Wednesday, October 09, 2013
Guillot needs to be punished for frivolous claim
Investigators have totally rejected Eric Guillot's claim that Luis Saez used an electrical device to urge Will Take Charge to victory in the Travers. Saez's exoneration should not be the end of this sorry saga. Guillot should face substantial sanctions for lodging a frivolous claim of foul, just as a jockey would be.
MIAMI, Oct. 9, 2013--The total exoneration of Luis Saez should not end the sorry saga of Eric Guillotâ€™s outrageous allegation that the jockey used a buzzer to urge Will Take Charge to victory in the Travers. Guillot needs to be punished.
Investigators for the state of New York took a month to find the irresponsible charge leveled by the trainer of Travers runnerup Moreno wholly unsubstantiated. Anyone who examined the video of the raceâ€”this included Hall of Fame jockey Jerry Bailey-- could have come to the same conclusion in five minutes. You have to wonder if the state took so long merely to look like it was putting more effort into the investigation than was necessary.
Jockeys, who lodge frivolous claims of foul, are subject to fines or suspensions. The same should apply to Guillot. He brought dishonor to the sport and tarnished the name of a rising star in the jockey ranks. There even would have been criminal implications for Saez. This is another example of sensational charges producing over-sized headlines and the retraction being buried.
Saez has the option of a civil suit for the damage done to him. Jose Santos reportedly won a substantial settlement from the Miami Herald, which printed a story that he might have used an electrical device aboard Funny Cide in the 2003 Kentucky Derby. (A confidentiality clause was part of the settlement.) That charge, too, was found to be baseless.
NYRA should also extract a pound of flesh from Guillot, who, unlike a newspaper, makes his living from the sport. A hefty fine, a lengthy suspension or a refusal to grant him stalls in the future should be among the options.
In addition to being wrong, Guillot made his allegations in a disrespectful manner. A college degree or even a GED diploma is not a requirement to become a trainer or lodge a claim of foul. But the gravity of what Guillot alleged should have demanded more care be put into his claim, even if it required outside assistance. There was, after all, $400,000 at stake, the difference between first and second in the $1 million Travers. A lawyer could have done what was necessary in a couple of billable hours.
Guillotâ€™s claim was comically inept in punctuation, spelling and tense. He didnâ€™t even get the name of the horse he was claiming against right. If his beef was written on a cocktail napkin in the wee hours after a night of commiserating, it couldnâ€™t have been more inappropriate.
â€śI Eric Guillot am filing a complaint for our lost in the race called the Traverâ€™s (sic) at Saratoga on Aug 24th 2013â€”My horse Moreno was beat a nose on the wire by horse named Take Charge Indy (actually Will Take Charge)â€”After suffering biggest defeat in our careerâ€”my brother Chip who was here cooking Cajun food had recorded races on NBC line for family once he got home and watched replay on NBC on big plasma TV he said it was obvious the kid had trouble celebrating cuss of black device in right hand switching too left hand and tucking under left shoulder under saddle pad! We feel this has crossed every integrity line of horse racing and would like this investigated an resolved!â€ť
Breeders' Cup needs to OK Lasix this year
John Pricci asked a question in a recent column that should not have to be raised. Will the 2-year-olds in this seasonâ€™s Breedersâ€™ Cup show their best form without Lasix?
That this is an issue is a product of pure stubbornness on the part of Breedersâ€™ Cup. The ban on Lasix was supposed to be in effect for all Breedersâ€™ Cup races in 2013 after only being the rule for juvenile races a year ago.
It was a disaster, leading to a 20 percent drop in entries for the 2-year-old races, a corresponding decline in wagering and the eventual abandonment of the Breedersâ€™ Cup Juvenile Sprint, which drew only five horses and was won by a maiden, who hasnâ€™t been heard from since.
In a rare display of unity, national horsemenâ€™s organizations told the Breedersâ€™ Cup, starting in 2014, no Lasix, no simulcasting. Whether horsemen should have this omnipotent veto power over the engine that now drives the sport is an issue for another day. They do and they used it.
Breedersâ€™ Cup could have stood its ground this year. But fearful of slim fields and handle throughout the two-day festival, they went for a face-saving compromise. The ban would remain only in the 2-year-old races.
So we have a situation where owners, trainers and horseplayers will have to guess how the juveniles will perform in a situation that most, if not all, have not faced before and will never face again.
This makes no sense other than as a balm to Breedersâ€™ Cupâ€™s pride. Theirs was a noble effort but it failed. Breedersâ€™ Cup should acknowledge this and lift the ban before Nov. 1, so that juveniles can race under the conditions that will prevail for the rest of their careers and that will be the rule in all other Breedersâ€™ Cup races.
