The plight of the handicapping challenged is the least of the issues confronting the experts as they search for truth about which benefits come from abandoning dirt. Two years of study by the Jockey Club supports the conclusion of earlier studies – that racing on synthetic tracks or turf has resulted in fewer equine deaths occurring from accidents. This information should prompt racetrack inventors to work harder at making their products consistent, predictable and dependable. Equine fatalities have inched upward repeatedly in the last 15 years. The statistics provide fodder for critics.
Like other circumstances pertaining to quality of life in the USA, the horse racing product has slipped below its once enviable standard of being the best in the world. Although the sport in countries such as England, Ireland, France and Australia has its problems, horse racing retains a sufficient importance to be included in mainstream discussions there. Synthetic racecourses have gained traction of sorts in some of these places because they have more in common with grass and because they are viewed to be practical. Abandoning work on perfecting the medium is no way to keep up with the Joneses.
Bobby Jones using hickory sticks couldn’t bring golf to its knees and neither can Tigers Woods using titanium. Some challenges can’t ever be conquered, which is why we’re addicted to them. Once a horse track that’s entirely predictable is made, there’ll be something else to confound horseplayers. How one goes about picking winners isn’t tougher these days; only different.
Vic Zast has five more wishes for Christmas. They're his own thoughts for making horse racing better. Learn more about he thinks on Facebook.com/viczast and Twitter.com/viczast.