It is impossible, of course, to duplicate the Derby experience. Although promoted as “the most exciting two minutes in sport,” each Run for the Roses is its own complicated story, having a beginning and end like no other.
Here, then, are the highlights and lowlights of the most recent spectacle. They have nothing to do with the winner.
The Take of the Race. A recap would not be complete without saluting the Derby’s record numbers. From a purely statistical viewpoint, the 137th edition was the biggest in just about every category. The crowd numbered 164,858, surpassing the record set in 1974 for the centennial running. At more than $165 million for the day, the all-sources wagering total was the third highest ever. Oaks day was a numeric success, too, drawing 110,211 patrons – the third largest in Oaks history. For those who believe a “name brand” horse is required to bring out a crowd, the numbers don’t bear this out.
In a Class of its Own. The Derby and Oaks day races were superb. On Friday, last year’s Kentucky Oaks winner Blind Luck made a triumphant return to the scene of her greatest victory by rallying from worst to first to edge Unrivaled Belle in the Gr. 2 La Troienne. In addition, jockey Martin Garcia pushed First Dude’s proboscis in front of Regal Ransom’s to win the Gr. 3 Alysheba - a race that nobody thought he did. Rosie Napravnik almost wore lilies for guiding St. John’s River to Kentucky Oaks glory, but Plum Pretty hung on.
Saturday’s offerings were equally thrilling – world class festival strong. Broken nose and all, Robby Albarado rode Sassy Image to victory over the game Hilda’s Passion in the Grade 1 Humana Distaff. Dogwood’s Aikenite proved his win on the Keeneland polytrack was not caused by track bias as he triumphed by a nose over Apriority in another stakes. Even the races that nobody watches – those that are run when the crowd's still at brunch – attracted high-quality runners that racetracks elsewhere would have in their features.
Painting the Track Pink. The breast cancer research group, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, owned Kentucky Oaks day. Its members dressed Churchill Downs with its trademark pink from top to bottom, including bunting on the buildings and the balls on the top of the finishing posts. A survivors’ walk on the track by hundreds of women who beat the deadly disease was inspiring. After only two years, one can’t imagine what Kentucky Oaks Friday would be without pink.
Front-runner for an Emmy. There’s no better horse racing analyst on television than Gary Stevens. He was superb with his explanations of why horses ran as they did in the Derby, noting such details as Dialed In blinking his eyes from the kickback to Pants of Fire being slow to change leads. Except for an excess of Saccharine violin music and the confusion caused by the intrusion of the on-track announcer’s call while Larry Collmus called the race for TV, NBC’s Derby coverage was furlongs better than other networks. How good Randy Moss, Laffit Pincay III and their cohorts on Versus were. If the sport’s resigned to only four or five days of network TV, make them all NBC days.
LOWLIGHTS
The “Defection” Derby. The late term defections by horses that excelled as two-year-olds continue to haunt the Derby. Last November, at Breeders’ Cup time, the current crop of three-year-olds was being hailed as the best in a decade. Expectations of watching a Derby with To Honor and Serve, Boys At Tosconova, Jaycito and Rogue Romance included were high. Hopes were raised even higher by the Kentucky Derby trail exploits of horses like Premier Pegasus and Toby’s Corner – two others that fell by the wayside.
There have always been disappointments such as these. Yet, in recent years, the trend seems to be gathering steam (Eskendereya, Quality Road, I Want Revenge, etc.). In addition, Uncle Mo’s drop-out was handled poorly by his owner and trainer, who entered last year’s Eclipse Award-winning two-year-old champion on Wednesday thus shutting another horse out, continued to double-speak and bloviate on Thursday, until finally announcing on Friday morning what everyone in the media center knew was going to happen all along.
Soap Box Orators. Turf writers were kind, by and large, to the candid Barry Irwin by not reporting that the CEO of Team Valor International squandered a chance to be gracious. In the post-Derby interview room, Irwin lambasted the press for concentrating on history instead of the present. He took after the racetracks for mistreating owners in partnerships and complained that all trainers that worked for him before Motion were liars, a blanket indictment that caught Bob Neumeier by surprise on the network telecast. In fielding questions after the Oaks, John Fort of Peachtree was pontific and windy. There’s no coaching owners on what to say in their post-race interviews, but these two, in particular, have had better days in front of a microphone.
Keystone Cops at Your Service. An extravaganza that attracts a crowd like the Derby’s can expect to have traffic problems. But the amount of time that it took people to exit the track at the end of Oaks and Derby day was appalling. For example, some members of the media, who began covering the day’s events as early as 5:30 am, waited as long as an hour and fifteen minutes for a van to ferry them back from the track to the parking lot – a trek out of walking distance for cameramen with heavy equipment. The excuse given for the delay was that National Guardsmen wouldn’t allow the vans to come back to the track once they departed the track with their first load of passengers. Isn’t this a problem that someone can solve?
Vic Zast invites friends to his Facebook page and followers to Twitter.com.


