Dutrow's latest flaunting of the rules came into focus sharply a couple Saturdays ago. The former trainer of such stars of the turf as Big Brown and Saint Liam saddled the winner of Gulfstream Park's Hutcheson Stakes. His productive work with Peachtree Stable's Flashpoint put the handy son of Pomeroy in some peoples' mind as a Kentucky Derby candidate. Nevertheless, if the horse ever got that far, Dutrow might be watching him race on TV from the hoosegow instead of Churchill Downs’ third floor clubhouse.
Many people might sympathize with this continuously-troubled man had this been the first time he's stumbled. But Dutrow has been charged with violating the rules 64 times in nine different states, including several dozen times on charges that should put a man down forever. If someone employed in another industry had as many run-ins with the law as he, they'd be rendered unemployable. In fact, Dutrow’s horse training business has felt no adverse effect from his troubles.
Other than a small loss of some respect, owners who hire trainers with a suspension-riddled past lose little by employing the otherwise unemployable. They pay no penalty when these employees veer off course and gain much when their wayward path leads to success on the racetrack. When the trainers get caught doing something they shouldn’t have done, it is business as usual for their horses. Life goes on uninterrupted as an alter ego fills in while his exiled boss vacations. Customers representing the horse's future, namely breeders, and profiteers representing the horse's past, namely bettors, watch idly. By the sin of omission, they’re complicit in the crimes being committed.
"Why not cheat?" asked Peter Meder, an executive search consultant for some of the country’s biggest companies. He can’t understand why all the participants in an out-of-sorts racing experience aren’t penalized. “What a perfect game!” he exclaimed, adding disbelief that every owner didn’t avail himself of a guy who was willing to be hoisted by his own petard without exploding his co-conspirators into disrepute. Meder said that employers in industry are routinely held liable for the misdeeds of their employees.
“Every one of my clients does drug testing and criminal background checks,” Meder said, admitting that the tests are conducted because the liability is too great if a company hires a known offender. A chief financial officer of a company will lose his job if a person he brought on board is responsible for a violation that relates to fiduciary malfeasance. Even if a man made millions of dollars for a company, he would be fired for cheating on his expense account. Horse racing, being a gambling game, becomes fraudulent when people invest their money on predicting the outcome in races in which some participants are playing at an undisclosed advantage.
If the consequences of recidivism weren’t so prevalent in horse racing, the sport would be held up as a standard for finding work for ex-offenders. Cities and states all across America are trying to establish programs that encourage employers to hire people returning to society from prison. In the corporate world, employers see the potential for negligent hiring liability and public relations nightmares and ex-offenders have trouble finding jobs. In horse racing, the owners go Scot-free when their ex-offending trainers behave badly. The job market remains open to everyone, even egregious violators.
Uniform rules that impact owners and trainers alike across all jurisdictions would reduce violations and are a possibility within the context of a centralized authority or comprehensive compact. It would be unlikely for horse racing as currently organized to punish the producers of some of its biggest stars. The public thrives on the success of individuals, caring little about how it's attained. Major League Baseball's attendance soared when players were breaking records because they were abetted by steroids. Only golf seems to honor a code which insists that victory be achieved without taking shortcuts.
Some people believe that there's an imaginary line that creates a distinction between cheating and using the rules to one’s advantage. It’s in this context that good people get caught, causing further decline in the trust given the sport by outsiders. In truth, there is only one line. It is hard and plain – this is right, that is wrong, why not stick to the straight and narrow. If you do, you won’t worry what people think and where your next paycheck comes from.
“Somebody in the current system loves the way things are,” Meder hypothesized. He believes that the majority of horse owners could easily change what is going on if they wanted. “The owners will ultimately pay the price for not doing anything, because they won’t have a sport,” Meder concluded. “If you go to the track and you think that the deal is rigged, you’re not going to invest in the market.”
Vic Zast is on Facebook and Twitter. He invites you to learn about his plans for the summer at ourlongestdrive.com.