Written by Tom Jicha
Friday, October 04, 2013
Horse of the Year is down to Dan or the Dude
Super Saturday raised as many questions as it provided answers as to 2013 divisional honors. But it did clarify one big thing. By process of elimination, Horse of the Year is down to Wise Dan and Game on Dude, with their performances at the Breeders' Cup the decisive factor.
The big winners on Super Saturday never left their stalls. The ten Grade 1â€™s raised as many questions as they provided answers for various divisional honors. But they did clarify the grand prize. Either Game on Dude or Wise Dan will be 2013 Horse of the Year.
If only one wins at the Breedersâ€™ Cup, he should be a unanimous choice. (I was going to add a caveat that Wise Dan would have to avoid being upset in Saturdayâ€™s Shadwell Mile at Keeneland. On second thought, even if he were beaten, then comes back and wins the BC Turf Mile and the Dude falls in the Classic, Dan still has the strongest resume in North America.)
If Wise Dan and Game on Dude both win on Nov. 2, Game on Dude will get the nod. All things being equal, an outstanding dirt horse will outpoll the leading grass horse every time. This is as it should be. Dirt is the dominant surface in American racing.
If they both go down to defeat, Game on Dude will capture the Eclipse for the same reason.
Itâ€™s a process of elimination. There are no other reasonable candidates even if both fall the first weekend in November.
Princess of Sylmar might have had a shot if she added the Breedersâ€™ Cup Distaff to her stunning triumph over two-time champion Royal Delta in the Beldame. (That the Princess won isnâ€™t stunning. The ease with which she ran past Royal Delta is.)
Six wins in seven races, including four straight Grade 1â€™s and two over older rivals, are awesome credentials. It would be the exact equal to Wise Dan (again assuming he wins Saturday but not at the BC) and would be superior to the Dudeâ€™s five-for-six (if he fails again in the Classic). The â€śwhat have you done for me lately?â€ť factor also would work in her favor.
However, itâ€™s unlikely she would be rewarded after avoiding racingâ€™s biggest stage while in perfect health and peak form, which seems to be the case. Her owner, Ed Stanco, changed his mind after saying the Alabama would be her 2013 finale. Maybe he will do it again when he ponders what could be on the line. Letâ€™s hope so.
If you really want to reach, you could make a case for Laughing, whose win in the Flower Bowl made her 2013 scorecard a perfect 4-for-4. If she were to win her fifth straight in the BC Filly & Mare Turf at the expense of Beverly D champion Dank and other top Euros, you couldnâ€™t blame her connections for arguing, â€śHey, what about us?â€ť
But if some voters bristled at giving the 2012 title to Wise Dan because all his wins were on grass, how do you rationalize giving it to a mare, who raced exclusively on turf and never outside her gender?
This appears to be a moot point. Like Princess of Sylmar, Laughing is not nominated to the Breeders' Cup and in all likelihood is not going to Santa Anita.
Anyone else would be a candidate solely of contrarians. Letâ€™s say Will Take Charge takes the BC Classic for his third straight win. His overall record for the year would be only 5-for-10. Moreover, do we really want to anoint a colt, who finished 8th in the Kentucky Derby, 7th in the Preakness and 10th in the Belmont, as Horse of the Year?
The road to an Eclipse shouldnâ€™t go through Moreno, who was second in WTCâ€™s two most recent victories. This is illustrative of the fact that WTC didnâ€™t come to prominence until attrition had taken its toll on his generation. Granted, he nailed Preakness champion Oxbow on the wire in the Rebel during the spring but this doesnâ€™t outweigh 8th, 7th and 10th in the Triple Crown events.
Palace Malice has supporters but he will go into the BC Classic 2-for-9. A win in the Classic would be enough to take the still-up-for-grabs 3-year-old honors, but thatâ€™s all.
If neither Will Take Charge nor Palace Malice manage to hit the board in the Classic, Orb, who is mercifully done for the year, could still sneak away with the 3-year-old title. We can debate that if and when the time comes.
Every year it seems there is one horse who goes home with nothing on Eclipse night despite an extraordinary season. Little Mike was the unfortunate odd one out last year. Grade 1 wins in the Woodford Reserve, the Arlington Million and Breeders Cup Turf would be enough to clinch the Turf Eclipse and make a case for Horse of the Year in many seasons. Poor Mike got nothing because he did it in Wise Danâ€™s year.
Beholder looks like the 2013 model for being very good in a season someone else was great. A few hours after Princess of Sylmar disposed of Royal Delta, Beholder toyed with a solid field of older fillies and mares in the Grade 1 Zenyatta. It was her fourth win in six starts, to go with a pair of seconds.
Those are Eclipse credentials most seasons. Not in the year of Princess of Sylmar, who outfinished her in the Kentucky Oaks. It won't even matter if Beholder wins the BC Distaff.