09 May 2011 at 08:03 am | #
And just think of what happens next year if as I now think will happen (and especially if the rumors in some circles of the opening Saturday night card on April 30 being a “dress rehearsal” for next year’s Derby turning out to be correct) the Derby is at night for the first time, and if it is very possibly with 200,000+ at Churchill Downs, many going just so they can say they attended the first-even Kentucky Derby held at night?
In fairness, however, with everything that happened in the last week, it could very well be some National Guardsmen were under orders not to allow any vehicles back in once they leave, not realizing there were vans that had to make multiple trips for cameramen and the like. This Derby of course came on the heels of what happened with Osama Bin Laden a week ago Sunday, and obviously some people would be greatly concerned as the Derby (and Friday’s Oaks) was the first truly big-time sporting event that took place since the events of May 1, 2011.
As for the actual racing, Animal Kingdom should really have been ranked higher by me than he was. For the purposes of the method I use, he actually was unbeaten, and actually had a win going 1 1/8 Miles as a two year old, a foundation very few two year olds get (and one reason if I had a serious Derby contender, I’d be looking at passing on the Breeders’ Cup Juvenile to await the Remsen at Aqueduct on Thanksgiving weekend, as that is the only Graded race in the sport for two year olds at 1 1/8 Miles).
The Uncle Mo situation I think is going to force Churchill Downs to add an also-eligible list on the Derby. Although the connections of Sway Away understood what happened, if it had been another horses, given the litigious society we now live in, I could see where another owner in that situation might have immediately gone to court to get an injunction that would have forced Churchill Downs to allow such horse to run in the Derby for purse money only as a non-betting starter and/or sued Churchill and/or the connections of the scratched horse for keeping them out. Whatever problems Churchill might have to deal with by having an also-eligible list would be more than offset by not having to deal with the potential blowback of what happened here with Uncle Mo.
Otherwise, the weekend provided us with some great racing that hopefully will lead to a great rest of the season.
09 May 2011 at 08:03 am | #
Many in the crowd would like to see the Kentucky Derby field reduced, but not for selfish reasons. Mr. Pletcher and Mr. Repole had at least a few reasons to wait to withdraw until after the draw: (1) they had another horse entered, and they effectively reduced the competition by 1 (even though their entry had no chance to begin with); (2) the media frenzy they created with respect to the health of Uncle Mo, and eventual scratch, served to resurect Todd Pletcher’s image after the Life at Ten fiasco, showing how considerate he is for the well-being of the animal, while further corroborating Mo’s excuse for his loss in the Wood Memorial. Bizarre is the only word that comes to mind when I see Todd Pletcher allowing himself to become a lap dog for someone I could only describe as a “Beverly Hillbilly.” They say money can’t but love, but in addition, it most certainly cannot buy “class.”
Speaking of class, disagree with Mr. Irwin being placed in the “lowlight” category. Query, do trainers who deceive and mislead owners and the public deserve being treated in a gracious manner? The question was asked, he was put on the spot, and he told it like it is, and was kind enough not to mention names. The truth is much more palatable to this degenerate, and I have great respect for Mr. Irwin and Mr. Motion, and although I was not astute enough to be able to prognosticate Animal Kingdom even in the money, was happy to see Mr. Irwin and Mr. Motion in the winner’s circle. Class will tell.
TTT
09 May 2011 at 09:00 am | #
My 25-year-old son watched the Derby for the first time in his life. He loved the race but Irwin’s comments afterward left a bad taste in his mouth.
First, he said Irwin came across like all trainers except Motion are liars.
More importantly, he was appalled by Irwin’s apparent hypocrisy on the meds issue in the post race press conference. Irwin essentially touted German mares as superior because they’re not allowed to breed if they ever raced on any drug. But even my very inexperienced son could glean from the pp’s that Animal Kingdom runs on Lasix.
So perhaps Barry should make sure his own house is completely clean before he continues to soapbox from the national stage he’s finally found.
09 May 2011 at 09:47 am | #
Great column! Captured every nuance on track,and on TV. Just terrific.
I am in the camp supporting Barry Irwin. And, although they are late to the game, the Laels and George Strawbridge who have come out against all this medication overload.
The med stuff just has to stop. The needle trainers who dominate American racing have to be put back on a level playing field—the same one the rest of the world uses.
Even hard core horseplayers would be shocked by the size of the veterinary bills that most of our leading trainers generate, month after month. And surprised to learn of the $300-400 “pre-race veterinary work” that almost all your favorite trainers use before almost every race. Kind of a last minute juice goose.
And these are not just the notorious characters, but virtually all the trainers under 50 who win a lot of races.
There isn’t a crack infested neighborhood in our country as doped up as our horseracing. It is simply ridiculous.
And obviously the overmedication is a major factor in the stunning reduction of average starts per horse over the past 20 years.
And how about the fact that our leading trainer loses not one, not two, but three post time favorites for the Derby just the week before over a three year period?
Maybe an overtaxed immune system or two?
Barry Irwin is hardly without sin, but I am glad he threw the stone he did at the trainers. One more voice added to what I hope becomes an unstoppable movement to reform the sport for the better. And the bettor.
Again, great column, Vic!!
