dates. For the overall sake of the sport, the move west would have been good. But with NYRA on solid ground thanks to the Aqueduct casino, it’s likely that Belmont Park will host the event in 2012.
It appears that the BC Ltd is convinced that only three tracks constitute the alternatives. But don’t put buying a racetrack past them. This is more than a rumor.
08 Nov 2010 at 01:44 pm | #
Vic,
You wrote: “Then the crowd filtered out the building, uttering the murmur that Zenyatta was greater in defeat than in victory. It was a declaration that made no sense whatsoever, but a belief that they wanted to hold on to.”
Then you commented, after attacking me: “Lastly, you don’t really believe that Zenyatta’s 19 for 20 record is greater than 20 for 20, do you? I stand by my original writing – that declaring the loss greater than a victory makes no sense at all.”
Vic, Stop acting like you are Red Smith. If Red were around, he would be paying homage to the great mare, not taking swipes at her, and attempting to diminish her legacy. You have been taking swipe after swipe at Zenyatta and her connections over the past year, starting with the Eclipse Awards voting. Nothing she ever accomplished was good enough for you and the Saratoga mafia (e.g., Steve Byk, NYRA mouthpiece Andy Serling).
Winning the Breeders’ Cup Classic did not count in your mind because it was over a synthetic surface. You complained that she never shipped to New York. But you never criticized Personal Ensign’s connections for not taking on the males more often, or for leaving New York about as often as Woody Allen. If Zenyatta were based East, and won three Beldames in a row, and three Personal Ensign in a row, you would not be complaining about her schedule, and you would be exalting her as an Equine Goddess. But no, since she’s based on the West Coast, you impose your own illogical and petty and unfair double standards. Vic, name ONE mare, just ONE mare in this country in the past 20 years that regularly ran against males.
As for your comment that Zenyatta’s second place finish diminishes her career, diminishes her body of work, and diminishes her legacy, it is apparent that, after all these years, you are too literal-minded to comprehend and appreciate the nuances and complexity of horse racing. I expected more from you. You are the kind of character who, after watching the 1978 Jockey Club Gold Cup, would say that Exceller turned in a better performance than Seattle Slew because Exceller won the race.
Zenyatta’s performance Saturday was historic. And it was historic not because she finished second, but because of what she was able to achieve. She came from far behind, like Silky Sullivan, over a track she never raced on, and over a surface she had little experience with. She had to knife through traffic in the far turn. A tiring Quality Road eased up in front of her, impeding her momentum. Then Musket Man crossed over in front of her, causing her to lose more momentum. She had to angle out far wide, and put on the charge of her life. The winning horse was on his home track, and had a clear inside path to the finish line. He ran huge, and needed that perfect trip to hold off Zenyatta by a nose. Despite all those obstacles, Zenyatta zoomed past the winners of the Preakness & Haskell, Jockey Club Gold Cup, and Woodward & Met Mile. Blame ran huge and had his perfect trip over his home track. But Zenyatta was much the best.
Vic, if you cannot to appreciate that historic and gutsy performance—the best performance in that race—then there is no hope for you. If you actually think that performance diminished her legacy, then there is no hope for you. I see that even Andrew Beyer has come around and got hold of his senses. (His speed figures are another story). Speaking of Beyer, I noticed that in the new Secretariat film, Beyer was cast as a naysayer. There is a scene in the Barn where Big Red “hoses” Beyer’s shoes. When the Zenyatta film comes out, Vic, I think you are a likely candidate to be standing in those shoes.
The fact is, Vic, that Zenyatta put horse racing back on the map. The overwhelming majority of your web traffic, and the traffic on this site, is directly attributable to her. She made horse racing relevant again. And for you not to appreciate that is a sad commentary on you.
08 Nov 2010 at 04:41 pm | #
Dear Mr. Zast:
Loved these words you wrote:
Now comes the invariable argument about which horse – Blame or she should be Horse of the Year. The debate trivializes history. An encounter that was greater than a characterization of worth transpired in the waning hours of Saturday’s daylight under the shadow of the famous Twin Spires....
After reading that, don’t believe you were taking a swipe at anybody.
A brief comment regarding your other statement:
“Then the crowd filtered out the building, uttering the murmur that Zenyatta was greater in defeat than in victory. It was a declaration that made no sense whatsoever, but a belief that they wanted to hold on to.”
I agree with you, she is not greater in defeat than in victory, but do believe she is no less, and that makes perfect sense.
The only comparisons of racehorses I make is for the purposes of pari-mutuel wagering, and whether she lost by a nose, a neck, a head, or a length on Saturday, or had she won the race by any of those margins, she is still the same Zenyatta, the great Zenyatta, the insuperable Zenyatta, and this is something that your vote, and the votes of your peers, will never change.