Maybe racing should create a separate trophy for situations like this. It could be called the Sham Award.
Written by Tom Jicha
Friday, September 27, 2013
Super Saturday is too much of a good thing
Saturday's racing on both coasts is spectacular. Ten Grade 1 races are scheduled, more than on either of the Breeders' Cup days. This could be too much of a good thing. Fall racing would be more exciting if these races were spread out over September and October, as they used to be.
MIAMI, Sept. 27, 2013--Super Saturday isnâ€™t hyperbole this weekend. Ten Grade 1 races are on tap, five apiece at Belmont and Santa Anita. This is more than Breedersâ€™ Cup Saturday.
There should be 11. The Kelso, a Grade 2, is worthy of a bump up.
What a great day. What a shame.
These races each deserve their own place in the sun, a day when itâ€™s all about them. At most they should share a bill with one other major stakes.
Itâ€™s insulting that the first confrontation between Eclipse champion Royal Delta and streaking 3-year-old filly leader Princess of Sylmar is buried as the fifth race on an 11-race Belmont card. We all know why. Even with casino money cascading in beyond the most wildly optimistic expectations, itâ€™s more important to build a big Pick 6 pool than to give a proper platform to one of the most anticipated showdowns of the year.
It used to be when the horses returned from Saratoga that the fall session at Belmont was known as the â€śchampionship meet,â€ť because so many divisional titles were decided in stakes spaced out during September and October. Now itâ€™s more like the â€śchampionship day.â€ť Make it two days, since the meetingâ€™s other three Grade 1 stakes will be lumped together next Saturday. Once upon a time horses could start in more than one of these championship events, such as the Futurity and Champagne, Matron and Frizette.
No more. The Futurity will be run Sunday, the Champagne six days later. Same for the Matron and Frizette. Itâ€™s not inconceivable that a horse could double up in six days but with Richard Dutrow out of the picture, itâ€™s beyond highly unlikely.
The culprits for the compacting of the best of racing are the Breedersâ€™ Cup the first weekend in November and the new school of training. Social Security checks go out more frequently than most thoroughbreds.
Thereâ€™s probably no remedy for the latter unless some free-thinking young trainer starts to win races in bunches with horses who race every couple or three weeks like in the old days. Racing is as much a copycat business as my old beat of television.
The Breedersâ€™ Cup is another story. Iâ€™ve advocated several times that the self-anointed World Championships move back on the calendar to Thanksgiving weekend. Black Friday is an unofficial national holiday. More people are off work than any other Friday of the year and a lot of people are looking for something to do or watch while their spouses go nuts at the mall.
One drawback is the late date comes with the threat of miserable weather and early nightfall in most of the United States. However, itâ€™s become increasingly evident that Breedersâ€™ Cup is hell bent on anchoring itself in Southern California. Santa Anita is in the midst of a three-year run as host track and Del Mar isnâ€™t spending millions to widen its turf course without at least a wink-wink deal that itâ€™s getting into the Breedersâ€™ Cup rotation. So neither of the potential negatives are an issue.
There are myriad reasons why not maintaining the Breeders' Cup as a movable feast would be bad for racing, and ultimately the Breedersâ€™ Cup. However, as long as it seems inevitable, we might as well look for positives. A big one would be the opportunity for Belmont, Santa Anita and Keeneland to space their most prestigious stakes throughout the fall and still leave time for what is considered to be the proper layoff prior to the Breedersâ€™ Cup.
Iâ€™ll be as chomping at the bit to bet Saturday's cavalcade of super stakes. But I would enjoy it just as much, probably more, if the marquee races were spaced so that I could be betting the best horses in the world all during the fall. As it is, weâ€™re looking at full cards of second-tier and state-bred stakes on both coasts by the second half of October.
One other bitch about this Saturday. With all the Grade 1â€™s and the time difference between coasts, you would think NYRA and Santa Anita could have found a way to tie together some of them in a crossover multiple wager bet. The final two Grade 1â€™s at Belmont, the Joe Hirsch Turf Classic and the Jockey Club Gold Cup, have scheduled post times of 5:17 and 5:49 respectively. The first two Grade 1â€™s at Santa Anita, the Chandelier for 2-year-olds and the Rodeo Drive for fillies and mares on the turf, go at 6 p.m. (Eastern) and 6:34.
It took NYRA years to come up with a less inviting multiple race wager than the Grand Slam, which a lot of simulcast sites donâ€™t even handle. It finally managed to bottom itself with the Thursday Pick 4, combining the last two in New York with the first two at Penn National, a track that might as well be Assiniboia Downs to Big Apple players.
Yet with an opportunity to link four championship caliber races on the biggest day of the fall outside the Breedersâ€™ Cup, NYRA and Santa Anita did nothing. Why?
Written by Tom Jicha