One such person is a former consultant for the European Pari Mutuel Association, Carlo Zuccoli - a flamboyant Italian (is that redundant?) who pens the Internet site nelrossodelluovo.com about horse racing in the UK, a country where Betfair is killing the bookmakers’ trade and lowering the cash contributions from punting that go to support purses.
“Ciao, horse racing in America,” said Zuccoli, sarcastically. He considers exchange wagering a curse - an invention that provides “peanuts” financially to the racetracks, drains money from the tote, encourages race-fixing and won’t maintain liquidity if the commissions negotiated are anywhere near what US tracks should demand.
North American racetracks made a crucial mistake decades ago when they began selling their product to off-track horse racing retailers at rates that are too lean to compensate for revenues lost by the exodus of gamblers from their premises. “We have to have a partnership where they have a vested interest in our success and we have a vested interest in their success,” observed Stephen Burn, the smooth-talking president of TVG - the new owner of Betfair, in a telephone interview. “But, equally, we can’t keep putting the price of the product up in a way that marginalizes fans,” he added.
Regardless, attendance has always been the responsibility of racetracks, so Betfair shouldn’t be charged with the job of creating fans. Perhaps someday the sport will experience a true divide – a small number of fans, who come out to the track for the animals, the food and the ambiance, will stand apart from the gamblers, who hole up in their homes with computers – but it’ll be a shame if it does. Or is that what the sport has come to already?
Of the two fan groups in horse racing’s future, it’s the gamblers who most crave exchange wagering. They will pay commissions for winning that are tiny in comparison to current takeout rates in the pari-mutuel system. An exchange enables a player to back or lay horses at fixed odds, avoid breakage disparities and hedge bets while races are being contested. Betfair will create a rebate program to attract “whales” in order to protect its liquidity during the start-up stages. The company is convinced it will draw younger players into the game because of the concept’s dynamism.
Demographically, Betfair’s customer base is a generation younger than the racetracks’. The sport has been attempting to attract the emerging computer-savvy, tech-oriented audience through social network marketing for a half dozen years; it seems to be making little headway with this initiative. But Jeff Platt, president of HANA, the 1800-member strong community of horseplayers, believes Betfair’s technology – dedicated to serving the gambler with lower takeout - may produce better counts.
“Look at the music industry,” offered Platt on the telephone, using a most unfortunate analogy. “Along comes a group like iTunes and they totally revolutionize the music industry. Now you have millions of people downloading just the songs they want for 99 cents a song and you see growth in the music industry,” he argued, making the common mistake of automatically connecting low prices with a sounder business.
For the record, music sales have plunged to $6.3 billion from $14.6 billion in the last decade, according to the Recording Industry Association of America. Creating availability of product and lowering prices have not helped record sales, but have harmed them. Musicians and singers are reacting by developing Internet stores for products that bear their names, pumping up the volume on concert touring (including the concert ticket prices) and stretching their resources out into other realms of entertainment like never before. What Platt could have said, with more thought for the good of the game in mind, is that the industry will have to learn how to live with exchange wagering and prosper with it. That, not the price of a download, is the big issue in this.
“It’s unclear if the betting exchanges have helped or hurt racing in the UK,” said Alastair Donald, managing director of the International Racing Bureau, from a perspective that’s completely opposite, at least, geographically, from Platt’s. Horse owners and trainers will have something to say before they give it their imprimaturs. “Betfair has had a lot of bad press, but most of that press is the bookmakers who were keen to see it fail,” Donald noted. Burn explained it slightly less diplomatically. He said, “What (our competitors) don’t like about it is that they didn’t invent it.”
Betfair is science, as inevitable as GroupOn or stem cell replacement. If the world is able to produce something new, it produces it. When people want something, you make a mistake by not letting them have it Betfair claims three million customers. If all goes as planned, those in New Jersey will be able to bet Monmouth on Betfair this summer.
“This is a chance for racing to get on the front foot instead of the back foot,” Burn believes, not perplexed by the criticisms faced. Zuccoli, stressed to the max by what’s already gone on, said, “The exchanges are the most incredible invention in the last 50 years, technology-wise – no question about that. But they are the instrument of the devil.”
You're invited to follow Vic Zast on Facebook and Twitter.



07 Feb 2011 at 10:00 am | #
Incredible. Seems you object to both federalism and capitalism. If Christie can poach business from Illinois maybe it’s because corruption, runaway spending, and ill-advised tax increases have brought that state to the verge of collapse. And if Betfair represents a similar threat to racing as we know it maybe it has more to do with how racing has been managed and has treated its customers lo these many years.
07 Feb 2011 at 02:58 pm | #
Sounds like you prefer the status quo. Had to look twice. Thought I was reading one of Ray Paulick’s “damn the fan” pieces.
If one was being honest, even the nut charged by loan sharks is “tiny” in comparison to the ransom forced on players by this putrid industry today. Their greed and dishonesty created this mess, not the wagering fan.
Personally, I hope you and racing get exactly what you want (deserve). Ban everything positive for the fan and keep raising the rates. This industry cannot die fast enough.
What do I know. I liked the Steelers. Maybe this mess is actually success in disguise. Anyone still risking money at today’s guaranteed loss rates has to be addicted, too rich to know better or one of the few who actually controls the action from the inside of this antiquated theft system.
You are probably right, don’t do anything new for the bettor, let nature decide based on today’s conditions as they exist, as they have existed for decades. Nothing new but higher rates. Simple, easy and it works. Right, Vic?
07 Feb 2011 at 08:21 pm | #
VZ,
What irritates me the most when you go after horseplayers is that you don’t even bother to do it with your usual style. Mr. Platt, however, in the face of recent internet bashing by professional writers such as you and Mr. Paulick (both with a history of disparaging those concentrating on the gambling aspect of the sport) is displaying remarkable composure, grace, intelligence, and accuracy in responding to distorted charges. So far, each knock has proven to be an opportunity for him to demonstrate the value of his leadership role in the betting boycott of California thoroughbred racing.
Unlike you and Fred Pope, I can make no claim to marketing expertise. But common sense supports the argument that “progress” in technology, the growing disdain for intellectual property rights in most of the world, the global outsourcing of labor to the lowest cost supplier, and the lowering of disposable income among the most likely consumers of said products, all played a part in lowering gross sales in the music industry. Perhaps you could investigate net profit and get back to us. What’s the cost of re-mastering Golden Oldies purchased by people like me who wouldn’t pay a dime for the mind-numbing noise today’s teenagers can’t seem to get enough of?
While few of us in your audience have to sing for our supper, it’s painful to listen to you whine for yours.
08 Feb 2011 at 07:10 am | #
Racing is in chaos; too many hands grabbing for pieces of the pie as it is. I’m not adverse to new viable forms of gambling for our game, but don’t you think it would be prudent for “Racing” to get its house in order before further complicating matters with this new method, which, if implemented, should be done by the tracks, without another dreaded greedy middle man entering the picture.
TTT