Sincerely,
Top Turf Teddy
08 Nov 2010 at 05:03 pm | #
You wrote: “Lastly, you don’t really believe that Zenyatta’s 19 for 20 record is greater than 20 for 20, do you? I stand by my original writing – that declaring the loss greater than a victory makes no sense at all.”
That’s not what Jim C. was saying. He was not saying 19 for 20 is a better record than 20-0 as you claim. He is responding to your assertion that the idea that “she was greater in defeat than victory” makes no sense. That’s your original writing and you are incorrect to assert this. The Classic was her best race, and she showed more greatness in it than she ever did in victory. Anyone who has watched racing for even a short time knows that the best horse does not always win for reasons too numerous to count. This was definitely the case in the Classic. Zenyatta was much the best.
08 Nov 2010 at 06:58 pm | #
Yo, Jim C. and Laurie K. love your passion, but get a life! You’ve been exzastirpated--let it be…
08 Nov 2010 at 07:04 pm | #
Eric,
Just registering my opinion. Nothing more. Nothing less.
08 Nov 2010 at 08:13 pm | #
Vic,
For the record, didn’t you have a blog prior to the BC Classic that you stated that you would vote for Zenyatta for HOY no matter what Zenyatta did in the race?
08 Nov 2010 at 08:15 pm | #
That was John Pricci.
08 Nov 2010 at 08:44 pm | #
http://www.horseraceinsider.com/Zasts-TrackWords/2010-09-04finally-and-presently-horse-of-the-year/
08 Nov 2010 at 09:41 pm | #
http://www.horseraceinsider.com/John-Pricci/comments/on-horse-of-the-year-and-invoking-the-hirsch-rule/#comments
This was the one I had in mind.
08 Nov 2010 at 10:55 pm | #
BLAME would NOT let ZEN pass him,
you got to give credit to BLAME,
I love ZEN,
but BLAME is HOY,
ZEN is horse of my heart
08 Nov 2010 at 11:19 pm | #
But he let Haynesfield run away from him, now didn’t he?
09 Nov 2010 at 05:02 am | #
I do not believe a filly or mare should run against colts, horses, or geldings, period. At Gulfstream, I saw a filly, in heat, flip in the gate, and be euthanized. The starter, not a horseman, had no clue. Some trainers have been successful, most notably Linda Rice, doing this, but in retrospect, our most tragic moments in the sport have been when this recipe was mixed. Zenyatta, like Ruffian,come around only a couple of times in our lifetime. But to throw them to the wolves(horse racing pundits who do not know horses always want these matchups), disrespects these most magnificent animals. It is and will always remain an honor and a privilege to be around the thoroughbred, and it should be about them, and for them.
09 Nov 2010 at 07:50 am | #
The dishonesty of people amazes me. The stupidity of people befuddles me. This ridiculous “Horse of the Year” debate certainly brings out the worst in people, who will say and do anything in an attempt to support their point of view. Here are a couple which are particularly aggravating to me, taken from a Jay Privman article:
“It was a clean-run race, and both horses ran their races,” said Dell Hancock, whose family owns Claiborne. “I don’t think she ever passed Blame—not even in the gallop-out. Dell Hancock – Claiborne Farm
Mike Smith did not attempt to beat Blame in the “gallop-out,” what kind of ridiculous statement is this. I can see it now, it will go down as one of the great moments in horse racing history, Blame, the horse that won the gallop-out, one of the greatest gallop-out horses of the 21st century! You nailed it Dell!
“Blame won the race and never let Zenyatta go by him…” Jay Privman – Daily Racing Form
Blame had nothing to do with “letting” anybody do anything Jay; talk about bias in reporting. Zenyatta ran out of racetrack. Period. The way you portray it, a person reading your article would get the impression that Blame was toying with Zenyatta, and she made some kind of noble but futile attempt. Tell it like it is; SHE RAN OUT OF RACETRACK. PERIOD. Your statement disgusts me. I expect a retraction and an apology on behalf of Zenyatta.
Thank you.
Top Turf Teddy
09 Nov 2010 at 08:36 am | #
Ted,
You are correct the debate is ridiculous to the extent people make things up or make comments without factual information.
Blame won the race fair and square, no matter whether one believes he or Zenyatta deserves HOY.
Nevertheless, it always irks me when people say things which are plain wrong. One of the most common has been, as you point out above, that Zenyatta never passed Blame.
I would invite anyone who has access to racereplays.com to click up the replay. If you stop the flash version at 2:17, which is the 2nd jump past the wire, it APPEARS to show Blame’s head up, Zenyatta’s down, with her a half-head in front. (The same view can be seen at the windows media version at 3:15)
I say, appears, because although the angle looks straight it might not be. If you let the video continue after that, it shows Blame galloping out ahead.
I repeat, Blame won the race, Zenyatta did not. But those who say she never went by appear to be wrong.
09 Nov 2010 at 08:45 am | #
Thanks Nick, all I ask for is honesty from people, which I do not think is too much to ask.