14 Mar 2011 at 05:35 am | #
As posted to the Too Smart To Fail Website at: http://www.toosmarttofail.com/forums/showthread.php?324-Vic-Zast-blog-Why-Not-Cheat
You bring up one of the real problems of the sport, that being owners who allow the Dutrows of the world to operate as they do. If they suddenly faces super-long suspensions with the owners also potentially facing suspensions or not being allowed to transfer their horses to another trainer for allowing their trainers to cheat, then I suspect we’d quickly see a lot of problems cleaned up in the sport. The other move that needs to be done would be to ban lasix, which I would look at phasing out in the following manner over a five-year period:
2012: No lasix allowed for ALL two year old races along with the Triple Crown and Breeders’ Cup events AND selected Grade 1 events that would include all such races for three year olds preceding the Kentucky Derby along with the Kentucky Oaks, Arlington Million, Jockey Club Gold Cup, Travers, Santa Anita Handicap, Pacific Classic, Joe Hirsch Turf Classic and Beldame among others.
2013: The ban on lasix expands to ALL races restricted to two and three year olds, as well as ALL Grade 1 and Grade 2 stakes events. Three year olds would only be permitted to use lasix when facing older horses in races where lasix would still be allowed.
2014: The ban on lasix expands to include ALL Graded Stakes and non-Graded stakes carrying a purse of at least $100,000. In addition, non-graded stakes where lasix is allowed would be barred from consideration for Graded status at this point.
2015: The ban on lasix expands to include all non-claiming races, including Allowance Optional Claiming and starter events.
2016: Total ban on lasix.
This to me would allow for a phase-out on lasix as well as immediately strengthen the breed and get rid of a good number of the cheaters.
14 Mar 2011 at 04:13 pm | #
Zero drugs allowed for ALL starters. Long prison terms & lifetime bans in ALL states when caught and convicted. Those who continue to do business with you also become banned from that association after conviction and banning.
So many fixes and not one will ever be used. NOT ONE!!!
Above article and one below simply more small indicators of why racing is doomed.
Give this article a good read over at bloodhorse.com.
It is the exact result I expected from this dying crooked self-serving industry.
End result, close down all avenues to the truth for wagering fans. Teach employees to lie if they say anything. Cover it up or shut it up. Truth/honesty is NOT racing’s motto…
This thieving rotten industry can’t go broke fast enough.
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/61857/khrc-wants-jockey-interviews-to-be-discussed
KHRC Wants Jockey Interviews to be Discussed
By Ron Mitchell
Updated: Saturday, March 12, 2011 10:31 AM
Posted: Friday, March 11, 2011 1:55 PM
Read more: http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/61857/khrc-wants-jockey-interviews-to-be-discussed#ixzz1GPQwsDz3 The Kentucky Horse Racing Commission is calling on other racing industry groups to take a look at the practice of conducting jockey interviews during the moments leading up to a race.
...
...
...
...
...
If there is a recommendation “made that jockeys should not be permitted to speak to the media after they leave the jockey’s room,” changes would need to be made to the Kentucky Administrative Regulations that govern racing in the state,” the report said.
Along with reviewing the post parade jockey interviews, the KHRC recommends the groups look into “formulation of a jockey responsibility rule” and “consider a recommendation that the Jockeys’ Guild provide media training to its members.”
...
14 Mar 2011 at 05:12 pm | #
Walt Gekko has it correct. Cheating would stop tomorrow if owners and their horses were suspended for the same time period as the trainer. To owners who say they don’t know the cheating is going on, I say this. You should know and are enabling the cheats by winking at the obvious.
Penalties should also be ramped up, and trainers suspended for more than a short time period (less than 30 days) should not be allowed to transfer their stock to assistants or family members.
Having said that, Vic’s anonymous racetrack general manager is incorrect when he says, “No trainer can win at a 30 percent clip by playing within the rules. Too much can go wrong with horses to have such a record.”
One of the reasons today’s trainers can win at a high (25% plus) rate is because they spot horses only when they are ready to run and in classes where they can win. If Charlie Whittingham or Woody Stephens started a top class horse 5 times a year they would have won 40 percent of the time. No longer do many trainers ‘waste’ races to get their horses in shape. They train them into shape and then run them.