09 May 2011 at 11:26 am | #
BJ,
would you clear up the 3-400 pre-race vet bill issue for me? Is that between races or actual pre-race( 5 days or less from race). 3-400 vet bills per month are possible with zero juicing if you include Chiro, message and other good for for the health of the horse therapies that only make the horse as healthy and happy as he can be. However 3-400 just for the few days before it runs is completely different. Could you please be more specific. I’ve seen these numbers floated around for a while. Pre-race and per month are apples and oranges and people need to know the difference.
09 May 2011 at 01:21 pm | #
Dear Ribot,
Here on the NYRA circuit top name trainer vet bills
range from $1000 to as much as $2000 per month on a regular basis.
Yes, gulp. This is modern training outside a mere handful of top barns. You could pretty much fit all they guys (and gals) who win lots of big races and do NOT train this way into a mini-van.
This is modern training at the top. Jab, jab, needle and jab.
The pre-race vet work—usually a day or two before—is part of that monthly cost, BUT is most often billed out to a different vet as a couple of guys on this circuit are “specialists.” And some vets quietly refuse to do it.
Industry apologists from Steve Byk to Steve Crist and a whole host of other guys who are industry dependant (or dazed) pooh-pooh the simple factual reality: our US horses pretty much do not run without lots of drugs in them.
And at the top, more drugs because the owners can pay the freight.
The evidence is every day in front of our eyes: Highest catastrophic mortality rate in the world, etc., etc. As well as horses who—again at the top—have racing lives which often do not even make it through their three year old year.
As I said before, it’s just ridiculous. Stupid.
Absurdly self-destructive.
There is no sound or good reason for to allow it --except that many of our top guys—leaving aside the out and out druggers like Mullins, for example—do not know how to train any other way.
So: We have fabulous big days like the Oaks and Derby as Vic Zast has so skillfully described, while everything else goes down, down, down.
Our medication methodology has more than a little to do with the descent.
(Written to you about 1/4 mile from the Saratoga backstretch.
bostonjoey
09 May 2011 at 02:02 pm | #
I have spoken to several owners and people on the backside relating to Barry Irwin’s statement and the are glad he made the comment. Obviously, not “all trainers” are liars and airing our dirty laundry on a national venue can further alienate an already skeptical public. But the inability of the sport to properly enforce even existing rules and regulations is an embarrassment. The frustration of owners is real and growing each year. Our industry must understand that the status-quo is unacceptable. I hope the industry gets the message and starts to make changes from within.
@Highgunner
09 May 2011 at 02:17 pm | #
Dear Bostonjoey,
First of all thanks for the reply!
As a trainer of my own homebreds I’d love to see one of those bills.(can’t even imagine the lack of horsemanship that goes into “regular” bills like that!!!)The highest bill I can recall on one single horse was around $600 and was with “A” certain joint therapy every 5 days @$70 each and weekly Chiro visits W/ 2 sets of X-rays that my vet assured me was nothing to worry about but I was so I paid for the piece of mind. By the way in that 30-40 day span the horse had a 2nd & 2 wins in MSW & Alw.
My point being 1-2k is...well a joke..I’ve only ran one horse in a stake(4th)but have had two BC horses(one winner) in my barn for other people for various reasons and none of them got or required that kind of stupidity.
The fact that the only legal treatments should run no more than $100 pre-race, leaves me with only more questions. Not sure what questions to even ask.
09 May 2011 at 03:15 pm | #
VZ,
To have “squandered a chance” to be candid rather than “to be gracious” would have been the greater sin, but former turf writer Irwin could easily have been both, and will probably be haunted by that sound byte forever; glass houses being what they are.
Required racing reform will not occur unless insiders like Irwin inject such incendiaries whenever the opportunity to reach millions presents itself. Far better his “soap box oratory” than “tut tuts” from turf-writing in-closet-tuckers.
Your “lowlights” ignored the time it took to exit the track in a van for the ill-fated Arkansas Derby winner—trapped in the inside post position—who suffered a career-ending injury in the race. Could the bump at the start been avoided had Uncle Mo’s empty stall been filled by shifting post positions outward from the rail rather than inward?
Perhaps it’s the “apple pie” quality of the specter of gladiators “about to die” at the Roman Coliseum that continues to inflate the record number of spectators drawn to the spectacle of a 19-horse demolition derby.
Inflated egos contributed to the other Derby casualty when the connections of Comma to the Top reversed their earlier decision to “remove him from Derby consideration,” and did so AFTER their multiple graded stakes winner had lost to a maiden race winner.
09 May 2011 at 04:20 pm | #
Regarding the trainer/vet bill issue: 2 or 3 years ago Dogwood’s Cot Campbell commented in the company newsletter about the vet bills from his trainers.
The bottom line? The bills from his younger trainers were sky high when compared to the older horsemen who had been in the game for many more years.
10 May 2011 at 07:11 am | #
What about the drug companies, the pusher’s pusher.
TTT
17 May 2011 at 02:33 pm | #
Vic and Vince:
Mr. Irwin never said “all” trainers are liars.