TTT
09 Nov 2010 at 10:08 am | #
For the Z-lots who call me a Zenyatta hater, from two years ago - http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/27377658/
09 Nov 2010 at 10:36 am | #
I am still the greatest of all time!
It’s not easy going UNDEFEATED!
Play it again Sam!
R-E-S-P-E-C-T
Find out what it means to me
R-E-S-P-E-C-T
Take care, Z-E-N
Oh (sock it to me, sock it to me,
sock it to me, sock it to me)
A little respect (sock it to me, sock it to me,
sock it to me, sock it to me)
Whoa, babe (just a little bit)
A little respect (just a little bit)
I get tired (just a little bit)
Keep on tryin’ (just a little bit)
You’re runnin’ out of foolin’ (just a little bit)
And I ain’t lyin’ (just a little bit)
(re, re, re, re) ‘spect
When you come home (re, re, re ,re)
Or you might walk in (respect, just a little bit)
And find out I’m gone (just a little bit)
I got to have (just a little bit)
A little respect (just a little bit)
And the beat goes on!
09 Nov 2010 at 02:05 pm | #
Vic,
I was just taking exception to your comments about her performance. That’s all. To me, it is similar in many respects to Seattle Slew losing to Exceller in the 1978 Jockey Club Gold Cup. That performance does not diminish her in any way; it only enhances her greatness. I also believe that, this year, you have been negative regarding her and her connections. Like I said, if Zenyatta were based on the East, and compiled a similar record, there would be zero negativity directed at her. And you tell me which trainer would have done a better job conditioning her the past three years than John Shirreffs.
Peace.
09 Nov 2010 at 09:05 pm | #
After the race the first interview Mike Smith gave he mentions that Quality Road by backing up into Zenyatta’s path caused Zenyatta to lose the race. I let that comment go by still stuned by Zenyatta’s loss. A few hours later I was still digesting everything written about the Classic from about how Zenyatta didn’t like dirt kicked in her face to Zenyatta didn’t take to the cuppy surface or the visual fact that Zenyatta was way to far back to win the race. However, I kept remember the first words from Mike Smith saying it was Quality Road backing up in Zenyatta’s path causing him to swerve and alter her momemtum that cost Zenyatta the race.
Then today I read an interview from John Shirreffs say the exact same thing..."When Quality Road backed up in front of her and Mike had to alter course and take back, that was tough. She’s zig-zagging down the lane, looking for a path, has to check and go one more wide. That probably cost her.”
I checked the splits for Zenyatta - after falling 16 lenghts back - 23.60, 23.80, then 24.40, then 24 flat.
So I went back over the race, calculated times, distances, the times of Blame and the rest of the field and discovered that both Mike and John were absolutely correct. The astonishing fact is that going into the far turn Zenyatta had the race won.
She was moving quite faster than the field which was actually slowing down except Blame, but Blame wasn’t running any faster though. By the time Zenyatta lost .60 or six lenghts because of Quality Road she had to start accelerating a second time but she ran out of ground.
Damn.
10 Nov 2010 at 10:19 am | #
John, yes.
10 Nov 2010 at 02:32 pm | #
...and another turf scribe feels compelled to discuss injuries: “Another horse was euthanized; another vanned off in discomfort.”
According to everything reported after the fact, Atta Boy Roy cooled out fine. His being vanned off was the byproduct of an over-reaction by the jockey and vets.
So when we’re wrapping up everything that is wrong with racing, it would be best to avoid mentioning things that ultimately turned out not to be true (or to at least offer a parenthetical fact).
10 Nov 2010 at 10:41 pm | #
Vic why would someone from Chicago not rent a car in Louisville it really is not hard to find your way around! Why would the taxi drivers not jack the prices up, what was the longest trip you took 15 mins. I would suggest Jack Fry’s for a great meal and if anything is over cooked they wouldn’t charge you a penny! As for the media party being a highlight I believe you might be the only person who would rate it as a highlight. I was between the 1/8th pole and 3/16th pole and there was not one person who could not tell she was beaten judging by the silence. As for the cold weather once again someone from Chicago complaining about the cold sounds a little strange, did you forget your coat? As for Santa Anita being better why would you want to have less people at the Championship and how long do you think East coast horsemen and owners will want to go where they don’t do very well? I spent the few days with mainly Ca people and they much perfered it being in Ky.And as for Ed Blowen being a rescuer, he doesn’t rescue horses he big notes himself for having famous horses who the owner still pay him to take them, he solicits horses not rescues them. People who get horses out of the slaughter pens rescue horses. Cot Campbell is legendary for running bad horses in Stake races so he can have free lunches at the expense of over matched horses . He jacks the price up that he pays for them, after he makes deals with the sellers before he buys them. And as for BC buying a racetrack. Come on they lost $1,000,000 each of the last two years.
11 Nov 2010 at 11:20 am | #
Murray K,
I take it you’re not a Vic Zast fan??
You have company! Neither am I