14 Mar 2011 at 05:33 pm | #
Stable security is a big issue, an issue that nobody seems to ever talk about. I’m not taking sides with guys who are cheating, but the track needs much tighter security measures, so that it is not feasible for a trainer to throw his hands up in the air, and claim he has no idea how his horse came up positive. Security as it stands at most tracks is laughable. Perhaps central locations for administering any type of medication, recorded by camera, with logs at that location. Banning syringes or other drug implements, except for at these locations, with random spot inspections. I know that these types of things are not practical, but without them, can’t see anything ever changing. Getting rid of Lasix would be an incredible accomplishment; you have to ask yourself what we have become in this nation, and why this substance is not allowed by so many other countries? Don’t we care about our animals anymore, or are they simply money-making machines?
TTT
14 Mar 2011 at 06:15 pm | #
No unhealthy horses in the gate. Zero drugs in the gate. If the horse needs a drug or is sick or showing signs of sickness IT DOES NOT RACE!!!
Lifetime bans for those who violate this in ALL states and for any who employ these banned people after their bans are effective.
Yeah. Like honesty and transparency are going to suddenly become policy in the racing industry.
14 Mar 2011 at 06:19 pm | #
http://www.drf.com/news/jockey-club-seeks-report-state-racing-industry
03/14/2011 2:21PM
Jockey Club seeks report on state of racing industry
By Matt Hegarty
The Jockey Club has commissioned a consulting firm to produce a report examining the state and direction of the U.S. racing industry, with the results to be presented at the organization’s Round Table Conference on Matters Pertaining to Racing in August in Saratoga Springs, according to a letter sent to racing officials seeking their cooperation.
The consulting firm, McKinsey & Company, has been asked to “examine the current course of the sport and where it would be over the next 10 years without change,” while providing recommendations to improve the short-term and long-term prospects of the industry. According to the letter, the study will include examinations of takeout rates, international markets, marketing efforts, and the industry’s efforts to address safety issues.
“The Jockey Club’s board of stewards firmly believes this study will illuminate the best opportunities for bringing sustainable, positive change to our sport and create a credible frame of reference for building consensus among breeders, owners, racetracks and other constituencies to move this sport forward,” the letter states.
The racing industry has been in a protracted state of decline for three years, following a long period of stagnation. In the past three years, handle on U.S. races has declined nearly 25 percent, to a level not seen since 1995. In addition, the foal crop has begun rapidly falling for the first time in 20 years, in concert with a crash of the bloodstock market brought on by the effects of the recent recession.
Most racing officials expect the foal crop declines to lead to pressure on tracks to reduce race dates by a significant amount over the next three years. Although race dates declined in 2010 by 7.75 percent, the financial struggles of many horsemen and the number of racetracks whose racing licenses are tied to slot-machine licenses, which require a minimum number of race dates, have provided resistance to significant efforts to slash days from the schedule.
Bob Curran, a spokesperson for the Jockey Club, said on Monday that the letter went to a cross-section of individuals in the racing industry, including racetrack executives, owners, breeders, trainers, horseplayers, regulators, media representatives, and racing consultants and advisers. The letters went to approximately 200 people.
The Round Table conference is scheduled this year for Aug. 14. The conference typically features presentations on the most significant issues facing racing.
========================================
http://www.paulickreport.com/news/the-biz/racing-study-commissioned-by-jockey-club/#PageComment_60548
Racing study commissioned by Jockey Club
by Paulick Report Staff | 03.14.2011 | 2:00pm
In an attempt to search for solutions to the problems facing the American racing industry, The Jockey Club has commissioned consulting firm McKinsey & Company to produce an in-depth analysis. This will be the first of its kind from The Jockey Club since 1975.
Read more at Daily Racing Form:
http://www.drf.com/news/jockey-club-seeks-report-state-racing-industry
Post a Comment (6)
#1 about 4 hours ago by G. Rarick
Excellent! Since no one at McKinsey will have any clue whatsoever about racing going into this, the results should be interesting, amusing and terribly, terribly expensive.
#2 about 3 hours ago by ron taylor
Another meeting of the mindless,and clueless.Glad to see another group forming to say they were part of the group that met for the free lunch on presentation day.......If they really want to know what’s wrong maybe they should come out of the ivory tower and start looking around.
#3 about 3 hours ago by ratherrapid
what are the “problems facing american racing”?
#4 about 2 hours ago by C Bea
Someone who knows nothing about racing providing a report to a group who’ll glean a whole new way to fleece the industry as a takeaway!! Nice!
#5 about 2 hours ago by Garrett Shaboo Ritter
Racing Industry need a Marketing plan like other Major sport Industry
#6 about 0 secs ago by SimplyNotSureRU
More blind leading the blind… This SAME crap happens regularly. AND NOTHING ever gets done.
What they will do:
Jockey bobble head dolls, $1 beer and dog days, free parking on dark days, big giveaways where the large prize winner is “pre-arranged”, takeout rate hikes, increase breakage to one dollar since they do not have time to count change with dollar bills… etc., etc… Hire people like Dutrow with huge salaries to run all security aspects of daily racing… STOP showing fans the odds since those huge drops at the 4f and 6f poles are such a problem. Only show the last 3 seconds of any race… Hire more blind and deaf persons for all steward positions. Increase all upper managemnet salaries and bonuses. Schedule more successful meetings like this one in the future. Silence all employees and fine them if they tell the truth…
What they will NOT do:
Solutions:
10% take across the damn board. All wagers.
NO BREAKAGE. It is theft of consumers change. Stop stealing it.
NO STARTER with any kind of drug in its system. Zero drugs in the gate.
Give wagering fans exchange wagering & updated wagering system similar to Wall Street… 5 to 1’s dropping to odds on at the 4f/6f pole is ridiculous.
LIKE I SAID. Decades of same suggestions over and over being ignored. Die, racing industry, die.
14 Mar 2011 at 08:54 pm | #
The real question is:
Why should I follow the rules,
the leaders Trainers/Owners of our Industry don’t follow the rules and they are NOT significantly punished to stop the cheating,
so why should I as a small honest trainer follow the rules,
If I don’t give my claiming horses drugs,
they will be claimed, given drugs,
moved up the training ladder so they can win more,
if I want my horse back,
it will cost more then it’s worth/Claimed for,
and if i GET IT BACK AND DON’T GIVE THE HORSE DRUGS, it won’t perform like it did when I claimed it back, and never will till it’s reclaimed by by a drugger trainer, that will move it up in claiming price.
The Honest trainers are just losers !!!!
15 Mar 2011 at 06:54 am | #
Sorry, easygoer132.2, that is not how the real world works.
This industry could raise the take to 50% and half of these people would still play and try and convince the world that the industry would make favourable changes in the future.
One born every minute. Trouble is, they are no longer growing up without viable opportunities that give them a much bigger break than this dieing industry EVER will.
New York just passed a new law that gives the tracks the right to give out free passes to regular folks. WHOOOOOWEEEEE. More bobble-head dolls… Heralded it like Jesus was coming. Huge fanfare. These idiots have no respect for those that make up their market. NONE!!! Why should they???
Anyone still playing is a fool and they know it. They simply want to entice new fools into the game. It is not every day you can get entire states for a few beads and a mirror or two. Racing industry is counting on the fact that not all of those “indians” are dead.
They hope there is still plenty of ignorance and stupidity to take advantage of yet. Anyone want a $1 beer and a 50 cent hotdog for a $500 bankeroll???
The math does not lie. If racing has it’s way, all of it’s employees will in the future. Lie that is. That is the recommendation of the KHRC…
Every time I watch an odds-on choice get beat in a 4 or 5 horse field of lifetime maidens who cannot run 6f in 80 seconds my point is proven. In other words, several times a day EVERY day. This is not lost on the racing industry either.
If players could just take one weekend and stop, all players, then a real message would be sent. Shrinkage of 5% to 10% per year is not going to end the bobble-head doll mentality. They have been having these meetings 2 or 3 times a year for decades and have not done one lasting constructive thing for the wagering public.
Never have, never will.
RIP…